Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: The static and dynamic characteristics of the rubber mounts for vibration isolation in
automotive powertrains and other dynamic systems should be predicted during their design and
development stage. In this paper, the static characteristic simulation of a rubber mount is performed
using the nite element method. The modelling and simulation methods for a large deformation
rubber spring represented by axisymmetric, quarter-symmetric and three-dimensional nite element
models are investigated by using nite element analysis software PATRAN for meshing and ABAQUS
and ADINA for computations. The predicted vertical static elastic characteristics of the rubber spring
agree well with the experimental results. The static strain–stress analysis of the rubber part shows
that the von Mises stress can be adopted as a stress measure for the rubber material. Moreover, the
modelling methods for the large deformation rubber mount are investigated with numerical tests of
elastic characteristics. The hybrid elements with full integration and lower-order interpolation show
less distortion and are suitable for large deformation simulation computations. The research results
will help engineers and researchers to perform engineering design and analysis of rubber mounts and
other vibration reduction rubber components using the nite element simulation method.
Keywords: rubber mount, nite element method, elastic characteristics, modelling method, numerical
simulation
procedures with second-order elements, such as six-node generated above. The predicted static elastic character-
triangle, eight- and nine-node quadrilaterals or 10-node istics of the rubber spring are given in Figs 6 and 7. It
tetrahedral, and 20- or 27-node hexahedral quadrilateral can be seen that the vertical elastic characteristic is linear
displacement /linear pressure elements, often fail more before deformation reaches 12.6 mm and then shows
rapidly and give less accurate solutions, owing to distor- hard elasticity beyond this point, at which the inner part
tion of higher-order elements, than nite element models of the rubber component makes contact with uid track
with linear elements [11]. Many nite element modelling body. The complete contact between them comes at a
techniques and solution methods for incompressible loading displacement of 14 mm. After this point, the pre-
materials have been studied [11–13]; however, they are dicted elastic characteristic of the axisymmetric model
largely dependent on problems considered. In this paper, with CAX4H elements exhibits harder elasticity than
nite element models with reduced integration, full inte- experimental results. This is mainly because of the
gration, rst- and second-order hybrid elements are numerical inaccuracies resulting from serious distortions
investigated in static elastic characteristic simulations of
an HDM rubber spring.
Static elastic characteristics of the HDM rubber spring Fig. 6 Comparisons of predicted (using ABAQUS ) and meas-
are numerically simulated with the nite element models ured vertical elastic characteristics
Downloaded from pid.sagepub.com at University of Ulster Library on December 12, 2014
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 216 Part D: J Automobile Engineering D13801 © IMechE 2002
FE SIMULATION OF A VEHICLE RUBBER MOUNT 969
Table 1 Comparisons of simulation procedure and results with dierent nite element models using ABAQUS
Vertical linear
stiness (N/mm) 148.41 150.40 146.09 146.088 154.601 153.947 161.73 165.71 155.36
16 mm
Final loading (15 mm set in
displacement (mm) 14.4 15 8.86 12.18 9.04 9.66 6.87 15 calculation)
Computation time (s)
with 2 CPUs 45 33 1800 3000 13 920 21 360 1980 420
3.2 Strain and stress analysis pressure, with the resultant eect that the yield stresses
are dierent in tension and compression. Some modied
Detailed strain and stress distributions of rubber and von Mises’ criteria are suggested for polymers, one of
its metal reinforcing part are analysed. A quarter- which is as follows [15]:
symmetric rubber spring model with a C3D8H element
is used, and a typical vertical load of 1208 N is applied. (s s )2+(s s )2
The vertical displacement contour, shown in Fig. 8a, 1 2 2 3
+(s s )2+2(s s ) (s +s +s )
reveals the main shear deforming area of the spring 3 1 C T 1 2 3
rubber. The strain energy density contour on the cross- =2s s (2)
section, shown in Fig. 8b, indicates that the maximum C T
strain energy occurred at corners A and C, and the strain where s +s +s accounts for the eect of hydrostatic
1 2 3
energies in the area around the line A–C are higher than stress; s and s are the absolute values of the compress-
C T
elsewhere. The maximum principal strain and von Mises ive and tensile yield strengths. If s =s , equation (2)
C T
stress distributions, shown in Figs 8c and d, are very degenerates to the conventional von Mises criterion of
similar to each other. The von Mises stress criterion is equation (1). For a glassy polymer, the ratio of the com-
usually used as a yielding criterion for metals and is pressive yield stress to the tensile yield stress is 1.3 in
expressed as general [15], but there is no general yielding criterion
for anti-vibration rubber so far. In the present case, the
(s s )2+(s s )2+(s s )2=2s2 (1)
1 2 2 3 3 1 k von Mises stress, which represents the eective stress, is
Yielding of a metallic material will occur when the shear regarded as a stress measure for the yielding of the
strain energy in it reaches a critical value. However, rubber spring. However, its eectiveness needs to be veri-
equation (1) is not exactly suitable for polymers such as ed by future experiments.
rubber because the hydrostatic stress of rubber is not The normal vertical static load of the rubber spring
considered. The yielding of a polymer has been found under working conditions is about 800 N, corresponding
to be dependent on the magnitude of the hydrostatic to a loading displacement of about 5.34 mm. Von Mises
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
11 Belytschko, T., Liu, W. K. and Moran, B. Nonlinear Finite 15 Miller, E. Plastics Products Design Handbook, 1981
Element for Continua and Structures, 2001 (John Wiley, (Dekker, New York).
New York). 16 SAE Handbook, 2000 (Society of Automotive Engineers,
12 Bathe, K. J. Finite Element Procedures, 1996 (Prentice Hall, Warrendale, Pennsylvania).
Englewood Clis, New Jersey). 17 Treloar, L. R. G. The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, 3rd edi-
13 Hughes, T. J. R. The Finite Element Method—Linear Static tion, 1975 (Oxford University Press, London).
and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, 1987 (Prentice Hall, 18 Takyayama, M., Tada, H. and Tanaka, R. Finite-element
Englewood Clis, New Jersey). analysis of laminated rubber bearing used in based-
14 Wang, L.-R. and Lu, Zh.-H. FEM simulation based model- isolation system. Rubber. Chem. Technol., 1992, 65, 46–62.
ing method of constitutive law of rubber hyperelasticity.
Rubber Chem. Technol., May–June 2003 (to be published).