You are on page 1of 5

Pediatric Pulmonology 46:1093–1097 (2011)

Combined Treatment for Child Refractory


Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia
With Ciprofloxacin and Glucocorticoid
Aizhen Lu, PhD, Libo Wang, MD,* Xiaobo Zhang, PhD, and Mingzhi Zhang, MD

Summary. Objects: To evaluate the efficacy of combined treatment of ciprofloxacin and gluco-
corticoid for child refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) pneumonia. Methods:
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of six pediatric refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia
cases treated with ciprofloxacin and glucocorticoids were reported. Results: Five cases compli-
cated with pleural effusion. The average febrile period prior to admission was 8.5  2.0 days,
the average total febrile period was 14.6  7.6 days, and the average febrile period after treat-
ment was 3.3  3.0 days. The average time in hospital for patients was 23.6  4.8 days. The
initial mean WBC count was 10,100  2,400/mm3. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in all cases were elevated during
the course of illness. After combined therapy, all children clinically improved, with resolution of
radiographic findings and normal laboratory items. We analyzed the 23S rRNA gene in four
nasopharyngeal secretions, and found mutations in A2063G of domain V in three cases, and
mutation in A2064G in the other case. Conclusion: Combined treatment of ciprofloxacin and
glucocorticoids can significantly ameliorate child refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia further
comparative study is needed to well evaluate the treatment efficacy. Pediatr Pulmonol.
2011;46:1093–1097. ß 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Key words: ciprofloxacin; glucocorticoid; refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia;


children.

Funding source: none reported.

INTRODUCTION fluoroquinolones in children is limited because of the


potential risk of joint toxicity. Despite this concern, flu-
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) is one
oroquinolones are successfully prescribed in some
of the major pathogens causing community-acquired
severe pediatric infections.6 In addition, many clinical
respiratory tract infections in children. Although
studies show that corticosteroids dramatically benefit
M. pneumoniae pneumonia (MP) is usually a benign
patients with severe MP,1,7,8 which is related to cell-
self-limited disease, it may develop into a severe life-
mediated immunity in M. pneumoniae infections.
threatening pneumonia in rare cases. These cases are
Therefore, we suppose that the combined treatment
defined as refractory MP showing clinical and radio-
of ciprofloxacin and corticosteroid may have good
logical deterioration after macrolide antibiotic therapy
efficacy in severe M. pneumoniae infections. Here,
for 7 days or more.1
Refractory MP may be related to emergency of
macrolide (ML) resistant M. pneumoniae. In children,
macrolide antibiotics are the first-choice agents for Respiratory Department, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University,
M. pneumoniae infections, and these antibiotics have Shanghai, China.
been thought to have excellent effectiveness against
*Correspondence to: Libo Wang, MD, Respiratory Department, Child-
M. pneumoniae for many years. However, in recent ren’s Hospital of Fudan University, No. 399, Wangyuan Road, Shanghai,
years, many isolates of M. pneumoniae from clinical China. E-mail: wanglbc@163.com
samples showed resistance to macrolides. Mutations in
domain V of 23S rRNA of M. pneumoniae are proved Received 10 September 2010; Revised 15 March 2011; Accepted 26
as main mechanism of resistance.2–5 March 2011.
Fluoroquinolones have a broad spectrum of activity DOI 10.1002/ppul.21481
against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and other organ- Published online 22 June 2011 in Wiley Online Library
isms such as Mycoplasma and Chlamydia. The use of (wileyonlinelibrary.com).

