ANEP-21 (Procedure For Ship Manning)

STD-NATO ANEP-2L ED L-ENGL L99L = 6654940 0063392 9T7
S%%d2 -
ANEP-21 *
EDITION 1
ALLIED
NAVAL
ENGINEERING
PUBLICATI0N
PROCEDURE
FOR
SHIP MANNING
FOR
NATO
-_
SURFACE SHIPS
SEPTEMBER 1991
NATO UNCLASSIFI ED
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Provided by IHS under license with NATO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale
S T D m N A T O ANEP-21 E D I-ENGL 1991 - bb54940 O063393 833
N A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
ANEP -2 1
PROCEDURE FOR SHIP MANNING
FOR NATO
SURFACE SHIPS
ANEP -2 1
T h i s ANEP i s p a r t of t h e ANEP S e r i e s on Ergonomics (Human F a c t o r s ) i n S h i p

Weapon System L i f e Cycle ( i n c l u d i n g i s s u e s r e l a t e d t o management, p e r s o n n e l
( e . g . manning), material ( e . g . h a b i t a b i l i t y ) and o r g a n i z a t i o n ) .
SEPTEMBER 199 1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

ANEP -2 1
11
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NORTH ATLATN IC TREATY ORGANIZATION
MILITARY AGENCY FOR STANDARDIZATION (MAS)
NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION
September 1991
1. ANEP-21 "Procedure for Ship Manning for NATO Surface Ships" is a

NATO UNCLASSIFIED publication.
2. ANEP-21 is effective on receipt.
3. It is permissible to distribute copies of this publication t o

contractors and suppliers and such distribution is encouraged.
--
E. STA1
Major General, NOAF
Chairman, MAS
II

~ ~
~ ~ ~
S T D - N A T O A N E P - 2 1 E D 1 - E N G L 19?1 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 00633’35 606
ANEP - 21 *
III
II CHAPTER II RESERVATION BY NATIONS
I 1
I 3
4
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
III

IV
ANEP - 21
RECORD OF NATIONAL RESERVATIONS (CONT.)
SPECIFIC RESERVATIONS
IV
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

_.
STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 W 6654740 0063397 4 ô 9
V
ANEP - 21 '
RECORD OF CHANGES
Change Date Effective By Whom

Date Entered Date Entered
V
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

S T D m N A T O A N E P - 2 1 E D 1-ENGL 1991 6654940 0063398 315
VI ANEP - 21
PREFACE
1. The p u r p o s e of t h i s document i s to d e f i n e a uniform methodology

f o r manpower r e q u i r e m e n t s d e t e r m i n a t i o n for NATO s u r f a c e s h i p s .
2. This Allied Naval E n g i n e e r i n g P u b l i c a t i o n , ANEP-21, has been

p r e p a r e d by IEG/6 Sub-Group 8 ON THE INFLUENCE OF HU" FACTORS ON SHIP
DESIGN.
3. Each n a t i o n i s encouraged t o use t h i s ANEP i n i t s own design i n

o r d e r t o p r o v i d e a b a s i s f o r e v a l u a t i o n o f i t s designsbyothercountries,
e . g . f o r t h e p u r p o s e s of procurement d e c i s i o n s .
4. T h i s ANEP i s p a r t of t h e ANEP Series On Ergonomics (Human F a c t o r s )

I n S h i p Weapon System L i f e Cycle which i n c l u d e s i s s u e s related t o WSLC
management, p e r s o n n e l , p l a n n i n g , a u t o m a t i o n , s e l e c t i o n and t r a i n i n g ,
material d e s i g n , s h i p b o a r d o r g a n i z a t i o n and p r o c e d u r e s . The c o v e r i n g
document of t h e s e r i e s , ANEP-20, ERGONOMICS (HUMAN FACTORS) I N SHIP
WEAPON SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE (WSLC) INTRODUCTION, describes t h e i n t e n t i o n s
o f t h e ANEP series andtheinterrelationshipsbetweenthevariousissues,
as w e l l as p r o v i d i n g a f u l l l i s t of t h e A N E P ' s , t o g e t h e r w i t h a summary
of e a c h .
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
VI

~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL L99L 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063399 2 5 1
ANEP - 21 VII
EDITION 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE NO.
INTRODUCTION 1-1
SUMMARY 2-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
THE SHIP MANNING DOCUMENT 3-1
THE DEVELOPMENT OF WORKLOAD ELEMENTS 4-1
ALLOWANCES AND CONSTRAINTS 5-1
DETERMINATION OF MANPOWER STRUCTURE 6-1
PROCEDURES FOR DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT 7-1
DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE 8-1
VII

S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1971 m 66516940 O063400 B T 3
VI11 ANEP - 21
1 INTRODUCTION 4 PAGE NO.

1. Related Documenti 1-1
2. Aim 1-1
3. Definitions 1-1
4. Recommendation 1-2
5. General 1-2
6. List of Annexes 1-3
7. List of Figures 1-4
2suMMARy
1. The Ship Manning Document 2-1
2. The Development of Workload Elements 2-1
3. Allowances and Conntrainti 2-4
4. Determination of Manpower Structure 2-5
5. Procedures for Document Development 2-5
6. Document Maintenance 2-6
3 THE SHIP MANN ING DOCUM EN" (SMDL

1. General 3-1
2. Description 3-4
3. Development 3-4
3 . 1 Data Collection 3-4
3 . 2 Analysis of Data 3-4
3 . 3 Review 3-5
3.4 Promulgation and Implementation 3-5
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4. Use 3-5
4 THE DEVELOPMENT OP WORKLOAD ELEMENTS

1. General 4-1
2. Operational Manning 4-2
2.1 Determination of Operating Stations 4-2
(watch stations and stations)
2.1.1 Definitions 4-2
2.1.2 General Considerations About Determination
of Watch Station and Station Requirement8 4-4
2.2 ~ Detendnation of Watch Station and Station
Requirement8 4-5
2.2.1 Workload Elements 4-5
2.2.2 Skill Requirement8 4-8
2.2.2.1 General Consideration8 4-8
2.2.2.2 Procedure 4-8
2.2.2.3 Documentation 4-8
VI11

_.
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 L65Li940 0063401 73T
ANEP - 21 IX
PAGE NO.
3. Maintenance Manning 4-10
3.1 Maintenance Task6 4-10
3.2 Detednation of Requirements 4-11
3.2.1 Maintenance Workload Element6 4-11
3.2.2 Skill Requirements 4-13
3.2.3 Documentation 4-13
4. Administration and Support Manning 4-15
4.1 Determination of Administration and
Support Work Actions/Tasks 4-15
4.2 Determination of Requirements 4-15
4.2.3 DOCW8ntation 4-17
5. Utility Task and Evolution Manning 4-17

5.1 Detednation of Utility Task and
Evolution Work Action8 4-17
5.2 Determination of Requirements 4-20
5.2.3 Documentation 4-21
5 ALLOWANCES AND CONSTRAINTS

