Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Book Problems:
1.1.18 Form the augmented matrix, and use row operations to get it in reduced echelon form:
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 1
This system is consistent if the rightmost column is not a pivot column. The rightmost column will
be a pivot column unless −3 + h2 = 0, i.e. unless h = 6.
1.2.12 The last column is a pivot, so the system is inconsistent, and there are no solutions.
Since
the last column is not a pivot for any values of h and k, this system is always consistent, so
h
∈ span{u, v} for any values of h and k.
k
1.3.22 For example,
1 1 1 1
A= 1 1 1 b= 2
1 1 1 3
Proofy Problems:
1. (c) The general strategy is that the first player will win if one of the piles has an even number of
raisins. Suppose the two piles have 2n and m raisins. The first player can eat the pile of m
raisins and leave two piles of 2n − 1 and 1 raisins. Now the second player must eat the pile of 1
raisin and split the 2n − 1 pile. Since 2n − 1 is odd, it can’t be split into two even piles. Thus
it leaves the first player back in the original situation of at least one even pile, and they can
proceed similarly.
(d) This statement is true! We prove this using a direct proof. Let x be any real number, and then
let y = x + 1. We know that
y = x + 1 > x,
and so we have shown that for every real number x, there exists a real number y such that
y > x.
(e) This statement is false! Note the difference in order! In this case, we have to pick a y that
works for an arbitrary x. This statement is false, as for every real number y we pick, we can
just set x = y + 1, and the inequality fails.
We split into two cases for j. If j is even, then j = 2p for some p ∈ N. Then we have
So 8 divides n2 − 1 if n is odd.
(Note that this is really equivalent to taking two cases of odd n: when n = 4k + 1 and when
n = 4k + 3. We could consider these two cases directly if we like. If n = 4k + 1, then
n2 − 1 = 16k 2 + 8k. If n = 4k + 3, then n2 − 1 = 16k 2 + 24k + 8. Both are multiples of 8. We
could also replace the case n = 4k + 3 with n = 4k − 1, which makes n2 − 1 = 16k 2 − 8k and
this is a bit simpler.)
(c) Statement: Let n be a positive integer. If n = 3k + 2 for some integer k, then n is not a perfect
square.
Contrapositive: Let n be a positive integer. If n is a perfect square, then n does not equal
3k + 2 for some integer k.
Proof. As n is an integer, we know that n takes one of three possible values, 3j, 3j + 1, and
3j + 2. We take each case by case. If n = 3j, then
n2 = (3j)2 = 3(3j 2 ) 6= 3k + 2
Proof. If a | b, then a = bm for some integer m. Then a2 = b2 m2 , and so there exists an integer
m2 such that a2 = b2 m2 , and so a2 | b2 .
Proof. If a and b are odd, then a = 2m + 1 and b = 2n + 1 for some integers m, n. Then we
have that:
b3 − 1 = (2n + 1)3 − 1
= 8n3 + 12n2 + 6n + 1 − 1
= 2 4n3 + 6n2 + 3n .
Thus b3 − 1 is even.
(a2 n)3 m = a6 n3 m = c.
Proof. The factors of 36 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 36, so these are the possible ages of the children.
The situations which could occur are:
Ages Sum of Ages
{1, 1, 36} 38
{1, 2, 18} 21
{1, 3, 12} 16
{1, 4, 9} 14
{1, 6, 6} 13
{2, 2, 9} 13
{2, 3, 6} 11
{3, 3, 4} 10
Since the census-taker knew the number on the gate, but said that they did not have enough
information, this means that there must be two situations with the same sum of ages. Otherwise,
knowing just the product and the number on the gate would be enough to determine the ages
of the children. (For example, if we knew that the gate number was 38, then the ages of the
children would have to be {1, 1, 36}, because there is no other situation with that sum.)
Thus the ages of the children can either be {1, 6, 6} or {2, 2, 9}, since the sum of ages in both
cases is 13. (So the number on the gate must have been 13.) However, once the man on the gate
says that he has an eldest child, the census-taker knows that the ages must be {2, 2, 9}, since
otherwise if they were {1, 6, 6}, there would be no eldest child, because the two oldest children
are the same age.