Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foreign policy is a policy by which two states or nation’s interact each other to make realtionship.
The Goals or straighty that guide a state's realtionship with other states.
“The foreign policy of a country is in a sense projection of its internal policies,social, political and
economic”(F.M Mohammad Ayuab Khan)
policy must throw light on the ways states attempt to change, and
-The President serves as the Chief Diplomat, and is charged with running U.S.
Foreign Policy
- Cabinet members, Intelligence agencies, Congress, Courts, and State and Local
governments assist
Three Tools
1. Diplomatic Tools
2. Economic Tools
3. Military Too
Diplomatic Tools
Diplomacy is the act of dealing with other nations, usually through negotiation
and discussion
◦ Diplomatic messages
◦ Unilaterally: Nation acts alone without the assistance or consent of other nations
Economic Tools
economic development
Military Tools
Military Force- Nations use force or the threat of military force to achieve foreign
policy goals
◦ Often involves stronger nations pressuring weaker nations to get what they want
The main objective of foreign policy is to use diplomacy — or talking, meeting, and making
agreements — to solve international problems. They try to keep problems from developing into
conflicts that require military settlements. The President almost always has the primary responsibility
for shaping foreign policy
Meaning:
The term imperialism has been used subjectively and arbitrarily. The use of the term is so arbitrary that it does
not relate to its real nature, whether the country’s policy is imperialist. Still, any type of foreign policy
followed by its opponents is sometimes dubbed as imperialist. The communist called the Western Powers
imperialistic; anti-communists gave the same name to communists, while uncommitted nations termed both
communists and capitalists as imperialists.
Different scholars have defined imperialism differently in their own ways. That is why Palmer and Perkins
observe. Imperialism can be discussed, denounced, defended, and died for, but it cannot be defined in any
generally accepted way. However, some of its important definitions are as follows
imperialism is a policy that aims at creating organization and maintaining an empire says, Moritz Julius Bonn.
In the words of Charles A. Beard, imperialism is the employment of engines of government and diplomacy to
acquire territories, protectorates, and or spheres of influence usually occupied by other races or peoples and to
promote industrial, trade, and investment opportunities.
On the other hand, Parker T Moon observes Imperialism means domination of none European native races by
dissimilar European nations. Morgenthau defined it all together in terms of the expansion of a state’s power
beyond its borders. Marxists like Lenin hold imperialism purely m economic terms and regarded it as the
highest stage of capitalism. Imperialism is closely related to colonialism. Both terms refer to superior-inferior
Or a rulers-ruled relationship.
Motives:
The motives of imperialism are economic gains such as control of competition-free markets, raw material
sources, and capital investment in virgin lands. Another motive is the enhancement of national prestige and
glory by acquiring a vast colonial empire. It also serves the purpose of extreme nationalism and national
defense.
Colonies were also conquered to settle the surplus population there. The policy of imperialism was also
pursued to spread a particular religion, culture, or ideology. Advanced Western societies attributed another
motive to imperialism, i.e., the supplement of less fortunate and poor yellow man’s Asia and black man’s
Africa. They contended that it was the white man’s burden to carry the good things of their own religion and
civilization to backward peoples of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
Methods:
Several methods were employed to successfully implement imperialism’s policy, such as military intervention
and war economic methods like exploring the foreign markets to sell finished products and the purchase of raw
materials and cheap labor. Means of economic investment and economic assistance are also employed these
days.
Through cultural methods, imperial states conquer men of other nations’ minds and can impose their religion,
culture, or political ideology. This method is regarded as far more superior to military victory and economic
mastery. Christian missionaries and Soviet and Chinese communists employed this method.
Imperialism in practice:
It was Great Britain that pursued this policy in letter and spirit for a long period. British imperialism had its
worldwide tentacles that it was usually said Sun never sets over the British empire. By 1914, the British
Empire, although it suffered many setbacks, continued to be the world’s largest and the richest empire.
France was the second-largest empire in Africa and South East Asia. Germany under Bismarck between 1884-
90 acquired Togoland Cameroons, South West Africa, German East Africa. The leasehold of Kaichow and
extensive economic rights in the Shantung peninsula in China and scattered groups of islands in the pacific.
Like Germany, Italy was also a latecomer.
. FOREIGN POLICY OF
PAKISTAN
Definition
OBJECTIVES OF PAKISTAN’S
FOREIGN POLICY
National Security.
Territorial Integrity.
National prestige.
6DETERMINENTS OF PAKISTAN’S
FOREIGN POLICY
Geo-Political Settings.
Socio-Economic Condition.
Ideological Considerations.
Motives.
External Environment.
Power Considerations.
National Interest.
ELEMENTS AFFECTING
FOREIGN POLICY
state.
PHASES OF PAKISTAN’S
FOREIGN POLICY
Alignment
1980-90 Afghanistan and Partnership with US
11
75Conclusion
involves diوerent
ٴ actors. It plays an enormous role in the international
aوairs
ٴ of a state. Without a properly formulated foreign policy, a state is
Нus, fully understanding the meaning and concept of the term foreign
researchers.
particular. While others argue that domestic politics and foreign policy
are two ‘independent’ arenas of issue, others are of the view that
another, this interaction only takes place at the ‘international’ level and
decisions. By this, it is argued that the stu ٴوof foreign policy derives