Religion and globalism have a complex relationship. While they seem to clash in their beliefs, with religion focusing on spiritual matters and globalism on material wealth, in reality both religion and globalism appropriate aspects of each other. Some key points of interaction include religions embracing global expansion and secular ideas, while globalization empowers religious communities and spreads religious ideas globally. Overall, religion is both opposing and enabling force in globalization.
Religion and globalism have a complex relationship. While they seem to clash in their beliefs, with religion focusing on spiritual matters and globalism on material wealth, in reality both religion and globalism appropriate aspects of each other. Some key points of interaction include religions embracing global expansion and secular ideas, while globalization empowers religious communities and spreads religious ideas globally. Overall, religion is both opposing and enabling force in globalization.
Religion and globalism have a complex relationship. While they seem to clash in their beliefs, with religion focusing on spiritual matters and globalism on material wealth, in reality both religion and globalism appropriate aspects of each other. Some key points of interaction include religions embracing global expansion and secular ideas, while globalization empowers religious communities and spreads religious ideas globally. Overall, religion is both opposing and enabling force in globalization.
difficult relationship with globalism. • First , the two are contrasting belief systems . Religion Globalism • Concerned with the sacred • Places value on material wealth • Follows the divine commandments Abides by human –made laws.
• Assumes the possibility of
communication between humans and transcendent • The link between human and divine confers some social power on divine. • God, Allah, Yahweh defines • Globalism yardstick is how and judges human action in much of human action can terms of moral terms (good lead to the highest or bad ) maximum satisfaction a d subsequent wisdom that this new status produces. • Religious people are less • Globalist are less worried concerned with wealth and about –whether they will all that comes along with it - end –up in heaven or hell. -higher social status • Their skills are more - a standard of living similar pedestrian as they aim to to the rest of the seal deals. community • Raise the profits of private -exposure to culture enterprises - top of the line education • Improve government for the children - revenue collections • A religious person’s main duty • Protect the elites fro being is to live a virtuous , sin-less life such that he can be excessively tax by the state assured of a place in the other and naturally enrich world. themselves . • They are ascetics because they shun anything material for its complete simplicity from their If he has a social conscience , domain to the clothes they wear , the food they eat and the globalist sees his work even to the food they eat and as contributing to the even to the manner in which general progress of the they talk. community . (lots of parables and allegories that are that are supposedly the language of the divine . • Globalist trained to be • Religious aspires to be saint shrewd businessman
• The religious detest politics • Globalist values them both
and the quest for power – as means and ends to open- for they are evidence of up further the economies of humanity’s weakness the world. • Religion and globalism clash over the fact that religious evangelization is in itself a form of globalization . • The religious is concerned • Globalist ideal is largely with the spreading holy focused on the realm of ideas globally. markets • The globalist wishes the spread of goods and services. • The missions being sent by the American-Born Again Christian Churches , Sufi, Shiites Muslim orders ,as well as institutions like Buddhist Monasteries , Catholics , Protestants , Mormons –churches are efforts of spreading the words of God and gaining adherents abroad. • Religion regard identities associated with globalism (citizenship, language and race )as inferior and narrow because they are earthly categories . • In contrast membership to religious group , organization or cult represents a superior affiliation that connects human directly to the divine and the supernatural. • Being a Christian , a Muslim or Buddhist places one in a higher plane than just being a Filipino, a Spanish speaker or an Anglo-Saxon. • These philosophical differences explain why certain groups flee their communities and create impenetrable sanctuaries where they cam practice their religions without the meddling and control of state authorities. Followers of Dalai Lama • Established Tibet for this purpose and certain Buddhist monasteries are located away from civilization so that hermits can devote themselves to prayer and contemplation. • These isolationist justifications are also used by the Rizalistas of Mt Banahaw, the Essenes during Roman-controlled Judea (now Israel) and for certain period ,the Mormons of Utah . • These groups believe that living with non- believers will distract them from their mission or tempt them to abandon their faith and become sinners like everyone else. • Communities justify their opposition to government authority on religious grounds. • Priestesses and monks led the first revolts against colonialism in Asia and Africa, warning that these outsiders were out to destroy their people’s gods and ways of life . • Similar arguments are being invoked by contemporary versions of these millenarian movements that