Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Greek Seers and Israelite-Jewish Prophets
Greek Seers and Israelite-Jewish Prophets
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20504277?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Brill is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Vetus
Testamentum
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Vetus
?* /6 8 5 S Testamentum
B RI L L Vetus Testament
Armin Lange
Vienna
Abstract
Ancient Greek seers (manteis) and Ancient Near Eastern prophets have often been compared
with each other. Although in rare cases Greek seers communicate a divine message to a wider
audience and are thus comparable to Ancient Near Eastern prophets and Israelite-Jewish prophets
in particular, Greek seers are distinctly different from Ancient Near Eastern prophets. In most
cases Greek seers employ forms of deductive divination while the use of deductive divination is
the exception with Israelite-Jewish prophets. If Greek seers use intuitive divination they do not
rely on divine revelations but have special ability to perceive more than normal human beings.
Although Ancient Near Eastern prophets and Greek manteis do thus not equate, the comparison
of the two sheds better light on the characteristics of both. On the one hand, the Ancient Near
Eastern understanding of the prophet emphasizes heavily his reliance on divine revelation. This
is especially true for Israelite and Jewish prophets. On the other hand, the Greek mantis acts
mostly as a diviner in his own right. His special insights and knowledge go back to his abilities.
Keywords
prophecy, seers, divination, Greece
Except those whom they say Apollo inspired of old none of the seers uttered
oracles, but they were good at explaining dreams and interpreting the flights of
birds and the entrails of victims. (Pausanias, Description of Greece 1.34.4)1
This quote from Pausanias claims that except for mythical times Greek seers did
not practice intuitive divination but relied on different forms of deductive
divination, such as oneiromancy, augury, and extispacy. To some extent, Pausanias'
claim seems to be confirmed by what is preserved of pre-classical and classical
Greek literature (see below, pp. 9-20). The only prominent exception to Pausanias'
l) Translation according to W. H. S. Jones, Pausanias L: Description of Greece Books I and II (LCL 93;
Cambridge, MA, 1998), p. 187.
C Armin Lange, 2007 DOI: 10.1 163/156853307X222899
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
462 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
rule seems to be the use of intuitive divination in some of the Greek oracles,2
although often oracles like the famous oracle of Delphi seem to have relied on
deductive forms of divination, too.
In the last decades, scholars compared the ancient Greek seer or mantis
with Ancient Near Eastern prophets. The mantis is therefore of great impor
tance when it comes to the question of prophecy in Greece and the Ancient
Near East. The word mantis is often translated as "prophet"3 or is described as
a prophet.4 Some scholars think that the mantis developed out of the Ancient
Near Eastern prophet5 while others see Israelite prophets influenced by Greek
seers.6 For a better understanding of the relationship between Ancient Near
Eastern prophecy and Greek divination it is therefore vital to carefully com
pare Ancient Near Eastern prophets and Greek manteis with each other.
To achieve this goal, I will first ask what prophecy is. In the second part of
my essay, I will give a few examples for Ancient Near Eastern prophecy in
general and Israelite-Jewish prophecy in particular. Afterwards I will ask if
Greek manteis used intuitive divination in archaic times and by way of the
example of Teiresias will describe how the manteis of mythical times were
employed in classical Greek tragedy. In a conclusion, I will compare the Greek
manteis with Ancient Near Eastern and Israelite-Jewish prophets.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 463
What Is Prophecy?
7) Cf. e.g. the studies of M. S. Kaufman, Prophecy in Archaic Greek Epic (Ph.D., State University
of New York, Buffalo, NY, 1979) and A. Karp, "Prophecy and Divination in Archaic Greek
Literature", in R. M. Berchman (ed.), Mediators of the Divine: Horizons of Prophecy, Divination,
Dreams and Theurgy in Mediterranean Antiquity (South Florida Studies in the History of Judaism
163; Atlanta, GA, 1998), pp. 9-44.
8) For the distinction between deductive and intuitive (inspired) divination, see e.g. J. Bott?ro,
Mesopotamia: Writing, Reasoning, and the Gods (trans. Z. Bahrani and M. Van De Mieroop;
Chicago, IL, 1992), pp. 105-107; idem, Religion in Ancient Mesopotamia (trans. R. Lavender
Fagan; Chicago, IL, 2001), pp. 92, 170-185.
