Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0 ABSTRACT
Turbine has been created to produce power by converting kinetic energy into other form of
energy (electricity). The design of the moving blade alternating with fixed nozzles generate
torque and shaft power momentum change of fluid pass through the blade from nozzles. This
is related to the First Law of Thermodynamics of energy conservation. The experiment
conducted with a lab scale Pelton Turbine to study on the impulse turbine and with objective
of studying the effect of the spear valve setting under varied load conditions. The load is pre-
set beforehand, and the opening of spear valve is manipulated into three different sets. From
the result obtained, power generated from middle opening is greater than fully and small
opening. Due to optimum speed of turbine, the middle opening offers higher efficiency and
power generation by producing optimum pressure. In conclusion, the best efficiency of the
power generated was 22.74% by the middle opening of spear valve. As the size of nozzles
increase the speed of turbine increase thus increasing the power generated, motor efficiency
and overall efficiency. However, as the speed is exceeding the optimum, the turbine will
continue to produce same amount of power with lower efficiency.
2.0 OBJECTIVE
• To study the effect of the spear valve settings under varied load conditions.
3.0 RESULT AND DATA
Turbine Input Power (W) 421.89 421.38 425.42 422.40 422.91 423.67 423.16 421.38 421.64
Motor Efficiency (%) 6.66 9.75 20.50 20.07 16.19 16.10 13.93 12.61 8.53
Overall Efficiency (%) 0.00 2.35 14.80 14.50 11.65 11.40 9.33 4.63 3.85
Table 2: Data for Middle Opening
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Load Combinations 0 L1 L2 L1+L2 L3 L1+L3 L1+L2+L3 L4 L5
Bar Abs 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Pump Inlet Pressure PT1
Pa Abs 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000
Bar Abs 2.74 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73
Pump Outlet Pressure PT2
Pa abs 274000 273000 273000 273000 273000 273000 273000 273000 273000
Turbine Stage 1 Bar Abs 2.68 2.67 2.68 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.67 2.67 2.67
PT3
Pressure Pa Abs 268000 267000 268000 268000 269000 267000 267000 267000 267000
Turbine Stage 2 Bar Abs 2.1 2.09 2.08 2.1 2.1 2.09 2.1 2.09 2.09
PT4
Pressure Pa Abs 210000 209000 208000 210000 210000 209000 210000 209000 209000
L/min 142.30 142.00 141.20 141.40 141.00 141.90 141.30 141.00 141.00
Water Flowrate FT
m3/s 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024 0.0024
Pump Speed SP1 Rpm 2006 2006 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
Pump Torque TQ1 Nm 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0
Pump Power PWR1 kW 2.134 2.134 2.134 2.134 2.134 2.134 2.134 2.134 2.135
Turbine Speed SP2 Rpm 1691.00 1638.00 903.00 881.00 589.00 580.00 465.00 1582.00 226.00
Turbine Torque TQ2 Nm 0.20 0.30 1.20 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.60 0.40 1.80
Turbine Voltage V1 V 86.10 82.50 41.10 39.90 23.90 23.50 17.20 79.10 6.40
Turbine Current I1 A 0.00 0.19 2.17 2.21 2.77 2.78 2.98 0.37 3.31
Power Generated (W) 0.00 15.68 89.19 88.18 66.20 65.33 51.26 29.27 21.18
Shaft Power (W) 35.42 51.46 113.47 119.94 92.52 91.11 77.91 66.27 42.60
Turbine Input Power (W) 395.30 392.10 392.24 392.80 394.04 391.82 390.16 389.34 389.34
Motor Efficiency (%) 8.96 13.12 28.93 30.53 23.48 23.25 19.97 17.02 10.94
Overall Efficiency (%) 0.00 4.00 22.74 22.45 16.80 16.67 13.14 7.52 5.44
Table 3: Data for Small Opening
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Load Combinations 0 L1 L2 L1+L2 L3 L1+L3 L1+L2+L3 L4 L5
Bar Abs 1 1 1 0.99 1 1 1 1 1
Pump Inlet Pressure PT1
Pa Abs 100000 100000 100000 99000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000
Bar Abs 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.1 3.09 3.1 3.09
Pump Outlet Pressure PT2
Pa abs 309000 309000 309000 309000 309000 310000 309000 310000 309000
Turbine Stage 1 Bar Abs 3.06 3.05 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.06
PT3
Pressure Pa Abs 306000 305000 305000 306000 306000 306000 306000 306000 306000
Turbine Stage 2 Bar Abs 2.99 2.99 2.99 2.99 2.99 2.99 2.98 2.99 2.99
PT4
Pressure Pa Abs 299000 299000 299000 299000 299000 299000 298000 299000 299000
L/min 52.00 47.30 46.90 47.00 47.20 46.70 46.70 46.60 47.10
Water Flowrate FT