wish to break away from the hold of the state or vow to overthrow the latter in the name of God. • To their prophets , the state seeks to either destroy their people’s sacred beliefs or distort religion to serve non-religious goals. Realities • In actuality, the relationship between religion and globalism is much more complicated . Peter Berger • Argues that far from being secularized , the contemporary world is furiously religious. • In most of the world there are veritable explosions of religious fervor , occurring in one form of another in all major religious traditions – • Christianity , Judaism , Islam,Hinduism,Buddhism and even Confucianism (if one wants to call it a religion )-and in many places in imaginative syntheses of one or more world religions with indigenous faiths. Religions • are the foundations of modern republics • The Malaysian government places religion at the center of its political system . • Its Constitution explicitly states that Islam is the religion of the Federation and the rulers of each state was also the Head of the religion of Islam. • The late Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini bragged about the superiority of Islamic rule over its secular counterparts and pointed out that there is no fundamental distinction among constitutional despotic , dictatorial , democratic and communistic regime . • To Khomeini , all secular ideologies were the same –they were flawed and • Islamic rule was the superior form of government because it was spiritual , yet Iran calls itself a republic , a term that is associated with the secular. NAHDLATUL ULAMA • Religious movements do not hesitate to appropriate secular themes and practices . • Moderate Muslim Association NAHDLATUL ULAMA in Indonesia has Islamic schools where students are taught not only about Islam but also about modern science, social sciences, modern banking, civic education , rights of women , pluralism and democracy. • In other cases , religion was the result of the shift in state policy. Church of England • shaped by the rationality of modern democratic (and bureaucratic culture ) • King Henry VIII broke away from Roman Catholicism and establish his own church to bolster his own power. In the United States • Religion and law were fused together to help build a modern secular society. • It was observed in the early 1800s by French historian and diplomat ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE, “ not only do Americans practice their religion out of self-interest ,but they often even place in this world the interest of which they are practicing”. Jose Casanova confirms that : • According to him ,religion has always been at the center of all great political conflicts and movements of social reform . • From independence to abolition • From nativism to women’s suffrage • From prohibition to civil rights movement Religion has been at the center of these conflicts , but also on both sides of the political barricades. • It remains the case until today. Religion for or against Globalization • There is hardly a religious movement today that does not use religion to oppose profane globalization. • Yet , two of the old world religions – Christianity and Islam see globalization LESS as an OBSTACLE and MORE AS AN OPPORTUNITY to expand their reach all over the world. • Globalization has freed communities from from the constraints of the nation-state, but in the process also threatened to destroy the cultural system that bind them together. • Religion seeks to take the place of these broken ties to either help communities cope with their new situation or organize them to oppose this major transformation of their lives it can provide the groups moral codes that answer problems ranging from health to social conflict to even personal happiness. • Religion is thus not the regressive force that stops or slows down globalization, it is a PRO- ACTIVE FORCE that give the communities a new and a powerful basis of identity. • It is an instrument with which religious people can put their mark in the re-shaping of this globalized world , although in its own terms. • Religious fundamentalism may dislike globalization’s materialism , but it continues to use the full range of modern means of communication and organization that is associated with this economic transformation. • It has tapped “fast long distance transport and communication , the availability of English as a global vernacular unparalleled power , the know-how of modern management and marketing “ which enabled the spread of almost promiscuous propagation of religious forms across the globe in all sorts of direction.” • It is therefore not entirely not entirely correct to assume the proliferation of Born-again groups or in the case of Islam , the rise of movements like DAESH (more popularly known as ISIS –Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) signals religion’s defense against materialism of globalization . • It is in fact the opposite . • The fundamentalist organizations are the result of the spread of globalization and both find ways to benefit or take advantage of each other. • While religion may benefit from the processes of globalization , this does not mean that its tension with globalist ideology will subside. • Some Muslims view globalization as a Trojan Horse hiding supporters of Western values like secularism, liberalism or even communism ready to spread these ideas in their areas to eventually displace Islam. World Council of Churches • An association of different protestant congregations –has criticized economic globalization ‘s negative effects. • It vowed that “ we as churches make ourselves