9) For the classification of prophecy as a type of divination, see e.g. M. Nissinen, References to
Prophecy in Neo-Assyrian Sources (SAAS 7; Helsinki, 1998), pp. 6, 167-169.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
464 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
10) M. Weippert, "Proph?tie im Alten Orient", in Neues Bibel Lexikon 3 (2001), pp. 196-200,
197; my translation of Weippert's definition is somewhat paraphrastic. Similar definitions have
been given by K. van der Toorn, "From the Oral to the Written: The Case of Old Babylonian
Prophecy", in E. Ben Zvi and M. H. Floyd (eds.), Writings and Speech in Israelite and Ancient
Near Eastern Prophecy (SBLSymS 10; Atlanta, GA, 2000), pp. 219-234, 219; and by Nissinen,
1998, pp. 6-9; idem, "Spoken, Written, Quoted, and Invented: Orality and Writtenness in
Ancient Near Eastern Prophecy", in Writings and Speech in Israelite and Ancient Near Eastern
Prophecy, pp. 235-271, 239-240.
n) See Nissinen, 2000, pp. 240-242.
12) See A. Lange, "Literary Prophecy and Oracle Collection: A Comparison between Judah and
Greece in Persian Times", in M. H. Floyd and R. D. Haak (eds.), Prophets, Prophecy, and Pro
phetic Texts in Second Temple Judaism (Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 427;
New York, NY, 2006), pp. 248-275.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 465
prophecy are even more difficult to use as they are legendary in character (such
as the prophetic stories in the Deuteronomistic History) or employ prophetic
messages for purposes of political propaganda (such as the Ancient Near East
ern royal inscriptions).
Similarly, the understanding of Greek prophecy has to cope with the lack
of evidence from the archaic period. Further obstacles are the problematic
transmission history of archaic texts like the Iliad and the Odyssey, the highly
subjective appreciation of prophecy in archaic and classical sources as well as a
disregard of practiced prophecy in classical times (Plato, Republic 364b-e; cf.
Laws 909b).13
Prophecy is not the most prominent form of divination in the Ancient Near
East but widespread nevertheless. From the reign of the Neo-Assyrian king
Esarhaddon a collection of Assyrian prophecies is preserved which fall into the
category of written prophecy. A good example is an utterance of the prophet
ess Bayd.
In this written report about Bayd's prophecy, the prophetess receives the mes
sages of several deities addressed to the Assyrian king Esarhaddon. Bayd
receives these messages directly and does not interpret any divinatory means.
Therefore, her prophecy falls into the category of intuitive divination. In
13) For the critical attitude towards various forms of divination in classical Greece, see e.g.
J. N. Bremmer, "Divination, Greek", Brills New Pauly 4 (2004), pp. 569-574, 572-574.
14) Translation according to S. Parp?la, Assyrian Prophecies (SAA 9; Helsinki, 1997), p. 6.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
466 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
Bayd's prophecy, not the prophetess herself is in the center of interest but the
messages of several deities, which the prophetess communicates. Bayd is not a
diviner in her own right but a channel through which the gods articulate
themselves. Therefore she is mentioned only in a brief ascription at the end of
her utterance as "by mouth of the woman Bayd".
In his 11th cent. BCE travel report, the Egyptian official Wen Amun
describes a Phoenician prophet.
Now while he was making offering to his gods, the gods seized one of his youths
and made him possessed. And he said to him: "Bring up [the] god! Bring the mes
senger who is carrying him! Amon is the one who sent him out! He is the one who
made him come! And while the possessed (youth) was having his frenzy on this
night, I had (already) found a ship and headed for Egypt and had loaded every
thing that I had into it."'5
Wen Amun leaves no doubt. The young man was seized by the gods. When he
spoke his prophecy not a Phoenician boy spoke to prince Zakar Baal of Byblos
but the gods themselves. As the Assyrian prophetess Bayd the young Phoeni
cian prophet of Wen Amun's travel report practices intuitive divination and
does not employ any divinatory means. And as the Assyrian prophetess Bayd,
the unnamed Phoenician prophet does not speak as a diviner in his own right
but is merely a channel through which the Phoenician gods speak to the prince
of Byblos.
A similar understanding of prophecy can be found in preexilic Israel and
Judah. A good example is Amos' conflict with Amaziah, the priest of Bethel,
as reported in Amos vii 12-17.
12 And Amazi'ah said to Amos, "O seer, go, flee away to the land of Judah, and
eat bread there, and prophesy there; 13 but never again prophesy at Bethel, for it
is the king's sanctuary, and it is a temple of the kingdom." 14 Then Amos answered
Amazi'ah, "I am no prophet, nor a prophet's son; but I am a herdsman, and a
dresser of sycamore trees, 15 and the LORD took me from following the flock,
and the LORD said to me, 'Go, prophesy to my people Israel.' 16 Now therefore
hear the word of the LORD. You say, 'Do not prophesy against Israel, and do not
preach against the house of Isaac.' 17 Therefore thus says the LORD: 'Your wife
shall be a harlot in the city, and your sons and your daughters shall fall by the
15) Translation according to J. A. Wilson, "Egyptian Myths, Tales, and Mortuary Texts", in
J. B. Pritchard (ed.), Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament (3rd ed. Princeton,
NJ, 1969), pp. 3-36, 26.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 467
sword, and your land shall be parceled out by line; you yourself shall die in an
unclean land, and Israel shall surely go into exile away from its land."' 16
Amaziah argues that in his criticism of king Jeroboam Amos would attack the
hand that is feeding him. Amos responds twofold. He is a man of his own
means and does not need the bread of the king. The Lord took him away from
being a farmer and a shepherd. He took him away to prophesy against Israel.