1. General 5-1
2. Productive Allowance Factor 5-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
2.1 Derivation 5-1
2.2 Application 5-4
3. Service Diversion Allowance 5-4
3.1 Determination of Activities 5-4
3.2 Calculation of the Service Diversion
Allowance 5-6
4. Training 5-7
4.1 Development of Training Manpower
Requirements. 5-8
4.2 Training T h e Allocation Criteria 5-8
5. Doctrinal Constraints 5-9
6. Standard Workweek 5-9
7. Leave and L i b e r t y 5-10
8. Compensation f o r Ineffectives 5-11
6 DETERMINATION OF MANPOWER STRUCTüR E
1. General 6-1
2. Procedure 6-1
3. Documentation 6-3
IX

~~~ ~~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 66.54940 0 0 6 3 4 0 2 h7b lcl
X
ANEP - 21
PAGE NO.
7 PROCEDURES FOR DOCUMENT DEVELOP m

1. General 7-1
2. Development of Workload Requirements 7-1
2.1 Baric Document 7-1
2.2 Appendice 8 7-2
2.2.1 -
Appendix 1 Condition Watch
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
As 8 ignments 7-2
2.2.2 Appendix 2
and Evolutionr
-
Table of Utility Tasks
7-2
2.2.3 Appendix 3 - Table of Administration
and Support Tasks 7-3
2.2.4 Appendix 4 - Table of Maintenance
Manning Requirements 7-3
2.2.5 Appendix 5 -
Ship Manning Req~ire1nent8
7-4
Analysis Chart (At Sea)
2.2.6 Appendix 6 -
Ship Manning Requirements
Analysis Chart (In P o r t ) 7-4
2.2.7 Appendix 7 - Sununary of Organizational
Manning Requirements 7-4
2.2.8 Appendix 0 -
Workload Summary 7-5
2.3 Additional Data 7-5
2.4 Special Consideration8 7-5
3. Cross Utilization 7-5
4. Balancing for Skill Level Requirement8 7-6
8 DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE
1. General 8-1
2. Validation 8-2

S T D = N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 = 66.54940
~
OOb3403 5 0 2
N A T O U N C L A S S X F I E D
1-1 ANEP - 21
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1.1 -TED DOC-
ANEP-24 Guideliner for Shipboard Habitability
Requirements for Combatant Surface Ships
mEP-21 Automation I
ANEP-20 Maintenance policy
ANEP-SO The Influence of Maintenance on Manning
- c
1.2 AIM
1.2.1 The purpose of this document is:
(a) To enunciate the policy of participating
nation8 in regards to procedures for manpowe
requirements determination for NATO ships.
(b) To establish a uniform methodology for the
manpower determination procese.
1,3 DEFINITION
1.3.1 Manpower requirements are the human resources
that are needed to accomplish specified workloads of
organizations. Specifically: The number of officers and
enlisted manpower required for each activity, which has been
approved for planning purposes, as representing:
-.
(a) A stated tentative need for manpower by

quantities and skills.
(b) A statement of the quantity and quality of

manpower needed to perform specific
capabilities in a projected environment. Po
ships, these requirements are displayed as
organizational manning requirements in Ship
Manpower Documents. For equipment, systems,
or individual functions, these requirements
are stated as pertaining to the specific
hardware or task involved.
N A T O U N C L A S S I P I E D
1-1

S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1 - E N G L 1 9 9 1 E b 6 5 4 9 4 0 OOb340i-i 4'19
ANEP - 21 1-2
1.3.2 The following elements comprise the workload for the

--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ehip systems:
, \
(a) Operational workload

(b) Maintenance workload
(c) Own unit support workload composed eft
(1) Administrative and support workloads
( 2 ) Military duty workload
(3) Utility task and evolution workload

( d ) Variou8 allowance factors applied to some
workloads.
1.4 RECOMMENDATION
1.4.1 It is recommended that nations should follow the
procedure8 set forth herein as the minimum acceptable
guideline8 in the development of manpower requirements for
NATO surface ships.
1.5 GENERAL
1.5.1 To obtain an economic and efficient surface ship
design manning must be addressed during the entire ship
design process. Manning determination is especially
important in the early design phase8 when it affecta ship
size and displacement and design of accommodations and
physical environment.
_.
1.5.2 In the Ship Manpower Document process, the
primary criteria for manpower requirements are the demands
imposed by Battle Conditions or by other more demanding
operational conditions. Maintenance and own unit support
requirements are then subsequently superimposed on this
skeleton. Various allowance factors are then applied to
allow for human fatigue and similar contingencies.
1.5.3 This Document also provide8 a glossary of term8
that are to be utilized in the manpower development process.
1-2

N A T O U N C ? A S S I F I E D
1-3
ANEP - 21
1.6 LIST OF ANNEXES

ANNEX A Foreword $1
ANNEX B Ship Manning Requirements Analysis Chart (In Port)

APPENDIX 1 Condition Watch Assignments
APPENDIX 2 Table of Utility Task8 and
Evolutions
APPENDIX 3 Administrative and Support Manning
APPENDIX 4, Part 1 Maintenance Manning/Table Of
Equipment Analysis
APPENDIX 4, Part 2 Rate/Rating Maintenance S u m m a r y
APPENDIX 4, Part 3 Facilities Maintenance Summary
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
APPENDIX 5 Ships Manning Requirements Analysis
Chart (At Sea)
APPENDIX 6 Ship Manpower Requirement8 Analysis
Chart (in Port)
APPENDIX 7 Summary of Organizational Manning
Requirements
APPENDIX 8 Workload Sununary
ANNEX C Gl08sary o f Terms
ANNEX D National Rank Equivalences for Naval Personnel
ANNEX E Typical U.S. Navy Standard Workweek
N A T O U N C L A S S 1 F I E D
1-3

STD.NAT0 ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1991 6654940 0063~iOb211
I .
Y A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
.ANEP - 21 1-4
1.7
P i a r e No. sl&!mz 8 1
BsfLwL
Figure 1 Symbolic Representation of the Four
Categories o f Manning 2-2
Figure 2 NATû Standard Procedure for Surface
Ship Manning 3-2
Figure 3 Determination of Operating Stations
and Workload Elements 4-3
Figure 4 Method8 and Information Source6 for
the Determination of Stations 4-6
Figure 5 Determination of Skill Requirements 4-7
Figure 6 Form 'M' -
Equipment/System Man/Hour
Requirements 4-9
Figure 7 Determination of Maintenance Tasks and
Workload Elements 4-12
Figure 8 Sources/Method8/Data for 'Make Ready,
Put Away, Data Recording and Productive
Allowance" 4-14
Figure 9 Determination of Administration and
Support Work Actions/Tasks and Workload
Elements 4-16
Figure 10 Methods of Admfnistration and Support
-. Workload Analysis 4-18
Figure 11 Determination of Utility Task and
Evolution Work Action6 and Workload
Elements 4-19
Figure 12 Application of Allowance Factor 5-5
Figure 13 Determination of Manpower Structure 6-2
1-4

2-1 ANEP - 21
2.1 The ShiD Mannina Document

2.1.1 Backaround
The Ship Manning Document meets the need for means
of documenting manpower requirements through the collection
of a l l ship workload elements.
The workload is then assigned to individual billets
for which the skill levels and the tasks to be performed are
established through operational, maintenance or own unit
support requirements.
The SMD takes into account the various ship degrees
of readiness or other evolutions.
2.1.2 The document i a not used solely for developing a
"manning plan". Its various uses may be as follows:
Improved manpower requirement predictions for new
ship types.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Management and control:

- assessment of manpower costs related t o
replacement of aging equipment and installation
of new systems;
- determination of the amount of the time actually
needed to perform various tasks.
2.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF WORKLOAD ELEMENTS
Discussion is directed to the establishment of man-

hour and skill requirements only. The workload elements are
grouped into four general categories in accordance with the
type of activity involved: (See Figure 1 )
2-1

ANEP - 21 2-2
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Pig. 1 Symbolic representation of the four categories

of Manning.
2-2

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1911 6 6 5 4 4 4 0 0063409 T20
N A T O U N C L A S S 1 , F I E D
2-3
ANEP - 21
2.2.1 Operational Manninq

Operational Manning is tho sum of operational naval
manpower needs for the various degrees of readiness. A
distinction i s made between two types of operating stations:
- Watch Stations, which are manned on a continuous
basis; and
- Stations, which must be manned for a apecific
ship function.
Calculations are made to detennine the mínimum
manpower needed to ensure that the ship is able to carry out
its mission and that security is maintained. This does not
preclude the assignment of other function8 to the peraonnel
involved.
2.2.2 Maintenance Manninq
Maintenance manning is the sum of the manpower
requirements for:
- Preventive Maintenance (planned in accordance
with data from the manufacturer);
- Corrective Maintenance (unplanned); and
- Facility Maintenance (cleanliness, etc.).
2.2.3 Administration and Support Manninq
Administration and Support Manning is the sum of
manpower requirement6 for:
- Administration Support;
- C o m m a n d S u p p o r t ( e n f o r c e m e n t of safety
regulation, maintenance of discipline, etc.);
- S u p p l y S u p p o r t ( s t o r e k e e p i n g , financial
management, operation of laundry facilities,
etc.); and
- Medical Support.
N A T O U N C L A S S X F I E D
2-3
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D L - E N G L 1991 0s 66.54940 0063430 7 4 2 =
ANEP - 21 2-4
2.2.4 Utilitv Task & Evolution Manning

This is the sum of the manpower needs for p e r f o d n g
work that does not fall into the above categories,
including:
- Utility Task8 (non-routine requirements such as
fog lookouts);
- Evolution6 (e.g. mooring, refuelling, towing,
rescue and assistance). These workload8 are
difficult to determine, but quite considerable.
O t h e r manpower requirements, not specifically
liated, must also be taken into account.
2.3 &&gWANCES AND CONSTRAINTS

The full workweek cannot be devoted to the tasks
described above, since there are certain nlossesa that must
be considered.
2.3.1 The Productive Allowance Factor accounts for delay8
caused by fatigue, adverse working conditions, and
interruptions. Work time is increased by 15% to include a
relaxation allowance and by S a to account for interruptions.
T h e rates are applied t o all categories of
production work but not to time bound work such as
watchstanding.
2.3.2 The Service Diversion Allowance accounts for various
activities that must be accomplished during working hour8
(e-g. inspections, haircuts, pay line).
2.3.3 Traininq, including lectures and films, on-the-job
drills and practicer, and off-ship training.
2.3.4 Leave and Libertv are not accounted for, SinCe
manpower calculations are based on requirements for battle
conditions,
A percentage of total manning is applied to
compensate for Aneffectives due to sickness, disciplinary
confinement, etc.
N A T O U N f L A S S I F I E D
2-4
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1971 bb5494U O063433 6 8 9
N A T O V N C L A S S I F I E D
2-5 ANEP - 21
2.4 DETERMINATION OF MANPOWER STRUCTURE

This section deals with the determination of
manpower -quantitative and qualitative
the determined workloads and skills.
on the b a s h of -
2.5 PROCEDURES FOR DOCUM EN” DEVELOPMENT
This section deals with data reduction and display.
T h e S M D normally consists of specific sections and
appendices as follows:
2.5.1 Basic Document - usually contains:
(a) Foreword
( b ) Definition of Terms
(c) Projected Operational Environment
(d) Required Operational Capabilities
(e) Standard Workweek
i f j Doctrinal Constrainta
(SI S u m m a r y of Organizational Manning Requirements
i h j Office; Billet and Station Summary
2.5.2 Ap~endices - usually consisting of:
APPENDIX 1
APPENDIX
- 2Condition Watch Assignment
- Table of Utility Tasks
and
Evolutions
APPENDIX 3 - T a b l e o f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e and
Support Tasks
APPENDIX 4 -
Table of Maintenance Manning
Requirements
APPENDIX 5 -
Ship Manning Requirements Analysis
Chart (At Sea)
APPENDIX 6 -
Ship Manning Requirements Analysis
Chart (In Port)
APPENDIX 7 -
Summary of Organizational Manning
APPENDIX 8 -
Workload Summary
2.5.3 Additional Data - If and aa required.
2-5
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 E 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 1 2 515 H
ANEP - 21 2-6
2.6 DOCUMENT MAINTENANCg

The development of an SMD does not mean that the
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
manpower requirements for a given ship or ship class have been

accurately determined f o r its total service life. The SMD must
be validated after operational experience has been obtained. The
document must be maintained to reflect any changes due to change8
in doctrine and/or equipment.
N A T O W N C L A S S I F I E D
2-6

S T D * N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1 9 9 1 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063413 4 5 1 E
3-1 ANEP - 21
CHAPTER 3 : THE SHIP KANN ING DOCUMENT

3.1 ÇEN-
Since the ship design and arrangement of the crew's
facilities are to a great extent determined by the manning
structure (quantity and quality) it is necessary to define
manpower requirements a s accurately as possible in the early
design phases.
Hitherto, manpower requirement^ were defined through
experience, or "best judgement approach". However, the accuracy
which can thus be achieved has dropped steeply due to growing
technological changes. Furthermore, it was not possible with
these methods of definition to determine whether the estinlat&
manning structure wa8 sufficient to fulfill mission requirements
under given peripheral conditions. Working out approaches for
changing or reducing personnel was likewise not possible with
these methods.
The goal of the method presented is to determine the
required manning structure with the smallest possible error
margin. This is achieved by applying analytical methods (e.g.
work measurement, method study) and at the time exploiting
accumulated corporate experience and expertise.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The recommended procedure rests on the tabulation of the

workload involved with all facets of operating and maintaining a
fully ready unit of the fleet and translating that workload into
manpower requirements. (See Figure 2). This procedure entails
the application of a selected work study and other industrial
engineering techniques to the analysis of operation, maintenance,
utility and evolution tasks, support and administrative functions
and training in order to quantify necessary workload and then
distributin-g that workload to individual billets in accordance
with variou8 doctrinal constraints and epecific criteria. The
result of this process is entitled a Ship Manning Document (SKD)
of an individual class of ships.
3-1

~
S T D - N A T O A N E P - 2 1 E D 1 - E N G L 1991 S 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 OOL3414 3 9 8
ANEP - 21 3-2
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ktermín.tíai of u t í l í t y
u s k and evolutiai wrk
-- Crítuí.
actianr and wrk1o.d eloænts
- u t i l l t y tulr and evolutím
)iuyiíng - I Prductíve Allowance ractor
b
PR 400 4
PR 210
rJA T O U N C fi A S S I P I E D
3-2

~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 6 6 5 4 7 4 0 O063435 224
3-3
ANEP - 21
Preliminary Dotermination
o f û p e r a t i a i a l , Ilainttnancc - Standard Workweak
- Allowances
and Utility task and
evolution w i n g - Workload
f
f
ûeterminatron of Adrmnistratron
and Support work actions/ - Productive Allowance Factor
tasks and workload clement.
- Admnirtratiai and support
Funning -
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
- P R 500
d
Mtormination of AllWanCeS for:

personnel structure - Service Diversion
- Training
- 1i.c f fcctivencrs
II Cross- U t i l i z a t ion C r i t e r i a
Standard Workweek
. Examinatiai of personnel
structura in respect t o t h e
f o a s i b i l i t y of tho rcquíred < Sccnario
operational c a p a b i l i t i e s
I
Figure 2 (Con't)
3-3

ANEP - 21 3-4
3.2 uESCRIPTION
An SMG documents the rationale for manning of a specific ship
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
class predicted on ship configuration, computed workload, required

operational capabilities and specified operating profile. The
level of manning so documented is t e m e d Organizational Manning and
is a statement of the m i n b u m quantitative and qualitative manpower
needs essential to the operacion, maintenance and support of LLü
ship under stated conditions of readiness. It al80 displays
assignment of ship personne1 to watch and battle stations and to
specific maintenance, support and administrative tasks.
3.3 DEVELOPMENT
The development of an SMD for a ship class i e an iterative
process essentially comprised of the following steps:
( 1 ) Data Collection
(2) Analysis of Data
( 3 ) Review
( 4 ) Promulgation and Implementation
3.3.1 Data Collection
Data Collection is the identification of all data
essential to the documentation of operating stations at al
condition of readiness and shipboard evolutions and for the
quantification of workload and the identification of skills.
A significant portion of this data is available form
various headquarters area activities. Wherever data are not
available - especially in the case of new constructions
these must be elaborated or gathered from similar types of
-
ships already in operation. Details on data collection are
given in the sections on determination of "workload elements".
-.
3.3.2 Analvsis of Data