ß 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


1094 Lu et al.

we reported six pediatric patients with refractory received azithromycin and one kind of third generation
M. pneumoniae infections, who dramatically responded of cephalosporins. Once the clinical characteristics got
to this combined therapy. Clinical and radiological worse, the combined therapy was prescribed. Ciproflox-
evaluations showed significant improvement in these acin therapy was treated as 10 mg/kg/day by intrave-
patients. Our study suggests that this combined therapy nous drip for 7–12 days. Once clinical manifestation
is effective in refractory M. pneumoniae infections. was improved, cephalosporins were used instead of
ciprofloxacin for safety. Corticosteroids were applied as
MATERIALS AND METHODS below: methylprednisolone was given 2 mg/kg/day by
intravenous drip till patients’ temperature became nor-
Subjects
mal, then replaced by prednisone oral treatment as
We retrospectively reviewed the records of six pre- 1 mg/kg/day and decreased gradually until the patient
viously healthy children who had refractory showed normal radiological graph. Patients who
M. pneumoniae infections at Children’s Hospital of received this combined therapy were informed consent
Fudan University between 2007 and 2009. During the document.
period, 614 children with M. pneumoniae infections
were admitted to the hospital. The M. pneumoniae RESULTS
infection was confirmed by serologic test (detecting
Clinical Characteristics and Chest Radiographic
M. pneumoniae IgM by ELISA) and M. pneumoniae
Findings
PCR tests of nasopharyngeal secretions. All children
had negative results of TB-IgM test and PPD test. And On admission, all patients had symptoms and signs
they had negative results of respiratory syncytial of pneumonia, including fever (>388C per axilla),
viruses, influenza viruses, adenovirus, and parainfluenza cough, and abnormal breath sounds. Five patients had
virus tests. They also had negative results of bacterial pleural effusions, and one of them required admission
cultures of nasopharyngeal secretions and two blood to the intensive care unit because of dyspnea. Five cases
cultivations. were male. The mean age of the six children was
7.1  2.7 years old. The average febrile period prior to
Sequence Analysis of 23S rRNA Genes admission was 8.5  2.0 days, the average total febrile
period was 14.6  7.6 days, and the average febrile
DNA was isolated from nasopharyngeal specimens.
period after combination therapy was 3.3  3.0 days.
Primers: MP23SF (5-CAA TAA GTT ACT AAG GGC
The mean hospital stay was 23.6  4.8 days. Initial
TTA TGG TGG ATG C-3) and MP23SR (5-TCC AAT
chest radiographic findings of these patients showed
AAG TCC TCG AGC AAT TAG TAT TAC TCA G-3)
segmental or lobar infiltrates. In combined therapy,
were used to amplify and sequence the full length of
all children showed a persistent fever with aggravated
the 23S rRNA fragment.
respiratory symptoms and signs, and their radiographic
findings had progressed to severe pneumonia. After
Treatment Schedule
combined treatment, the symptoms of all children were
All patients had macrolide treatment for more than clinically improved, with defervescence and resolution
7 days before admission. On admission, all patients of radiographic findings (Table 1, Fig. 1). All patients

TABLE 1— Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics of Patients With Refractory MP Pneumonia

Fever (day)
Hosp. ML X-ray Extra-pulmonary
Patients Age Gender A B C (day) before findings manifestation

1 6 M 8 16 0 21 Azithromycin, clarithromycin RUL consolidation None


2 4 M 7 21 7 30 Azithromycin RL infiltration, RUL atelectasis, Increased myocardial
pleural effusion enzyme
3 7 M 12 20 2 24 Azithromycin RUL consolidation, pleural effusion, Increased liver enzymes
LLL infiltration
4 6 M 7 16 6 24 Erythromycin, azithromycin, RLL consolidation, pleural effusion None
clarithromycin
5 12 F 10 10 0 16 Azithromycin RL infiltration, pleural effusion None
6 8 M 7 15 5 27 Azithromycin, clarithromycin RUL consolidation, pleural effusion Increased liver enzymes

A, Fever prior to admission; B, total fever duration; C, fever duration after combination treatment; RL, right lobe; RUL, right upper lobe;
LLL, left low lobe; RLL, right low lobe.

Pediatric Pulmonology
Ciprofloxacin and Steroid in M. pneumoniae Pneumonia 1095

Fig 1. Chest radiographs of case 2 (male, 4 years old). (A) Before admission, (B) on
admission, (C) 3 days after combination therapy, (D) 7 days after combination therapy, and
(E) 12 days after combination therapy.

were followed up a month after their discharge, and (LDH) was 534  289 IU/L (Table 2). All these data
there were no articular complications. became normal after the combined therapy.
We succeeded in amplifying the domain V of 23S
rRNA gene in four nasopharyngeal specimens, the other
Laboratory Findings
two specimens failed. Three specimens harbored an
In this study, one case had negative M. pneumoniae- A2063G mutation in domain V of 23S rRNA genes, and
IgM at admission, but became positive after 3 days. one had A2064G mutation.
One case had the procedure of closed thoracic drainage.
Five patients had positive M. pneumoniae IgM in the
DISCUSSION
pleural fluid test. The initial mean WBC count was
10,100  2,400/mm3 (neutrophil, 71.8  5.9% and The refractory MP may be associated with emer-
lymphocyte 24.1  4.6%). The mean max erythrocyte gence and increase of ML-resistance strains. In China,
sedimentation rate (ESR, Wintrobe method) was prevalence of ML-resistant M. pneumoniae isolates in
92.2  24.3 mm/hr. All C-reactive protein (CRP) elev- pediatrics has increased rapidly. In 2009, Xin et al.9
ated dramatically. The mean max lactate dehydrogenase reported that 46/50 (92%) M. pneumoniae isolates from

TABLE 2— Laboratory Findings

Serum IgM
Total WBC (109/L) differentials CRPM ESRM LDHM Pleural Mutation
Patient (neutrophil/lymphocyte %), On (mg/L) (mm/hr) (IU/L) On Max fluid IgM position

1 14.5 (78.9/20.1) >160 97 244 >1:1,280 >1:1,280 ND A2063G


2 8.2 (68.6/28.4) 58 80 779 1:320 >1:1,280 >1:1,280 ND
3 8.9 (69.2/23.2) 115 104 633 1:640 1:1,280 >1:1,280 A2063G
4 9.0 (77.3/19.8) >160 132 ND Negative >1:5,120 1:320 A2063G
5 8.9 (73.5/22) 76 64 207 1:320 1:320 1:320 ND
6 11.4 (63.2/31) >160 76 808 1:320 1:640 1:160 A2064G

LDH normal range: 114–240 IU/L.


