Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison of Dobutamine and Dopamine Acute Myocardial Infarction Infarct
Comparison of Dobutamine and Dopamine Acute Myocardial Infarction Infarct
SUMMARY To compare cardiovascular effects of dobutamine and dopamine, we administered the two
agents at a dose of 10 gpg/kg/min i.v. to two groups of chronically instrumented conscious dogs, beginning 40
minutes after coronary artery occlusion and continuing for 24 hours thereafter. A control group that was
given an infusion of 5% dextrose was also studied. During the first 30 minutes of infusion, both dobutamine
and dopamine produced similar increases in cardiac output, left ventricular dP/dt and dP/dt/P, without
significant changes in heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure or regional myocardial blood flow. At 24
hours, cardiac output and left ventricular dP/dt and dP/dt/P continued to be greater in the dobutamine
group than in the control group. The acute positive inotropic effects of dopamine were no longer apparent at
24 hours. Epicardial blood flow in the dobutamine-treated group also was higher than that in the control
group. There were, however, no differences between groups in the ischemic-to-nonischemic myocardial
blood flow ratio. In addition, infarct size, measured by nitroblue tetrazolium staining, was smaller in the
dobutamine group (55 ± 4% of risk zone) than in the dopamine group (76 ± 6%) or the control group (76
+ 5%). The dobutamine group also differed from the dopamine group in their plasma catecholamine levels.
Arterial plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine increased above the postocclusion
baseline values only during dopamine infusion by 1.50 ± 0.34 and 0.87 0.32 ng/ml, respectively.
Dopamine also caused myocardial release of norepinephrine, as evidenced by a significant transmyocardial
gradient (coronary sinus minus arterial difference) of 1.48 + 0.27 ng/mI. The results show that dobutamine
increases collateral flow to the ischemic myocardium, enhances left ventricular performance, and reduces
infarct size. None of these effects were produced by dopamine under these experimental conditions. The
difference between the effects of the two drugs probably is related, at least in part, to the detrimental effects
of local myocardial release of norepinephrine by dopamine.
DOBUTAMINE is a cardioselective adrenergic agent chemic myocardium because it has both /3-receptor-
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on December 11, 2019
that augments myocardial contractility, cardiac output mediated inotropic and metabolic effects that would
and myocardial blood flow with only minimal changes increase oxygen consumption, and an at-adrenergic va-
in heart rate or arterial blood pressure. '-5 It may be used soconstrictor effect that would reduce oxygen sup-
clinically to improve depressed cardiac function with- ply.". 12 Tuttle'0 speculated that this reduction in nor-
out further impairment of oxygen balance or metabo- epinephrine release may contribute to the protective
lism of the ischemic heart.6` Dobutamine not only effect of dobutamine on ischemic myocardium.
improves the global performance of the heart, but also Like dobutamine, dopamine is a commonly used
reduces infarct size during acute experimental myocar- inotropic agent. Although dobutamine and dopamine
dial infarction.9 These salutary effects probably are have similar acute cardiac effects,513' '4 it probably is
causally related to the increase in ischemic myocardial not appropriate to generalize the salutary effects of
blood flow produced by dobutamine. However, Tut- dobutamine on infarct size to dopamine, because their
tle'0 showed that a reduction of myocardial necrosis by mechanisms of actions as sympathomimetic amines
dobutamine was accompanied not only by an increase are different.1l 1'-' Dobutamine acts directly on adren-
in myocardial blood flow, but also by a reduction in the ergic receptors, whereas dopamine exerts its adrener-
amount of norepinephrine released from cardiac sym- gic action both directly on adrenergic receptors and
pathetic fibers that was facilitated after myocardial indirectly by releasing norepinephrine from sympa-
ischemia. Local release of excessive endogenous nor- thetic nerve endings.20 Dopamine's potential action of
epinephrine is generally thought to be injurious to is- releasing norepinephrine from the heart is in contrast to
the reduction in myocardial release of norepinephrine
From the Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, and the Car- produced by dobutamine.'0 Therefore, it appears that
diovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, and the dopamine may not have the same salutary effects as
Department of Medicine and Thorndike Memorial Laboratory, Boston dobutamine in acute myocardial infarction. Indeed,
City Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. dopamine has been shown to increase ischemic injury,
Supported in part by USPHS grants HL-24214, HL-14646, HL-
17403 and HL-18318. as measured by epicardial ST-segment elevation.21 22
Presented in part at the 36th Annual Scientific Sessions of the Ameri- The effects of dopamine on infarct size have never
can College of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia, April 29, 1982. been studied.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Chang-seng Liang, University of In the present study, we compared the effects of
Rochester Medical Center, Cardiology Unit, Box 679, Rochester, New
York 14642. dobutamine and dopamine on systemic hemodynam-
Received September 16, 1982; accepted November 15, 1982. ics, myocardial blood flow, and infarct size in the
Circulation 67, No. 4, 1983. conscious dog with acute myocardial infarction.
