COURT: Call the cases. Sundays. 8 am to 5 pm COC: Criminal case No. 15-126689 PROSECUTOR: By the way Madam Witness, do People of the Philippines versus Mayor you know the accused Mayor _____________ in _________________. For Plunder under this case? REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7080 of the RPC for the WITNESS: Yes, your honor. presentation of evidence by the Prosecution. PROSECUTOR: Could you please describe him COURT: Appearance? Madam Witness? PROSECUTOR: For the prosecution, Your Honor, WITNESS: YES, your honor we are ready to present our witness, PROSECUTOR: Please describe the accused. ________________. Your honor, we will be presenting today the secretary of Mayor’s office of - San Diego considering that we cannot present the private complainant in this case because he is in MAYOR: Kinagagalak kong makasama kayong dispose and I already advised him to bring to this lahat sa araw na ito, mga kapatid, kababayan at court a medical certificate duly notarized. aking mga tinuturing pamilya. Ngayong araw na ito, ATTY. 1: For the defense, ready Your Honor. ginugunita natin ang isang pagkakataon kung saan COC: On the witness stand. tayo’y gagawa ng isang kasaysayan. Ang (Swear in the witness )Raise your right hand. Do pagbubukas ng limang palapag na paaralan na ito you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and ay isang simbolo para sa ating mag-aaral na nothing but the truth? pagbigyang tuunang pansin ang pagtaas ng kalidad WITNESS: Yes ma’am. ng ating edukasyon. Kulang kulang sa walong COC: Please state your name, age and other daang milyon ang naging umpisa para maipatayo personal circumstances. ang gusaling ito at kung makikita natin hindi WITNESS: _____________________, of legal napupunta sa wala ang buwis na binibigay natin sa age , residing at 123 ABC Street. San Diego, bayan. Kung kaya’t mga kababayan ko, tayo na’t presently working as Secretary at the Mayor’s magkaisa para sa isa’t isa. Maraming salamat po. Office. COC: Your witness, Fiscal. WITNESS: Matangkad po siya, medyo kayumanggi PROSECUTOR: Your Honor We are offering the at itim ang buhok… Makapal po ang kilay nito at testimony of this witness to prove the material maliit ang ilong… allegations in the information; to identify the MGA TAO: Mayor! Mayor! accused in this case and likewise to identify some MAYOR: (Cut the ribbon) Salamat sa pag-imbita. documents to this case and to testify on such other Thank you. Thank you. (Papayungan si mayor) matters as may be relevant your honor, Your WITNESS: Isa po si mayor sa mga kasama sa Honor. With the permission of the Honorable Court, pagpapatayo ng 800 million school building sa may we proceed your Honor. Brgy. San Jose, kasama sina Congressman Jose PROSECUTOR: Madam Witness. You mentioned at Counselor Juan. Pero sa totoo lang po ay halos that you are a secretary at the Mayor’s Office of 200 million lang po ang nagastos nito gamit ang San Diego. Is that Correct Madam Witness? mga low quality materials. WITNESS: Yes, your honor MAYOR: (Uupo sa gilid at makikipagchismisan sa PROSECUTOR: What proof do you have to show Congressman at counselor) that you are the Secretary of the said Office? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH WITNESS: I have my I.D. Pera, pera, pera nanaman! PROSECUTOR: Your honor the ID has already COUNSELOR: Mayor ______, eto nga pala yung been marked as exhibit C during the pretrial. natirang kalahating bilyon sa project natin sa school PROSECUTOR: What is the schedule of your work building, pashower naman kayo mayor. at Office of the Mayor? MAYOR: Oo naman counselor, dahil malinis ang trabaho mo, eto bonus. (Tawa sila both). WITNESS: Hindi lang po doon nagtatapos, your But if you believe the prosecution did not prove any honor. one of these things beyond a reasonable doubt, Nagkaroon din sila ng project sa pagpapaayos ng then you must find the defendant not guilty. daan. MAYOR: Peeeeeeeeraaaaaaaaaaaa, Kailangan (FAST FORWARD) mon a pera, Mayor, nasan na yung pera mo?~ MAYOR: I think congressman, we should have to COC: The jury finds the defendant guilty. fix the roads of San Diego. HAHAHAHAHHA Paano kaya kung sirain at ipagawa ulit natin para may COURT: The jury is thanked and excused. Court is bago nanamang raPe??? adjourned. CONGRESSMAN: I love how you think mayor! HAHAHAHAHAHAAH (CLAP) - Mga trabahador, kunware binabagbag yung daan. (MAGLALAKAD SI MAYOR SA GITNA) TAO 1: Ano ba yan, traffic nanaman! TAO 2: Anong oras na! Late nanaman tayo! TAO 3: Grabe pala si Mayor. Bakit ba siya yung (beep) binoto natin? - TAO 4: Hindi naman ganyan yan dati, pero nung CONGRESSMAN: Congratulations, Mayor! naging mayor naging sakim na din. MAYOR: Mali Congressman, dapat congrats satin , tulad nang napag-usapan eto ang hatian (MAGBUBULUNGAN LAHAT NG TAO) HAHAHAHHAHAHA - (UUPO SI MAYOR SA GITNA AT MAGIISIP) WITNESS: Isa lang po ang mga yun sa halimbawa ng mga kacorrupt’an nila, your Honor! Nakalista po MAYOR: Dahil sa kapangyarihan kinain ako ng sa mga dokumentong eto ang mga ebidensya para kasakiman ko, tama sila, hindi naman ako ganun mapatunayan ang mga sinasabi ko, Your Honor. dati, pero anong nangyari sakin ngayon? Eto ba PROSECUTOR: I have no further question your talaga ang gusto kong mangyari nung tumatakbo honor. If the complainant is ready your honor. We pa lang ako? Diba hindi naman? will present him next hearing. NARRATOR: Sa huli, napagtanto ni Mayor, na mali COURT: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I am ang maging gahaman, hindi sa lahat ng bagay ay now going to read to you the law that you must pera ang magpapatakbo sa buhay natin. Dahil dito follow in deciding this case. nahanap nito ang tunay na kahulugan ng kasiyahan sa pamamagitan ng pagbibigay tulong sa kanyang To prove the crime charged against the defendant, mga kapwa preso habang nakakulong ito. the prosecution must prove three things to you: Tinutulungang niya itong makapagipon sa First, that the defendant took a excess fund from kanilang pagpyansa at binibigyan ng sapat na the fund of the people; tulong para sa mga naiwan nilang pamilya sa labas Second, that the defendant did not give the audit ng preso gamit ang natitira nitong pera. about the projects executed; and
Third, that the defendant intended to take away the
money of the people, either permanently or temporarily If each of you believes that the prosecution proved all three of these things beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the defendant guilty.