Professional Documents
Culture Documents
treatment
高雄長庚兒童過敏免疫風溼科
王玲 主任
2012-9-8
1
Contents
I. Small airway and physiology
3
The bronchial trees in the lungs are made up of
conducting and respiratory zones
Conducting zone
First 16-17 branches
Transport air into smaller airways
Respiratory zone
Lower 6-7 branches
Sites of gaseous exchange
4
The majority of bronchial tree generations are
made up of small airways (<2mm diameter)
18
12
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Airway Generation
The small airways include: terminal bronchioles, respiratory bronchioles, alveolar ducts and alveolar
sacs
1. Figure adapted from: Weibel ER. Morphometry of the Human Lung, Academic Press, 1963. 5
The small airways (<2 mm diameter) account
for ~98.9% of total lung volume1
104
Cross-sectional area (cm2)
102
10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 23
Airway generation
The small airways are often considered to be a ‘quiet zone’, because they contribute little to the
total airway resistance of the bronchial tree
Lung compliance
1. Wagner EM, et al. Peripheral lung resistance in normal and asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:584-8.
7
The small airways only contribute to ~10% of
total airway resistance
• Hence, the small airways are known as the ‘silent zone’ of the lung
Impulse oscillometry
Nitrogen washout
FVC: forced vital capacity; FEF25–75: forced expiratory flow between 25–75% of FVC; RV: residual volume; CC: closing capacity; CV: closing
volume; HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography; eNO: exhaled nitric oxide
1. Contoli M, et al. Allergy 2010;65:141-151; 2. Kaminsky DA, et al. J Appl Physiol 2004;97:1849-58.
9
1. Specific lung function parameters can be
used to assess the small airways
FVC FVC
RV
RV
FVC: forced vital capacity; FEF25–75: forced expiratory flow between 25–75% of FVC; RV: residual volume
Inspiration Expiration
Air trapping
The technique allows for indirect assessment of small airway inflammation in particular with regards
to air trapping on expiration
20 III
10
II
I
0
TLC
Lung volume CV RV
CC
In the single-breath test, increased closing volume (CV) or closing capacity (CC), and an
increase in the phase III slope of the washout curve reflect air trapping
RV: residual volume; CC: closing capacity; CV: closing volume; TLC: total lung capacity
Adapted from: GINA Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2011 (update)
15
Asthma inflammation is evident in the small
airways
200
Eosinophils (EG2)/mm2
Small
airways
100 Large
airways
*
n=16
0
>2 <2
Internal airway diameter (mm)
An increased eosinophil count has been observed in the small airways of asthma patients
Subepithelial fibrosis
Lumen occlusion (mucous plug)
Reproduced from: Contoli M, et al. Allergy 2010;65:141-151 with permission from John Wiley and Sons.
17
Peripheral resistance is significantly increased in mild
asthma with normal lung function (L) & in nocturnal asthma
(R)
* *
0.07
0.069
(cm H2O/mL/min)
0.06
0.05
7 fold
0.04 increase
0.03
0.02
*
0.01
n=15
0 0.009 n=18
Healthy Patients with Non-nocturnal Nocturnal
subjects mild asthma asthma asthma
stimulation increases
*
peripheral lung
0.19
resistance in patients
0.1
with mild asthma2
0 NS
0.09
0.07
0.05
n=14
-0.1
Pre-challenge Post-challenge Pre-challenge Post-challenge
Cool, dry air is a stimulus which can be used to mimic exercise-induced asthma
1. Anderson SD, et al. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;6:37-42; 2. Adapted from: Kaminsky DA, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1784-90
19
Summary
• The small airways account for the majority of bronchial tree
generations and the vast proportion of total lung volume
• Inflammation in the small airways is an important feature of asthma
and is associated with pathological changes in this lung
compartment
1. Weibel ER. Morphometry of the Human Lung, Academic Press, 1963; 2. Contoli M, et al. Allergy 2010;65:141-151;
3. Hamid Q, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:44-51; 4. Kraft M, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1551-6;
5. In ‘t Veen JC, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1902-1906; 6. Zeidler MR, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:1075-1081; 20
7. Wagner EM, et al. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:584-8; 8. Kaminsky DA, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1784-90.
III. GINA Guideline recommendations in
asthma treatment
21
GINA Guideline for Asthma Management
Since 1993
1995 NHLBI/WHO
Workshop report
Adapted from: GINA Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2011 (update ). www.ginasthma.org
23
Assessment of current clinical control is a
cornerstone of asthma management
1. Assessment of current clinical control (preferably over 4 weeks)
Characteristic Partly controlled
Controlled
(Any measure Uncontrolled
(All of the following)
present)
*Any exacerbation should prompt review of maintenance treatment to ensure that it is adequate; † By definition, an exacerbation in any week makes that an
uncontrolled week; ‡ Without administration of bronchodilator, lung function is not a reliable test for children 5 years and younger
24
Adapted from: GINA Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2011 (update). www.ginasthma.org
Step-up therapy in childhood asthma with ICS
Step 2Step3
Adapted from: GINA Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2011 (update).
