You are on page 1of 4

Saint Mary's University

COLLEGE OF LAW
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

COURSE OUTLINE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II
Second Semester, School Year 2019-2020

TEXTBOOK: ISAGANI A. CRUZ AND CARLO L. CRUZ, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, QUEZON CITY:
CENTRAK BOOK SUPPLY, INC., 2015 EDITION.

TOPIC/ CASES
REFERENCE/S
THE FUNDAMENTAL
POWERS OF THE STATE

General Principles
Police Power
 MMDA v. Bel-Air Village Association, G.R. No. 135962, 27
The Police Power
March 2000
 Lutz v. Araneta, 98 Phil 148/Association of Small Landowners
Eminent Domain v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343
 Binay v. Domingo, 201 SCRA 508/Villacorta v. Bernardo, 143
Taxation SCRA 480
 Basco v. PAGCOR, 197 SCRA 52

Eminent Domain
 City of Manila v. Chinese Community, 40 Phil 349/Republic of
the Philippines v. La Orden de PP. Benedictinos de Filipinas,
1 SCRA 646
 Philippine Press Institute v. COMELEC, 244 SCRA 272
 City Government v. Ericta, G.R. No. 34915, 24 June 1983
 Export Processing Zone v. Dulay, 149 SCRA 305

BILL OF RIGHTS: CIVIL AND


POLITICAL RIGHTS

General Principles

Suffrage Suffrage
 Kabataan Party-List, et al. v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 221318,
16 December 2015
 Romuladez v. Regional Trial Court, G.R. No. 104960, 14
September 1993
 Akbayan v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147066, 26 March 2001
 Macalintal v. Commission on Elections, 405 SCRA 614

Citizenship Citizenship
 Re: Application for Admission to the Philippine of Vicente D.
Ching, 316 SCRA
 Tecson v. COMELEC, 424 SCRA 277
 Moy Ya Lim Yao v. The Commissioner of Immigration, 41
SCRA 292
 Bengson v. HRET, 357 SCRA 545

1|P a g e
 Mercado v. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630
 Poe-LLamanzares v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. 221697 & G.R.
NOS. 221698-700, 8 March 2016
 Republic Act No. 9225 (Citizenship Retention and
Reacquisition Act of 2003)
 Teodora Sobejana-Condon v. COMELEC, et al., G.R. No.
198742, 10 August 2012
 Valles v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 137000, 9 August
2000/Maquiling v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 195649, 16 April 2013

Due Process
Due Process of Law  Corona v. United Harbor Pilots, G.R. No. 111953, 12
December 1997
 Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, 19 November
2001 (“void for vagueness” doctrine)
 City of Manila v. Judge Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, 12 April
2005
 Lupangco v. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 848
 Army and Navy Club v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 110223, 8
April 1997
 Acebedo Optical v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 10152, 31
March 2000

Equal Protection
Equal Protection  International School Alliance of Educators v. Quisumbing, 333
SCRA 13
 Dumlao v. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 392
 GSIS v. Montesclaros, 434 SCRA 441

Searches and Seizures


 See Rules 126 of the 2000 Revised Rules of Criminal
Searches and Seizures
Procedure
 People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57
 Roan v. Gonzales, 145 SCRA 687
 Pangandaman v. Casar, 159 SCRA 599
 People v. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683
 Valmonte v. De Villa, 178 SCRA 211/185 SCRA 665 (Motion
for Reconsideration)
 Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159
 People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716
 People v. Canton, 394 SCRA 478
 Zulueta v. Court of Appeals, 253 SCRA 699
 Saluday v. People, G.R. No. 215305, 3 April 2018

Liberty of Abode and Travel


Liberty of Abode and Travel  Marcos v. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668/178 SCRA 760 (Motion
for Reconsideration)

Freedom of Religion Freedom of Religion


 Estrada v. Escritor, A.M. P-02-1651, 4 August 2003
 Valmores v. Achacoso, G.R. No. 217453, 19 July 2017
 Ang Ladlad v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 190582, 8 April 2010
 Austria v. NLRC, G.R. No. 124382, 16 August 1999/ Fonacier
v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-5917, 28 January 1955
 Islamic Dawah Council of the Philippines, Inc. v. Office of the
Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 153888, 9 July 2003
 Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu, 219
SCRA 256/251 SCRA 569 (Motion for Reconsideration)
 Iglesia ni Cristo v. Court of Appeals, 259 SCRA 529
 Aglipay v. Ruiz, 64 Phil 201
 James M. Imbong, et al. v. Paquito N. Ochoa, Jr., et al., G.R.
No. 204819, 8 April 2014