750
DOBUTAMINE AND DOPAMINE IN ACUTE MI/Maekawa et al. 751
the weight of the slice. The weights for all the slices the three experimental groups was determined by two-
were than added up to determine the total risk region way analysis of variance for independent groups with
and infarct size. Finally, left ventricular slices were cut repeated measures.28 Dunnett's test29 was used to de-
into 42-50 myocardial segments, which were divided termine the significance of differences between the
into endocardial and epicardial halves. These pieces preocclusion control and the serial repeated measure-
were then weighed and counted for radioactivity and ments after coronary artery occlusion in each group.
regional blood flow measurements. Left ventricular The t test was used to analyze the difference between
transmural segments were grouped into four regions two means; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
according to their endocardial blood flows determined
40 minutes after coronary artery occlusion. Trans- Results
mural segments with endocardial blood flow less than Coronary artery occlusion was successfully pro-
25 ml/100 g/min were designated as severely ische- duced in 31 dogs, as shown by coronary angiography
mic. Segments with endocardial blood flows of 25-50 and postmortem examination on the second day of the
ml/100 g/min and 50-75 mi/100 g/min were designat- experiment. All dogs showed evidence of acute myo-
ed as moderately ischemic and mildly ischemic, re- cardial ischemia in the first hour after coronary artery
spectively. Areas with flows more than 75 ml/l00 g/ occlusion, including electrocardiographic ST-segment
min were considered nonischemic. elevation and decreased left ventricular dP/dt. Five
dogs were excluded from the study: one dog died
Experimental Protocol shortly after coronary artery occlusion, before the drug
Dogs were divided into three groups according to infusion, and four dogs died during the drug infusion
drug assignments: dobutamine (10 ,ug/kg/min), dopa- (two dogs received dobutamine, one dopamine and
mine (10 ,ug/ml/min), and 5% dextrose solution. The one 5% dextrose). Eight of the remaining dogs (1 1 ± 1
drugs were administered randomly to dogs. The rest of kg) received dobutamine, eight (12 ± 1 kg) dopamine
the protocols was identical in the three groups. and 10 (11 ±- 1 kg) 5% dextrose.
After a 30-minute control period, the left anterior
descending coronary artery was occluded by inflating Systemic Hemodynamics
the previously implanted balloon occluder with a pre- Acute coronary artery occlusion produced similar
determined amount of normal saline. Systemic hemo- changes in systemic hemodynamics in all three groups
dynamics, including cardiac output, heart rate, aortic (figs. 1-3). There was a decrease in cardiac output and
blood pressure, left atrial pressure, and left ventricular left ventricular dP/dt and dP/dt/P, and an increase in
dP/dt and dP/dt/P, were measured at 5-10-minute in- heart rate. Mean aortic blood pressure did not change
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on December 11, 2019
tervals during the control period and in the first 40 significantly, while total peripheral vascular resistance
minutes after coronary artery occlusion. Microsphere increased initially but subsequently returned to preoc-
organ blood flows and plasma catecholamine levels clusion control values.
were measured immediately before and 40 minutes Figures 1-3 also show the acute effects of dobuta-
after coronary artery occlusion. mine, dopamine and 5% dextrose on hemodynamic
Beginning 40 minutes after coronary artery occlu- variables during the first 30 minutes of drug infusion.
