You are on page 1of 6

Journal of Health Policy and Management (2020), 05(02): 146-151

Research
Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Motivation, Supervision, and Adherence to Medical Waste


Policy in South Labuhanbatu, North Sumatera
Syahrul An1), Irnawati Marsaulina2), Destanul Aulia2)
1)Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sumatera Utara
2)Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Sumatera Utara

ABSTRACT

Background: Medical waste is unwanted biolo- variables were motivation and supervision. The
gical products that are highly infectious in nature. data were collected by questionnaire and analyz-
It is broadly classified as infectious waste and ed by multiple logistic regression.
biohazardous waste, and can easily spread any Results: Adherence to medical waste policy was
disease virally and can even pose a danger to life. affected by strong motivation (OR= 6.31; 95%CI=
Medical waste is found in hospitals, laboratories, 2.74 to 9.33; p= 0.048) and regular supervision
research centres, tattoo parlours, and others. It (OR= 5.56; 95%CI= 3.42 to 8.09; p= 0.039).
has to be disposed properly otherwise it poses a Conclusion: Adherence to medical waste policy
health and environmental danger. This study is affected by motivation and supervision.
aimed to examine the effects of motivation and
supervision on adherence to medical waste policy Keywords: waste policy, adherence, motivation,
in South Labuhanbatu, North Sumatera. supervision.
Subjects and Method: This was a cross-secti-
onal study carried out in South Labuhanbatu, Correspondence:
North Sumatera. A sample of 34 health care wor- Syahrul An. Masters Program in Public Health,
kers were selected for this study, consisting of Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, North
health center doctors, private doctors, and health Sumatera. Email: 44nregar@gmail.com. Mobile:
clinic owner. The dependent variable was adhe- 082366502449.
rence to medical waste policy. The independent

Cite this as:


An S, Marsaulina I, Aulia D (2020). Motivation, Supervision, and Adherence to Medical Waste Policy in South
Labuhanbatu, North Sumatera. J Health Policy Manage. 05(02): 146-151. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpm.-
2020.05.02.07.
Journal of Health Policy and Management is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

BACKGROUND Globally, more than 35 million health


Health clinics which produce medical waste care workers face the risk of percutaneous in-
every day has not been effective in its mana- jury due to exposure to contaminated sharps.
gement such as used gauze, plastic, syringes The incidence of exposure to microorganisms
and infusion bottles. Nowadays, many private observed among all health workers most
health clinics have opened inpatient and out- highly exposed was nurses (Efstathiou et al.,
patient services, of course the medical waste 2011). This is because nurses are health wor-
generated is also increasing. Even though kers who most often contact with patients
medical waste is very dangerous because it both directly and indirectly in an effort to
contains various types of diseases and provide nursing services to patients.
poisons. If it is not managed properly and World Health Organization (WHO) in
correctly, it can lead to contracting infectious 2005 estimated that around 2.5% of health
diseases, especially to health workers and the workers worldwide faced HIV exposure and
community in general (Pratiwi, 2013).

e-ISSN: 2549-0281 146


An et al. / Motivation, supervision, and adherence to medical waste policy

around 40% faced exposure to B Hepatitis affect individual performance. Individual