accountable to the victims of the project of economic globalization by becoming the latter's advocates inside and outside the centers of powers. Catholic Church • And its dynamic leader –Pope Francis, likwise condemned globalization’s throw –away culture and is fatally destined to suffocate hope and increase risks and threats . Lutheran World Federation 10th Assembly 292 –page declaration • Message included economic and feminist critiques of globalization • Sharing the voices of the members of the church who were appointed by globalization and • Contemplation on the different pastoral and ethical reflections that members could use to guide their opposition. • Our world is split asunder by forces we often do not understand but that result in stark contrast between those who benefit and those who are harmed , especially under the forces of globalization. • Today , there is a desperate need for healing from terrorism , its causes and fearful reactions to it. • Relationships in this world continue to be ruptured due to greed , injustices and various form of violence. • These advocacies to reverse or mitigate economic globalization eventually gained the attention of globalist institutions . 1998: World Bank • Brought in religious leaders in its discussion about global poverty , leading eventually to a cautious , muted and qualified collaboration in 2000. • Although , it yielded insignificant results(the World Bank agreed to support some faith- based anti-poverty projects in Ethiopia and Kenya ) • It was evident that the institutional advocates of economic globalization could be responsive to the liberationist, moral critiques of economic globalization (including many writings on social justice coming from the religious. • With the exception of militant Islam, religious forces are well-aware that they are in no position to fight for comprehensive alternative to globalizing status quo. • What Catholics call the, “PREFERENTIAL OPTION FOR THE POOR” is a powerful message of mobilization but lacks substance when it comes to working out a replacement system that can change the poor’s condition in concrete ways. • The terrorism of the ISIS is unlikely to create a CALIPHTE governed by justice and stability.
• In Iran, the unchallenged superiority of a
religious autocracy has stifled all freedom of expression , distorted democratic rituals like elections and tainted opposition. Conclusions: • For a phenomenon that” is about everything “, it is odd that globalization is seen to have very little to do with religion. Peter Bayer and Lori Beaman observed that: • Religion , it seems is somehow, outside – looking at globalization as a problem or potential . • One reason for this perspective, is the association of globalization with modernization, which is the concept of progress that is based on science , technology, reason and the laws. • With reason , one will have to look elsewhere than to moral discourse for fruitful thinking about economic globalization and religion. • Religion, being a belief system that cannot be empirically proven , and is therefore anathema to modernization. • The thesis that modernization will erode religious practices is often called SECULARIZATION THEORY. • Historian, political scientists and philosophers have now debunked much of secularization theory . Samuel Hungtinton • One of the strongest defenders of globalization admits in his book , THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATION -that civilization can be held together by religious worldviews . -this belief is a hardly new . -as far as the 15th century, Jesuits and Dominicans used religion as an ideological armature to legitimize the Spanish empire. Max Weber • Observed the correlation between religion and capitalism as an economic system. Calvinism • Branch of Protestantism • Believed that God , therefore has already decided who would and would not be saved • Calvinist , therefore made their mission to search for clues as to their fate and in pursuit , they redefined the meaning of profit and acquisition . • This inner-worldly ascetism –as Weber referred to this Protestant ethic –contributed to the rise of modern capitalism . • It was because of moral arguments that religious people were able to justify their political involvement . • When the Spaniards occupied lands in the Americas and the Philippines , it was done in the name of the Spanish King and God , for empire comes from God alone. Then , over 300 years later ,American President William McKinley claimed that “ after a night of prayer and soul-searching , he had concluded that it was the duty of the United States to educate the Filipinos and uplift and civilize and Christianize them and by God’s grace do the very best we could by them”. • Religious leaders have used religion to wield influence in political arena either as outsiders , criticizing the pitfalls of pro-globalization regimes or as integral members of coalitions who play key roles in policy decision-making and the implementation of government projects. Perdition • The warnings of perdition (hell is place prepared by Allah for those who do not believe in Him, rebel against His laws and reject his messengers ) • The promises of salvation (but our citizenship is in heaven ) • And their obligatory pilgrimages (visit to Bethlehem or Mecca )-religions are actually malleable . • Their resilience has been extraordinary that have outlasted secular ideologies (communism ) • Globalist ,therefore , have no choice but to accept the reality that religion is here to stay. Reference: • Claudio, L. (2018).The Contemporary World. C and E Publishing. Quezon City :Philippines.