m3/s 0.0009 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008
Pump Speed SP1 Rpm 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014
Pump Torque TQ1 Nm 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Pump Power PWR1 kW 2.135 2.134 2.135 2.135 2.135 2.136 2.135 2.137 2.136
Turbine Speed SP2 Rpm 1347.00 1165.00 389.00 377.00 244.00 237.00 192.00 1020.00 113.00
Turbine Torque TQ2 Nm 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.70 0.30 0.70
Turbine Voltage V1 V 68.80 58.50 17.00 16.50 9.20 9.10 6.30 50.30 2.80
Turbine Current I1 A 0.00 0.14 0.91 0.91 1.08 1.09 1.14 0.24 1.25
Power Generated (W) 0.00 8.19 15.47 15.02 9.94 9.92 7.18 12.07 3.50
Shaft Power (W) 28.21 24.40 24.44 23.69 15.33 17.37 14.07 32.04 8.28
Turbine Input Power (W) 177.39 160.56 159.21 160.33 161.01 159.31 159.31 158.96 160.67
Motor Efficiency (%) 15.90 15.20 15.35 14.77 9.52 10.91 8.83 20.16 5.16
Overall Efficiency (%) 0.00 5.10 9.72 9.37 6.17 6.23 4.51 7.59 2.18
70.00
60.00
Power Generated (W)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00
Turbine Speed (RPM)
25.00
20.00
Motor Efficiency (%)
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00
Turbine Speed (RPM)
14.00
12.00
Overall Efficiency (%)
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00
Turbine Speed (RPM)
100
90
80
Power Generated (W)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00
Turbine Speed (RPM)
30
25
Motor Efficiency (%)
20
15
10
0
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00
Turbine Speed (RPM)
25.00
20.00
Overall Efficiency (%)
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00
Turbine Speed (RPM)
15
Power Generated (W)
10
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
-5
Turbine Speed (RPM)
25
20
Motor Efficiency (%)
15
10
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Turbine Speed (RPM)
12
10
Overall Efficiency (%)
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
-2
Turbine Speed (RPM)
100.00
80.00
Power Generated (W)
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00 2000.00
-20.00
Turbine Speed (rpm)
Graph 10: Power Generated against Turbine Speed for All Opening
25.00
20.00
Motor Efficiency (%)
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00 2000.00
Turbine Speed (rpm)
Fully Opening Middle Opening
Small Opening Poly. (Fully Opening)
Poly. (Middle Opening) Poly. (Small Opening)
Graph 11: Motor Efficiency against Turbine Speed for All Opening
30.00
25.00
Overall Efficiency (%)
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00 2000.00
-5.00
Turbine Speed (rpm)
Graph 12: Overall Efficiency against Turbine Speed for All Opening
CALCULATION
Fully Opening
Fully Opening for 0 Fully Opening for L1
𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
.𝜂 motor = .𝜂 moto =
𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
28,09 𝑊 41.09 𝑊
= 421.89 𝑊
× 100% = 421.38 𝑊
× 100%
= 6.66 % = 9.75 %
𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
.𝜂 motor = .𝜂 motor =
𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
87.20 𝑊 84.78 𝑊
= 425.42 𝑊
× 100% = 422.40 𝑊
× 100%
= 20.50 % = 20.07 %
𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
.𝜂 motor = .𝜂 moto =
𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
35.42 𝑊 51.46 𝑊
= 395.30 𝑊
× 100% = 392.10 𝑊
× 100%
= 8.96 % = 13.12 %
𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
.𝜂 motor = .𝜂 motor =
𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
113.47 𝑊
= 392.24 𝑊
× 100% = 119.94 𝑊
392.80 𝑊
× 100%
= 28.93 % = 30.53 %
𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
.𝜂 motor = .𝜂 moto =
𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
28,21 𝑊 24.40 𝑊
= 177.39 𝑊
× 100% = 160.56 𝑊
× 100%
= 15.90 % = 15.20 %
𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
.𝜂 motor = .𝜂 motor =
𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
24.22 𝑊 23,69 𝑊
= 159.21 𝑊
× 100% = 160.33 𝑊
× 100%
= 15.35 % = 14.77 %
The objective of this experiment was to study the effect of the spear valve under various
conditions of loads. Spear valve is used in the turbine to supply continuous control over the
flow which can maintain the constant water level in the intake as well as maximize the
production of energy. This experiment needs to be conducted for three different openings
which were small, middle and fully open. Every opening consists of nine different conditions
where the load switch combination is varied as stated in the datasheet.
