Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This work concerns my preliminary research on the Templars in Bologna, focusing on the
famous brother Pietro da Bologna, general attorney in Curia Romana, with the purpose of
discovering his real identity and seeking a more detailed understanding of his life. This article
The economic power of Templar Order at the end of thirteenth century had grown
considerably through the many donations of goods and properties made by pilgrims, kings
and nobles. All these properties were well managed by the Order and used to build a huge
income.
At the same time, the reign of King Philip of France needed money desperately to support all
the wars and campaigns he was conducting. Thanks to his influence on the pope, Clement V,
the king was probably able also to take advantage of the criticisms in regard to the utility and
morality of the Order after the fall of Acre in 1291.1 So the Order appeared as another
possible easy source of funds to the king, who had already obtained money, by force, from
For obtain this result the king began the trial of the Templars in October 1307 with the arrest
of Templars in France. In the first period of the trial the Pope was not able to act in any way
and it was only in the summer of 1308 that pope Clement V wrote the papal bull Faciens
control, ensuring the control of local trials to local ecclesiastical authorities. From this point,
many local trials were held all around Europe, however attention remained focused on Paris,
where the Order had one of its principal bases. This article considers a crucial stage in the
Templar trial, which was held in Paris in the spring of 1310, when the Order was finally
permitted to defend itself properly by nominating four advocates led by Pietro da Bologna,
the Templar general attorney in the Curia Romana.2 This French trial was one of the most
important because it led to the imprisonment of the Templar Master Jacques de Molay and
It has long been known that Pietro defended the Order from March 1310 to 18 May 1310, and
that he then disappeared. Many important historians such as Michelet, Lizerand, Oursel and
Partner have concluded that he may have died in prison in Paris. They reported that he was
the main defender at this trial and that he vanished at the moment at which the Bishop of
Sens, who was controlling the city of Paris, began to execute the Templars under his custody.
Alternatively, modern historians of the Masons presumed that Pietro escaped to reach La
Rochelle and then Scotland, where he acted as a vehicle to connect the “knowledge” of
From my study of local sources in Bologna I can supply a very different account of what
happened to him by drawing-upon new sources that describe his movements following the
trial. We know from the same important historians referred to above that he was: a legal
expert, a priest, that he came from Bologna and was general attorney of the Order in the
Curia Romana. However we do not have his full name or much further information.
2 R.Oursel, Le procès, Paris 1955, p.81; J.Michelet, Procès des Templiers, II, Paris
which mention Pietro during the years of the trial and later.
We will analyse these materials in chronological order. The first batch are original documents
produced by the records office of the archbishop of Ravenna, Rinaldo da Concorezzo, who
was nominated by the Pope to be the main judge in local trials in the north-east of Italy
between 1309 and 1311. In September 1309 he was able to take the place of the Inquisition in
of Templar properties, which mentions some of the Templars who had been appointed to
manage the Templars ‘farms in Bologna’s territory. This inventory was prepared by the
Inquisition in March 1309, before the Archbishop replaced the Inquisition in their
management: it was used by him and kept in his office and still remains in Ravenna’s
archiepiscopal archive. One of the eight pages of this scroll mentions one Petrum de Rotis,
who managed an important farm in the suburbs of Bologna after August 1308, when the
inquisitor took possession of Templar goods and before March 1309 when the inventory was
completed as we can see in the notary’s signature and dating at the end of the document.4
This is evidence that, on this date, this Templar was in Bologna. It is my hypothesis (as we
shall see below) that Pietro Rota could be the full name of brother Pietro da Bologna, the
Another interesting document, also from the Ravenna archive and dated 13 October 1309, is
one where the archbishop provides “room and board” for the Bolognese Templars who were
under his custody during the local trial, along with clothes and money. It mentions Petro as
preceptor of the house of Bologna. If Pietro Rota was preceptor of the house of Bologna in