sion, one of the three drug solutions was infused in Left ventricular dP/dt and dP/dt/P increased signifi-
each group at a rate of 0.19 ml/min for 30 minutes cantly during the infusion of dobutamine and dopa-
using a Harvard infusion pump. Systemic hemody- mine. Mean aortic blood pressure increased slightly in
namics were again determined at 5-minute intervals; both groups. Cardiac output also increased slightly
regional blood flows and plasma concentrations of ca- above the values before drug infusion (fig. 4), but did
techolamines were measured at the end of the 30-min- not differ significantly from the preocclusion controls.
ute infusion. Thereafter, the dog was continuously ad- The changes in cardiac output and left ventricular dP/dt
ministered the same dose of the drugs for an additional and dP/dt/P were of similar magnitude in the two
23 hours at a rate of 0.9 ml/hour, using a battery- groups (fig. 4). In addition, total peripheral vascular
operated Sigmamotor mobile infusion pump (Sigma- resistance did not change significantly from the preoc-
motor, Inc.) as previously described.9 clusion controls in two groups. Heart rate also did not
On the second day, 24 hours after coronary artery change significantly from the preocclusion control
occlusion, the left ventricular and coronary sinus cath- during dobutamine infusion, but was higher than the
eters were reinserted under local anesthesia, and sys- control value during dopamine infusion. Dextrose in-
temic hemodynamics, regional blood flow, and plas- fusion did not affect any of the hemodynamic re-
ma catecholamine levels were measured again. The sponses to acute coronary occlusion. Mean left atrial
amount of the drug delivered from the infusion bag pressure decreased from 4.7 ± 1.0 to 3.4 ± 0.9 mm
over the experimental period was verified by subtract- Hg (p < 0.05) during dobutamine infusion, but did
ing the weight of the bag after the infusion from that not change significantly during dopamine infusion
before the infusion. (6.7 + 1.4 to 7.6 ± 2.2 mm Hg) or 5% dextrose
infusion (4.0 ± 1.0 to 3.7 + 0.8 mm Hg). Stroke
Statistical Analysis volume increased only during dobutamine infusion
The experimental results are given as mean ± SEM. (18 ± I to 20 ± 1 ml, p <0.05).
The statistical significance of the difference between At 24 hours after coronary artery occlusion, all dogs
DOBUTAMINE AND DOPAMINE IN ACUTE MI/Maekawa et al. 753
15 . 3 :tsa --
1C, 3000 40 group (0.78 + 0.03) than in the dextrose group (0.58
+0.07,p <0.05).
600-
I
I
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DOPAMINE
I
Lj~~~~~~.~~~~125
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
100
0 06 0 X2200
Zk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~75
50~~~~~~~~~~~~~50
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on December 11, 2019
mine infusion on cardiac output, heart rate, left ventricular dPI } 4''')1
I \
dtanddP/dt/P,meanaorticbloodpressureandtotalperipheral 5000
vascular resistance. The abscissa denotes time after coronary K \'s t
artery occlusion, and the baseline values are shown at zero 404000
'
time. Bars indicate SEM. Asterisks show the values that differ
from the baseline control at p < 0.05, as determined by Dun-
nett's test. 3000 50
M 5% Dextrose
0 Dobutomine
a Dopomine T
150
Li)
*r
tz,
010
'io
(.0
M 50
after occlusion. Figure 8 also shows that the difference FIGURE 5. Effects of 5% dextrose, dobutamine and dopamine
between coronary sinus and arterial concentrations of on cardiac output, left ventricular dPIdt, and dPldt/P 24 hours
norepinephrine was acutely increased only by dopa- after coronary artery occlusion. The effects are expressed as a
mine, suggesting a net release of norepinephrine from percentage of preinfusion control values obtained 25-40 min-
the heart. In contrast, the difference between coronary utes after coronary artery occlusion. Bars show SEM. Asterisks
sinus and arterial concentrations of epinephrine sug- indicate values that differ significantly from the dextrose group
gests a net uptake in the heart. There were no differ- at p < 0.05. Dagger signs denote values that differ significantly
ences between the three groups. from the dobutamine group.