1. Removed the asthma indication of Single-agent LABA
by FDA in 2008
Seretide
oxis
Taiwan Indication
• 使用劑量 :
成人 : 每天一次 , 每次 2 puffs
小孩 : 每天一次 , 每次 1 puff
• Pharmacology :
1. Conversion to an active metabolite
2. High pulmonary deposition and retention
3. High protein binding
4. Low bioavailability
Estimated equipotent daily doses of ICSs for
adults†
*Approved for once-daily dosing in mild patients ; †Comparison based upon efficacy data
‡Patients considered for high daily doses except for short periods should be referred to a specialist for assessment to consider alternative combinations
of controllers. Maximum recommended doses are arbitrary but with prolonged use are associated with increased risk of systemic side effects.
30
Adapted from: GINA Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2011 (update ). www.ginasthma.org
IV. Ideal properties of an ICS for asthma
treatment
particle size
distribution generated
by a DPI
10 10
Rapid inhalation is
needed to produce a
high proportion of
0 0 particles within the
1.0 10.0 100.0 1.0 10.0 100.0 respirable range
DPI: dry powder inhaler; PIF: peak inspiratory flow; MMAD: mass median aerodynamic diameter
懸浮液 溶液
Shaken
before use - - + - +
Particle
Size(um) 1.1-2.1 5 3.4-4.0 5 3.4-4.0
Ciclesonide 52%
HFA-MDI solution
HF
AM
Fluticasone DPI 12% DI
52%
Fluticasone
16%
HFA-MDI suspension
Budesonide MDI 22 - 28%
Budesonide DPI 28 %
Deposition characteristics of 99mTc-labeled CIC (ex-actuator) ;Leach CL, et al. Chest. 2002;122:510-516.; Borgström L, et
al. Eur Respir J. 1994;7:69-73. Pickering H, et al. Clin Ther. 2000;22:1483-1493.; Hirst PH, et al. Respir Med. 2001;95:720-
727. Thorsson L, et al. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:529-538.; Thorsson L, et al. Eur Respir J. 1994;7:1839-1844.
2. Prolonged Activity in the Lungs
Importance of lipophilicity
• 支氣管內皮細胞中進行快速的代謝作用
Mutch E, et al. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(suppl 45):267s-268s. Abstract P1749. Nave R, et al. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med. 2003;167:A771. Abstract A1510. Nave R, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:A91.
Data on file, ALTANA Pharma.
3. Ciclesonide is highly plasma protein-bound,
reducing the risk of systemic side effects1
25
15
13%
12%
10%
10
5
Plasma protein binding
ensures that only 1% of 1% 1% 1%
ciclesonide and des-CIC is 0
unbound in the systemic CIC1 des-CIC1 MOM2 FP3 BUD4 BDP5
circulation
Only unbound systemic drug fractions can exert unwanted systemic pharmacological
effects
Alvesco 是蛋白結合率極高 . 到達全身的量非常低
CIC: ciclesonide; des-CIC: desisobutyryl ciclesonide; MOM: mometasone furoate; FP: fluticasone; BUD: budesonide; BDP: beclomethasone dipropionate
1. Nave R, et al. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004;43:479-486; 2. Affrime MB, et al. J Clin Pharmacol 2000;40:1227-1236;