and C Hepatitis viruses and 90% of infections variables (abilities, skills, family background
resulting from these exposures occurred in and demographics), organizational variables
developed countries. In the United States of (resources, leadership, rewards, job structure
America, more than 8 million health workers and design), and psychological variables
in health facilities are exposed to blood or ot- (perception, attitude, personality, learning
her bodily fluids (Reda et al., 2010). and motivation. All three groups of variables
Research data on 114 health workers in affect working groups which ultimately affect
10 DKI Jakarta health centers showed that personal performance (Gibson, 2011).
around 84% of them had been stabbed by South Labuhanbatu Regency has 52
used needles. The prevalence of positive HBs- units of health facilities or health clinics con-
Ag was found to be 12.5% in the dentist group sisting of 17 units of health center, 22 units of
and 13.3% in laboratory personnel. Even doctor's practice and 13 units of private cli-
though other health workers with an inci- nics. The results of the South Labuhanbatu
dence of around 4% (Basuki, 2006). District Office of Environmental Report on
The policy on managing medical waste UKL/UPL documents and temporary B3
based on the Regulation of the Minister of medical waste permit storage that private
Environment and Forestry of the Republic of health clinics have UKL/UPL and permits
Indonesia Number: P.56/MenLHK-Setjen / have 21 units of B3 Waste Temporary Storage
2015, explained that the Management of Ha- Places consisting of 2 health center units, 11
zardous and Toxic Waste (B3) arising from units of doctor practice and 8 private clinic
health service facilities includes stages name- units.
ly: reduction and sorting of Waste B3, B3 The result of interviews with 5 private
waste storage, B3 waste transportation, B3 health clinics that have medical B3 waste sto-
waste treatment, B3 waste burial and B3 was- rage licenses, of which 3 clinics have B3 was-
te landfill. Every health company and clinic te transportation contracts and 2 clinics do
has a contract with a transport and Collection not have B3 waste transportation contracts.
Company and the B3 waste disposal (Minis- Clinics that do not have contracts to dispose
try of Environment and Forestry of the of waste by burning, storing it in a box (card-
Republic of Indonesia, 2015). board), and throwing it in the trash. The re-
Hasan and Rahman (2018) stated that sults of interviews with 5 clinic units that do
almost all companies which have health not have a B3 waste permit that the clinic is
services that treat waste has not been effec- not compliant to manage B3 waste. Clinics
tive in Khulna Bangladesh. It is necessary at dispose of waste by burning in a rubbish bin,
all stages of medical waste management from planted in the ground, disposed of in the
the formulation of appropriate laws, separa- trash and stored in a cupboard.
tion and transport of waste to final disposal. Another factor that causes non-optimal
The processes and methods adopted for was- medical waste management was lack of moti-
te management must be technically sustain- vational factors from the head of the health
able and with long-term financial support. clinic to make a temporary storage permit B3
Compliance of health workers in because they have to incur additional opera-
implementing medical waste management tional costs and consider that B3 manage-
regulations in health facilities reflects the ment can be done like regular waste mana-
performance of health workers. According to gement. The purpose of this study was to
Gibson, there are three variables that can analyze the effect of motivation and super-

www.thejhpm.com 147
An et al. / Motivation, supervision, and adherence to medical waste policy

vision on the level of compliance with medi- of 2014 and Regulation of the Minister of En-
cal waste policies in South Labuhanbatu Re- vironment and Forestry of the Republic of In-
gency. donesia Number: P.56/MenLHK-Setjen/20-
15 concerning Procedures and Requirements
SUBJECTS AND METHOD Technical Management of Hazardous and
1. Study Design Toxic Material Waste from Health Service
Survey study with cross sectional approach Facilities, namely reduction and sorting of B3
was conducted in South Labuhanbatu Dis- Waste, B3 Waste storage, B3 waste trans-
trict conducted in August 2019. portation, B3 waste treatment, B3 waste bu-
2. Population and Sample rial and B3 waste landfill.
The population is 34 people (8 head of health 5. Study Instruments
center, 15 practice doctors and 11 health cli- Data collected by questionnaire. Validity and
nic owners). The entire population became reliability tests were carried out on 10 health
the samples (total sampling). center or clinics in North Labuhanbatu Re-
3. Study Variables gency. Test reliability was done by calculating
The independent variables are motivation item total correlations and Cronbach alpha.
and supervision. The dependent variable is 6. Data Analysis
compliance with medical waste policies.. Univariate analysis to explain all study vari-
4. Operational Definition of Variables ables. Bivariate analysis used product mo-
Motivation is the urge or desire of health ment correlation test. Multivariate analysis
clinics to be obedient in managing medical was using multiple logistic regression.
waste based on intrinsic and extrinsic moti- 7. Research Ethics
ves. Researchers expressed the willingness to be
Supervision is all the actions of the leader- informants by submitting informed consent
ship in providing the aim to monitor and to be signed. Researchers also keep the iden-
supervise the compliance of health clinics in tity and answers of informants confidential, it
managing medical waste based on direct was used only for the study.
supervision such as inspection, direct obser-
vation, reporting and indirect supervision in RESULTS
the form of reports. 1. Univariate analysis
Medical waste policy compliance is all Table 1 showed that most of them have low
respondent’s actions in carrying out their motivation (58.8%), poor supervision (67.-
duties and responsibilities including mana- 6%) and lack of compliance with medical
ging medical waste permits and management waste policies (70.6%).
based on Minister of Health Regulation No. 9

Table 1. Frequency Distribution


Variable n %
Motivation High 14 41.2
Low 20 58.8
Supervision Good 11 32.4
Poor 23 67.6
Compliance Yes 10 29.4
No 24 70.6

www.thejhpm.com 148
An et al. / Motivation, supervision, and adherence to medical waste policy

2. The result of bivariate analysis 0.001) and supervision (r= 0.52; p< 0.001)
Table 2 showed the results of the bivariate increased compliance with medical waste
analysis. Good motivation (r= 0.62; p< management policies.

