Big data and global recruitment in MNC’s

Introduction
Throughout the last decades, the use of Big Data has become widely common among
Multinational corporations, i.e. vast amounts of structured and unstructured data produced by
routine organizational activities (Mayer and Cukier, 2013). The reasons for this are well proven:
storage costs (in both formats) have decreased sharply, while technology for data processing
(sensors, wearables, etc.) is still cheap. Around the same time, methods that enable organizations
to manipulate and manage stored data are now integrated into standard applications, enabling
professionals to easily derive information from their data and use it to enhance their
organizational performance. According to the needs of clinicians, university academics have
begun thinking about the application and effect of Big Data within organizations. Work has
grown in this field in two major areas: first, they have sought to describe how organizations have
used their massive data holdings to enhance results (Davenport et al. 2010). We have already
seen that, due to various their increased capacity to leverage their big data, companies prefer to
follow new strategic decision-making frameworks "data-driven" through various business
functions (Beath, al. 2012). Second, a report by McAfee and Brynjolfsson (2012). The analysis
has quantified the influence of evidence-based models on company performance: organizations
that use big data to shape their strategy and verdict processes are better than those that don't.
More precisely, these firms were 5% more profitable on average than their counterparts were in
the same industry.

Figure 1 – the ways in which top MNC’s are using big data analysis
The value development advantages of talent analytics are obvious. For example, if a company
can establish a causal link between training expense and productivity, it can build a training plan
that can have a concrete profitability effect. The advent of talent analytics as a distinct area of
market intelligence was quite sluggish considering its possible benefits (OrgVue 2019). In
Deloitte's 2014 Global Human Resource Dynamics report, surveyed organizations found that
they understand the value of developing capacity for talent analysis but also showed major holes
in their internal preparation.

In addition, only 15 percent of respondents said that talent analytics is of crucial significance in
their company in a survey conducted by Falletta (2014).

Lawler et al. (2015) produced similar findings, but further reports found that the use of talent
profiling in some fields was common due to data access. All this has evolved rapidly, though: for
example, the IBM 2016 study on talent analysis showed that in the past 2 years the use of
predictive analytics had grown by 40 percent. A number of factors (OrgVue 2019) have driven
interest in talent analytics;

a) The widespread use of metrics in marketing, financing and other business functions has
contributed to the understanding that data use can lead to value development.
b) The availability of cheap systems has made it simple and visually enticing to capture,
store, and process data.
c) The increasing application of metrics by HR teams also had driven companies to invest in
quantitative skills growth by HR practitioners.

Some companies also find out that analytics will allow them to handle uncertainties (OrgVue
2019), as they will help to evaluate risk factors, build mitigating plans (CRF 2017) and finally
match HRM activities with results.

Big data and recruitments

Big data was defined by Dedic and Stanier (2016) as a label widely used to classify large
quantities of data generated by sensors, wearable devices and social media platforms. Big data
could have been from multiple formats such as structured and unstructured data, but it has been
found out that the most popular kind of big data is unstructured data (i.e. data whose underlying
data structures are unclear). The 3 V’s (Akter et al. 2016) are commonly used to describe Big
Data as volume, speed and variety. Volume refers to the sum of data collected by a variety of
outlets, including social media, enterprise and the internet of things. The other V is the rate at
which the data are produced and the third V is the speed at which the data is produced.
Additional aspects of big data were established, namely uncertainty and sophistication (McAfee
& Brynjolfsson, 2012).

Variability depends on the frequency of information (i.e. may be either regular, hourly and real-
time), although uncertainty means that due to divergent data schemes influencing data
processing, the multiplicity of the data sources makes it impossible to deal with them. Many
companies store complex data by using the databases. Databases are typically cloud-based and
are highly effective for monitoring and data presentation. Stored records contains information
about the employee, holidays, operating hours, timesheets, etc. The 'data lake' idea has become
very common in the sense of big data management. Data lakes make it easier for businesses to
store several forms of data at a low cost because they do not need data transformation to match a
specified data model. For knowledge seeking rather than research, data lakes are incredibly
useful. Data lakes supplement data centers in data management that typically use an integrated
data model and hence facilitate reporting and advanced analytics (usually requiring a data
scheme). Analytics is a phrase widely common in the business world since the idea of big data is
gaining popularity (Joseph and Johnson, 2013).

Although the term is sometimes used as a synonym for big data, the two words are in fact
somewhat different. In reality, analytics refer to methodologies for analyzing vast data stored by
organizations. Any of the work has been undertaken to identify the various kinds of analytical
firms which may be used and Tells implies that there are three distinct types of analytic that are
applicable to the enterprise. Description analytics analyze data trends and use mathematical
analysis for data overview and visualization (Rehman et al. 2016). In comparison, predictive
analysis is a collection of methods used to forecast potential effects on the basis of historical
evidence. The core methods for predictive analyses include machine learning’s and prediction
models (Gandomi and Haider 2015). In the end, prescriptive analytical approaches are focused
on modeling, simulation and algorithms to model possible scenarios and their effect on market
performance (Evans and Lindner 2012).
The curiosity of organizations in their personnel data is not new. Although the label "talent
analytics" itself is new, companies have already wanted to understand the data of their workers
to boost their overall performance. Talent analytics may have an intellectual background focused
on the "scientific management" (Kaufman 2014), but there is a growing interest in fact-based
management – that is, decision-making based on various forms of evidence– that is, the major
driver for talent analytics (Barends et al. 2014). In addition to the mark, what is exceptionally
recent is that organisations are able to integrate a number of data streams (both internal and
external to the organization), and use them to resolve critical problems related to recruiting,
retention and managerial tools (CIPD 2013). Furthermore, the use of talent analytics can be used
to calculate returns on acquisitions in some fields and the advantage of a particular compensating
method and can thereby include crucial facts that can guide strategic advancement to the senior
management. In that sense it removes "good feelings" that motivate judgment at the senior level,
which is an important advantage of talent analytics (Guenole et al. 2017). That being said, there
is still some uncertainty about what talent analytics means for HR practitioners in practice,
particularly when it is confusing with other conventional HR-related metrics practices.