Analysis of data is the application of doctrinal
constraints, specific criteria, and the SMD methodology of the
information collected ln order to produce initial manning
requirements. The result of this process is a draft SMD.
(See Annex-A).
3-4

N A T O
~~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 3 9 9 3
U N C L A S S I F I E D
~
E b b 5 4 9 4 0 0013437 U T 7 - ~
3-5 ANEP - 21
3.3.3 Review
A draft SMD should be reviewed by appropriate
Headquarters and Command authorities with regard to the
feasibility of the operational requirements to be fulfilled in
the anticipated operational environments.
3.3.4 promulaation and Imulementation
Promulgations is the printing and distribution of an

approved SMD for an individual class of ships depicting the
minimum quantitative and qualitative manpower needs of that
class as agreed upon as a result of the review process. As an
official publication, it then becomes the basic manning
document for that class. The document must be updated in
every phase of the development.
The results of analyse8 can, for example, be used:

- as input data for the ship design and crew accommodation;
- to predict the impact of system and equipment and trade-
O f f s on personnel, or for modernization/reoutfit;
- to improve personnel utilization, especially if there are
shortages;
- to estimate workload on specific manpower;
- for preparing the training concept;
- as a means of work evaluation, whereby the determined man-
hours are nominal;
- for deriving requirements on systems/equipment, in respect
of the operating and maintenance expenditure;
- for elaborating a role plan.
The modernization of ships over their active life can benefit
from the SMD. The SMD can be viewed 8s a living document over the
life of a ship.
3-5
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~
~
~
~
STD.NAT0 ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 hL54940 0063YLô T33
ANEP - 21 4-1
TER 4 : THE D F W RKL AD ELEMENT

D S K W R EQUIREMENTS
Aa a broad generalization, the determination of rewired

manning may be viewed in terms of an equation which relates the
combined sum of men and equipment to capabilities. In the
process of designing a new ship, any of these three quantities
may be treated an an unknown or variable and alternative
solutions considered u n t i l optimization of one or all i8
ach-leved. The required operational capabilities define the
functional outputs of the ship system which must result from
employing various combinations of men and equipment, and the
general characteristics and configuration describe the nature of
the material installation and its arrangement. Manning is thus
the unknown quantity for which a solution is required. This is
accomplished by quantification of the hours of work and m i n h u m
skills required to perform each identifiable task essential to
operation of the ship system in order to ensure the safe,
reliable and effective accomplishment of the assigned mission.
The measurement or calculation of workload and minimum skill
requirements is a complex process whether accomplished by direct
observation or by analytical means. Whatever the technique
utilized, however, the objective must be an accurate and complete
appraisal of what must be done, by whom, when and how long. No
single technique is universally applicable the suitability of any
single one depends upon the purposes. This section is intended
to identify and define the workload categories utilized in SMD
development and to consider alternative solutions considered
until optimization of one or all is achieved. The required
operational capabilities define the functional outputs of the
ship system which must result from employing various combinations
of men and equipment, and the general characteristics and
configuration describe the nature of the material installation
and its arrangement. Manning i s thus the unknown quantity for
which a solution is required. This is accomplished by
quantification of the hour8 of work and minimum skills required
to perform each identifiable task essential to operation of the
ship system in order to ensure the safe, reliable and effective
accomplishment of the assigned mission.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The measurement or calculation workload and minimum skill

requirements is a complex process whether accomplished by direct
observation or by analytical means. Whatever the technique
utilized, however, the objective must be an accurate and complete
4-1

~~ ~
STD.NAT0 ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 bL.54140 0063439 9 7 T
4-2 ANEP - 21
appraisal of what must be done, by whom, when and how long. No

single technique is universally applicable and the suitability of
any single one depends upon the purposes. This section 18
intended to identify and define the workload categories utilized
in SMD development and to consider alternative means available
for documenting each in terms of man-hours and minimum skill
levels. It should be noted that this discussion is directed to
the establishment of man-hour and skill requirements only. The
conversion of these into optimum manning be specific billete is a
different problem contingent upon the ability of men to do
productive work within the parameters and constraints detailed in
Section V and the considerations of task assignment set forth in
Section VI.
4.2 OPERATIONAL MANNI NÇ (See figure 3)
4.2.1 Determination of operatina stations (Watch
stations and stationsi
4.2.1.1 Definitions
Operational manninq is the quantitative and
qualitative sum of naval man-power needs to man operating
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
stations during a specified condition of readiness. The

operational manning requirement for a condition of readiness
is expressed in terms of the related condition Watch
organization.
meratina stations are specific positions which
must be manned for the proper or effective functioning of a
system, sub-system or equipment during a specified condition
of readiness. A distinction must be made between: Watch
stations and stations.
A Watch station is an operating station manned on
_.
a continuous basis to eatisfy the required operational

capabilities prescribed for the condition of readiness in
effect. A Watch etation requires routine relief of aesigned
personnel.
A station is a position manned to satisfy
operating station requirements for a specific ship function.
Assigned personnel man a station on an as-required basis for
an indefinite period as dictated by the need for the
functional requirement.
4-2

STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D 1 - E N G L 1771 66.54940 0 0 6 3 4 2 0 b î 1
'&NEP - 21 4-3
Deuriainatiar of o p r i t h g
s t a t i o n s and wodclorid
olemrnti
- TAC -
PR 200
I
-Constraints
-termination of the p r a t i n g
-Roquind Clparational Caprbil:
s t a t i a n s for t h e d i f f e r e n t
degrees of readiness
L. -EqIAipmt
- F m c t l o n r l Raquiranrnts
-nuiual Backup ü p r a t i a n s
ïmtcrminatíon of t h e t u k s -1 - 8 - i ~ Dat.
t o be perfotmad -k PR Ir"
Inv8stipatfont of
Human Rtliability
Stress k r i l y s r s
Figure 3
4-3
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

4-4
ANEP - 21
Quantitative Watch station and station

requirements are a function of:
( 1 ) ship, system and equipment design and
arrangements;
(2) required operational capabilities;
( 3 ) operating procedures.
4.2.1.2 General coneiderations about determination of
watch 3-t ion and station secruirementg
In existing ships, ship design and operating
procedures are relatively fixed, the only variable which may
be readily invoked to influence operational manning
requirements is a change in Required Operational
Capabilities which adds or deletes required functions.
In the development of a new ship design the
situation is essentially reversed. Here, it is the Required
Operational Capabilities which are relatively fixed and
operating station requirements determined by the nature of
the design.
The following procedure must be applied for
determining the number of Watch stations and stations:
- The required operational capabilities are analyzed
to establish the degrees of readiness and other
operational situations.
- Determination of the functional chains to be
carried out and their inter-relations and their
-.
allocation to the conditions of readiness.
- The systems, sub-systems and equipment8 which must
be in operation to support each functional
requirement are established. (Partial manning and
other constraints must be carefully observed.)
Normal and stand-by operation must be observed.
- The minimum operating stations which must be
manned to ensure eystem, sub-system or equipment
operation and performance commensurate with the
established functional requirements are to be
determined.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4-4 .

S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 I8 6 5 4 7 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 2 2 4b't
N A T O U N C L A S S I F ED
ANEP - 21 4-5
The methods for determining the stations are shown

in figure 4.
The following criteria are to be observed when
determining the requirements for Watch stations and
stationa:
(1) The station is required f o r accomplishing the

ship's mission.
(2) The atation is required to ensure the health or
safety of the crew.
(3) The station ia required to meet a directed
security requirement.
Having met one or more of the above criteria, the
station requires the full attention of an individual and its
function cannot be performed by another person or installed
equipment. Manual backup must be considered when
determining station requirements.
Individual Watch station and station requirements
cannot be defined independently of total ship and system
manning, but must reflect the overall Watch or evolution
situation in effect. Each Watch organization or manning
detail must include the necessary skills to ensure adequate
supervision, effective performance, and to provide for
necessary decision making, communication and training.
4.2.2 Determination of Watch station and station I
requirements
4.2.2.1 Workload elements
-.
The time required for performing the particular
function must be determined for the specified Watch stations
and stations. This information is also required when
allocating additional tasks. Methods for determining time
requirements are shown in figure 4.
Besides time requirements, the maximum possible
workload period must also be determined for the individual
stations by means of a stress analysis, since this could
have consequences on the quantity of man-power required.
4-5
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 W Lb54940 0063423 3 T 0
IJATO U N C L A S S I F I E D
4-6 ANEP - 21
&xi 8 t i n g Ships/Opeta t i o n o l Nev Ship I k s i a

SM=
a c t i v i t y sunpling functional analysis, í n c l .

-system block diagruas
work masurement - requirement a l l o c a t i o n s h e e t s
-time lmt a n a l y s i s
r e t h o d s t u d y techniques - c o r r e l a t i m charts
-arrangement plans
c r i t i c a l examination -funttionirl and o p e r a t i o n a l
sequence diagruns
work study t e c h n i q u e s
equipment s p e c i f i c a t i o n s
task a n a l y s i s
d e s i g n work study
system trade-offs r t u d i t r
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
-ODs AND INFORMATION SOURCES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF STATIONS
Pfgure 4
4-6

~ ~~ ~~ ~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 m 6654740 0063424 2 3 7 m
NATO-
ANEP - 21 4-7
.kill nquirwben+I
PR 2 1 0
Performing tuk-
r I t
II Determination of a b i l í t i e
u i d s k i l l s necessary for
t h e t u k r performcd- I
A b i l i t y urd
s k i l l profiles
I
abilities u i d s k i l l s
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Figure 5
N A T O U N C L A S S I F X E D
4-7

STD=NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL L991 Ib L 5 4 7 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 2 5 1 7 3
4-8 ANEP - 21
4.2.2.2 ml1 recru irementp,

4.2.2.2.1 -tiona
Effective performing of functions can only be
guaranteed when qualitative and quantitative manning needs
are fulfilled. Man-power qualifications are important for
specifying ranks, accommodation facilities and for
recruiting personnel. It should also be noted that higher
qualifications/ranks require more space and recruiting
personnel becomes more difficult. The objective is
therefore to determine the minimum qualification required.
The required qualification is determined primarily
by the complexity of the task, the extent of the task and
the required pre-requisite skills.
4.2.2.2.2 Procedure
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The following procedure must be followedr (See
figure 5 )
- The determined task8 are subject to a taak
analysis.
- On the basis of this analysis experts determine
the required abilities and skills f o r perfodng
the functions.
4.2.2.2.3 Documentation
Documentation of operating station requirements
must provide quantification of the man-hour8 involved, and
the determination of the minimum skill levels and
qualifications requisite to effective performance of
requird-tasks. This will normally involved the results of
the analysis of each operational capability supported,
critically to mission accomplishment, tasks performed, pre-
requisite skill8 and training, and position within the
overall organization.
N A T O U N C L A S S T F I E D
4-8

~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 m 6654740 0063426 O O T
ANEP - 21 4-9
fquipœn t/syr t e m :
lo. of . q r i i P i m t / s y s t . r on tho s h i p :
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1) E n t e r cross rih.ro applicable

2) We v a l u s f o r CM il n o empirical v a l u r i are a v a i l a b l e
3) use m r v a l u s for CM i f n o e n p i r i c a l v a l u s are a p p l i c a b l a
Figure 6
N A T O U N C L A S S I P I E P
4-9

S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1 - E N G L 1991 bb.54940 OOb3Y27 TYb _.
~
4-10 ANEP - 2:
Operating stations are documented in SMD

development for all degrees of readine8a and operational
situations affecting total ship man-power requirements.
These normally include:
(a) Degree8 of Readiness, I, III, IV, V stations in
all ship8.
( b ) Evolution stations in all ships for those
evolutions which are time significant. (See
paragraph 5 f o r criteria establishing tfme-
significant utility task and evolution
requirements which must be documented.)
4.3 MAINTENANCE MANNING (See figure 7)
4.3.1 Maintenance tasks
Maintenance tasks comprise preventive, corrective
and facility maintenance of the ship and its component
systems and equipment. Work elements considered in
determining the total man-hours associated with each
category of maintenance are as follows:
( 1 ) make ready;
( 2 ) accomplishment of the maintenance action;
( 3 ) put away;
( 4 ) data recording (completion of forms - is not
performed for facility maintenance).
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The foll-owing rules of determination are applicable:
- The equipment/areas a8 candidates for Preventative
Maintenance (PM), Corrective Maintenance ( C M ) and
Facility Maintenance (E")are to be determined. The
technical concept, equipment list and other relevant
documents must be available for this purpose.
- Other-equipment or task6 to be performed in the areas
are to be specified. They must be differentiated
according to PM, CM and FM. Entries are made in Form M
(Figure 6). These tasks form the basis for determining
the man-hours and the required skills.
4-10

~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1991 bbCY940 OOL3Li28 9 8 2 .
ANEP - 21 4-11
4.3.2 Determination of reqyLT ementa

--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4.3.2.1 mintenance workload elements

The following procedure i s to be applied for
determining the maintenance workload elementsr
0 The duration of the individual activities must be
determined (man-hour requirements). Preferably,
empirical values should be taken. If these are
not available, values based on analyses or
estimated values should be taken. Estimate values
must be based on comparable systems/equipment.
- The total number of man-hour8 xequired comprises
the pure working time for the above mentioned work
elements plus relevant allowances. It is
therefore mandatory to check whether the
determined number of man-hours includes time for
"make ready, put.away, data recording and
productive allowance" (see Section III). If this
is not the caseI empirical values or estimated
values must be taken for these activities (see
figure 8). Entries are made in Form M (figure 6).
- The quantity of man-power required for perfonning
the PM, CM and FM activities must be determined.
- The frequency of recurrence of the individual
activities is to be determined. Preference should
be given to empirical values.
- The total number of man-hours per task is to be
determined. This is calculated a8 follows:
4-11

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1’7’71 m 6 6 5 4 7 4 0 üüL3429 d l 9
P A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
4-12 ANEP - 21
PR 300
I
- t e n d n i t i o n of time
required *n accosiplirh
-- E u i c Dat.
N l 0 ~ u i C e 8 for
88Ch +uk
. nrkt k A d y
.. Out way
- D i t . Sucotâing
Productive U l w u r c e Pactor
D e t e r m i t i o r . of the
f r t q w n e y of the oraintenancc
work i d - 8
t A
of prronr necerruy for g u i c Dati

p.rfo&g the work actions
C a l c u l a t i a i of the tom1
Utenance m o w
requirtuntm an weekly
P A T O V N C L A S S 1 P I E D