this period, it seems likely that references to every time is mentioned Pietro preceptor,5 in any
55 AARA 9688
We also have an account of an instrument,5, as an arbitrament, made by a notary in Bologna’s
municipal office, now in Bologna’s state archive, on October 1313, which mentions Petrus de
Monte Achuto (Monte Achuto is a small village in the territory controlled by Bologna), who
was the preceptor of Bologna’s Templar house. After the council of Vienne the Pope decided,
with the papal bull Ad providam Christi vicarii to allocate Templar assets to Hospitallers:
from the document it is evident that he was a legal expert who represented the local Templar
Order in Bologna, according to the papal bull mentioned above, in the passage of its
the archbishop of Ravenna. Given that this man is documented as being in Bologna on this
date and that Pietro Rota was preceptor of Bologna in this period and earlier, it is necessary to
verify if were these Pietros one and the same. In the relatively small Templar house in
Bologna it seems very improbable that were two Templars named Pietro, both legal experts,
and both preceptors in the same period. A serious historical investigation of the identity of
Pietro da Bologna needs an extensive work of comparison of different sources: this article
Another important text, which relates to this matter, is the book written by Nicolò Pasquali
Alidosi, a local historian, about Bolognese knights of all orders, who were present in Bologna
from XIII century to 1616.6 We do not know all the sources used by this author, but the names
of the knights reported by Alidosi are confirmed in various medieval documents relating to
the local trial of Templars. The book was also dedicated to an important knight of Malta: this
may strengthen the author’s credibility because he could have had access to local archive of
the Order of St. John. He lists the Bolognese Templars and shows that in 1304 there was a
knight called Pietro Rota who was the general attorney of the Templars in Curia Romana.
This book also supplies a list of Hospitallers, which includes the same Pietro Rota who is
5 ASBo, Ufficio dei Memoriali, Reg.127 (1313), c.110r.
the church of St. Mary of the Temple, in Strada Maggiore in Bologna. We should notice that
medieval sources confirm duly various information provided by Alidosi in these lists of
knights.
Analysing these kinds of local burial sources, we can focus on two inscriptions found on
tombs reported by another local historian, Marcello Oretti7, in the eighteenth century. These
burials were inside the same church, St. Mary of the Temple. The first is the inscription on the
tomb of friar Bartolomeo Tencarari, secretary of Pietro, who had previously already been
general attorney of Templars in Roman Curia. This person is in Alidosi’s list of Templars in
Bologna in 1304-14 and is confirmed his presence also by early fourteenth century documents
Plate 1 shows the drawing of the possible tomb of Pietro as reported again by Oretti in the
same church in the centre of the floor. The inscription, which has exactly the same text as that
"(Here lies) Pietro of the family Rota, illustrious in the grace of <his> virtue. Here rests the
intrepid legal defender of Christ, loved within the Order. On the tunic bringing the spirit
<moral values>, which he was full of, and the cross; now scale the heights supreme, offering
us the example of a look that contemplates the things of heaven. In the year 1329, at the sixth
hour, in the fourth <day> of May, the light broke through the organs of the mind."
In Plate 1, the person is represented in liturgical dress, as is to be expected if this person was
The family name Rota (or Roda) is recorded in the city of Bologna, and the mountain
countryside where Monte Achuto is located, as a reasonably important family coming from
Lombardy since XII century. However, Roda it is not a common family name in Bologna, but
is attested its presence for sure, in that date, already in a good position in local society.
7 BCB, Ms Oretti, B114, c.205 r and v.
Another interesting source is the ancient bell from the local Mansion on which the name of
Pietro from Bologna is inscribed, proving that he was in Bologna in 1303 and held a senior
position. In fact, during the Napoleonic period, the local government acquired the properties
of the Hospitallers and some objects were sold, such as this bell, which is now in a bell tower
“Friar Pietro da Bologna made it in 1303, Cesare Lambertini, commendatory of St. Mary of
It was common practise, when church bells were re-cast, to mention the original inscription to
express the continuity of the devotion. It may be the case that Lambertini, every morning
going in his church, saw the tomb of his predecessor, who seems to have died as a Hospitaller
brother.