On, on admission; M, maximum during the course; ND, not determined.

Pediatric Pulmonology
1096 Lu et al.

pediatric patients are resistant to macrolides. In 2010, controlled studies for corticosteroid use in MP may be
Liu et al.2 reported that 90/100 (90%) M. pneumoniae necessary.
isolates are resistant to macrolides. All these ML- Although the high prevalence of ML-resistant
resistant isolates have the mutation at position 2063 or M. pneumoniae isolates exists in China, severe M.
2064 in 23S rRNA genes. In our study, four samples of pneumoniae infections are rare. Macrolides are pre-
nasopharyngeal secretions harbored the amplication of scribed widely, they also seem effective on ML-resistant
23S rRNA genes, three with the mutation of A2063G, M. pneumoniae. There may be two reasons, one is that
one with A2064G. This suggested the four patients had most M. pneumoniae infections are mild and self-limit-
ML-resistant M. pneumoniae infections. ing, the other is that macrolides may have immunomo-
It has been proposed that cell-mediated immunity dulatory effects. According to our experience, only
play an important role in the progress of M. pneumoniae 6 patients among 614 patients with M. pneumoniae
infection.11 Animal study showed that when animals infections treated with macrolides showed progressive
are infected with mycoplasma, a large number of pneumonia. A study in Japan reported that children
lymphocytes, mainly CD4þ T-cells, initially infiltrate infected with ML-resistant M. pneumoniae have longer
the peribronchiolar and perivascular regions.12 Open- fever duration than those with macrolide sensitive
lung biopsy findings in patients with MP also revealed M. pneumoniae when treated with macrolides.16 It
infiltration of peribronchiolar lymphoplasmocytic cells suggests that virulence of M. pneumoniae itself also
and exudates, with prominent neutrophils in the bron- impact the clinical manifestation. In our case series,
chiolar lumens (cellular bronchiolitis).10 Many cyto- four patients were confirmed infected by ML-resistant
kines are involved in M. pneumoniae infection, such M. pneumoniae and initial macrolides did not effect
as IL2, IL1, IL5, IL6, and IL8.13,14 These cytokines on the progression of the disease. Therefore, it is a
promote the inflammatory response. It was suggested possible explanation that ML-resistant M. pneumoniae
that hyperimmune reaction of T-cells which produce a itself could be responsible for the severity of disease.
variety of inflammatory mediators is involved in the M. pneumoniae is very sensitive to fluoroquinolones.
lung tissue destruction.13,14 Thus, stronger immunologi- Ciprofloxacin is the third generation of fluoroquino-
cal reactions may induce more severe pneumonic infil- lones, and its cartilage toxic effect is considered the
trations. In our study, the marked elevated CRP and least.6,16 A system review about ciprofloxacin use in
ESR suggested the severe systemic inflammatory severe neonatal infections finds that no serious adverse
response to M. pneumoniae infections. events, particularly joint toxicity are not observed.17 In
Given that the M. pneumoniae infection was an addition, there is a case report that fluoroquinolones are
immune-mediated disease, immune suppressive therapy effective for ML-resistant M. pneumoniae infection in
would be valid. Corticosteroids have roles of immune adults.18 However, the experience of using fluoroquino-
regulation and anti-inflammation. It was reported that lones to treat MP in children is rare. In this study, we
corticosteroids could improve symptoms and pulmonary combined ciprofloxacin with steroid to treat refractory
lesion rapidly in children and adults with M. pneumo- MP and got good effect without adverse events.
niae infection.1,8 Animal experiments also showed that Although we did not perform a case–control study
combined treatment of clarithromycin and dexametha- owing to small numbers of cases, the rapid clinical and
sone can reduce lung histopathologic score and cyto- radiological improvement of refractory M. pneumoniae
kines than clarithromycin or dexamethasone only.15 infections in children showed the beneficial effects of
However, there was no evidence-based report about the combined therapy. Since the appropriate courses of
appropriate methods of steroid use, in particular, those corticosteroids or ciprofloxacin therapy in children are
of dosage, administration route, or duration of treat- not well established, further comparative study is
ment. Lee et al.8 reported that oral prednisolone of needed to define the optimal methods of this combi-
1 mg/kg/day tapering within a week for severe MP in nation therapy.
children may be helpful. Tamura et al.1 reported that
intravenously administered methylprednisolone at a REFERENCES
dose of 30 mg/kg once daily for three consecutive days
1. Tamura A, Matsubara K, Tanaka T, Nigami H, Yura K, Fukaya
is effective for refractory MP in children. For safety, we T. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy for refractory Mycoplasma
initially gave methylprednisolone intravenously at a pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J Infect 2008;57:223–228.
dose of 2 mg/kg /day, till the patient’s fever dropped, 2. Liu Y, Ye X, Zhang H, Xu X, Li W, Zhu D, Wang M. Charac-
then we changed to predisone 1 mg/kg/day orally. This terization of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae
regiment also improved clinical manifestation without isolated from children in Shanghai, China. Diagn Microbiol
Infect Dis 2010;67:355–358.
any side-effect. Since all these three reports were cases- 3. Dumke R, von Baum H, Lück PC, Jacobs E. Occurrence
based and the severity of pneumonia and clinical mani- of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains in
festations of the patients might be different, further Germany. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010;16:613–616.