4-12
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

= bbC4740
~
~ ~ ~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 00b31130 5 3 0 œ.
H A T O U N C L A S S I P I E D
4-13
( T h e for performing task + tinte for make ready,

put away, data recording, productive allowance).
It
pumber of ~ersons r e e d for performina task

These maintenance man-hour requirements are to be
calculated on a weekly basis.
- The information required for d e t e d n i n g the total

number of man-hours required is contained in Form
M (Figure 6).
- The methods, etources and information suxumarized in
figure 8 should be referred to for gathering data.
Estimated values &re give there, for instance for:
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
o make ready, put away, data recording;
o productive allowance;
o CM workload.
4.3.2.2 Skill sectuirements
See 4.2.2.2
4.3 2.3 pocumentatfon
All PX, CM and Un man-hours are to be compiled and
entered in Appendix 4 to Annex B, Parts 1-3.
P A T O U N C L A S S I P I E D
4-13
. -

r J A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
1 4-14
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Sourccs/Methods/Data
r
Maintenance engincerlng analysfs

Manufacturer data (company manuals,
specifications)
------
Technical service regulations
Equipmentlist plan
Application of dota from
comparable equipment
Estimation of duration and frequency
based on experience with comparalhe
equ i pmcn t
L
Data collected on board

I
. Activity sampling
Documented standards
Task Analysis
Estimated value for make ready, put

, awayl data recording * 30 O of
perf ormancc time
~
Estimated value for productive

allowance = 20 t of performance
time ( sec Section III)
o for electronic equipment:

CM A workload = PM A workload
o for other equipment:
CM A workload = 5 0 1 PM A workload
t
4-14

~
~
~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1 9 9 1 I6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063Y32 303
4-15 ANEP - 21
EDITION 1
4.4 ADMINISTRATION AND SUP PORT MANN1 NG (See figure 9 )

4.4.1 petermination of Administration and S U P V O ~Work
~
Actions/Taske
Administration and SUD DO^^ Work actions comprise
administrative, military, resupply, food service, hygienic
and other service tasks in support of unit personnel and
equipment. In identifying these task8, four apecific area8
are considered, which are defined in the Glossary of Terms:
( 1 ) administrative support;
( 2 ) conmiand support;
(3) supply support;
( 4 ) medical support.
All tasks to be performed in the above areas are to be
determined.
4.4.2 Determination of remirements
4.4.2.1 Workload elements
The workload deriving from administration and
support work actions can only be determined after
determination of the amount of man-power required for
operational, maintenance and utility tasks, evolution
manning, since the workload is dependent on this.
Workload is also conditioned by the actual
capability provided by the installed facilities.
Routine cleaning and preservation of medical
department spaces is facility maintenance and should be
documented accordingly. The workload for the four work
area8 are documented according to the methods given in
figure 10. The methods are ranked in order of
appropriateness.
4.4.2.2 Skill reauirements
See 4.2.2.2
4-15
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~ ~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D II-ENGL I I 9 7 1 S 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 3 3 2 4 T 111
ANEP - 21 4-16
El2uLuu
~ -~
Determination of Administration
and Support work a c t i o n s / t u k s
and workload elearnts
-Abmtnistratiar u i d .Upport
mrnninp -
PR SOO
Determination of Administration . Pasults of the preliminary

and support work a c t i o n r / t u k s Chtermination of operationa:
t o be performed - Maintenance and u t i l i t y
t a s k and e v o l u t i o n manning
I i n port
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
V
I t I
Determination of the t i m Productive Allowance Factc

re-,-;;rcC for pirforming B u i c Data
work ACtiOnS/tukS
CalcUhtiOll O f th8 t o t a l
-
Admlnisttation and
rupport manhour requireaunts
on a weekly b u i c
at sea
Figure 9
4-16

~
STDONATO A N E P - 2 1 ED 1-ENGL 1991 D Lb.549i.IO 0 0 6 3 4 3 4 1Ob m
4-17 ANEP - 21
EDITION 1
4.4.2.3 Docuentatioq
In documenting administration and support
workload, discrimination must be made between at sea and in
port conditions. Manning provided must be adequate to cover
the most demanding condition in each area.
Taeks and workload6 are to be documented in
Appendix 3 to Annex B.
4.5 UTILITY TASK AND EXOLUTION MANNING (see figure 11)

4.5.1 Determination of Utility task and evolution work
actions
Utility task and evolution work actions comprise
tasks which do not fall within the categories of
operational, maintenance, administration or support manning,
but which are essential to the operation of a ship or
accomplishment of its aesigned mission (see Glossary of
Terms, Annex C ) .
In determining total station requirements for a
specific evolution, it is necessary to exclude station
requirements that are common to the watch condition in
effect to preclude double counting of the man-hours
involved.
Conversely, the man-hour value of any Watch
station not filled during an evolution must be deducted form
the total man-hour requirement. Selection of those
evolutions which must be considered in developing total ship
manning is determined from the operational profile and
required operational capabilities.
Any evolution with a predicted frequency of
occurrence of less than once quarterly or duration of less
than .O5 hours weekly i s not considered time significant and
therefore should be disregarded in determining total man-
hour requirements. These are considered as peak workloads
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
for which manning will not be provided.

Evolutions conducted eolely for training purposes
are accounted for a1 training rather than as a utility task
and evolution manning requirement.
4-17

ANEP - 21 4-18
ITION 1
and Support Workload

Analysis (Rank i n order of
approFirtness .
1. T u k k r a l y s i s 1 . T u k kialysis ûperation.1
hudit u i d
2.0pcrational Audit 2. Operational A u d i t Interview
and i n t e r v i e w and I n t e r v i - Techniques
aupporttd by
3.Work Sampling - Work Neasurewnt
Supply Administrative
I - Co&.rary
.
Ship's Service
1 >
rnâ Functions FMttianS hmctions
1.Tuk Analysis 1.Work Iilcuuremnt 1. T u k k i a l y s i s
2 . û p r a t i o n a l Audit 2.llcthod S t u d y 2 . Work Iltasurement and

mâ Interview tkthod Study
3.Work Sunpling 3. Clpcrrtional Audit

and Interview
F i g u r e 10
4 . Work Sampling
N A T O U N ~ L A S IS F I E D
4-18
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~
~
~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 bb.54940 OObJ43L T 5 9
B A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
4-19 ANEP - 21
ELmLQlu
Det.emina?ion of total station r

m u i t a w n t b cicluclrnij S L I L J O I I Y 1 - üprotinrj stations
t h u I arc‘ coaaon C O ttic watch
ctinùition
Determinatron of time required

for - Basic Data
- Ripgin9 w - Productive
- Accmpl i s h m n t A i i w a n c r Factor
- St r 1k k . d t w i d
Unriqqiw
i
Determination of the trequency - B A S L C Daca

of t h t work a c t i o n s
J
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
D c t c m ~ ~ n ~ t iof c n t h e number
of p e r i m s neccssary f o r - Baric Data
p r f o m i n . ) t h c r u y k rctlonr
Calculation of the total

utility tiirk and cvoliitíon
m n h o u r requirements on
ueeklp b a r i c
L
B A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
4-19

N A T O U N C J JA S S I P I E D
ANEP
______
- 21 4-20
EDITION 1
The manoeuvre tasks to be performed can be broken
down into a maximum of four work steps (see Glossary of
Terms, Annex C) .
- Accomplishment of the evolution
- Strikedown
- Unrigging
4.5.2 Determination of reauirements .
4.5.2.1 Workload elements ,
Utility tasks and evolutions represent a significant

portion of a ship's total workload and must be accurately
calculated and added to other work requirements in
determining total ship manning. By their nature, most
utility tasks are not regularly repetitive, or of regular
duration or of regular degree of effort and are thus
difficult to express in the form of basic manning criteria
or work standards. For this reason, the workload associated
with such tasks in operational ships has normally been
determined by work sampling. Where this is not possible,
estimates of the workload must be developed analytically
either through task analysis or by projects based on work
sampling collected in other ships.
The average duration and frequency of occurrence
of all tasks to be performed at the stations are to be
defined, broken down into the above-mentioned work steps
(5.1). This is done by applying the appropriate work study
techniques.
--Determinationof an average frequency of
occurrence i6 made from consideration of anticipated
operating requirements as defined by desfgn characteristics,
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
and standard operating procedures. Determination of average

education is made by detailed analysis. As applicable,
consideration is given to such factors as rig capacity,
normal delivery rate; approach, hookup, disconnect and
breakaway time; and the advance time required to man
stations (including necessary watch reliefs), establish
communications, muster personnel, don life jackets and
safety equipment, etc. (The advance time to man stations
4-20

~
~
~ ~
STD.NAT0 ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 6654940 0063438 821 II
P A T O U N C L A S S 1 P I E D
4-21 ANEP - 21
EDITION
varies widely from ship to ship, depending upon internal
procedures, the operational aituation, and the nature of the
detail. Actual times should be established from ship
records or observation wherever possible).
Advance times are for general detail manning and
assume necessary breakout and rigging has been accompiished.
It is further assumed that detail personnel will be Secured
nearly simultaneously with completion of the evolution.
It should be noted that the total man-hours
determined shall include necessary relaxation and
contingency allowances.
The size of the team required €or performing the
tasks must also be determined. It must be ensured that this
man-power is recruitable. the total number of man-hours
required is determined based on the time required for
performing tasks (rigging, accomplishment strikedown and
unrigging), productive allowance, frequency of occurrence
and required team size.
4.5.2.2 Skill reauirements
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
See 4.2.2.2
4.5.2.3 Documentation
In Appendix 2 to Annex B a l l utility tasks and
evolutions including duration, productive allowances,
frequency of occurrence and required team size are to be
shown.
4-21

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 W 6654940 0063439 768
5-1 ANEP - 21
FDITION L
The development of workload requirements as discussed in

Section II provides the documentation for the largest p o r t i o n of
the man-hour requirements necessary to operate, maintain,
administer and support a fully effective ship class. These man-
houri do not, however, represent the full sum of fmpositions upon
any individual's or group of individuals' time on-board ship.
N o r has nay discussion been presented regarding dictated
requirements and other considerations.
As a reeult, it is the purpose of this section to discuss
the additional elements which impose man-hours requirements to be
absorbed by the ship's crew under the general heading of
allowances and constraints. These additional elements are:
- Productive Allowance Factor.
- Service Diversion Allowance.
- Training.
- Doctrinal Constraints.
- Standard Workweek.
- Leave and Liberty.
- compensation of Ineffectiveness.
5.2 PRODUCTIVE ALLOWANCE FACTOR
The Productive Allowance Factor is a percentage allowance
applied to basic productive work requirements to reflect those
delay8 arising from fatigue, environmental effects, personal
need6 and unavoidable interruptions which serve to increase the
time required f o r work accomplishment.
5.2.1 perivatioq
In determining the total time required to perform a
specific task, there must be allowances added for recovering
from the physiological and psychological effects resulting
from the work done, and attending to personal needs.
N A T O U N C L A C S I F I E D
5-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~ ~
~ ~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1971 BlS 6 6 5 4 7 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 4 0 4 8 T
ANEP - 21 5-2
JDITION 1
The provision of time to compensate for productivity
lost to these basic requirements is normally baaed on the
calculation and application of a relaxation allowance or some
other suitAble factor.
While the precise calculation of a relaxation
allowance is highly desirable in documenting workload, this is
not always practicable in SBíD development. the following
considerations apply:
(1) Accurate determination depend8 upon reducing task8 to
include work elements and then computing the amount of
relaxation necessary to recover form the fatigue
engendered by the activity involved Ln each element.
Such a process requires accurate tiipe measurements or
highly sophisticated analytical estimates of the work
involved, either of which is time consuming and must be
performed by highly skilled observers or analysts. Given
the total number of diverse tasks to be considered in
documenting the workload of entire ships, the burden of
calculating specific allowances for each work element
would be overwhelming.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
( 2 ) The preciee development of a relaxation allowance
requires observation of repetitive work under relatively
constant circumstances such a s might be found on an
assembly line. Few tasks performed aboard ship are of
such a nature. Thus, while detailed calculation of a
relaxation allowance may be useful in the conduct of
maintenance engineering analysis supporting a new item of
equipment, a similar effort in an operational ship is of
little value unless the task has a significant
relationship to total workload and the circumstances
surrounding ita performance will not be affected by nay
variable inherent in the ship's operation.
(3) The- methods used f o r data collections aboard an
operational ship are seldom directed toward precise
measurement of specific work elements, but rather seek to
determine the total workload in aggregate terms. There
is no advantage in trying to establish a relaxation
allowance with a higher degree of accuracy than t h e
measurement of the work elements themselves.
H A T O U N C L A S S 1 P I E D
5-2

S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 6654940 O063443 316
5-3 ANEP - 21
BDITION L
Based on the above, alternative means for the

calculation off relaxation allowances have been explored for
SMD development. The outgrowth of this has been the
productive allowance factor described below. (The following
data are based on U.S. Navy experience). Basic rational
supporting this allowance factor ist
(1) Extensive industrial experience indicates that a
total relaxation allowance of 10% is the minimum
feasible for men (12% for women).
(2) Calculated blanket value for composite tasks range
from 10-208.
(3) Analysis of representative shipboard tasks and
extensive activity sampling indicate that the
average value approximates 15%. This value has been
standardized for use in SMD development where a more
precise measurement ha8 not been made or is
impracticable.
Added to the relaxation allowance, however
determined, is a factor for unavoidable delays, interruptions
or other irregular and non-calculable delaya, The industry
standard for this “contingency allowance” is 5 % , a value
supported by activity sampling in operacional ships.
The productivity allowance factor used in SMD
development is a composite of the average 15% relaxation
allowance and the 5% contingency allowance for a total value
of 20%. It should be noted that this allowance is an average
value for all work aboard ship and may or may not express the
exact total allowances applicable to any particular task or
work element. Use of the productive allowance factor does,
however, provide a measured standard value reflecting all
delays-in productive work which will be experienced in the
performance of all tasks under the various conditions of ship
employment and thus its application provides adequate man-
hours for total workload accomplishment.
5-3
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~ ~
S T D - N A T O A N E P - 2 1 ED 1-ENGL 1991 6654740 0 0 6 3 4 4 2 2 5 2
5-4
5.2.2 &DDl iCa t ioq
The productive allowance factor is applied to all

categories of productive work included within the SMD which
are measured or calculated as basic work times and which are
not time bound. (Basic work time is the actuel measured or
calculated time to perform a work element or task exclusive
of any delays or idle time. Time bound work is that which
requires the presence of an individual for a defined period.
He may be idle or working during the period but must be
alert and ready. Watch station and rtation requirements are
primary examples). The allowance is a p p l i d a8 described in
figure 12.
5.3 SERVICE DIVERSION A L L OWANCE
Service diversions are those actions required of personnel

by regulations or the nature of shipboard routine which must be
