Responses Participant Law Libraries

SC CA HREP DOJ OSG OMB UP AdU FNS

Information Online; Adminis-
searching visiting trator did
activities the -do- -do- -do- -do- not -do- -do- -do-
library partici-
pate
Views on the adequate -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- Both
adequacy of adequate
the services and not
of the library
Views on the Yes -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-
library as an
integral part
of the
Institution
Views on the Just right -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- Expen-
costs of the sive
libraries
operations
Awareness aware -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-
on the
concept of
resource
sharing
Willingness Willing -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-
to share to share But But But
resources resources with with with
with other res- res- res-
institutions trict- trict- trict-
ions ions ions

Willingness Willing -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-

to support the to
establishment support -do-
of a the
consortium consor-
tium
Ways to Mostly -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-
support the non-
library tangible
consortium assist-
ance
 Responses Participant Law Libraries
SC CA HREP DOJ OSG OMB UP AdU FNS
Possible NLP No No Web NLP No speci- NLP No SC or
cental node speci- speci- -like fic spe- UP
of the fic fic answer cific
consortium answer answer an-
swer

The Administrators’ Take on their Libraries and on the Proposed Consortium

The above table presents the views of the administrators