DOBUTAMINE AND DOPAMINE IN ACUTE MllMaekawa et al. 755
TABLE 1. Effects ofDobutamine, Dopamine and 5% Dextrose on Plasma Catecholamine Levels in Dogs After Coro-
nary Artery Occlusion
Norepinephrine (ng/ml) Epinephrine (ng/ml)
Time Arterial Coronary sinus Arterial Coronary sinus
Group 1 - dobutamine
0 0.42±0.09 0.44±0.05 0.93±0.18 0.26±0.05
40 min 0.54±0.08* 0.55±0.07* 1.53±0.34* 0.53±0.10*
70 min 0.66 ± 0.13* 0.63 ± 0.07* 1.49 ± 0.30* 0.71 0.09*
24 hr 0.74±0.12* 0.89±0.07* 0.70±0.15 0.37 ±0.05
Group 2 - dopamine
0 0.51 ±0.09 0.67±0.13 0.98±0.15 0.35±0.07
40 min 0.79±0.13* 0.73±0.14 1.93±0.40* 0.71 ±0.30
70 min 2.27±0.39* 3.75±0.46* 2.82±0.43* 1.58±0.33*
24 hr 1.48±0.25* 1.64±0.29* 1.77±0.39 1.05±0.23*
Group 3 - 5% dextrose
0 0.53±0.09 0.61 ±0.15 0.91 0.15 0.32±0.05
40 min 0.68±0.11* 0.78±0.22 1.58±0.39* 0.48±0.12
70 min 0.70±0.13* 0.69±0.19 1.76±0.49* 0.50±0.10
24 hr 0.71 ±0.06* 1.11 0.10* 0.73±0.08 0.30±0.04
Values are mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate values that differ significantly from the control values (zero time) obtained
before coronary artery occlusion. The 40-minute values represent the effects of coronary artery occlusion, whereas the
effects of drug infusion are shown by the values obtained at 70 minutes and 24 hours after coronary artery occlusion.
'4
C'a only a small fraction from the ischemic region. Signifi-
'R (3- cant changes in the amount of norepinephrine released
from the ischemic myocardium might have been
masked by norepinephrine-containing blood returning
from nonischemic regions.
Our results further indicate that unlike dobutamine,
dopamine affected neither cardiac function nor isch-
t01.5 t 35% Dextrose emic myocardial blood flow 24 hours after coronary
c
'a, : 5 llDobutamine arterial occlusion, although the acute cardiovascular
~~~~Dopamine effects of dobutamine and dopamine during the initial
infusion were similar. Infarct size also was unaffected
0.5
TABLE 3. Effects of Acute Coronary Artery Occlusion on Organ and nonischemic myocardium, because tissue norepi-
Blood Flows nephrine was depleted in both of these regions after
Organ blood flow acute myocardial infarction.33 This endogenously re-
(mll 100g/min) leased norepinephrine may produce a greater vasocon-
Organ Control Occlusion strictor effect than circulating catecholamines .' Al-
Brain 58±3 55±3 pha-receptor-mediated vasoconstriction could have
Lungs (bronchial artery) 52 ± 7 34 ± 5* limited the increase in myocardial blood flow.36
Right ventricle 88 ± 7 85 ± 7
In addition, endogenously released norepinephrine
may exert deleterious effect on the ischemic myocardi-
Adrenal glands 295 ± 18 272 ± 20 um by its oxygen-wasting effects in the'mitochondria,
Kidneys 506± 22 396 ± 24* and its actions causing calcium accumulation in the
Liver (hepatic artery) 37 ± 4 30 + 3* cardiac cell.'1 12 Myocardial cellular damage may be
Stomach 41±4 31±5* produced in isolated rat heart by even small doses of
Small intestine 46±4 38±3* norepinephrine released by hypoxia or myocardial in-
farction.37 Furthermore, dopamine increases arterial
Large intestine 64+ 6 53±4* concentrations of free fatty acids22 'whereas dobuta-
Spleen 266 ± 21 260 ± 19 mine does not.4 Since myocardial lipolysis increases
Bladder 10±1 6±1* myocardial oxygen requirements, these effects of do-
Pancreas 35 ± 4 32 ± 3 pamine are detrimental in the setting of acute myocar-
Splanchnics 63 ±4 54 ± 3* dial ischemia.'2
Femoral muscle 5.1± 0.5 4.1± 0.5*
Earlier studies in anesthetized, open-chest dogs
showed that dopamine exaggerated the ischemic in-
Skin 3.0±0.3 3.4±0.4 jury, as evidenced by epicardial ST-segment eleva-
Bone 15±3 10±2* tions.21' 22 On the other hand, our results in conscious
Values are mean + SEM. N = 26. dogs indicate that infarct size was not significantly
*p < 0.05 vs control (paired t test). increased by dopamine. This apparent discrepancy