or are normally accomplished during normal off-watch working
hours and which therefore deduct from individual capacity to do
productive work.
5.3.1 petermination of Activities
The following types of activatee are considered in
development of the Service Diversion Allowance (SDA):
- Quarters.
- Inspections.
o Sick Call.
o Pay Line.
_.
o Haircuts.
- Business at the post office, ship's store and
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
other ship's service activates including time

awaiting service.
- BU8ineS8 at the personnel or disbursing office.
5-4

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 W 6654740 0 0 b 3 4 4 3 177 W
5-5
ANEP -
21
222umLL
Productive Allowance Factor
Watch Stations
Stations
Preventive Maintenance +
Corrective Haintenance (if allowance factor it not
Facility Maintenance Included i r ( basic time)
Administration and +
Support (if allowance factor is not
included in basic time)
U t i l i t y Task a n d ?
Evoìu t ion (if developed by work

sampling data) / -
(if time
bound)
Training and
Service Diversions
+ -
= no applicatlon
application
Application of Allowance Factor

F i g u r e 12
5-5
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STDaNATO A N E P - 2 1 E D 1-ENGL 1991 Sll 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 4 4 025 E
ANEP - 21 5-6
EDITION 1
- Other administrative requirements including:
- Commanding Officer's Non-Judicial Punishment
(-TI
- Participation on board8 and committees.
- Interviews and non-training related
aisemblies.
The weekly hours required for quarters and
inspections can be quantified by reference to standard
shipboard routines. Other activates are subject to
variation and should be determined by work sampling Or other
appropriate work study technique.
Variable activates considered in the SDA are in
many cases influenced by internal ship procedures and
management. Critical examination of the procedures
affecting each activity or element may s e m e to point out
changes which could reduce the man-hour8 involved. However,
legitimate service diversions reflect requirements imposed
on ship personnel which must be included within the confines
of the normal work day. It is therefore not permissible to
attempt reduction of the CDA by directing that an action be
accomplished cutside of normal working hours. Elements of
the SDA representing actions which are essentially
individual in nature are stated as averages f o r all
personnel. While obviously not applicable to any epecific
individual, such averages are reflective of total productive
losses which may be expected in the ship as a whole.
5.3.2 Calculation of the Service Diversion Allowance
As indicated, determination of variable portions
of the SDA should be accomplished by use of an appropriate
work study technique in each clasri of ship. When this is
precluded, such as in the case of new conitruction,
appropriate factors for predictive use must be calculated by
use of data obtained from existing ship8 of similar type.
In application, of course, such factors must be rigidly
analyzed to determine relevance to and compatibility with
the ehlp being documented. The factors are to be determined
by the Navy, broken down according to conditions of
readiness and watchstanders/non-watchstanders.
5-6
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD.NAT0 ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1771 6 6 5 4 7 4 0 0063445 'TbL
5-7 ANEP - 21
The factors shown in figure 13 are applicable if no

other data is available.
NOTE: A detailed description of the factors has
been omitted, since they vary from nation
to nation.
Degree of Readiness D.R. III D.R. IV D.R. V

Element
I Quarters
Inspections
I --
1*0° I loso
0-
1.00
.67
1.50
1.00
1.18
1.42
1.25
1-50
All Other 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.25 1.25
TOTAL 2.50 3.00 3.17 4.00 3.85 4.00
TYPICAL SERVICE DIVERSION ALLOWANCE

Figure 13
5.4 Jw4INING
For purposes of SMD development, training is defined as

activity of a practical or instructional nature which contributes
directly to combat readiness or per80nnel effectiveness but which
otherwise detracts from individual capacity to accomplish
productive work. Four categories of training are nonnally
considered, (defined in GlOS8ary of T e n n s , Annex C):
- Formal Trafning .
o Proficiency Training.
- Drille and Practices.
- Off-ship training.
5-7
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~~ ~
S T D * N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 bL549'iO OU63'i4b 9 T B W
flJATO V N C L A S S I F X E D
ANEP - 21 5-8
-ON 1
As herein defined, training in the general sense might be

conridered as a service diverrion and handled accordingly. Because
of specific requirements placed upon 6hips for training and to
achieve better quantification, however, it has been found necessary
to define, quantify and display training a8 a separate and distinct
category.
5.4.1 peveloment of T r a h i nu Ma m o w e r Recruirement8
The number of man-hours which must be expended in
support of each training category varies by type of ship and
operational situation. For that reason the actual training
requirements and associated man-hours should be developed for
each ship class.
Since the quantities obtain va& widely, averaging
techniques must be applied to derive standard factors for use
in SMD development. While these factors require extensive
additional analysis, and validation in each ship observed for
SMD development, they represent the best estimates currently
available and provide a compromise between actual training
observed and what appears to be required.
5.4.2 Trainina Time Allocation Criteria
Training time is allocated to the various categories
on the basis of operational situation and condition of
readiness. The following general criteria are applicable:
(1) Time allotted in Degree of Readiness III is
restricted to the minimum required and provides only
for that training which contributes to combat
readiness.
( 2 ) Time allotted in Degree of Readiness IV provides
for all identifiable required training in support of
- combat readiness and personnel effectiveness. It --`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
6hould be noted that the time required for the

categories of formal training, and drills and
practices fncreases significantly due to the
inclusion of more personnel oriented training (e.g.,
safe driving instructions) and the increased time
spent at general quarters or in performing evolution
which are wholly intended for training.
(3) Time allotted in Degree of Readiness V provides
Y A T O U N C L A S S I P I E D
5-8

_..,
~
~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1991 111 6 L 5 4 7 4 0 0063'147 834 =

--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
N A T O U N C L A C S I P I E D
5-9 ANEP -
21
ITION L
primarily for formal training a h c e few drills and

practices are routinely accomplished in port. Time
for off-ship training ir not considerad ar an
allocation factor except in ship8 where in-port
workload is the governing condition (e.g. tendere).
The opportunity for off-ship training i8 routinely
asre~sedin conjunction with leave opportunity as
discussed in paragraph 7.
No standard allocation factor i 8 provided for either
proficiency or off-ship training. Requirements for
proficiency training are difficult to quanfify and the time
involved vary by rating and station assignment. Where normal
day to day on watch, on station or on the job instruction or
practice is found to be inadequate to eat'isfy requirements, an
appropriate value muet be calculated and applied to the sum of
allocated times as appropriate to the individual or group
considered. Off-ship training must be calculated on the basis
of measured requirements in those ships to which applicable.
5.5 poc TRINAL CONSTRA INTS
Prior to the production of the initial draft SMD, it is

incumbent upon the preparing activity to identify and compile all
applicable doctrinal constraints (See Glosaary of Term8, Annex C).
If it is determined in the process of applying the doctrinal
constraints to the development of manning requirements that any
specific directive or classification of directives appear to impose
an artificial or unnecessary requirement or does not allow the most
efficient utilization of manpower reiources, this condition will be
properly annotated and documented for action by the appropriate
authority.
5.6 STANDARD WOFtKWEEE
The itandard workweek is the total time expressed in hours

necessary to accomplish the workload of a ship (including watches).
The standard workweek i a to be established by authority and shall
include appropriate hours for watchstandere and non-watchstanders.
Elements which comprise the workweek include:

5-9

~~
STD.NAT0 ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1SqL bb549Y0 0063YLiô 3 7 0
ANEP - 21 5-10
EDITION 1
- Operation of equipment.
o Watches, military duties and military assemblies.
- Maintenance.
- Administration.
o support .
0 Utility tasks and evolutions.
- Training.
0
- Supervision, job-related conversations, etc.

- Productive Allowance Factor.
- Service Diversions.
In the development of the SMD, the standard workweeks are to

be utilized as a constraint and are not to be exceeded. They form
the analytical based for workload computations. The nature of Navy
work, watch and duty requirements makes it impossible under all
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
circumstances to fix work periods on a daily or weekly basis.

Averaging techniques have therefore to be employed in determining
the elements which comprise the various workweeks. As a result,
they are not necessarily an expression of the maximum weekly hours
which might actually be expended by an individual in any particular
week, but rather regulate the average weekly hours that will be
expended on a monthly or annual basis. The workweeks are based on
the most demanding conditions routinely observed. Typical sample
U.S. Navy Standard Workweek is displayed in Annex E.
__
5.7 SEAVE AND LIBER R

Leave and liberty are essential consideration in the
management of manpower resources. Necessarily, the minimum manning
provided in any ship should be adequate to ensure meeting basic
policy requirements relating to both. Even so, the SMD is
developed on a basis which makei leave and liberty secondary
considerations. This is so becaure the Ship Manning Document is
directed primarily to the establishment of the minimum manning
essential to mission performance by a ship at sea in a wartime
5-10

~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1 9 9 1
-
bbSiI940 OOb3Y49 607 Ml
5-11 ANEP - 21
environment. Leave and liberty are essentially peacetime

considerations for a ship in port or operating locally from it8
homeport.
The basic assumption of the SMD is that the manning required
to support a ship in the demanding environment of combat at sea
will be significantly greater than the manning necessary to Bustain
routine functions in peacetime wither at sea or in port. In most
instances, the relaxation from battle to peacetime conditions of
readiness does in fact provide adequate slack in required man-hours
to underwrite the needs of leave and liberty as well as off-ship
training.
Based upon the above considerations, the,current policy in SMD
development is to calculate manpower requirements for the most
demanding at sea condition without regard to leave and liberty
requirements.
5.8
Individuals on-board ship are subject to certain occurrences

which are unscheduled but nevertheless detract from the ship's
gross potential to accomplish necessary workload. Compensation
must be made in the development of an SMD for:
- Emergency Leave.
- Temporary Additional Duty under treatment and sickness
with onboard confinement.
0 Disciplinary confinement.
In the absence of more definitive data, a percentage of total
enlisted manning is to be established by authority to compensate
for ineffectives. It is not possible to predict the likelihood of
any particular individual becoming unavailable for any of the
cauaes listed above nor it is feasible from a c o s t standpoint to
duplicate critical skills in order to compensate for these causes.
s-11
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~
~
~
~
!STD.NATO ANEP-2L ED 1-ENGL 1991 U bb549YO 0 0 6 3 4 5 0 329 H
6-1
PTER 6 : DETERMINATION OF MANPOWER SmU(=TURE (See figure 1 4 )
6.1 GENE-
T h e determination of t h e m a n p o w e r structure, both
quantitative and qualitative, is a complex procedure, which
influences every decision regarding the design and optimization
and is influenced by theme decirions.
The de8ign proceer i r directed towards optimizing:
- System performance.
- Man-machine relationships. I
0 Equipment design.
- Arrangements.
- System Manning.
- Life-cycle costs.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
All of the above goals have an impact on the number of
stations which must be manned to meet functional and performance
requirements.
6.2 PROCEDURE
The manpower structure required for fulfilling mission
requirements is detennined on the basis of the predicted workload
and skills, taking into account regulations and aspects of
"Cross-Utilization". The standard workweek represents the
nominal work time. The manpower etructure for personnel on board
Qpp on shore ir to bet detennined.
The following procedure ir applied:

- The stations and function/work actions necessary for
operation are document. These are the basic billets to
be manned. The determined workload is then allocated.
- Allocation of allowances for training, eervice

diversion.
N A T O U N C L A C S I F I E D
6-1

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 bcS54940 0063451 2 6 5
P A T O U N C L A S S I F I E D .
- 21
ANEP 6-2
BLLzuQu
I
B A T O U N C L A S S I P I E D
6-2
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

N A T O U N C L A S S 1 P I E D
6-3 ANEP - 21
EDITION.
- The workload resulting from performance of the functions
is then determined, taking the standard workweek as a
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
reference.
- If there are still free capacities, non-critical tasks
with regard to time are allocated, taking into account
cross-utilization aspects. If the workload is then too
high a new distribution of functions must be made.
- W h e n t h e dasired workload has been achieved the
activities which have not yet been allocated are
documented with the specified workload and allocated to
manning posts, taking into account cross-utilization
aspects. ,
The following is significant for the allocation of

maintenance tasks:
- Depending on the maintenance concept, the PM/CM
tasks can be performed by:
- watch/station personnel;
- special maintenance personnel;
- system support group (ship/shore);
- There are various ways of determining personnel,
depending on the method of performance:
(a) I f m a i n t e n a n c e w o r k i s p e r f o r m e d b y
watch/station personnel actions, these are
allocated to the operational personnel, taking
into account qualification and free capacities.
-
(b) If maintenance work is performed by epecial
maintenance personnel or a system support
group, the total amount of time allocated to
the respective type of personnel is to be
determined and divided by t h e standard
workweek. If a system support group is
provided for maintenance, modifying variables,
such as a number of ships t o be manned
simultaneously, time spent in harbour, etc.,
must also be taken into account for the
determination of personnel.
6-3

ANEP 21 - 6-4
JDITION 1
- -
Based on the determine operational personnel
and enlisted men
- officer8
the workload for administration and
support work actions is determined.
Following this determination, another cross-utilization
takes place, which includes the administrative and
support personnel.
- The tasks involved in the individual functions are to be
documented and respective ability and skill prof iles
derive. These ability and skill profiler are comparable
with the ability and skill profiles which should be
contained in documents. If there are no suitable
profiles available, these must be elaborated by experts.
The qualification required for peiforming the tasks is
derived from the skill profiles.
- Scenarios are to be used to check whether mission
fulfillment is possible with the determined personnel
structure.
6.3 DOCUMENTATION
The results of the personnel structure determination are
entered in the Ship's Manning Requirements Analysis Chart (Appendix
5 to Annex B).
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
6-4

7.1 GEN-
Preceding sections of this manual have dealt primarily with
the rational behind the SMD programme, workload determination and
data collection. This section of the manual will be primarily
concerned with data reduction and display. The general trend of
this section, therefore, will be to guide a preparing activity in
the construction of the variOur workload appendices of the SpLD.
7.2 pEvELOPMENT OF WORKLOAD REOUIREMENTS
7.2.1 Basic Document
A basic ship manning development consists of explanatory
material necessary to facilitate use and understanding of the SMD
and establishes the basic criteria used in development of the
Organieationaì Manning requirements of the ship class. Specific
section headings recommended f o r the basic document are:
(1) Foreword. (USN examples of the following are
included at Annex A).
(2) pefinition of T e m e . terms which are used elsewhere
in this manual and which are applicable to the ship
clase being documented will be defined in the
section. As a minimum, this section should contain