Pediatric Pulmonology
Ciprofloxacin and Steroid in M. pneumoniae Pneumonia 1097

4. Wolff BJ, Thacker WL, Schwartz SB, Winchell JM. Detection 11. Radisic M, Torn A, Gutierrez P, Defranchi HA, Pardo P. Severe
of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae by real- acute lung injury caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae: potential
time PCR and high-resolution melt analysis. Antimicrob Agents role for steroid pulses in treatment. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:
Chemother 2008;52:3542–3549. 1507–1511.
5. Morozumi M, Hasegawa K, Kobayashi R, Inoue N, Iwata S, 12. Opitz O, Pietsch K, Ehlers S, Jacobs E. Cytokine gene expres-
Kuroki H, Kawamura N, Nakayama E, Tajima T, Shimizu K, sion in immune mice reinfected with Mycoplasma pneumoniae:
Ubukata K. Emergence of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma the role of T cell subsets in aggravating the inflammatory
pneumoniae with a 23S rRNA gene mutation. Antimicrob response. Immunobiology 1996–1997; 196:575–587.
Agents Chemother 2005;49:2302–2306. 13. Lee KY. Pediatric respiratory infections by Mycoplasma pneu-
6. Gendrel D, Chalumeau M, Moulin F, Raymond J. Fluoroquino- moniae. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008;6:509–521.
lones in paediatrics: a risk for the patient or for the community? 14. Yang J, Hooper WC, Phillips DJ, Talkington DF. Cytokines in
Lancet Infect Dis 2003;3:537–546. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Cytokines Growth Factor
7. Ho JC, Ooi GC, Mok TY, Chan JW, Hung I, Lam B, Wong PC, Rev 2004;15:157–168.
Li PC, Ho PL, Lam WK, Ng CK, Ip MS, Lai KN, Chan-Yeung 15. Tagliabue C, Salvatore CM, Techasaensiri C, Mejias A, Torres
M, Tsang KW. High dose pulse versus nonpulse corticosteroid JP, Katz K, Gomez AM, Esposito S, Principi N, Hardy RD. The
regimens in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Respir impact of steroids given with macrolide therapy on experimental
Crit Care Med 2003;168:1449–1456. Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory infection. Infect Dis 2008;
8. Lee KY, Lee HS, Hong JH, Lee MH, Lee JS, Burgner D, Lee 198:1180–1188.
BC. Role of prednisolone treatment in severe Mycoplasma 16. Jick S. Ciprofloxacin safety in a pediatric population. Pediatr
pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2006;41: Infect Dis J 1997;16:130–133.
263–268. 17. Kaguelidou F, Turner MA, Choonara I, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Cipro-
9. Xin D, Mi Z, Han X, Qin L, Li J, Wei T, Chen X, Ma S, Hou floxacin use in neonates: a systematic review of the literature.
A, Li G, Shi D. Molecular mechanisms of macrolide resistance Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011;30(2): e29–e37.
in clinical isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae from China. 18. Miyashita N, Maruyama T, Kobayashi T, Kobayashi H, Taguchi
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:2158–2159. O, Kawai Y, Yamaguchi T, Ouchi K, Oka M. Community-
10. Rollins S, Colby T, Clayton F. Open lung biopsy in Mycoplasma acquired macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumo-
pneumoniae pneumonia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110: nia in patients more than 18 years of age. J Infect Chemother
34–41. 2011;17(1): 114–118.

Pediatric Pulmonology

You might also like