may be related in part to the use of anesthesia and
by dopamine infusion. The changes in plasma catechol- open-chest preparations by previous investigators. In
amine demonstrate that as expected, dopamine caused addition, epicardial ST-segment elevation was used to
a release of endogenous catecholamines from both detect acute effects of dobutamine in the earlier stud-
sympathetic nerves endings and adrenal medulla. In ies, whereas infarct size was measured 24 hours later
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on December 11, 2019
contrast, dobutamine, which, like isoproterenol, has a in our experiments. Aggravation of ischemic insult
large N-substituent group,32 is not taken up into the during the acute phase of myocardial ischemia might
sympathetic nerve endings and does not cause release not necessarily produce a greater infarct size in our
of endogenous norepinephrine. Dopamine produced a preparation because the infarct size, as expressed by
net release of norepinephrine from the heart. Norepi- percent risk zone, was already nearly maximal in' the
nephrine probably was released from both the ischemic control dextrose group (76%).38
Dobutamine improves myocardial mitochondrial ul-
Adrenal Glands
trastructure in patients with congestive cardiomyo-
r* t
pathy.39 This may lead to better mitochondrial use of
150 oxygen and better recovery of depressed cardiac func-
100
tion. The mechanism responsible for these biochemi-
cal effects, however, is poorly understood.
50 The diminished inotropic effects of dopamine 24
hours after coronary artery occlusion probably are re-
_
lated to both the loss of viable myocardium and the
150.
Splanchnics
decrease in tissue catecholamine storage.33 Dopamine
might have enhanced the rate of norepinephrine deple-
100 tion in the heart. Although depletion of norepinephrine
by itself does not necessarily change intrinsic myocar-
50- dial contractility,33 40 it would attenuate the inotropic
response of the heart to indirectly acting adrenergic
agents like dopamine.
Dobutamine and dopamine exert different effects on
FIGURE 9. Changes (percentage of preinfusion values) in peripheral vasculature. Dobutamine increased skeletal
blood flow and vascular resistance in skeletal muscle, adrenal muscle blood flow. In contrast, dopamine increased
glands, kidneys, and splanchnics after 30 minutes ofinfusion of blood' flow to the kidneys and adrenal glands. The
5% dextrose, dobutamine, and dopamine. Bars show SEM. As- increase in renal blood flow probably is caused by the
terisks indicate values that differ significantlyfrom the dextrose dopaminergic action of the drug.'6 The increase in
group; dagger signs indicate values that differ significantlyfrom adrenal blood flow was accompanied'by increases in
the dobutamine group. plasma catecholamines, suggesting the blood flow re-
758 CIRCULATION VOL 67, No 4, APRIL 1983
sponse was closely coupled to the adrenal release of 12. Opie LH: Myocardial infarct size. Part I. Basic considerations. Am
catecholamines. The mechanism for this change is not Heart J 100: 355, 1980
13. Crexells C, Bourassa MG, Biron P: Effects of dopamine on myo-
known. cardial metabolism in patients with ischemic heart disease. Cardio-
Both dobutamine and dopamine are useful inotropic vasc Res 7: 438, 1973
agents in patients with heart failure. Dobutamine is a 14. Goldberg LI, Hsieh Y, Resnekov L: Newer catecholamines for
preferred agent to improve depressed myocardial per- treatment of heart failure and shock: an update on dopamine and a
4& first look at dobutamine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 19: 327, 1977
formance in patients with low output cardiac failure3 15. Tsai TH, Langer SZ, Trendelenburg U: Effects of dopamine and ,B-
and patients with acute myocardial infarction.42 Dobu- methyl-dopamine on smooth muscle and on the cardiac pacemaker.