definitions of:
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
- Organizational Manning.
- Operational Manning.
- Maintenance Manning.
-
-.
Administration and Support Manning.

- Utility Task and Evolution Manning.
- Degree of Readiness.
- Watch Stations.
(3) Proiected Operational Environment
7-1

~ ~~~~ ~ ~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED It-ENGL It99It II DbSLi94U 0 0 6 3 4 5 5 900 E
7-2
(4) P-itd ODerational CaQ8bilities
(5) Standard Workweek
-
poctrinal Constraints
S- of Ormaìzation al Hannina R m i r e menta
Officer Billet and Station Slimmrizy
The appendices of an SMD document the various

workload elements used in computing total ship manning
requirements and display the illocation of these elements to
specific billets. (USN examples of the following are included
at Annex B).
7.2.2.1 ADDendix 1 - Condition Watch AssiQnments
Thi8 appendix displays minimum required operating
stations which must be manned during various degrees of
readiness. This appendix shall clearly identify stations
manned by titled, minimum skill level required and the
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
specific billet(s) assigned to the station in each degree of
readiness or special condition.
7.2.2.2 ADDendiX 2 - Table of Utility Tasks and Evolutions
The format of this appendix is optional provided the
basic information listed below i8 included:
(1) P a r t 1 is intended primarily for use in evaluating
the prediction of utility task and evolution manning
in the case of new construction. This part shall
consist of the narrative rationale for assignment of
_.
average utility task and evolution time

requirements. Data presented shall be in rufficient
detail to establish the frequency and duration of
each utility task and evolution detail connidered in
developing total rhip workload computations and, on
the basis of the specified operating profile, shall
establish the weekly workload equivalent for each
such task and evolution for degree of readiness III,
IV, and V as appropriate.
7-2

~~ ~
~~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 3 9 9 1 sl bL549YO 0063456 847
7-3 ANEP - 21
BDITION 1
(2) Part 2 shall be contained in each SMD. This part

shall list specific stations which must be manned
for each evolution considered and the billet to
which assigned. A listing shall also be provided of
time significant utility tasks considered
specifying ta6k by and billet(6) to which assigned.
This listing of time significant utility t a s k s is a
requirement in the case of new con8truction. Its
preparation for operational 6hips may not be
desirable depending on the degree of sophistication
of the data collection method employed. If activity
sampling is employed, for example, this information
may or may not be retrievable. .
7.2.2.3 FDDendiX 3 - Table of Administration and SUDDOrt
Tasks
This appendix is also primarily applicable to the
development of workload requirements for new construction.
Its inclusion in an SMD for an operational ship class is
highly desirable but may not be feasible due to other
constraints. Format is optional provided basic content
requirements are met. As a minimum this appendix shall
contain a narrative statement of the rational for the
identification of administration and support tasks and
quantification of allocated time for accomplishment. This
shall be supported by a detailed listing of task assignments
by specific task, total weekly hours allocated for
accomplishment in specific billet or category of personnel to
which assigned.
7.2.2.4 Amendix 4 -
Table of Maintenance Manninq
Requirements
This appendix should be developed in three parts:
_.
(1) Part 1 Maintenance Mannina/Table of Eaui m e n t

0
&nal~sisChart. This part of Appendix 4 shall

consist of a summary of preventive and corrective
maintenance requirement by i t e m of maintainable
equipment
(2) Pa* 2 -
R8te/R8tina &iaintenance Sunmia m Chart.
This part of the appendix shall consist of a matrix
summary of data developed in Part 1 showing the
total preventive and corrective maintenance hours
7-3
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~~ ~~~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 O063457 783 m
ANEP - 21 7-4
for each specific rate, by maintenance group.

Separate summary charts shall be prepared for at sea
and in port maintenance requirements when specified.
(3) ?art 3 - Pacilitv M aintenance Sunanam. This final

section of the maintenance appendix shall summarize
in matrix form the weekly man-hours requirements
allocated to passageways, heads, exterior decks and
bulkheads (less propulsion and machinery spaces) and
propulsion and machinery spaces. Separate summaries
shall be prepared for at sea and in port facility
maintenance requirements when specified.
7.2.2.5 Appendix 5 -
Ship Manninu Recmiiements Analvsis
Chart [At Seal
This appendix shall display the assignment of
operating stations for the at aea degrees of readiness
specified by billet assigned and shall quantify the actual
man-hours to each billet for operational, maintenance, utility
task and evolution and administration and support tasks based
on data developed by Appendices 1 through 4. Total workload
for each billet shall be developed by application of work
allowances, service diversion times and training allowances.
All work elements total shall sum to the total developed in
related previous appendices and the assignment of tasks shall
be consistent with requirements developed in these appendices.
It is recognized that individual task requirements may be
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
assigned to another skill in this appendix than that specified
as the minimum skill specified in a previous appendix.
7.2.2.6 Amendix 6 -
Ship Manninu Recruirements Analvsis
Chart fIn Port)
This appendix is essentially identical to Appendix 5
but shall cover degree of readinees V assignments and workload
only. -
7.2.2.7 Appendix 7 - Summan? of Oraanizational Manninq

maua?mu
This appendix shall provide a tabular summary of the
total per80nnel required to operate, maintain, administer and
support the ship class. This summary will be detailed by the
formal organization within the ship class.
7-4

~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1991 IC1 6654740 0 0 6 3 4 5 8 61T =

7-5 ANEP - 21
&fLcuLa-
7.2.2.8 FD- ndix 8 = Workload Sunnnaw

This appendix shall contain a tabular listing of
workload assigned to the fonnal organization. Separate
summaries shall be provided for at sea and in port when in
port distribution of workload has been displayed. Total in
this appendix should agree with those in Appendices 5 and 6
respectively.
7.2.3 .&ciditionalDatg
Paragraphi 7.2.1 and 7.2.2 describe the minimum
contents of an SMD. This is not intended.to exclude
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
additional information relating to ship manning requirements

and the preparing activity may include any relevant data
deemed appropriate to support or facilitate the use or
understanding of the document. Any such material provided
shall be included as a iupplement to the SMD.
7.2.4 SDecial Considerations
Preceding paragraphs have outlines the basic format
of an SMD. Minor modifications may be made to facilitate
special considerations (e.g. automated data processing, etc.)
provided all essential data elements as describe above are
shown.
7.3 CROSS-UTILIZATION
As was pointed out above, perfect utilization (loading all
billets to the maximum appropriate work week objective) is seldom
attainable. Careful redistribution of workload to other than the
minimum skills specified in Appendices 1 through 4 of the SMD will
allow a closer approximation of calculated optimum manning than is
normally achieved during the initial distribution. Analysis of the
man-hour rëquirements for all workload elements plus appropriate
allowances will invariably reveal that fractional parts of various
rate, are required. A8 a result the preparing activity shall
conduct a critical evaluation of each workload element by t a s k in
order to asses the feasibility of its redistribution. Various
considerations which must be adhered to in thii evaluation are:
(a) Facility Maintenance taiks which are of a menial nature

(painting, chipping, sweeping. polishing bright work,
etc.) will not be assigned to inappropriate to
personnel. Rtery attempt will be made to assign such
7-5

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1 - E N G L 1991 E 6654940 00b3459 5 5 6 E
N A T O UNC- E D
ANEP - 21 7-6
$DITION 1
menial facility tasks to lower level personnel. Elements
of the make ready and put away tasks can be assigned to
more highly skilled personnel. The necessary rigging and
unrigging which are inherent in certain facility
maintenance tasks are prime examples. The feasibility of
reallocating assigned spaces to more equitably balance
workload should be investigated. Care must be exercised
divisional integrity is maintained i.e. space8 will not
be assigned to divisions which have no parochial interest
in them nor will space8 be divided into less than whole
units.
(b) Individual task8 may be assigned to other than the
minimum skill specified provided the assignment is made
to higher skill levels. Priority of reassignment will be
given to corrective maintenance actions and supervisory
tasks.
(c) Utility tasks and evolutions, corrective maintenance

actions and command support tasks will be assigned to
non-watchstanders to the maximum extent practicable.
(d) Initial billet assignments to operational manning tasks

will be critically examined to investigate the
feasibility and practicality of reassignment to alternate
skills. The unscheduled work portion of a non-
watchstander's work week may be used for cross-
utilization in watchstanding and the alternative should
be examined.
(e) Assignment of tasks to alternate skills will be examined.

Certain tasks can easily be redistributed to more than
one rating.
7.4 -CI NG POR SKI= LEVEL REQYXREMENTS

In the process of establishing n d n b u m requirements and
effecting adjustments by cross utilizing skills, care must be
exercised to ensure that the various entities within the ship are
in fact viable organizational components. The concept of command
support was addressed in 2.2.2.4, but the full extent of the
qualitative requirements can best be evaluated only after the
initial departmentr, divisions, etc. are constructed. Due
consideration must be given to the provisions of 4.2.2.2.
P A T O U N C L A S S I P I E D
7-6
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~
STDmNATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 m h654740 0063460 2 7 8 H
8-1 ANEP - 21
&LlnmLa
TER 8: DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE

8.1 GENEW&
The development of an SMD for a particular ihip class does
not mean that the minimum quantitative and qualitative manpower
requirements for each individual unit of that class have been
precisely determined. This would only occur if each unit within
the class were identical in all respects to the baseline rhip on
which the SMD was predicted. However, configuration changes of
varying degrees occur during the course of a shipbuilding
programme or through a fleet modernization programme. In some
cases, this could cause substantive quantitative manning
differences because of variance in operating itations and/or
other workload changes. In other cae~es,these configuration
differences necessitate qualitative manning adjustments in order
to provide required skills and skill levels.
Significant changes which occur to the ship class as a whole
necessitate procedures by which the SMD can be maintained as an
accurate description of the manpower requirements. Changes which
occur to individual units because of major alterations must be
maintained to allow revision of the manpower authorizations to
reflect actual requirements. Even if no configuration changes
occur, workload could change. Increased age of ship equipments
and systems will cause corrective and facility maintenance
workload to increase. Experience gained in operating other
systems and equipments could cause preventive maintenance
workload adjustments.
A 8ubstantial amount of the data contained in an SMD for new
construction or major conversion is based on functional task
analyses, multiple activity charts, design work studies,
maintenance engineering analyses and other analytical
predictions. Although the techniques employed in arriving at
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
these predictions have been sufficiently refined to ensure a high

degree of accuracy, a certain degree of error could exist. The
analytical predictions must therefore be validated against data
obtained in the operational environment for which the sye~temor
equipment was designed. For these and other reasons, procedures
to verify the class SKD and evaluate recommended changes thereto
are a necessary part of the manning documentation programme.
8-1

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 m
~~
6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063461 104 =
~~
ANEP 21 - 8-2
JDITION 1
8.2 VALIDATION
Implemented S13Du will be validated on a recurring ba.18
using accepted industrial techniques (work study, operational
audit, computer aided techniques, etc.).
SMDi for new construction or major converiionis will be
validated during the first deployment of the lead ship which most
closely approximates the operational environment for which the
ship class was designed.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
8-2

Y A T O U N C L A S S iF I E D
A-1 ANEP - 2
W E X A
FOREWORD
1. The (Ship Clair) Ship Manning Document (SMD) delineates by

individual billet8 the minimum quantitative and qualitative
personnel needs errontialto tho performance of assigned mission
aroar and required oprational capabilitier prescribed for a
fully ready unit of the (Ship Clarr). The manning contained
herein is tenned 'Organizational Manningm and is predicted upon
tho mirrion, requirod operational capabilities, operating
profile, configuration and computed workload.
2. Theae personnel roquiranontr have boon developed in
accordance with t h m "Proc.dura for rhip Xanning for NATO Surface
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Shipr'. Manning calculationr have been based upon:

(a) Ship'r characteristics.
(b) Required Operational Capabilities (doc) mtatement for

(Ship Class).
(c) Brief statement describing technique employed to
quantify workload. Two examples are:
(1) Work study technique of activity sampling

((number) observations having 90% confidence
level) taken during a (number) week observation
period on board (prototype ship) while deployed to
(brief statement of prototype ship'r activity)).
or
( 2 ) Principles of functional analysis, work study and
human factors, combined with other measurement and
prediction techniques.
(d) Input6 received during document development and/or

review by rhips of the clams, Type commanders and Fleet
Commanders-in-Chief.
3. (Other -brief statements as may bet deemed necessary)
P A T O U N C L A S S I F X E D
A-1

S T D - N A T O ANEP-2L E D L-ENGL L77L
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale 0 6654740 0 0 6 3 4 6 2 040 U
~ ~
B-1 ANEP - 2
ANNEX B
SHIP M A ” I N G REOUIREMENTS ANNIYSIS CHART I IN PORTI
This Annex consista of ADDendiCeB 1-8
Appendix 1 Condition Watch Assignments
Appendix 2 Table of Utility Task8 and Evolutions
Appendix 3 AdmLnistrative and Support Manning
Appendix 4
Part 1 - Maintenance Manning (Table of Equipment Analysis

Chart Electronics) (PMS Maintenance Group)
Part 2 - Rate/Rating Maintenance Summa
7 Chart
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Part 3 = Facility Maintenance Siimmasy
Appendix 5 Ships Manning Requirements analysis Chart (At Sea)

Operations Department
Appendix 6 Ships Manning Requirements Analysis Chart (At Port)
Appendix 7 S u m m a r y of Organizational Manning Requirements
Appendix 8 Workload Summary

-
gJA T O U N C L A S S I F I E D
B-1

I
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
4o -s i j
O 0 O 0
E
i
cP
?
U
, ::
Y
i
Y
-
-i: z
L
El i.
Y
Y
i
Y
Y
ia
L
d
Li
m m
?
W b ?
YI
L.
i
i
i Y
O
Y f
ò
Y i-
2 *
a O
m
?
:1 m
?
O
rn h
I
B-1-L

B-2-1 ANEP
- - 21
F P E N D I X 2 to
&"EX B
See Section V paragrapha 2.2b and 2.2~. Definition of "utility

Tasks and Evolutions" can be found in the Gloesary of T e m .
B-2-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

S T D = N A T O ANEP-22 E D 1-ENGL 1991 D 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063415 B 5 T 0
~- ~~
~
~~
mrn
... - .. h. h.
9-9 9
N - N N NFi
* N I * I
NNN O 0
N N I
???
N
? " 8.
? ??? 99
d U N
...
SZst
n--
8 h? m?
n Fi
. . . 3.%.
mmm
Nmm
n -I
N N
I
. I
,
n
ooc
? O ?
N- - -
h E. Z.
n
. . . 8. 8.
82.51
-- w
U
k
d
v1
œ r n
-
. .h cli
U
d
u
oco m z
...
rnmm 51 ..
ro m
n ~
. . . 5151
F i * -
NNN
.. N
3
O
5.1 5 1. O
rn n ci
U
z
m
Y
Li
O O
Y
111 Y
111
<I
I C
C O
O P
Y
i
L
c
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
B- 2-2

S T D - N A T O A N E P - 2 1 E D 1 - E N G L 1991
W 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063466 7 9 6 W
~_____
= 66.54940 0063Li67
~
STDINATO ANEP-21 E D II-ENGL 1991 622
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
8s!38 os! - 0 ~ o W o
SSSÖZÖP
939ggöö
www
338
883
33
-
YX
c,
e
Y
mb
ez
W
-- - -
w w
YY .
w W
“.
w w
Y.
-lil ---
w w w
YYC!
2a t;;
a
t;;
Zc 2 Z G Z Z Õ W K ööö E
I
B-2-3

~- ~~
~~~
S T D - N A T O A N E P - 2 1 E D 1 - E N G L 1971 W 6 6 5 4 7 4 0 0063468 567
No 8et format is lssued for this Appendix. A typical foimat

