Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vaccine Platform: o o o o o o
Vaccine Platform: o o o o o o
Contents
1Vaccine platform
2History
o 2.12020 development
o 2.2Clinical trials
o 2.3Results of Phase III trial
o 2.42021 development
o 2.5Scottish Study
3Approvals
o 3.1Suspensions
4Safety profile
5Production and supply
6References
7External links
Vaccine platform[edit]
The AZD1222 vaccine is a replication-deficient simian adenovirus vector, containing the full‐
length codon‐optimised coding sequence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein along with a tissue
plasminogen activator (tPA) leader sequence.[33][34]
The adenovirus is called replication-deficient because some of its essential genes were deleted and
replaced by a gene coding for the spike. Following vaccination, the adenovirus vector enters the
cells, releases its genes, those are transported to the cell nucleus, thereafter the cell's machinery
does the transcription in mRNA and the translation in proteins.
The one of interest is the spike protein, an external protein that enables the SARS-type coronavirus
to enter cells through the enzymatic domain of ACE2.[35] Producing it following vaccination will prompt
the immune system to attack the coronavirus through antibodies and T-cells if it later infects the
body.[6]
History[edit]
2020 development[edit]
In February 2020, the Jenner Institute agreed a collaboration with the Italian company Advent Srl for
the production of the first batch of a vaccine candidate for clinical trials.[36]
In March 2020,[37][38] after the Gates Foundation urged the University of Oxford to find a large
company partner to get its COVID-19 vaccine to market, the university backed off from its earlier
pledge to donate the rights to any drugmaker.[39] The U.K. government encouraged the University of
Oxford to work with AstraZeneca instead of Merck & Co., a US based company. People at Oxford
were reportedly concerned the vaccine would not be distributed worldwide. Government ministers
also had concerns that a vaccine manufactured in the U.S. would not be available in the U.K.,
according to anonymous sources in Wall Street Journal. Financial considerations at Oxford and spin-
out companies may have played a part.[40][41]
In June 2020, the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) confirmed that the
third phase of testing for potential vaccines developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca would
begin in July 2020.[42]
Clinical trials[edit]
In July 2020, AstraZeneca partnered with IQVIA to speed up US clinical trials.[43]
On 31 August 2020, AstraZeneca announced that it had begun enrolling adults for a US-funded,
30,000-subject late-stage study.[44]
On 8 September 2020, AstraZeneca announced a global halt to the vaccine trial while a
possible adverse reaction in a participant in the United Kingdom was investigated.[45][46][47] On 13
September, AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford resumed clinical trials in the United Kingdom
after regulators concluded it was safe to do so.[48] AstraZeneca was criticised for vaccine safety after
concerns from experts noting the company's refusal to provide details about serious neurological
illnesses in two participants who received the experimental vaccine in Britain.[49] While the trial
resumed in the UK, Brazil, South Africa, Japan[50] and India, it remained on pause in the US till 23
October 2020[51] while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigated a patient illness that
triggered the clinical hold, according to the United States Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar.[52]
On 15 October 2020, Dr João Pedro R. Feitosa, a 28-year-old doctor from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,
who received a placebo instead of the test vaccine in a clinical trial of AZD1222, died from COVID-
19 complications.[53][54][55] The Brazilian health authority Anvisa announced that the trial would continue
in Brazil.[56]
2021 development[edit]
In February 2021, Oxford–AstraZeneca indicated developments to adapt the vaccine to target new
variants of the coronavirus,[64] with expectation of a modified vaccine being available "in a few
months" as a "booster jab".[65] A key area of concern is whether the E484K mutation could impact the
immune response and, possibly, current vaccine effectiveness.[66] The E484K mutation is present in
the South African (B.1.351) and Brazilian (B.1.1.28) variants, with a small number of cases of the
mutation also detected in infections by the original SARS-CoV-2 virus and the UK/Kent (B.1.1.7)
variant.[66]
Scottish Study[edit]
A study was carried out by universities across Scotland of the effectiveness of first dose of Pfizer–
BioNTech and Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines against hospital admissions in Scotland,
based on a national prospective cohort study of 5.4 million people. Between 8 December 2020 to 15
February 2021, 1,137,775 patients were vaccinated in the study, 490,000 of which were with the
Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine. The first dose of the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine was associated
with a vaccine effect of 94% for COVID-19 related hospitalisation at 28–34 days post-vaccination.
Results for both vaccines combined showed a vaccine effect for prevention of COVID-19 related
hospitalisation which was comparable when restricting the analysis to those aged ≥80 years (81%).
The majority of the patients over the age of 65 were given the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine. As of
22 February 2021, the study had not been peer-reviewed.[67][68]
Approvals[edit]
Authorization and eligibility by country
show
Full authorization
show
Emergency authorization
Eligible COVAX recipient
On 27 November 2020, the UK government asked the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency to assess the AZD1222 vaccine for temporary supply,[122] and it was approved for
use on 30 December 2020, as their second vaccine to enter the national rollout.[123]
On 4 January 2021, Brian Pinker, 82, became the first person to receive the Oxford–AstraZeneca
COVID-19 vaccine outside of clinical trials.[27]
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) received an application for a conditional marketing
authorisation (CMA) for the vaccine on 12 January 2021. A press release stated that a
recommendation on this could be issued by the agency by 29 January, with the European
Commission then making a decision on the CMA within days.[3] The Hungarian regulator unilaterally
approved the vaccine instead of waiting for EMA approval.[124]
On 29 January 2021, the EMA recommended granting a conditional marketing authorisation for
AZD1222 for people 18 years of age and older,[12][13] and the recommendation was accepted by
the European Commission the same day.[14][125]
On 30 January 2021, the Vietnamese Ministry of Health approved the AstraZeneca vaccine for
domestic inoculation, the first to be approved in Vietnam.[126]
The vaccine has also been approved by Argentina,[127] Bangladesh,[128] Brazil,[129] the Dominican
Republic,[90] El Salvador,[130] India,[131][132] Malaysia,[133] Mexico,[134] Nepal,[135] Pakistan,[136] the Philippines,
[137]
Sri Lanka,[138] and Taiwan[139] regulatory authorities for emergency usage in their respective
countries.