tamine produces favorable effects on hemodynamics in J Pharmacol Exp Ther 156: 310, 1967
most patients with acute myocardial infarction6 and in 16. Goldberg LI: Cardiovascular and renal actions of dopamine: poten-
heart failure complicating coronary artery disease' tial clinical applications. Pharmacol Rev 24: 1, 1972
17. Kho TL, Henquet JW, Punt R, Birkenhager WH, Rahn KH: Influ-
without serious deleterious side effects. Nevertheless, ence of dobutamine and dopamine on hemodynamics and plasma
dopamine may increase renal perfusion by its unique concentrations of noradrenaline and renin in patients with low
dopaminergic action, not present with dobutamine. cardiac output following acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Clin
Our present study suggests that dobutamine is more Pharmacol 18: 213, 1980
18. Robie NW, Nutter DO, Moody C, McNay JL: In vivo analysis of
effective than dopamine in producing sustained cardiac adrenergic receptor activity of dobutamine. Circ Res 34: 663, 1974
improvement after acute myocardial infarction, and 19. Sonnenblick EH, Frishman WH, LeJemtel TH: Dobutamine: a new
that the norepinephrine-releasing property of dopa- synthetic cardioactive sympathetic amine. N Engl J Med 300: 17,
mine may be detrimental to the ischemic myocardium. 1979
20. Nash CW, Wolff SA, Ferguson BA: Release of tritiated noradrena-
line from perfused rat hearts by sympathomimetic amines. Can J
Acknowledgment Physiol Pharmacol 46: 35, 1968
The authors thank Samuel Rivers, Stephanie Arnold, Debra Gins- 21. Reid P, Pitt B, Kelly D: Effects of dopamine on increasing infarct
burg, Catherine H. Mesner, and Chhanda Panda for their excellent area in acute myocardial infarction. (abstr) Circulation 46 (suppl
technical assistance. The following chemicals were generously supplied II): 11-210. 1972
by pharmaceutical companies: Indocyanine green (Cardio-Green) by 22. Lekven J, Semb G: Effect of dopamine and calcium on lipolysis
Hynson, Westcott and Dunning, Division of Becton, Dickinson and and myocardial ischemic injury following acute coronary occlusion
Company, Baltimore, MD; dobutamine HCl (Dobutrex) by Lilly Re- in the dog. Circ Res 34: 349, 1974
search Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN. 23. Heymann MA, Payne BD, Hoffman Jl, Rudolph AM: Blood flow
measurements with radionuclide-labeled particles. Prog Cardio-
vasc Dis 20: 55, 1977
References 24. Liang C: Metabolic control of circulation. Effects of iodoacetate
1. Tuttle RR, Mills J: Dobutamine. Development of a new catechol- and fluoroacetate. J Clin Invest 60: 61, 1977
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on December 11, 2019
amine to selectively increase cardiac contractility. Circ Res 36: 25. Peuler JD, Johnson GA: Simultaneous single isotope radioenzyma-
185, 1975 tic assay of plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine and dopamine.
2. Hinds JE, Hawthorne EW: Comparative cardiac dynamic effects of Life Sci 21: 625, 1977
dobutamine and isoproterenol in conscious instrumented dogs. Am 26. Lowe JE, Reimer KA, Jennings RB: Experimental infarct size as a
J Cardiol 36: 894, 1975 function of the amount of myocardium at risk. Am J Pathol 90:
3. Leier CV, Heban PT, Huss P, Bush CA, Lewis RP: Comparative 363, 1978
systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of dopamine and dobu- 27. Nachlas MM, Shnitka TK: Macroscopic identification of early
tamine in patients with cardiomyopathic heart failure. Circulation myocardial infarcts by alterations in dehydrogenase activity. Am J
58: 466, 1978 Pathol 42: 379, 1963
4. Liang C, Hood WB Jr: Dobutamine infusion in conscious dogs 28. Winer BT: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd ed.
