Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spatial Smoothing
Category: Pre-Processing Last Updated: 09 April 2018 Published: 09 April 2018 Hits: 7981
1. Theoretical Background
Spatial smoothing means that data points are averaged with their neighbours. This has the effect of a low pass
filter meaning that high frequencies of the signal are removed from the data while enhancing low frequencies. The
result is that sharp "edges" of the images are blurred and spatial correlation within the data is more pronounced
(see figure below).
The approach of spatial smoothing is commonly used in fMRI studies and is justified by the fact that fMRI data
inherently show spatial correlations due to functional similarities of adjacent brain regions and the blurring of the
vascular system.
The standard procedure of spatial smoothing is employed by convolving the fMRI signal with a Gaussian function
of a specific width.This so called Gaussian kernel is a kernel with the shape of a normal distribution curve. In the
figure below you can see a standard Gaussian with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.
The size of the Gaussian kernel defines the "width" of the curve which determines in turn how much the data is
smoothed. The width is not expressed in terms of the standard deviation σ, as customary in statistics, but with the
https://support.bra nvoyager.com/bra nvoyager/funct onal-analys s-preparat on/29-pre-process ng/86-spat al-smooth ng?tmpl=component&pr nt=1 1/4
05.02.2021 Spat al Smooth ng - Support Bra nVoyager
Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM). In this case the FWHM would be 2.35: The maximum of this curve is y = 0.4
at x = 0. The half maximum is y = 0.2 at x = -1.175 and at x = 1.175. Therefore, the full width of the curve at the
point of the half maximum is about 2.35. Nevertheless, the FWHM is also related to the standard deviation σ as
follows: FWHM = σ √(8 ln(2)).
There are several benefits associated with the application of spatial smoothing:
Improving validity of the statistical tests by making the error distribution more normal
Most parametric tests assume normal error distributions and according to the central limit theorem the distribution
of an average tends to be normal with a sufficiently large number of independent observations being averaged.
However, there are also some drawbacks which have to be carefully considered when specifying whether and to
which extent spatially smoothing has to be applied:
Edge Artifacts
Along the edges of the brain, brain voxels are smoothed with non-brain voxels, resulting in a dark ring around the
brain which might be mistaken for hypoactivity.
Merging
If activation peaks are less than twice the FWHM apart they are detected as a single activation rather than two
separated ones.
Extinction
If the filter width is set too large, especially small meaningful activations might be attenuated below the significance
threshold.
https://support.bra nvoyager.com/bra nvoyager/funct onal-analys s-preparat on/29-pre-process ng/86-spat al-smooth ng?tmpl=component&pr nt=1 2/4
05.02.2021 Spat al Smooth ng - Support Bra nVoyager
In general, spatial filtering is implemented in BrainVoyager by applying a 3D Gaussian kernel to the data. The
width of the kernel can be either specified in mm or in pixels. Please note that the specification is only correct, if
the "voxel resolution" has been indicated correctly. If you want to run Gaussian smoothing only within the slice
plane, check the "2D" option instead of the default check mark in the "3D" option. This might be useful when the
data set contains only few slices. Furthermore, in the 2D space you can choose between smoothing in the "Space
domain" or in the "Frequency domain". Both options show similar outcomes. However, for smoothing in the
frequency domain, the image has to be first Fourier transformed, multiplied with the filter function and then back-
transformed into the spatial domain which is accompanied by higher computational costs. Therefore, the space
domain is checked by default. Nevertheless, for particularly large kernels (> 15 mm), smoothing in the frequency
domain is recommended, since the computational cost of the spatial filter increases with the size of the filter kernel
whereas the costs for the frequency filter is independent of the filter width.
After BrainVoyager has finished spatial smoothing a new FMR is created whose file name is characterized by the
options you used for filtering the data: "SD" for space domain versus "FD" for frequency domain, "3D" versus "2D",
"SS" for spatial smoothing and the size of the filter kernel expressed in millimeter "mm" or pixels "px".
Oversimplified, for single-subject analyses only modest filter sizes should be applied (about 4 mm), while for multi-
subject analyses wider filters are reasonable to account for the intersubject-variability (about 6 -10 mm). However,
to exploit the full spatial resolution of the data it is recommended to apply spatial smoothing only after having run
single-subject analyses with no or only modest filter widths.
Furthermore, it is important to take into account that different preprocessing steps, like motion correction and
creation of VTC files might also induce smoothing effects on the data depending on the interpolation method used.
For example trilinear interpolation (often used because of its fast computation advantage) has the side-effect of
“blurring” the data.
In sum, different factors have to be considered carefully, before deciding on the optimal kernel size.
In the figures below the effect of different smoothing kernels on the amount of significant activations is nicely
visible (with the same statistical threshold):
https://support.bra nvoyager.com/bra nvoyager/funct onal-analys s-preparat on/29-pre-process ng/86-spat al-smooth ng?tmpl=component&pr nt=1 3/4
05.02.2021 Spat al Smooth ng - Support Bra nVoyager
No Smoothing
4 mm FWHM
6 mm FWHM
8 mm FWHM
Note: The AMR is detached in all four versions of this functional data set, otherwise you would not see the
difference in the blurring factor!
Worsley KJ, Marrett S, Neelin P, Evans AC. Searching scale space for activation in PET images. Hum Brain Mapp
1996; 4: 74 - 90. (theoretical background)
Mikl M, Mareček R, Hluštik P, Pavlicová M, Drastich A, Chlebus P, Brázdil M, Krupa P. Effects of spatial smoothing
on fMRI group inferences. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 490 - 503. (practical considerations)
https://support.bra nvoyager.com/bra nvoyager/funct onal-analys s-preparat on/29-pre-process ng/86-spat al-smooth ng?tmpl=component&pr nt=1 4/4