Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The side that “affirms” or argues for the proposition or The side that argues the status quo, against the
change proposition.
Has burden of proof, therefore goes first and last. Can cast doubt on the arguments or proposition, not
introduce alternative
Must outline the case and introduce new points of Responds by refuting Affirmative, rather than
argument formulating new arguments
STEP 2: Research! - Over Winter Break
Now that you know your topic and the side you will debate, you will need to do some research. Use the charts
below to organize your claims, key quotes and statistics, and make notes on reasoning and credibility. You will
also want to collect some opposition research, including the opposition’s claims, so that you are able to build your
crossfire and rebuttal. Finally, you will collect a works cited list of credible sources.
Your Side:
Claim #1 Julie Bindel interviewed a sex trade survivor, she stated about
Decriminalizing prostitution would make it sex work, “There is no way to make it safe.” The people who
easier for sex workers to escape violence, as work is this industry have and are already weaving through the
they would not have to fear arrest when law, by decriminalizing sex work you are immediatly ignoring
making a report human trafficking and pimping which has been illegally
flourishing on it’s own. This doesn’t make prostitutes any less
safe when the people they work around are the same.
● Interviews with prostituted individuals in New Zealand
reveal that a majority of prostituted people in the
country did not feel as if decriminalization had curbed
the violence they experience, demonstrating that
prostitution is inherently violent and abusive. (Report of
the Prostitution Law Review Committee : pp. 14)
Claim #2 While we agree that women have the right to choose what they
Bodily Autonomy want to do with their bodies, decriminalization of sex work is
not a viable option. As stated previously, prostitution is not a
real choice as it surfaces from desperation.
Claim #3 This would actually make it harder for sex workers to get out of
Decriminalizing prostitution would allow sex the industry. Decriminalization of sex work will make it easier
workers to ger back on their feet and find for people to get these jobs and be sucked into the industry. Just
better jobs and housing without having because it is legal doesn’t mean it isn’t frowned upon any less
prostitution arrests on their record by the majority. Sex wokers may not have a crminal record but
they will have a much harder time removing themselves from
that form of work.
Works Cited: Add your list of credible sources in here. Make sure to use proper MLA citations. You will put
together a formal team copy of this to turn in on Debate Day!
Sex work is a multi billion dollar industy. Although it functions almost completely illegally it heavily affects
everyone around them. It can disturb people’s safety, reputation, and their normal day to day lives. That’s why
my partner and I do not think DC should not pass the Sex work Decriminalization Bill. Legalizing sex work
would directly increase human traffiicking rates. Janet Rodriguez, a human trafficking survivor says,
“separating prostitution from human trafficking is impossible.” New Zealand legalized prostitution, and instead
of a safer business, it resulted in brothels becoming locations for rape and pimps being able to control what
prostitutes do and what they’re paid, rather than setting their own rates and boundaries as they did previously.
Sex trade rates would dramatically increase in DC as there is no longer a legal deterrent making it a sex tourism
hot spot. As the capital of the United States, it would be univiting to be known as a sex trade hub, especially
where international affairs are centered. Research done by Demand Abolition surveyed over 8,000 males
around the country and found that, if sex work was legalized, they “would see a 20 percent jump in the number
of people willing pay for sex.” / 1 in 5 men who have not participated in the sex industry say they would buy
sex if it was legal”. Moreover, it is an inherently violent and frowned upon industry. After New Zealand
decriminalized prostitution in 2003, there were still reports among prostituted persons of “continuing stigma”
and “harassment by the general public.” In addition, there was little difference in disclosure of occupation to
healthcare professionals before and after decriminalization. (The Impact of the Prostitution Reform Act on the
Health and Safety practices of Sex Workers: pp. 11 and 12). This wouldn’t help previous sex workers to
remove themselves from this industry, or in other words, get back on their feet. Passing this bill would
ultimately negatively affect DC and the sex workers themselves.
Crossfire #1 (3 minutes):
● Be prepared with questions for your opponents. You will add questions to this section BASED ON
WHAT THEY SAID
● Answer your opponent as succinctly as possible. Don’t evade and try to be honest. Be prepared to fire
back with a question of your own
Brainstorm questions you will ask the opposition here, but leave room to add more as you listen to the debate:
● How will you stop/reduce abuse and violence before it happens?