with and without autonomic nervous system inhibition: effects on New York, McGraw-Hill, pp 261, 1971
systemic hemodynamics, regional blood flows and cardiac metab- 29. Dunnett CW: New tables for multiple comparisons with a control.
olism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 211: 698, 1979 Biometrics 20: 482, 1964
5. Vatner SF, Baig H: Importance of heart rate in determining the 30. Reimer KA, Jennings RB: The "wavefront phenomenon" of myo-
effects of sympathomimetic amines on regional myocardial func- cardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis
tion and blood flow in conscious dogs with acute myocardial isch- within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk)
emia. Circ Res 45: 793, 1979 and collateral flow. Lab Invest 40: 633, 1979
6. Gillespie TA, Ambos HD, Sobel BE, Roberts R: Effects of dobuta- 31. Schaper W: The morphology of collaterals and anastomoses in
mine in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol human, canine and porcine hearts. In The Collateral Circulation of
39: 588, 1977 the Heart, edited by DAK Black. New York, American Elsevier
7. Tubau JF, Bourassa MG, Cote P: Hemodynamic and metabolic Publishing, 1971, pp 5-18
changes induced by dobutamine in patients with coronary disease. 32. Iversen LL: Catecholamine uptake processes. Br Med Bull 29:
(abstr) Circulation 60 (suppl II): 11-41, 1979 130, 1973
8. Pozen RG, DiBianco R, Katz RJ, Bortz R, Myerburg RJ, Fletcher 33. Mathes P, Cowan C. Gudbjarnason S: Storage and metabolism of
RD: Myocardial metabolic and hemodynamic effects of dobuta- norepinephrine after experimental myocardial infarction. Am J
mine in heart failure complicating coronary artery disease. Circula- Physiol 220: 27, 1971
tion 63: 1279, 1981 34. Glick G, Epstein SE, Wechsler AS, Braunwald E: Physiological
9. Liang C, Yi JM, Sherman LG. Black J, Gavras H, Hood WB Jr: differences between the effects of neuronally released and blood-
Dobutamine infusion in conscious dogs with and without acute borne norepinephrine on beta adrenergic receptors in the arterial
myocardial infarction. Effects on systemic hemodynamics, myo- bed of the dog. Circ Res 21: 217, 1967
cardial blood flow, and infarct size. Circ Res 49: 170, 1981 35. Russell MP, Moran NC: Evidence for lack of innervation of /3-2
10. Tuttle RR: The experimental basis for using dobutamine in acute adrenoceptors in the blood vessels of the gracilis muscle of the dog.
myocardial infarction. In Proceedings: European Dobutamine Circ Res 46: 344, 1980
Symposium, edited by A Glynne, RA Lucas. London, Guy's Hos- 36. Mohrman DE, Feigl EO: Competition between sympathetic vaso-
pital, 1978, pp 58-67 constriction and metabolic vasodilation in the canine coronary cir-
11. Ceremuzyfiski L: Hormonal and metabolic reactions evoked by culation. Circ Res 42: 79, 1978
acute myocardial infarction. Circ Res 48: 767, 1981 37. Waldenstrom AP, Hjalmarson AC, Thornell L: A possible role of
LV FUNCTION AND INFARCT SIZE BY CTT/Slutsky et al.