It is YHWH who speaks through him not the bread of the king. As the
Assyrian prophetess Bayd and as the unnamed Phoenician prophet of Wen
Amun's travel report, the prophet Amos does not prophesy in his own right
but God speaks through him. Amos speaks the word of YHWH (dbryhwh).
TIherefore he introduces his prophecies with the messenger formula, "thus says
the Lord" (e.g. Amos vii 17). And as the Assyrian prophetess Bayd and as the
unnamed Phoenician prophet of Wen Amun's travel report, Amos does not
employ any deductive means to communicate with his god. His prophecy is
also to be classified as intuitive divination.
My perception of the self-conception of Ancient Near Eastern prophecy in
general and Israelite-Jewish prophecy in particular as a communicative act in
which the prophet serves merely as a communicative means to the divine is
confirmed by Jer. xx 7-10. It is exceptional as it narrates how a prophet
describes his prophetic experience. According to Jer. xx 7-10 Jeremiah experi
ences his prophesying as being overpowered and forced to communicate god's
message against his own will:
7 0 Lord, you have enticed me, and I was enticed; you have overpowered me, and
you have prevailed. I have become a laughing-stock all day long; everyone mocks
me. 8 For whenever I speak, I must cry out, I must shout, 'Violence and destruc
tion!' For the word of the Lord has become for me a reproach and derision all day
long. 9 If I say, 'I will not mention him, or speak any more in his name', then
within me there is something like a burning fire shut up in my bones; I am weary
with holding it in, and I cannot. 10 For I hear many whispering: 'Terror is all
around! Denounce him! Let us denounce him!' All my close friends are watching
for me to stumble. 'Perhaps he can be enticed, and we can prevail against him,
and take our revenge on him.'17
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
468 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
The four examples show that in the Ancient Near Eastern cultures prophecy
was a form of intuitive divination and prophets were understood as an instru
ment through which the gods articulated themselves. Neither the prophet nor
his prophetic ability was important but only his message. The prophet is a
communicative device without any special divinatory abilities of his own. As
such a communicative device, he communicates the message which he received
from the gods to a wider audience.
Although the vast majority of prophetic texts from ancient Israel and Judah
attest thus to prophecy as a form of intuitive divination in which the prophets
serve as a communicative means for the divine, a few references are preserved
in Israelite-Jewish literature where prophets also employ means of deductive
divination. A good example is the report of how Samuel chose Saul as the king
of Israel in 1 Sam. x 20-24.18
20 Then Samuel brought all the tribes of Israel near, and the tribe of Benjamin
was taken by lot. 21 He brought the tribe of Benjamin near by its families, and
the family of the Matrites was taken by lot. Finally he brought the family of the
Matrites near man by man, and Saul the son of Kish was taken by lot. But when
they sought him, he could not be found. 22 So they inquired again of the Lord,
"Did the man come here?" and the Lord said, "See, he has hidden himself among
the baggage." 23 Then they ran and brought him from there. When he took his
stand among the people, he was head and shoulders taller than any of them. 24
Samuel said to all the people, "Do you see the one whom the Lord has chosen?
There is no one like him among all the people." And all the people shouted,
"Long live the king!"'9
18) For this interpretation of 1 Sam. x 20-24, see e.g. W Hertzberg, Die Samuelb?cher (6th ed.;
ATD 10; G?ttingen, 1982), pp. 68-69; J. Lindblom, "Lot-Casting in the Old Testament", VT12
(1962), pp. 164-178; B. Albrektson, "Some Observations on Two Oracular Passages in 1 Sam",
ASTI (1977-1978), pp. 1-10; P. Kyle McCarter, I Samuel: A New Translation with Introduction,
Notes, and Commentary (AB 8; Garden City, NY, 1980), pp. 192-193, 195-196; C Van Dam,
Urim and Thummim: A Means of Revelation in Ancient Israel (Winona Lake, IN, 1997), p. 185.