2|P a g e
Freedom of Expression Freedom of Expression
 Eastern Broadcasting Corp. V. Dans, 137 SCRA 628
 Borjal v. Court of Appeals, 301 SCRA 1
 Filipino Broadcasting Network v. Ago Medicaland Educational
Center-Bicol Christian College of Medicine, 448 SCRA 413
 Pita v. Court of Appeals, 178 SCRA 362
 MTRCB v. ABS-CBN, 448 SCRA 575
 Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. V. Judge Capulong, 160 SCRA 865
(1988)
 Newsounds Broadcasting v. Dy, G.R. No. 170270, 2 April
2009
 Sanidad v. COMELEC, 181 SCRA 529
 In Re: Emil P. Jurado, 243 SCRA 299
 Reyes v. Bagatsing, 125 SCRA 553
 Miriam College Foundation v. Court of Appeals, 348 SCRA
265
 Jose Jesus M. Disini, Jr., et al. v Secretary of Justice, et al.,
G.R. No. 203335, 11 February 2014
 In relation to Academic Freedom (Section 5 [2], Article XIV of
the Constitution); Cases: Garcia v. Faculty Admission
Committee, 68 SCRA 277 (1975), Miriam College v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 127930, 15 December 2000)
 Republic Act No. 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act of
2012)

The Impairment Clause Impairment Clause


 Philippine Veterans Bank Employees’ Union v. Philippine
Non-Imprisonment for Debt Veterans Bank, 189 SCRA 14

Right to Information
Involuntary Servitude
 Chavez v. PCGG, G.R. No. 130716. December 9, 1998/19
May 1999 (Motion for Reconsideration)
Speedy Disposition of Cases
Poverty and Legal Protection
 People v. Rio, 201 SCRA 702

BILL OF RIGHTS: RIGHTS Rights of the Accused


OF THE ACCUSED  People v. Mahinay, 302 SCRA 455 (Miranda Rights)
 People v. Bravo, 318 SCRA 812 (Exclusionary Rule)
Rights of the Accused  People v. Andan, 269 SCRA 95 (Confessions and Admissions
(See also Rule 114 of the to the Media)
2000 Revised Rules of  Olivas v. Office of the Ombudsman, 239 SCRA 283 (Criminal
Criminal Procedure [Bail]; Investigation v. Preliminary Investigation)
Sections 7-8, Rule 117 of the  Serapio v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148468, 28 January
2003/Enrile v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 213847, 18 August
2000 Revised Rules of
2015 – Read also the Dissenting Opinion of J. Leonen (Bail)
Criminal Procedure [Double
 Webb v. People, 276 SCRA 243 (Impartial Trial)
Jeopardy])
 Lejano v. People, G.R. No. 176389, 14 December 2010
(Proof of Guilt)
Ex Post Facto Laws  Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (Prejudicial Publicity)
 Re: Request for Radio-TV Coverage of the Trial in the
The Writ of Habeas Corpus Sandiganbayan of the Plunder Cases Against the Former
President Joseph E. Estrada, 360 SCRA 248 (Public Trial)
Speedy Disposition of Cases  People v. Salas, 143 SCRA 163 (Trial in Absentia)
& Free Access to Courts  Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70 (Speedy Trial)
 Cabal v. Kapunan, 6 SCRA 1059 (Right Against Self-
Incrimination)
 Beltran v. Samson, 53 Phil 570 (Right Against Self-
Incrimination)
 People v. Judge Ayson, 175 SCRA 210 (Right Against Self-
Incrimination)
 Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, 297 SCRA 754 (Cruel and
3|P a g e
Degrading Punishment)
 People v. Velasco, 340 SCRA 207 (Double Jeopardy)

Writ of Habeas Corpus


Ilusorio v. Bildner, 332 SCRA 169/361 SCRA 427 (Motion for
Reconsideration)

OTHER REFERENCES:

Constitutional Rights and Social Demands by Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J. (2004 Edition)
Constitutional Law: Notes and Readings on the Bill of Rights, Citizenship and Suffrage by Rene Gorospe,
Volumes I and II (2006 Edition)

Prepared by
HERSON S. VALMORES
Associate Professor, SMU-LAW

4|P a g e

You might also like