is attached.
nAdministrative and support manning" i r described Ln the
Glossary of Terms.
N A T O O N C L A S S I P I E D
B-3-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

B-3-2
o m r a
a c c
m - u u
Y U
Y D o
-.
u C A c
a a i-
C Y P L
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Y
- - O u
.>cc
- m o
n
W c, W
œ
c(
L.i
a
P
Y
L,
æ cc
ri( cn
cn
cn
cn I 51 cn
c
il
u
i
E
0
E
I æ
Y
, -
Li
c
X
U
Li
Y
U
O
-.
a c1
z
Y
: c
4
a z
z
l ba YI P
M
c
3
s YI
QO
B-3-2

B-4-1
Pa
%
a
.
I
O
Y
Y
I Li.
c(
rn
rn
a
J
U
z
0 a
e
Y
L
m m
n O
ce
i k
O
%
Pm c
2
Y
c
Y
¡i
U
B-4- 1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~ ~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 IbL.54940 0 0 6 3 4 7 2 T 9 T I

. .
O
(Y
.
$a
M
O -.
n P
w
U
Li
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ci
VI
- VI
f I U
c1
m U
X E z
m o
- P =I
O
(o O
t-
(1 o'
4 4
z
Y
a
rl
B-4-3

~ ~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 m 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063473 426