noradrenaline in the development of myocardial infarction. An tive ultrastructural study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 215: 527, 1980
experimental study in the isolated rat heart. Am Heart J 95: 43, 40. Spann JF, Sonnenblick EH, Cooper T, Chidsey CA, William VL,
1978 Braunwald E: Cardiac norepinephrine stores and the contractile
38. Vokonas PS, Malsky PM, Paul SJ, Robbins SL, Hood WB Jr: state of heart muscle. Circ Res 19: 317, 1966
Radioautographic studies in experimental myocardial infarction: 41. Loeb HS, Bredakis J, Gunnar RM: Superiority of dobutamine over
profiles of ischemic blood flow and quantification of infarct size in dopamine for augmentation of cardiac output in patients with
relation to magnitude of ischemic zone. Am J Cardiol 42: 67, 1978 chronic low output cardiac failure. Circulation 55: 375, 1977
39. Unverferth DV, Leier CV, Magorien RD, Croskery R, Svirbely 42. Keung ECH, Siskind SJ, Sonnenblick EH, Ribner HS, Schwartz
JR, Kolibash AJ, Dick MR, Meacham JA, Baba N: Improvement WJ, LeJemtel TH: Dobutamine therapy in acute myocardial infarc-
of human myocardial mitochondria after dobutamine: a quantita- tion. JAMA 245: 144, 1981
SUMMARY We evaluated 11 dogs using computerized transmission tomography (CTT); eight were
studied after coronary occlusion and three served as sham controls. Ungated scans (1 cm deep) of the left
ventricle (LV) were obtained from LV apex to base to determine infarct size (IS). At the middle LV level,
prospectively gated scans were obtained to determine LV function. In all infarct dogs, contrast medium
enhancement of the entire infarct or the periphery of the infarct occurred. Autopsy IS was compared with
the IS by CTT using either the inner (IM) or outer margin (OM) of the contrast-enhanced periphery of the
infarcts as the border of the infarct. IS by both CTT techniques correlated well with autopsy IS (r = 0.89 for
IM; r = 0.93 for OM). The estimate using OM (26.5 + 12 g) gave IS sizes similar to autopsy values (25.5 +
11.7 g), but IS derived using IM (14.1 8.0 g) underestimated autopsy values by approximately 45% (p <
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on December 11, 2019
0.01). From the prospectively gated CTT images, we calculated mid-LV end-diastolic (EDA) and end-
systolic areas (ESA) as well as percent area change before and after coronary occlusion. EDA increased
from 17.0 + 5.3 cm2 to 23.7 + 7.6 cm2 (p < 0.05). ESA increased from 12.1 + 4.1 cm2 to 18.6 7.2 cm2 (p
< 0.05), and percent area change decreased from 29.3 5.0% to 21.7 9.9% (p < 0.05).
We conclude that CTT imaging can reliably estimate IS, particularly when the area of rim enhancement
of the infarct is included within the presumed infarct region. Estimates of chamber function can be made
from gated CTT scans. Anterior myocardial infarctions produce left ventricular dilatation with reduced
chamber function, which can be detected by gated CTT scans.
QUANTITATION of myocardial infarct size is impor- infarct volume and to compare two CTT methods of
tant in assessing clinical prognosis after infarction and assessing myocardial infarct size with autopsy values;
in evaluating the effects of interventions designed to we also used CTT to characterize middle left ventricu-
reduce the myocardial damage during ischemia.'-5 Ex lar (LV) chamber dynamics before and after coronary
vivo studies have shown that computerized transmis- occlusion by prospective ECG gating and evaluated
sion tomography (CTT) can be used to accurately the variability in estimates of cardiac function by pro-
quantitate irreversibly damaged myocardial tissue.6-9 spective ECG gating of CTT images obtained on two
Recent reports have also shown the ability of CTT to different days.
quantitate infarct size in vivo, though the method var-
ied in each study.'0 1 The present study was designed Methods
to define the accuracy of CTT scans for quantitating Experimental Model
Eleven conditioned mongrel dogs (mean weight 28
From the Department of Radiology, University of California, San ± 4 kg) constituted the study population. Each dog
Diego Medical Center and the San Diego Veterans Administration was given subcutaneous morphine sulfate, 3 mg/kg,
Medical Center, San Diego, California. and then anesthetized with i.v. pentobarbital, 25 mg/
Supported in part by the Research Service of the Veterans Adminis-
tration and by grant (SCOR) HL-24922-01 from the NIH. kg. Through a left thoracotomy, a hydraulic coronary
Dr. Higgins is recipient of USPHS Career Development Award K04 occluder was placed around the proximal left anterior
HL-2001 from the NHLBI. descending artery, and in four dogs an injection cath-
Address for correspondence: Robert A. Slutsky, M.D., Veterans eter was placed into the left atrial appendage. The
Administration Medical Center (114), 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San
Diego, California 92161. catheters were burrowed subcutaneously and external-
Received October 25, 1982; revision accepted November 23, 1982. ized. The wound was closed aseptically and the dogs
Circulation 67, No. 4, 1983. were allowed to recover. Control CTT scans were ob-
759