19) Translation according to the New Revised Standard Version.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 469
The manteis are mostly known for employing deductive means of divination:
"The male Greek seers were technical specialists, experts on the intestines of
sacrificial victims and, especially, the flight of birds".23 The exception to the
rule could be the legendary seers of old mentioned by Pausanias, of whom
only a few names have been preserved. In alphabetic order, we know of Abaris,
Amphilytus, Bacis, Calchas, Cassandra, Glanis, Helenus, Laius, Lysistratus,
20) For the deuteronomistic rejection and elimination of deductive divination in the literature of
ancient Israel, see A. Lange, "Becherorakel und Traumdeutung: Zu zwei Formen der Divination
in der Josephsgeschichte", in A. Wenin (ed.), Studies in the Book of Genesis: Literature, Redaction
and History (BETL 155; Leuven, 2001), pp. 371-379.
21) See e.g. the surveys by W. R. Halliday, Greek Divination: A Study of Its Methods and Principals
(London, 1913); and Bremmer, 2004, passim. Instructive surveys of ancient Greek divination
can also be found in J. S. Morrison, "The Classical World", in M. Loewe and C. Blacker (eds.),
Oracles and Divination (Boulder, CO, 1981), pp. 87-114; and J. Pollard, "Divination and Ora
cles: Greece", in M. Grant and R. Kitzinger (eds.), Civilization of the Ancient Mediterranean:
Greece and Rome (New York, NY, 1988), pp. 941-950.
22) Due to space constraints, only a selection of references to manteis in archaic and classical
Greek literature can be analyzed. For a more extensive survey, see J. Dillery, "Chresmologues and
Manteis: Independent Diviners and the Problem of Authority", in S. I. Johnston and P. T. Struck
(eds.), Mantike: Studies in Ancient Divination (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 155;
Leiden, 1995), pp. 167-231.
23) J. N. Bremmer, "The Status and Symbolic Capital of the Seer", in R. H?gg (ed.), The Role of
Religion in the Early Greek Polis: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Ancient Greek
Cult, Organized by the Swedish Institute at Athens, 16-18 October 1992 (Acta Instituti Atheniensis
Regni Sueciae 8.14; Stockholm, 1996), pp. 97-109, 98.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
470 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
And Helenus, the dear son of Priam, understood in spirit this plan that had found
pleasure with the gods in council; and he came and stood by Hector's side, and
spake to him, saying: "Hector, son of Priam, peer of Zeus in counsel, wouldst
thou now in anywise hearken unto me? for I am thy brother. Make the Trojans to
sit down, and all the Achaeans, and do thou challenge whoso is best of the Achae
ans to do battle with the man to man in dread combat. Not yet is it thy fate to die
and meet thy doom; for thus have I heard the voice of the gods that are for ever."
(Iliad 7.44-53)26
24) For the Sibyls, see H. W Parke, Sibyls and Sibylline Prophecy in Classical Antiquity (ed. B. C.
McGing; Croom Helm Classical Studies; London, 1988).
25) For these oracle books, see R. Baumgarten, Heiliges Wort und Heilige Schrift bei den Griechen:
Hieroi Logoi und verwandte Erscheinungen (ScriptOralia 110; T?bingen, 1998), pp. 48-63; and
Lange, 2006, pp. 261-273.
26) Translation according to A. T. Murray, Homer: The Iliad I(LCL 170; Cambridge, MA, 1988),
pp. 305, 307.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 471
Similar, the seer Theoclymenus employs both deductive and intuitive divina
tion in Homer's Odyssey: Theoclymenus predicts the return of Odysseus to his
wife Penelope by way of a bird omen:
So plain a bird of omen did I mark as I sat on the benched ship, and I declared it
to Telemachus. (Odyssey 17.160-161)27
Then among them spoke godlike Theoclymenus: "Ah, wretched men, what evil is
this that you suffer? Shrouded in night are your heads and your faces and your
knees beneath you; kindled is the sound of wailing, bathed in tears are your
cheeks, and sprinkled with blood are the walls and the fair rafters. And full of
ghosts is the porch and full the court, of ghosts that hasten down to Erebus
beneath the darkness, and the sun has perished out of heaven and an evil mist
hovers over all." (Odyssey 20.350-357)29
In the manner of second sight, Theoclymenus sees the future of the doomed
suitors displayed on their faces and elsewhere in the room. No recourse to any
form of deductive divination is mentioned. But neither does Homer refer to
any divine revelation which Theoclymenus might have received.30
Although not part of a mythical past, Herodotus' report about an oracle
given to Pisistratus by the chresmologue Amphylitus is also of interest for my
question as it attests to the use of intuitive divination by a Greek diviner in late
archaic times. Although Herodotus labels Amphylitus not as a mantis but as a
chresmologue, this particular reference reflects more the idea of the archaic
mantis.