There are also specific records of legal documents regarding Templars in Bologna in 1313, as
mentioned before, made by notaries in Bologna’s municipal office in the early XIV century,
in which Pietro is mentioned: the research on this specific archival material called Memoriali
is far away from being completed due to the presence of around 20.000 recordings which
were made per year. In fact for all Bolognese notaries was necessary to register at the
Commune, after 2 days, all acts in excess of the value of 20 lire. Comparing these records
with previously presented documents, it is the possible to verify wheter Pietro Rota was the
same person as Pietro da Bologna, comparing all different kinds of local sources in
Drawing these pieces of evidence together we can notice that the bell's inscription reports that
in 1303 “Pietro da Bologna fecit ” as preceptor of Bologna’s Mansion, and the local historian
Alidosi, reported that in 1304 Pietro Rota was general attorney of the Templars. Following
chronological order, we can observe that the inventory of Templar properties reports that in
in those years, Latin and “volgare” translation into Italian language co-existed, for literary or
legal purposes, as exemplified by the “Divina Commedia” by Dante Alighieri. The poet,
incidentally, lived in Bologna and Ravenna and it is possible that he knew all the actors of this
story: the Pope, Pietro and the Archbishop. They were studying law all together in Bologna
around 1280. This may have influenced Dante to take the Templars’ side when he was
writing Purgatorio in Ravenna in 1313, two years after local absolution of Templars by
Archbishop Rinaldo.
Dante wrote:
We may also focus on the above-mentioned document dated October 1309, providing room
and board, in which it is reported that Pietro was preceptor of the Bologna Mansion.
Following this analysis, we have a document9 dated June 1311 that reports that Pietro was
preceptor of Bologna’s Mansion and was judged innocent in the trial in Ravenna by
archbishop Rinaldo. Unfortunately this document is damaged and we have only brief
9 AARa 8011
Monte Achuto as having already been preceptor of the Bologna Mansion, and, at the time,
The most important information was related by local historian Alidosi reporting that, in 1315,
Pietro Rota, previously a brother of the Temple, became a Hospitaller and he is remembered
as “pugil”, namely a legal defender. In fact also in the tombstone drawn by Oretti, and
showed in plate 1, Pietro Rotis, stirpe rotis petrus, is remembered as“pugil”, namely a legal
defender again.
The last interesting source is the inscription on the tomb of friar Bartolomeo, died in 1323,
also mentions Pietro as general attorney of the Order in the Curia Romana.
This diverse collection of sources paints a rather different picture of Pietro’s life. Building
upon the foregoing we can reconstruct his actions at the time of the trial of the Templars as
follows. He was probably born on the hills of Bologna in Monte Acuto, thus the name Pietro
da (from) Bologna used in Paris, so far from Bologna. His family name was Rota (Rotis),
family name attested in Monte Acuto and in Bologna at that time; he was general attorney in
the Curia Romana and probably also preceptor of the Mansion in Bologna. In 1309 he was
attested in Bologna in the Inventory of Templar properties, in 1311 he was judged innocent in
Ravenna trial, in 1313 he was identified in Bologna probably as Camerario of the Archbishop
of Ravenna, in 1315 he became knight of St. John, and, finally, in 1329 he was buried, as
showed in Plate 1, in St. Mary of the Temple in via Emilia in Bologna city, destroyed in the
last world war. No local information about him is available for 1310, the year of the trial in
Paris.
If this identification is correct, there is the possibility that Pietro survived the trial in Paris in
1310 and later became a knight of St. John. This article represents only the first step in this
research and a wider comparison of the sources, connected to him, should reveal more explicit
confirmations of his identity and details about his life and career.
Abbreviations:
Plate 1. Tomb of Pietroof Pietro Roda as drawn by Marcello Oretti in eighteenth century in
Bologna.
Acknowledgements.
I would like to thank Nottingham Trent University for this opportunity of research, my DoS
Nicholas Morton, together with Martyn Bennet and Natasha Hodgson for helping me to write
down this article; Anne Gilmour-Bryson and Anthony Luttrell for their interest in this