Table 2. The result of bivariate analysis


Variable r p
Motivation 0.62 <0.001
Supervision 0.52 <0.001

3. The result of multivariate analysis cant (OR = 6.31; 95% CI = 2.74-9.33; p =


Table 3 showed the results of multivariate 0.048). The supervision variable has a posi-
analysis. Table 3 explained that the moti- tive effect on the level of compliance with
vational variable has a positive effect on the waste management policies. Study subjects
level of compliance with waste management with good supervision have an odds value of
policies. Subjects with high motivation have 5.56 times to be more compliant with waste
an odds value of 6.31 times more likely to policies than subjects with poor supervision
comply waste policy than study subjects with and it is statistically significant (OR= 5.56;
low motivation and it was statistically signifi- 95% CI= 3.42-8.09; p=0.039.
Table 3. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis
95% CI
Independent Variable OR p
Lower limit Upper limit
Motivation 6.31 2.74 9.33 0.048
Supervision 5.56 3.42 8.09 0.039

DISCUSSION waste derived from 35 articles in South


1. The effect of motivation on compli- Africa, where official landfills determined by
ance with medical waste policy the government cannot overcome the amount
The results showed that there was a positive of medical waste generated so that the
influence of motivation on the level of com- management of medical waste in health
pliance with waste management policies. facilities is not optimal.
Highly motivated study subjects have an odds A study by Baaki et al. (2017) at Nige-
value of 6.31 times to be more compliant with rita health facilities found that training fac-
waste policy than study subjects with low tors, awareness in themselves (motives) as
motivation and it was statistically significant the most dominant factor, followed by envi-
(OR= 6.31; 95% CI=2.74-9.33; p=0.048). ronmental laws and socialization of regu-
The level of compliance with medical lations. The need to provide motivation to in-
waste management has not been in accor- crease staff awareness in health facilities.
dance with the Regulation of the Minister of According to Kartono (2011), motiva-
Environment and Forestry of the Republic of tion is the driving force that results in an or-
Indonesia Number: P.56/MenLHK-Setjen/- ganization member to use his/her abilities in
2015. In line with Al-Momani et al., (2019), the form of expertise or skills, energy and
which stated that the management of medical time to carry out various activities that are
waste in health facilities is poor and the lack his/ her responsibility and fulfill his/her obli-
of regulations governing medical waste pro- gations, in order to achieve goals and various
cedures in Jordan. According to Al-Momani predetermined organizational goals.
et al. (2019), the management of medical

www.thejhpm.com 148
An et al. / Motivation, supervision, and adherence to medical waste policy

2. The effect of supervision on comp- such as reports. The report can be in oral or
liance with medical waste policy written form.
The results showed that there was a positive
influence between supervision on the level of .AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
compliance with waste management policies. The researchers compiled this research sour-
Study subjects with good supervision have an ced at their own expense without involving
odds value of 5.56 times to be more comp- the Environmental Agency of South Labu-
liant with waste policies than subjects with hanbatu Regency where the researchers wor-
poor supervision and it was statistically signi- ked and other agencies.
ficant (OR= 5.56; 95% CI=3.42 to 8.09; p=
0.039). CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The low level of supervision from the There was no conflict of interest.
related officers causes the level of compliance
of waste management to be not maximal. A FUNDING AND SPONSORSHIP
similar study by Caniato at al. (2016) showed The researchers compiled this research sour-
that the management of hazardous and non- ced at their own expense without involving
hazardous waste was partially separated, the Environmental Agency of South Labu-
medical treatment of waste was rarely carried hanbatu Regency where the researchers wor-
out, 75% of hazardous waste was not treated ked and other agencies.
in Gaza health facilities.
According to Awodele et al. (2016) all ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
health facilities have the same process in Researchers thank to the Institute of Masters'
managing medical waste that is the separa- Program of Public Health, Faculty of Public
tion, collection, storage and transportation to Health, Universitas Sumatra Utara and the
outside the specified location. Officers res- Journal of Health Policy and Management of
ponsible for collecting medical waste must Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia, which
use gloves. has facilitated the preparation of journals
Pasaribu (2019) said that there was a about the level of compliance with medical
relationship between the supervision of IPCN waste management in health clinics in South
nurses and compliance with disposing of Labuhanbatu District and reviewers to
medical and non-medical waste in Padang maximize journal content.
Lawas Hospital. The important thing is that
supervision is carried out continuously to REFERENCE
improve compliance in disposing of medical Al-Momani H, Obaidat M, Khazaleh A, Mu-
and non-medical waste. neizel O, Afyouni NM, Fayyad SM (20-
Supervision techniques according to 19). Review of medical waste manage-
Siagian (2008) namely direct supervision ment in Jordanian health care organi-
and indirect supervision. In this case, inter- sations. British Journal of Health Care
nal supervision is when the leader of the Management, 25(8). https://doi.org/-
health center, doctor's practice and the health 10.12968/bjhc.2019.0041
clinic conducts its own direct supervision of Awodele O, Adewoye AA, Oparah AC (2016).
the activities being carried out by the health Assessment of medical waste manage-
workers. Indirect control (indirect control) is ment in seven hospitals in Lagos, Nige-
supervision that is not directly carried out by ria. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1–11.
the leadership but through intermediaries https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-