Pisistratus' men, in their march from Marathon towards the city, encountered the
enemy when they had reached the temple of Pallenian Athene, and encamped
face to face with them. There (by the providence of heaven) Pisistratus met
27) Translation according to A. T. Murray, Homer: The Odyssey II (LCL 105; Cambridge, MA,
1980), p. 163.
28) For Theoclymenus in the Odyssey, see Dillery, pp. 173-175.
29) Translation according to Murray, 1980, pp. 299, 301.
30) Cf. Dodds, The Greeks and the Irrational, p. 70.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
472 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
Amphilytus the Acarnanian, a diviner, who came to him and prophesied as fol
lows in hexameter verses:
"Now hath the cast been thrown and the net of the fisher is outspread:
All in the moonlight clear shall the tunny-fish come for the taking."
So spoke Amphilytus, being inspired; Pisistratus understood him, and, saying
that he received the prophecy, led his army against the enemy. (Herodotus, Histo
ries 1.62-63)31
In the three examples taken out of Homer and Herodotus, the reports about
intuitive divination fit the second leg of the scholarly definition of prophecy
by Weippert (see above, pp. 463-464), i.e. communication of the vision or
audition to an audience. In all three examples described above the seer com
municates his insights to an audience, namely Helenus speaks to his brother
Hector, Theoclymenus addresses the suitors of Penelope, and Amphilytus
gives his oracle to Pisistratus.
But what about the first leg of the communicative process called prophecy?
In the Iliad, Helenus clearly states that he has the voice of the gods. Homer
thus implies that Helenus experienced an audition. In Amphilytus' case,
Herodotus claims that this chresmologue was inspired. The Greek word used
here is ?vOc&Co which can be translated verbally as "to be full of a deity."32
Although no audition or vision is explicitly reported, Herodotus implies such
an act of communication by using the rare word EvOeioCco. Hence, at least in
the cases of Helenus and Amphilytus, a communicative process can be
observed which agrees with the definition of prophecy by Weippert. The two
seers communicate a message received from the divine to their respective
audiences.
Theoclymenus on the other hand does not fit Weippert's definition of
prophecy. In the Odyssey, Homer mentions no divine cause for Theoclymenus'
vision of the impending mass-killing of Penelope's suitors. Theoclymenus
seems to use intuitive divination without relying on divine revelation. He has
the power of the second sight and is thus capable to practice intuitive divina
tion without constant recourse to divine revelation. This observation will
become important when I discuss the employment of the mantis in classical
Greek tragedy.
31) Translation according to A. D. Godley, Herodotus I: Books I-II (LCL 117; Cambridge, MA,
1999), p. 73.
32) For this meaning of ?vOe?Cco, see Pseudo-Apollodorus, Library 2.8.3.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 473
The three cases analyzed so far could hint to a more extensive archaic tradi
tion of intuitive divination by manteis. Neither Homer nor Herodotus empha
sizes that in performing prophecy Helenus or Amphylitus would have done
something exceptional. On the contrary both authors mention it almost in
passing by. Elsewhere, Homer stresses the extraordinary ability of Helenus to
perform bird augury while his use of intuitive divination is mentioned in pass
ing by as if it goes without saying.
To him even in death Persephone has granted reason, that he alone should have
understanding. (Odyssey 10.494-495)33
So saying the spirit of the prince, Teiresias, went back into the house of Hades,
when he had spoken according to the divine word (bEeli KaTaO 0?cpxt' G'Xr?V).
(Odyssey 11.150-151)36
Persephone thus granted Teiresias as the only deceased the cognitive and ratio
nal ability which allowed him to receive a divine oracle37 without interpreting
33) Translation according to A. T. Murray, Homer: The Odyssey I (LCL 104; Cambridge, MA,
1984), p. 381.
34) For Teiresias in the Nekyia-episode of the Odyssey, see G. Ugolini, Untersuchungen zur Figur
des Sehers Teiresias (Classica Monacensia 12; T?bingen, 1995), pp. 81-91.
35) For the discussion about whether the Nekyia is a later insertion into the Odyssey or not, see
A. Heubeck, A Commentary on Homers Odyssey 2: Books IX-XW (Oxford, 1989), pp. 75-77.
36) Text and translation are guided by Murray, 1984, pp. 396-397.
37) For this meaning of 0?a(paxa, cf. Homer, Odyssey 11.297 and 13.172.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
474 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
But Hesiod says that he beheld snakes copulating on Cyllene, and that having
wounded them he was turned from a man into a woman, but that on observing
the same snakes copulating again, he became a man. Hence, when Hera and Zeus
disputed whether the pleasures of love are felt more by women or by men, they
referred to him for a decision. He said that if the pleasures of love be reckoned at
ten, men enjoy one and women nine. Wherefore Hera blinded him, but Zeus
bestowed on him the art of divination (tiiv jtavtliKiv). (Pseudo-Apollodorus,
Library 3.6.7)40
38) For other versions of this legend, see Ugolini, pp. 66-78.