● If this bill was passed, does the law enforcement have to completely rely on sex workers to reach out
for help in their own? How will you know that they will report?
● How do you feel about DC becoming a mecca for sex tourism?
● How do you plan to control/regulate illegal sex work like trafficking, underage workers, and pimping.
● If the bill was passed, Is it possible to properly regulate these laws when sex work has been working
through the law for decades?
My opponent has wrongfully claimed that the decriminalization of sex work will provide bodily autonomy,
reduce violence and increase access to justice. [Debater’s name] has only scratched the surface of the sex work
industry and has overlooked the deeper and inherent nature of it. The legalization of prostitution would serve to
increase prostitution rates and worsen the issues that my opponent claims decriminalization will resolve. We
concede that workers have the right to their own bodies, however, prostitution is not an active choice for the
majority of workers. Melissa Farley, founder of the Prostitution Research and Education organization, has found
that over 85% of sex workers do not wish to be prostitutes; their unlivable conditions have forced them into
such roles and therefore one cannot claim that prostitution provides autonomy. We further disagree with the
opposition’s illegitimate claim that legalization will reduce violence as prostitution’s violent nature cannot be
remedied. In interview with writer Julie Bindel, sex work survivors have declared that there is “no way to make
it safe.” According to a New Zealand study, where sex work was legalized, the majority of prostituted
individuals have revealed that they do not believe decriminalization had curbed the violence they experience.
As the Washington Post reports, “Giving legal immunity to the men who buy sex or profit from it will create a
demand that will lead to more young girls and women forced into the sex trade.” Legalization would only bring
more workers into the industry, causing more people to lose their autonomy as they are subjected to what is
essentially compensated assault. In addition, the legalization of sex work would not increase access to justice or
make the industry more ethical and safe. Legal reports from the Netherlands, another country with legalized
prostitution, have reported that decriminalization has provided a front of legitimacy that allows for sexual
exploitation and makes it easier for traffickers to operate and escape charges. Working conditions have also
worsened, as workers who previously were self employed are pressured into registering under a brothel rather
than working self employed. By putting their work in the hands of another, they are surrendering their
autonomy and may be subjected to actions they don’t wish to partake in, as well as likely being compensated
less. To conclude, my opponent’s arguments are invalid as the legalization of sex work expands the industry
and subjects more workers to an inherently violent and dangerous occupation.
Crossfire #2 (3 minutes):
● Be prepared with questions for your opponents. You will add questions to this section BASED ON
WHAT THEY SAID
● Answer your opponent as succinctly as possible. Don’t evade and try to be honest. Be prepared to fire
back with a question of your own
- How will the United States be different than other countries whose legalization efforts have had
negative outcomes?
- How do you propose to reduce trafficking rates/keep them regulated?
- How are prostitutes going to prove assault and how will perpetrators actually be charged?
- Do you honestly think that prostitution is healthy and safe for workers? If not, then how do you defend
the fact that legalization will bring more workers into this harmful trade?
Summary Speech (2 minutes): Summarize the main points in the debate and your side’s main arguments.
Grand Crossfire (3 minutes): Brainstorm questions that you will ask the opposition to drive home the
rightness of your argument and wrongness of their argument.
Final Focus Speech (2 minutes): Tell the judge why your side won the debate. For this part, you will speak
directly to the judge.
While the decriminalization of sex work may be a difficult issue for some parties to connect with, my partner
and I worked to understand the perspectives and backgrounds of those it would most directly affect. My
opposition advocates for the passing of D.C.’s Sex Work Decriminalization Bill but fails to recognize that
legalization would only serve to further endanger sex workers and U.S. citizens. In order to best protect these
individuals, it is imperative that D.C. does not legalize sex work. My side has effectively argued this point by
completing thorough research, acknowledging our opposition’s claims, and critically analyzing the potential
effects of the bill. The use of a variety of sources that extend internationally as well as directly from sex
workers has allowed us to gain the majority perspective and prove that the negative outcomes heavily outweigh
the few potential benefits of legalization.
● 9:00am Meet in our Interdisciplinary Zoom to get instructions for the day