In Fink and Sturman (2017), metrics as well as primary measures of success (KPIs) are useful for
evaluating the efficacy of current systems. They should, in other words, analyze the way HR
teams work. The ultimately aim is to define models in order to forecast alternate scenarios that
can influence strategic decision-making (Levenson, 2015). An analogy will explain the
difference, for illustration. Organizations may have policies to enhance their workforce's racial
diversity. Talent analytics will help identify possible initiatives that will improve diversity, for
example, and determine their possible effects on revenue. It does not vary significantly from
what metrics and KPIs are doing when they just capture the current condition (i.e. if the
percentage of workers from ethnic origin has increased).

Conclusion
Big data manipulation gives several chances, as data can be mixed and connected in order to find
trends not found. Even though the use of large data could improve the management of human
resources, the use of big information in the sense of the human resources role remains a gray
area. Workforce data are particularly sensitive and companies have to be vigilant about what data
are to be gathered and what they do about it (Cappelli 2017). The content of emails may be
tracked, for instance, but most organizations will be wary of what they see as an extremely
invasive activity. Increased data from critical sources like wearable devices and cell phone
records are available, putting workers even more accountable (CIPD 2013). Crucially, the GDPR
restricts the employer's right to access personal data at the time of processing for reasons not
defined at the time. The GDPR allows the employer to be kept aware of the processing and use
of the results. Moreover, personal data should only be stored if the reason for which this data is
obtained is originally compliant. In reality, for a different reason manipulating data involves the
express approval of the employee. Finally, if personal data are no longer necessary, it should be
withdrawn from the server indicating the periodic analysis and purification of the HR databases.
Talent analytics, which concentrate on consumer knowledge, are commonly argued not to vary
significantly from customer analytics, for example. In principle, it's accurate in that management
has a better idea of how the workforce operates, but when working with details regarding
workers there are in fact some ethics challenges. Firstly, the data gathered by the HR team are
sensitive and personal by their own design. they contain non-disclosed material (Chen et al.
2012). Thus, while consumers may opt out of sharing their favorite shopping’s with stores,
workers may be robbed of preference and, in some situations, they may not become aware of the
fact that the data are gathered in the light of the contractual arrangement which may be biased to
the employer.

References
1. Davenport, Thomas H., Jeanne G. Harris, and Jeremy Shapiro. 2010. Competing on talent
analytics. Harvard Business Review 88: 52–58.
2. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will
Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
3. McAfee, Andrew, and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2012. Big Data: The Management Revolution.
Harvard Business Review 90: 60–68
4. Beath, Cynthia, Irma Becerra-Fernandez, Jeanne Ross, and James Short. 2012. Finding
Value in the Information Explosion. MIT Sloan Management Review 53: 18–20.
5. Falletta, Salvatore. 2014. In search of HR intelligence: Evidence-based HR Analytics
practices in high performing companies. People & Strategy 36: 28–37.
6. OrgVue. 2019. Making People Count: 2019 Report on Workforce Analytics. London:
OrgVue.
7. CIPD. 2013. Talent Analytics and Big Data: The Challenge for HR. Research Report
2013. London: CIPD.
8. Guenole, Nigel, and Sheri Feinzig. 2018. The Business Case for AI in HR. With Insights
and Tips on Getting Started. Armonk: IBM Smarter Workforce Institute, IBM
Corporation.
9. Barends, Eric, Denise M. Rousseau, and Robert B. Briner. 2014. Evidence-Based
Management: The Basic Principles. Amsterdam: Centre for Evidence-Based
Management.
10. Levenson, Alec. 2015. Strategic Analytics: Advancing Strategy Execution and
Organizational Effectiveness. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler
11. Evans, James R., and Charles H. Lindner. 2012. Business analytics: the next frontier for
decision sciences. Decision Line 43: 4–6
12. Gandomi, Amir, and Murtaza Haider. 2015. Beyond the hype: Big data concepts,
methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management 35: 137–44
13. Kaufman, Bruce E. 2014. The historical development of American HRM broadly viewed.
Human Resource Management Review 24: 196–218.
14. Joseph, Rhoda C., and Norman A. Johnson. 2013. Big data and transformational
government. IT Professional 15: 43–48
15. Dedic, Nedim, and Clare Stanier. 2016. Towards differentiating business intelligence, big
data, data analytics and knowledge discovery. In International Conference on Enterprise
Resource Planning Systems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 114–22.
16. Akter, Shahriar, Samuel Fosso Wamba, Angappa Gunasekaran, Rameshwar Dubey, and
Stephen J. Childe. 2016. How to improve firm performance using big data analytics
capability and business strategy alignment? International Journal of Production
Economics 182: 113–31
17. Cappelli, Peter. 2017. There’s No Such Thing as Big Data in HR. Available online:
www.hbr.org (accessed on 16 April 2018).
18. Chen, Hsinchun, Roger H. L. Chiang, and Veda C. Storey. 2012. Business intelligence
and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly 36: 1165–88.
19. Guenole, Nigel, Jonathan Ferrar, and Sheri Feinzig. 2017. The Power of People: Learn
How Successful Organizations Use Workforce Analytics to Improve Business
Performance. New York: Pearson Education.