39) For this legend, see Ugolini, pp. 33-65.
40) Text and translation according to J. G. Frazier, Apollodorus: The Library I (LCL 121; Cam
bridge, MA, 1995), pp. 363, 365-367. Instead of "divination" Frazier translates "soothsaying".
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 475
Different stories are told about his blindness and his power of soothsaying. For
some say that he was blinded by the gods because he revealed their secrets to men.
(Pseudo-Apollodorus, Library 3.6.7)42
In later versions of the legend of Teiresias' blindness the divinatory gift given
to him transforms even into deductive forms of divination. A good example is
the legend told by the 5th cent. BCE mythographer Pherecydes of Athens:43
But Pherecydes says that he was blinded by Athena; for Chariclo was dear to
Athena... and Tiresias saw the goddess stark naked, and she covered his eyes with
her hands, and so rendered him sightless. And when Chariclo asked her to restore
his sight, she could not do so, but by cleansing his ears she caused him to under
stand every note of birds; and she gave him a staff of cornel-wood, wherewith he
walked like those who see. (Pseudo-Apollodorus, Library 3.6.7)44
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
476 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
The story is told that Calchas the prophet, with Amphilochus the son of Amphi
araus, went there on foot on his return from Troy, and that having met near
Clarus a prophet superior to himself, Mopsus, the son of Manto, the daughter of
Teiresias, he died of grief. Now Hesiod revises the myth as follows, making Cal
chas propound to Mopsus this question: "I am amazed in my heart at all these figs
on this wild fig tree, small though it is; can you tell me the number?" And he
makes Mopsus reply: "They are ten thousand in number, and their measure is a
medimnus; but there is one over, which you cannot put in the measure." "Thus he
spake," Hesiod adds, "and the number the measure could hold proved true. And
then the eyes of Calchas were closed by the sleep of death." (Strabo, Geography
14.1.27)46
46) Translation according to H. L. Jones, The Geography of Strabo VI (LCL; Cambridge, MA,
1950), pp. 233, 235. Another, extended, and probably later version of the divination contest
between Calchas and Mopsus is told by Pseudo-Apollodorus (Epitome 6.2-4): "But Amphilo
chus, and Calchas, and Leonteus, and Podalirius, and Polypoetes left: their ships in Ilium and
journeyed by land to Colophon, and there buried Calchas the diviner; for it was foretold him
that he would die if he met with a wiser diviner than himself. Well, they were lodged by the
diviner Mopsus, who was a son of Apollo and Manto, and he wrangled with Calchas about the
art of divination. A wild fig-tree grew on the spot, and when Calchas asked, "How many figs
does it bear?" Mopsus answered, "Ten thousand, and a bushel, and one fig over," and they were
found to be so. And when Mopsus asked Calchas concerning a pregnant sow, "How many pigs
has she in her womb, and when will she farrow?" Calchas answered, "Eight." But Mopsus smiled
and said, "The divination of Calchas is the reverse of exact; but I, as a son of Apollo and Manto,
am extremely rich in the sharp sight which comes of exact divination, and I divine that the
number of pigs in the womb is not eight, as Calchas says, but nine, and that they are all male and
will be farrowed without fail to-morrow at the sixth hour." So when these things turned out so,
Calchas died of a broken heart and was buried at Notium" (translation according to J.G Frazier,
Apollodorus: The Library II [LCL 122; Cambridge, MA, 1996], pp. 243, 245). As with the Hes
iod fragment quoted above, neither Calchas nor Mopsus make any recourse to deductive meth
ods and means of divination. But divine revelations are not mentioned either by
Pseudo-Apollodorus. Again Mopsus and in this case also Calchas are intuitive diviners which do
not rely on any divine revelation.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 477
like the Teiresias of the mythical traditions, Mopsus performs intuitive divina
tion on his own without recourse to divine revelation. The point of this com
petition is not which seer has better access to divine revelation but which seer
is better able to perform intuitive divination. Mopsus wins the contest because
his capabilities in intuitive divination exceed those of Calchas. According to
Weippert's definition, neither Mopsus nor Calchas can hence be described as
prophets.