www.thejhpm.com 150
An et al. / Motivation, supervision, and adherence to medical waste policy

2916-1 Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor


Baaki TK, Baharum MR, Akashah FW (2017). P.56/MENLHK-SETJEN/2015 tentang
Critical success factors of medical waste Tata Cara dan Persyaratan Teknis
management implementation in health Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya
care facilities in Nigeria: A case study. dan Beracun dari Fasilitas Pelayanan
Journal of Design and Built Environ- Kesehatan (Regulation of the Minister
ment, 17(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.- of Environment and Forestry of the Re-
22452/jdbe.vol17no1.2 public of Indonesia Number P.56/ME-
Basuki C (2006). Pengantar kesehatan ling- NLHK-SETJEN/2015 concerning Pro-
kungan (Introduction to environmental cedures and Technical Requirements
health). Rosda Karya for Management of Hazardous and To-
Caniato M, Tudor TL, Vaccari M (2016). xic Waste Material from Health Service
Assessment of health-care waste mana- Facilities). In Biro Hukum KLHK RI
gement in a humanitarian crisis: A case Pasaribu DA (2019). Hubungan Pengawasan
study of the Gaza Strip. Waste Manage- Perawat IPCN (Infection Prevention
ment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.was- Control Nurse) Dengan Kepatuhan
man.2016.09.017 Perawat Membuang Sampah Medis
Efstathiou G, Papastavrou E, Raftopoulos V, Dan Non Medis di RSUD Padang Lawas
Merkouris A (2011). Factors influencing (The Relationship between Nurse Over-
nurses’ compliance with Standard Pre- sight and the Compliance of Nurses to
cautions in order to avoid occupational Dispose Medical and Non-Medical
exposure to microorganisms: A focus Waste in Padang Lawas Hospital). 1(2),
group study. BMC Nursing, 10(1), 1–12. 15–19
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-1 Pratiwi D (2013). Pengelolaan Limbah Medis
0-1 Padat Pada Puskesmas Kabupaten Pati
Gibson RL (2011). Bimbingan dan konseling (Solid Medical Waste Management in
(ketujuh) Guidance & counseling (se- Pati Health Center). KESMAS - Jurnal
venth). Pustaka Pelajar Kesehatan Masyarakat, 9(1), 74–84.
Hasan MM, Rahman MH (2018). Assess- https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v9i1.2
ment of Healthcare Waste Management 833
Paradigms and Its Suitable Treatment Reda AA, Fisseha S, Mengistie B, Vande-
Alternative: A Case Study. Journal of weerd JM (2010). Standard precau-
Environmental and Public Health, tions: Occupational exposure and beha-
2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/- vior of health care workers in Ethiopia.
6879751 PLoS ONE, 5(12), 1–6. https://doi.org-
Kartono K (2011). Pemimpin dan kepemim- /10.1371/journal.pone.0014420
pinan (Leader and leadership). Rajawa- Siagian SP (2008). Manajemen sumber daya
ligrafindo Persada manusia (Edisi Pertama)/Human re-
Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the source management (First ed.). Bina-
Republic of Indonesia (2015). Pera- pura Aksara.
turan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan

www.thejhpm.com 151

You might also like