On 7 February 2021, the vaccine roll out in South Africa was suspended. Researchers from
the University of the Witwatersrand said in a prior-to-peer analysis that the AstraZeneca vaccine
provided minimal protection against mild or moderate disease infection among young people.[140]
[141]
The BBC reported on 8 February 2021 that Katherine O'Brien, director of immunisation at
the World Health Organization, indicated she felt it was "really plausible" the AstraZeneca vaccine
could have a "meaningful impact" on the South African variant particularly in preventing serious
illness and death.[142] The same report also indicated the Deputy Chief Medical Officer for
England Jonathan Van-Tam said the (Witwatersrand) study did not change his opinion that the
AstraZeneca vaccine was "rather likely" to have an effect on severe disease from the South African
variant.[142]
On 10 February 2021, South Korea granted its first approval of a COVID-19 vaccine to AstraZeneca,
allowing the two-shot regimen to be administered to all adults, including the elderly. The approval
came with a warning, however, that consideration is needed when administering the vaccine to
individuals over 65 years of age due to limited data from that demographic in clinical trials.[143][144]
On 10 February 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued interim guidance and
recommended the AstraZeneca vaccine for all adults, its Strategic Advisory Group of Experts also
having considered use where variants were present and concluded there was no need not to
recommend it.[145]
On 16 February 2021, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) granted provisional
approval for COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca.[9][1]
On 26 February 2021, the vaccine was authorized with terms and conditions by Health Canada.[146]
Suspensions[edit]
On 3 March 2021, Austria suspended the use of a batch of the vaccine after two persons
suffered blood clot related complications after vaccination that resulted in one death.[147] In total four
blood clot cases have been identified for the same batch of 1 million doses.[147] Although no causal
link with vaccination had yet been established,[148] several other countries, including Denmark,
[149]
Norway,[149] Iceland,[149] Romania,[150] Bulgaria,[150] Ireland,[151] Italy,[148] Spain,[152] Germany,[153] Netherlan
ds[154] and Slovenia[155] also halted the vaccine rollout while awaiting for the European Medicines
Agency to finish a safety review. Indonesia is also halting their vaccine rollout awaiting more safety
reviews from World Health Organization.[156]
On 11 March 2021 the European Medicines Agency stated that there was no indication that
vaccination had caused blood clots, which are not listed as side effects with the vaccine.[147]
[30]
According to the EMA, the number of thromboembolic events in vaccinated people is no higher
than that seen in the general population.[30] As of 11 March 2021, 30 cases of thromboembolic events
had been reported among the almost 5 million people vaccinated in the European Economic Area.
[30]
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency of the UK has also stated that after
more than 11 million doses administered it had not been confirmed that the reports of blood clots
were caused by the vaccine and that vaccinations would not be stopped.[31] On 12 March 2021
the World Health Organization stated that a causal relationship had not been shown and that
vaccinations should continue.[157]
On 14 March 2021, AstraZeneca has confirmed that after over 17 million people have been
vaccinated in the European Union and UK there has been no evidence of an increased risk of blood
clots in any particular country.[32] The company reported that as of 8 March 2021 across the EU and
UK, there have been 15 events of deep vein thrombosis and 22 events of pulmonary
embolism reported among those given the vaccine, which is much lower than would be expected to
occur naturally in a general population of that size.[32]
On 15 March 2021 the German Paul-Ehrlich Institute reported that out of 1.6 million vaccinations
seven cases of cerebral vein thrombosis in conjunction with a deficiency of blood platelets had
occurred.[158] According to the PEI, the number of cases of cerebral vein thrombosis after vaccination
was statistically significantly higher than the number of cases that would occur in the general
population during a similar time period.[158] These reports prompted the PEI to recommended a
temporary suspension of vaccinations until the EMA has completed their review of the cases.[159]
Safety profile[edit]
As of 28 February 2021 the MHRA said that over 9 million Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccinations had
been given. Around 10% of recipients experience adverse effects, mostly mild in nature, including
"injection site tenderness, injection-site pain, headache, fatigue, myalgia, malaise, pyrexia (fever),
chills, arthralgia, and nausea". 194 cases of anaphylaxis had been reported. Across all COVID-19
vaccines types, incidences of Bell's palsy in vaccine recipients were no higher than would be
expected naturally. 275 people, mostly the elderly or infirm, had died shortly after vaccination, but
this figure was consistent with an expected coincidental death rate, with no suggestion of a causal
link.[24]
In March 2021, countless European countries suspended the usage of the vaccines due to blood
clots, some even died from it. Italy decided to further investigate after a few deaths to determine if
there’s a link. The usual statement is that there is no direct link between the vaccines and the cause
of deaths or adverse side effects. The same statement was shared in India for Covishield, another
name for the same vaccine, as and when any incident occurred. The advantages outweigh the
disadvantages; you’re are protected against Covid-19.