Thus, already archaic myth and literature show a tendency to understand intu
itive divination as a gift initially awarded to a seer who then performs intuitive
divination in the manner of second sight without repeated recourse to the
divine benefactor. This idea of the second-sight-mantis becomes even more
prominent in classical Greek tragedy. In the classical tragedies, mythical Greek
seers are often described as being gifted with intuitive divination and perform
ing it on their own although the same seers often employ deductive means of
divination, too. Due to constraints of space, out of the wealth of evidence, I
can only discuss the example of Teiresias in Sophocles' tragedies Antigone and
Oedipus Tyrannus.47
In classical Greek tragedy, the figure ofTeiresias is characterized by continu
ity and discontinuity to earlier legends:
Die Figur des Teiresias im Drama ist vollig anders als die Figur des Teiresias, die
in einigen Mythen einem Geschlechtswechsel unterzogen und von den G6ttern
bestraft und belohnt wird, dieser Teiresias unterscheidet sich auch vom (sic) dem
jenigen, der in der Odyssee Odysseus in Verbindung mit den Toten bringt.48
47) For a survey on the Teiresias-figure in Greek tragedy, see Ugolini, pp. 117-224.
48) Ugolini, p. 188.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
478 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
You shall learn, when you hear the indications of my art! As I took my place on
my ancient seat for observing birds, where I can mark every bird of omen, I heard
a strange sound among them, since they were screeching with dire, incoherent
frenzy; and I knew that they were tearing each other with bloody claws, for there
was a whirring of wings that made it clear. At once I was alarmed, and attempted
burnt sacrifice at the altar where I kindled fire; but the fire god raised no flame
from my offerings. Over the ashes a dank slime oozed from the thigh bones,
smoked and sputtered; the gall was sprayed high into the air, and the thighs,
streaming with liquid, lay bare of the fat that had concealed them. Such was the
ruin of the prophetic rites by which I vainly sought a sign, as I learned from this
boy; for he guides me, as I guide others. (Sophocles, Antigone 998-1014)49
I know that he whose sight is closest to that of the lord Phoebus is the lord Tiresias.
(Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus 284-285)
But here is he who shall convict him; yes already they are bringing in the godlike
prophet, in whom alone among mankind truth is implanted. (ibid., 297-299)5?
49) Translation according to H. Lloyd-Jones (ed.), Sophocles II: Antigone, The Women ofTrachis,
Philoctetes, Oedipus at Colonius (LCL 21; Cambridge, MA, 1998), pp. 95, 97.
50) Translation according to H. Lloyd-Jones (ed.), Sophocles I: Ajax, Electra, Oedipus Tyrannus
(LCL 20; Cambridge, MA, 2001), pp. 351, 353.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 479
Tiresias, you who dispose all things, those that can be explained and those
unspeakable, things in heaven and things that move on earth, even though you
cannot see you know the nature of the sickness that besets the city; and you are
the only champion and protector, lord, whom we can find. (Sophocles, Oedipus
Tyrannus 300-304)51
It is Teiresias who understands all things, who knows even the secrets of
heaven. And it is this special ability which gives Oedipus hope that Teiresias
might be able to name the cause of the Theban plague.
Sophocles describes Teiresias thus both as an intuitive and as a deductive
diviner. With regard to intuitive divination, Teiresias does not rely on a revela
tion from Apollon or any other deity. His intuitive divination is based on a
special perception of the world and thus in modern words can best be described
as second sight or sixth sense. Again, in classical Greek tragedy, the figure of
Teiresias is not a prophet in the sense of Weippert's definition.
That in its performance of intuitive divination, Sophocles' Teiresias figure is
not the exception but the rule is illustrated by the recharacterization of
Cassandra in classical Greek tragedy:
Perhaps in analogy to the prophetic arts of her twin brother Helenus..., the
Cypria and the post-Homeric tradition ascribed to her the same prophetic abili
ties. According to that tradition, snakes lick the ears of both siblings in the temple
of Apollo Ihymbraeus (Anticlides FGrH 140 F 17; POxy. 56.3830). Because C.
rejects the god's advances, he takes away her credibility as a prophetess (Aesch. Ag.
1203-1208; Lycoph. 348; Verg. Aen. 2,247; Apollod. 3,12,5). In the tragedy, C.
is depicted as an ecstatic seer with sibylline qualities (Aesch. Ag. 1140; Eur. Hec.
121, 676-77; Eur. Tro. 170, 341, 349, 408), but the fact that she prophesies in
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
480 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
her own right and not Apollo through her, speaks against true ecstasy and points
to a post-Iliadic, poetic construction... 52
How do the Greek manteis compare with Ancient Near Eastern prophets in
general and with Israelite-Jewish prophets in particular?