Pelton turbine is used for electricity generation in hydraulic power plants. The energy
extracted from the kinetic energy of the water is used for the rotation of the impeller. The paddle
geometry is designed to absorb the kinetic energy of the fluid for the rotation of the paddle.
The rotation of the turbine is converted to electric power using an electrical generator with rotor
and stator. This is due to development of torque and shaft power in the turbine.
From tables 1, 2 and 3, the power generated, shaft power, turbine input power, motor
efficiency and overall efficiency for fully, middle and small opening were calculated. In this
experiment, the step was followed appropriately to the lab manual given. The experiment was
repeated for three different types of the opening valve, which was fully, middle and small. Each
of its runs with different types of loads and combinations. Load 2-7 is the combination of load
1, 2 and 3 while load 8 and 9 were load 4 and load 5. Based on table 1 and 3, show the full
and small opening valve which load 2 had higher power generation, motor efficiency and
overall efficiency while in table 2 which was middle opening only had higher power generation
and overall efficiency which was 89.19 W and 22.74 % respectively. Furthermore, the lowest
efficiency and power generation at fully and middle opening valve is load 0 and load 1 was
2.35% and 4.00% respectively but small opening valve was load 5 which was 2.18%. Based
on Tables 1, 2 and 3, the combination of loads 1 and 2 has higher overall efficiency compared
to load 1 and 3 but this combination of three loads will generate less power and have low
efficiency.
Based on the graph 1, 4 and 7, the power generated is higher at the speed around 600
to 900 RPM because the power produced by the turbine increases from zero at the minimum
speed to the maximum at the optimum speed. According to Cobb & Sharp, 2013, as the speed
is above optimum, the turbine continues to produce the same power with lower efficiency.
Furthermore, the power generated in graph 4 by the middle opening valve was greater than
the full and small opening valve as shown in graphs 1 and 7. From the table above in section
3: Result and Data, the efficiency of the turbine is higher around 20 to 40% as shown in table
1, table 2 and table 3. The middle opening valve has higher efficiency compare to fully and
small opening valve which was 22.74% because of the optimum speed of the turbine in the
laboratory. Lastly, according to Takao & Setoguchi, 2012, the middle opening valve produced
an optimum pressure to turns the blades for giving the optimum speed for higher efficiency and
higher power generation.
From all the results discussed above, it can be concluded that different diameters of
the spear valve by controlling the opening valve will affect the speed of the turbine, the power
generated, overall efficiency and motor efficiency. As the diameter of the nozzle increase, the
speed of the turbine increases because the power generated, motor efficiency and overall
efficiency to increase (Sheet, 2016).
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This experiment briefly focused on the effect of spear valve towards the performance
of turbine. The concept of second law of thermodynamics was used where loss in heat energy
by the steam is converted by the turbine to electricity. The heat flows spontaneously only from
hotter to colder bodies. It can do work only with a drop-in temperature. The steam the enters
a steam turbine is hotter than the steam that exits it. The best efficiency of the power generated
was 22.74%. Overall, the energy generated for middle opening valve was the highest
compared to the other’s opening. The middle opening valve had the most optimum pressure
to ensure the blade move efficiently creating an optimum speed for the turbine to produce
electricity. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was achieved.
For recommendation, several errors may happen during experiment. The spear valve
must be precisely open or closing when conducting the experiment for accurate results.
Besides, the work distribution between members are needed in taking results, controlling the
valve and changing the load button. Lastly, installing the dampener absorber may reduce the
vibration from the blade of the turbine.
6.0 REFERENCES
6. Nigussie, T., Engeda, A., & Dribssa, E. (2017). Design, Modeling, and CFD Analysis of
a Micro Hydro Pelton Turbine Runner: For the Case of Selected Site in Ethiopia.
International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3030217
7. Zoppe, B., Pellone, C., Maître, T., & Leroy, P. (2006). Flow analysis inside a Pelton
turbine bucket. Journal of turbomachinery, 128(3), 500-511.
8. Agar, D., & Rasi, M. (2008). On the use of a laboratory-scale Pelton wheel water turbine
in renewable energy education. Renewable Energy, 33(7), 1517-1522.
9. Barstad, L. F. (2012). CFD analysis of a Pelton turbine (Master's thesis, Institutt for
energi-og prosessteknikk).
7.0 APPENDICES
FORMULA
P=IxV 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡
𝜂 motor = 𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒.𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
Pturbine.input = Pgage x Q