3. Rohatagi S, et al. J Clin Pharmacol 1996;36:938-941; 4. Ryrfeldt A, et al. Eur J Respir Dis 1982;122(suppl):86-95; 41
5. Martin LE, et al. Postgrad Med J 1975;51:11-20.
4. Ideal ICS should have high receptor affinity
Brand Alvesco Pulmicort Duasma Flixotide Flixotide
MDI DPI MDI Accuhaler Evohaler
(DPI) (MDI)
Active
Ciclesonide Budesonide Fluticason propionate
Ingredient
Dose
160μg/puff 200μg/puff 250μg/puff
Oral deposition 48%
72% 72% 88% 84%
(CIC)
Protein binding
99% 88% 90%
GR affinity CIC:12
935 1800
Des-CIC: 1200
Activity drug
Des-CIC Budesonide Fudicason propionate
Pro-durg
+ - -
5. Ciclesonide has a low oral bioavailability1
Ciclesonide1 <1
Beclomethasone dipropionate3 41
Budesonide4 11
Ciclesonide has low oral bioavailability due to high first pass metabolism and does not appreciably
contribute to the systemic availability of the drug
Swallowed Fraction
Systemic
Orally bioavailable circulation
fraction
Gut absorption
GI tract Liver High
Plasma
protein
binding
High first-pass
metabolism
Systemic
High clearance side effects
44
V. Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability
of ciclesonide
45
In clinical trials
• Clinical Efficacy
– Alvesco vs BUD
– Alvesco vs FP
• Safety
– Long-term use of Alvesco: growth
– Alvesco vs BUD
– Alvesco vs FP
• Tolerability
– Placebo-like tolerability
Ciclesonide once-daily improves FEV1 (L) and reduces
asthma symptoms (R) as effectively as FP
0.6
Change in FEV1 vs. baseline
* ** 0.5
0.5
0.46
after 24 weeks (L)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
n=479
0
Ciclesonide FP HFA
80µg OD 100µg BID
Data are presented as means; *p<0.0001 vs. baseline; **p<0.0001 vs. baseline
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; OD: once-daily; BID: twice-daily
Adapted from: Dahl R, et al. Respir Med 2010;104:1121-1130. Boulet LP, et al. Respir Med 2007;101:1677-1686 with permission from Elsevier. 47
Once-daily ciclesonide achieves a greater reduction
in eNO than twice-daily fluticasone propionate
2 weeks 4 weeks 8 weeks 12 weeks
0
eNO reduction from baseline (%)
-10
-20
-30
eNO: exhaled nitric oxide; OD: once-daily; BID: twice-daily; FP: fluticasone propionate; CIC: ciclesonide
*p<0.05 vs. fluticasone propionate
Ciclesonide 200μg OD
Randomized, open-label, parallel group study with a treatment period of 8 weeks to compare the
effectiveness of a small particle ICS (ciclesonide) and a large particle ICS (fluticasone DPI) on
small airway function
Fluticasone propionate *DPI: particle size 5.4µm diameter; ciclesonide HFA: particle size of 1.1µm diameter
OD: once-daily; BID: twice-daily; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; DPI: dry powder inhaler
0.01 2.5
NS *
2
0 1.5
Fluticasone propionate
100µg BID 1
-0.01
0.5
NS
-0.02 0
-0.02 Ciclesonide
* -0.5 200µg OD
Ciclesonide Fluticasone propionate
100µg BID
200µg OD n=30 -1
-0.03 n=30
*p<0.05 vs. baseline; NS: not significant; OD: once-daily; BID: twice-daily
All patients were pretreated with fluticasone propionate 100μg twice-daily during an 8 week run-in period
51
Once-daily ciclesonide significantly improves
symptom-, rescue medication-, nocturnal awakening-
free days and FEV1 in children than FP
60 0.15
Days
(%)
40 0.1
20 0.05
0 0
Symptom- Rescue Nocturnal
free medication- awakening- FP 88µg BID CIC 80µg OD CIC 160µg OD
days free days free days
-0.06
-0.2
baseline (nmol/mmol)
-0.4
-0.6 -0.67
-0.8
-1.0
-1.21
-1.2
* n=744
-1.4
Age 6–11 years
Adapted from: Pedersen S et al. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2009;22:214–220
1.2 *
Change from baseline in body height
1.18
1
0.8
(cm)
0.6 0.7
0.4
0.2
n=84
0
CIC 160µg OD BUD HFA 400µg OD
Age 6–11 years
Reproduced from: Von Berg A et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2007;18:391-400
8
7
6
(cm)
5
4
3
2
1
0
n=661
3 months 6 months 12 months 3 months 6 months 12 months 3 months 6 months 12 months
OD: once-daily
Adapted from: Skoner DP, et al. Pediatrics 2008;121:e1-e14.
57
Oropharyngeal deposition with ciclesonide is
low1,2
4500
Low oropharyngeal
4000 deposition helps to avoid
Concentration in mouth-rinsing
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
n=18
0
Time after inhalation: 4 minutes 25 minutes 4 minutes 25 minutes
Ciclesonide + des-CIC Fluticasone propionate
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; DPI: dry powder inhaler; PEF: peak expiratory flow
1. Dahl R, et al. Respir Med 2010;104:1121-1130; 2. Boulet LP, et al. Respir Med 2007;101:1677-1686; 3. Adachi M, et al. Respirology 2007;12:573-580;
4. Cohen J, et al. Eur Respir J 2008;31:1213–1220; 5. Hoshino M. Allergol Int 2010;59:59-66; 6. Pedersen S et al. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2009;22:214–220
7. Derom E, et al. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2005;18:328-336; 8. Skoner DP, et al. Pediatrics 2008;121:e1-e14 60
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide (with
or without spacer) in children with asthma
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 doses of ciclesonide (with
or without spacer) in children with persistent asthma.
Patients and methods: This was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-
controlled, 12-week study of ciclesonide 40, 80 or 160 mg (once daily pm).
Children (6-11 years) were randomised 1:1 to treatment via a MDI or MDI +
spacer. The primary variable was change from baseline in mean morning
PEF. Secondary variables included: time to first lack of efficacy (LOE),
asthma control, FEV1, and asthma symptom score Safety assessments
included: adverse events (AEs), urinary cortisol excretion and body height.
Results: In total, 1073 children received treatment. At endpoint, mean
morning PEF significantly improved with all doses of ciclesonide vs.
placebo. There was no difference over placebo in time to first LOE, but
ciclesonide was superior to placebo on asthma control, symptom score,
and FEV1. There were no differences between the spacer or non-
spacer.