The majority of references describe the mantis as someone who employs
deductive divination. Even if a given mantis is described as using intuitive
divination, he does not rely on a vision or audition. In the perception of the
ancient Greeks, the intuitive mantis seems to have been normally gifted with
what is called second sight today. I.e. the intuitive mantis did not communi
cate divine visions or auditions. Prophetic manteis occur only in archaic leg
end. And even there, they are the exception to the rule. The intuitive manteis
of old did also perform deductive divination in the understanding of archaic
52) J. N. Bremmer, "Cassandra", Brill's New Pauly 2 (2003), pp. 1157-1158, 1158; cf. idem,
1996, p. 103; F. Graf, Nordionische Kulte: Religionsgeschichtliche und epigraphische Untersuchungen
zu den Kulten von Chios, Erythrai, Klazomenai und Phokaia (Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana 21;
Z?rich, 1985), pp. 347-348. For the role of Cassandra as a female seer in classical Greek tragedy,
see D. Neblung, Die Gestalt der Kassandra in der antiken Literatur (Stuttgart, 1997),
pp. 21-72. For the mechanism of Cassandra's intuitive divination, see S. Mazzoldi, "Cassandra's
Prophecy between Ecstasy and Rational Mediation", Kernos 15 (2002), pp. 145-154. For an
analysis of the most important passage with regard to Cassandra's intuitive divination, i.e.
Aeschylus, Agamemnon 1070-1342, cf. B. Feichtinger, "Zur Kassandra-Szene in Aischylos' Ores
tie und ihren poetischen Funktionen", W?rzburger Jahrb?cher f?r die Altertumswissenschaft 17
(1991), pp. 49-67.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482 481
and classical Greek authors. On first glimpse, the Greek mantis compares only
to a certain extent with the Ancient Near Eastern prophet.
The exceptions to this rule are the mentions of Helenus in the Iliad (7.44
53) and Teiresias in the Odyssey (10.494-495; 11.150-151). For their forecasts,
both Helenus and Teiresias rely on an anteceding revelation by a deity. In these
early references, Helenus and Teiresias are thus comparable with Ancient Near
Eastern prophets. The same is true for the chresmologue Amphilytus, whose
forecast of Pisistratus' regaining the rule of Athens seems also to be based on a
divine revelation.
But even though some early prophetic manteis are thus comparable with
Ancient Near Eastern prophets, they are also distinctly different from them.
Different from a figure like Amos, Helenus practices not just prophecy but
also bird augury (Iliad 6.76). With Ancient Near Eastern prophets the divine
character of their messages is almost always heavily emphasized but it takes
detailed study of the Greek references to prophetic manteis to identify the
revelations which their prophecies are based on. Furthermore, the employ
ment of deductive divination by intuitive manteis seems to be quite common
while it is the exception to the prophetic rule in Israel.
Although Ancient Near Eastern prophets and Greek manteis do thus not
equate, the comparison of the two sheds better light on the characteristics of
both. On the one hand, the Ancient Near Eastern understanding of the
prophet emphasizes heavily his reliance on divine revelation. This is especially
true for Israelite and Jewish prophets. The messenger formula describes them
as mere communicators of the divine message. On the other hand, the Greek
mantis acts mostly as a diviner in his own right. His special insights and
knowledge go back to his abilities. He is able to either perform acts of deduc
tive divination or is able to see and perceive more than the average human
being by way of second sight. This might also be the reason why the combina
tion of deductive and intuitive divination is more prominent in ancient Greek
literature. Because intuitive divination is mostly understood as a form second
sight, i.e. because the diviner gains his insights without regular recourse to
divine revelation, intuitive divination and deductive divination are more
closely related in Greek culture than in Israelite-Jewish cultures. On the one
hand, in ancient Greece, both intuitive and deductive divination are skills of
the diviner. On the other hand, in Israelite-Jewish cultures, intuitive divina
tion, i.e. prophecy, relies totally on the divine. Prophecy's absolute depen
dency on the divine creates a far more significant divide: Prophecy relies on
the divine but deductive divination relies on human skills in its deductive
approach.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
482 A. Lange / Vetus Testamentum 57 (2007) 461-482
The rare descriptions of prophetic manteis and chresmologues allow for the
speculation, that the Greek manteis developed out of the Ancient Near Eastern
prophets during the so called "orientalizing revolution,"53 i.e. during the time
when in Ionia Greek culture was born out of a merge of Ancient Near Eastern
and Mycenean cultures. It is after all rather surprising, that with the exception
of the chresmologue Amphilytus in Herodotus' history the only references to
prophetic manteis can be found in the Homeric epics, i.e. in texts that devel
oped in Ionia and display a known preference for deductive divination.
53) For this term, see Burkert, 1992, esp. pp. 1-8, 128-129.
This content downloaded from 137.204.24.180 on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45:11 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms