a.

That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
b. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
c. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
d. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
e. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
f. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

g. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
h. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
i. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
j. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
k. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
l. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

m. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
n. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
o. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
p. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
q. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
r. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

s. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
t. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
u. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
v. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
w. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
x. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

y. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
z. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
aa. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
bb. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
cc. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
dd. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

ee. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ff. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
gg. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
hh. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ii. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
jj. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

kk. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ll. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
mm. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
nn. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
oo. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
pp. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
qq. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
rr. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
ss. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
tt. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
uu. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
vv. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

ww. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
xx. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
 Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
yy. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
zz. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
aaa. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
bbb. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

ccc. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ddd. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
eee. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
fff. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ggg. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
hhh. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

iii. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
jjj. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
kkk. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
lll. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
mmm. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
nnn. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
ooo. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ppp. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
qqq. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
rrr. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
sss. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
ttt. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

uuu. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
vvv. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
 Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
www. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
xxx. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
yyy. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
zzz. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

aaaa. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
bbbb. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
cccc. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
dddd. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
eeee. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
ffff. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

gggg. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
hhhh. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
iiii. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
jjjj. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
kkkk. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
llll. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
mmmm. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which
is matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
nnnn. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
oooo. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
pppp. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
qqqq. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
rrrr. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

ssss. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
tttt. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
uuuu. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
vvvv. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
wwww. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and
clear violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
xxxx. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

yyyy. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
zzzz. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
aaaaa. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
bbbbb. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ccccc. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
 Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
ddddd. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

eeeee. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
fffff. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
ggggg. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
hhhhh. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
iiiii. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
jjjjj. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.

kkkkk. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
 inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
lllll. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
mmmmm. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to
the appellant. He has been condemned unheard.
nnnnn. That it reflects from the charges that various factual controversies are involved which is
matter of inquiry and cannot be resolved without holding a regular and full-fledged
inquiry but the authority did not conduct any regular inquiry without assigning any
reasons. Reliance is placed on 2007 SCMR 192 and 2006 SCMR 846.
ooooo. That no show cause notice was ever served upon the appellant which is sheer and clear
violation of principle of natural justice as guaranteed by the Article 10 of the
Constitution 1973 of the country. It is also violation of principle of Audi alterem
Partem, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
ppppp. That the impugned order is exparte and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the
appellant. He has been condemned unheard.