8-5-1
O w
2
Y,
2
Y, Y, Y, w Y,
1
(u
3 2 3 2 3
x z z x x
O
2 Ir ~
cr)
9
4
? ? ?
/d
8
* If I f
G
v) If
r( <y
2
o
r( r(
O O
o o O
O O
I 6-5-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D 1-ENGL 1991 W 6654940 0063474 8 6 2 E
B-6-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
C
ri
I-
P
I-
V:
V:
4
4
U
z
P
O
H
4
z
z
H
rn
H
>
H
n
U
O
B-6-1

8- 7- 1
SUMMARY OF ORGANIZATIONAL MANNING REQUIREMENTS

- DIVISION
N
-
ANEP -
APPENDIX 7 to
21
-
RATE -
NEC TOTAL -
RATE -
NEC TOTAL
Quarter Master Chief 1 Personnelman 1st Class 1

Quarter Master 2nd Class 1 Personnelman 3rd Class 1
Quarter Master 3rd Class 2 Personhelman Designated 1
Quarter Master Designated 1 Striker
Str iIser
Yeoman Chief 1 Postal Clerk 2nd.Class 1
Yeoman 2nd Class 2516 1 Designated Strtker 1
Yeoman 3rd Class 1 I
Yeoman Designated Striker 1 Hospital Corpsman Chief 8505 1

Designated Striker 1 Hospital Corpsman 1
TOTAL 17
OC - DIVISION
Radioman Chief 1 Signalman Chief 1
Radioman 1st Class 2342 1 1 Signalman 2nd Class 2
2312 Signalman 3rd Class
Radioman 1st Class 23141 1
2312
Radioman 2nd Class 2314
Radioman 2nd Class 2342
Radioman 2nd Class
Radioman 3rd Class 23421
2304
Radioman 3rd Class 1
ñadioman Designated 1
Stri Ise r TOTAL 16
B-7-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

~
~
~~
STD.NAT0 A N E P - 2 1 E D 1 - E N G L 1771 68.54940 0063476 L 3 5
B-8-1
P
n w
W U
Y b
& i d
w v)
VI v)
VI
4
- <
a
a I I i U
z
o
t æ
3
O
O €-
c( <
4 z
z
B-8-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

N A T O UNCLASSIFIED
ANEP - 21
. - . GLOSSARY
c- 1
OF ïERHS ~
-
Ã R E n
KICPBLXSIODKF OF "HE C V O ~ I ~bum

: Of th8 indfvfdual uork a c t i m s n e c e r s a y
t o e f f e c t execution of the evolution l e r a duplicated operational iunnin9 t i m if
inwolwd. Measurement enconparses actions required f r m the time deuil rs s e t
m t i l secure.
A C T I V I T Y S W t f N G r A technique In which r lar98 n d r o f instantaneous

obremataœas u e u& over a perid o f tíme of a group of machines, processes or
. workers: t.ch Observrtím reoords what 4 8 h a p p n i n g a t t h a t i n s t a n t urd the
p8rcen+.ge of absexvationr rocorb.6 f o r a p u t i c u f u a c t i v i t y or delay i r r ~ a s u r e
of the p.rcrntrqe o f tima during which t h a t a c t i v i t y or âelay occurs (almo h w n
u work s r a p l i n q ì .
. W l f f O N A L DUn/SECONDARY o V n / C O L ì A r t r u t DVIY: h r t y i n mn r u t h o r i r d a d d i t i œ u i
duty billet to which an indavrdual i r amsigned, and w h i c h i r in 8dditian t o hrs
p r i m r y duty. %e duty may or my not k a t him prrmuient duty r t r t i m . Luch
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
d d i t i a n a l duty rhould n o r u l l y require 1.88 wan SOI of the Incwb.nt8 t h .

ADIUNfSTRATfvt SUPPORT: M a i n i a t r a t i v e Support canprises work actionm neceisary
for +h. mintannee of prsauiel reeorûs, preparation of correspondencer u i d
rupport of command a & n i n i s t r r t r v e functions. Adaiurrstrative support t u k s uiclude
t h e workload of: S N p ' r û f f z c e , ?ersonne1 Office, Dcpartnwntal Offrces (less Sieply),
and Post Office.
-
#
DftfZT: A mpecific md1itAW r u n p e r space which i s assigned qualifiers t h a t define

t h e d u t i e s , U s k i and functions t o be performed and the s p e c i f i c s k i l l s and s k i l l
l e v e l required t o perform tbe delineated functzans. ( N 0 " E : B i l l r t connotes a z l i t a r y
manning, pasiUon connotes c i n l i u i mnnrng).
BILILT hWLYSISt 'Ihr c r i t i c a l exmination uid the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of t a s k s , functions,
c and r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of a military b i l l e t t o deternune its s t a f f i n g and performuice

requrenrnts.
JIU3
Wet.
a - A descriptive title- hrlhtes thc p r h q furtini of a spcxfic
orginitrticrul t i t l e s mi Wet t i t l e s caafom to the arginiutian stxucuue
appnmd by the ccgnhnt cumurd, Irirciu cr affke. (See d a o W).
WABIUTï: l ñ e 8 b i l i t y to execute a rpecified course of action.
-AT RSADINLSS:
a. Applied t o organizations or a q u i p e n t , means a v a i l a b i l i t y f o r combat operations.
b. A p p l i e d t o p e r r a i n e l , r u 1 8 q u a l i f i e d t o carry-out combat operations in t h e
m i t to uhrch t h e y are u s i m e d .
Cû?@WlüSüPPOR: Coiaund Support msipríses work actions associated w i t h t h e
p r e p r a t i o n and execution of plans required f o r the i n t e r n a l frinctioning of t h e
. CahPrnd and n n r g r r a t of u s i 9 m d persminel. Comaand Support t u k s u e
orsentially U U t a r y i a nature urd a r e p.rf-d
w i t h i n the 6 -
by various p e t t y o f f i c e r s
ar d í c t a a d by organizational r e l a t i o n s h i p or assigned
tespoaaibility. Inc1ud.d t u k r are those required fort
NA"û VNCUSSIfIED
c-1

STD=NATO ANEP-21
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
ED 1-ENGL L99L
Not for Resale
I6 8 5 4 9 4 0 0063477 57L U
~ ~ ~ ~
c-2
(1) niintenuice of discipline

(2) tnforcemant of general safety regulations
(3) Division and d e p a r œ n t a l a u n a g m n t
(4) Organisation and execution of maintenance plan8
(5) D e v e l o p m t urb oreeution of training plans
COHDlTfaW U A n t t Condition Watcher provide the specific rhipboard

watch organizations necessary to effect the deprees of readinems
prtter4bed for varying operational situations.
-1TxONAL )(AWNflSG: Conditional )riming i r an authoriced roôuction
i n organisational a u m i n 9 resulting from or accomplisheâ by a
C Q I I I I Y ~ S U T ~reduction
~O in the required operational capabilities prescribed
by the chief of Naval Operations for a fully ready ship.
m D I T f û N Or M I N G -1NtSS - QNXIUL DECREtS Ot ILADIWLSS
a. tXmT 1Rie aim is to anploy the full operational éapability

of the unit involved. All Stations are fully manned and c m
therefore be put into operation in the shortert:tiae.
Comnrndinp offieers may order temporay relurtion from the
irrst degree of readinems to p c m i t designated personnel
to &au and distribute meals at their rction stations.
b. SECQSD The aim is to unploy the best operational capability

t!!at CM be maintained for a prolonged period ( 0 . 9 . 2 to 3
w e e k s ) With up to one half of the personnel on duty. nrphasim
is to be laad on the warning -ponent.
C. mZm Tñr aim is tc' have realpns a v a i ì a k ! e te eountef M

wwpcc+d thrert r r ä to rctrir. s u f i i c i t r r t wuning trr,e cc
b r s w a higher degree of readiness, while reluing equipent
and up to one third o? t h e personnel on duty. n i í s degree
can k uíntained for an indafinite perlob.
d. ?OM The a h i s to b w all systems operational, mufficient

rystemr are to be u n n e d to give all warnings required.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
e. tlTZW Th* rim is to a l l w for rest uiâ relaxation w i t h i n t h e

limitations inpored by the notice ordered. It i s the lowest
degree of readiness only when in port or at anchor.
(1) Condition I: Battle Readiness -

knerrl Quarters All
pmrsonn.1 continuoruly a l e r t . All possible op.ratioiu1 systems rurned
Ud oporatíng. no rrintemnce upected except that mutinely associated
with watdi-rtmung and Urgent repbiZS. Mxfpm expected creu OnâurMce
i. 24 .continuow hours.

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED II-ENGL
(2) Condition XI: Battle Readiness -

Limited Action Condition IX
i s a special condLtion vhicn provides cont~nuingreadiness for limited
action or r u i m u n readiness in a specific funetional area for an exten.lac;
prrioâ of time at the exptnse of reduced readiness ín other functional
ar$ar. Accaoplishnunt of urqent undenay preventive maintenance and
support functions is expected. A a i n i m m of four to s i x hours to rest
is provided p.r m m per day. Subject to these conditiona, required
o p r a t i o m l systar are continuously manned and operatinp. )luhm
expected creu endurance at Condition II i r 10 continuous dayr.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(3) Condition SIX1 Warthe Cruislng kadinesr Operational
w8t-s u e m n n e d and omrating ar necessary to confonh with prercribeä
kquireã -rational ~ap.bilities (mûcri. Aeeomp1isìment of ali noriai
underuay maintenance, support and a8ninirtrative function. i s expected.
Opportunity for eight hours of rest ir provided per man per day. nutiipm~
expected crew enâurrnce at Condition III $8 60 continuous day,.
L
CUüTXNGLNCY IIlsLnJAHQ: A contingency allovancc ir a m a l l allowance of
time uhrch may t e ~ncluâeâin a standard tim to meet legitimate and
upected items of uork or delays, the p r e c i s e measurtment of which is
umconoaical because of their infrequent or irregular occurrence.
CûRRECTTvL MIUTENAXE (CM): Corrective Maintenance is uork aceanplished
oa A n unscheduled basAs because of u l f u n c t i o n , failure or dettrioration.
In quantitative t e m , it i # the rork1o.d associated w i t h restoration o f
&ísaâled r y n t m u . equipment, or components to an operational conditaon
within pnôeteraineâ tolerances and liisitations.
CüS7QFQR SVIPORT -WER ioQLl1-S (CS): Cuitmer Support is the

a?riliutive and uuantiutivt sum o f naval manpower requirements to
u c a p l l r h the niccrrary rorkloaâ as8oeiated w i t h providing repair and
c- 3

support rervicrr to units of the rleet. mi8 workload element i8 unique
to tender and repair ships.
DATA ELEWEKT t A basic unit of infoxmation having a unique meaning,
which has sub-categories (Data ftaisl of distinct units of values;
e.9. military personnel grade, sex, race, qeogrrphic location, and
rilitay unit.
DATA RECORXNC: This includes ccnn?ietion of forms or other records

reporting accomplishment of the maintenance action, and preparation of
repair request if the repair i s beyond the capability of ship's fort..
WCTRRIAL COHSTIUXNTS: Doctrinal constraints are those publications,

official correspondence, directives, and statements of guidance (oral
anb written) issued by competent authority which impact upon the
sunpower requirements for any c l a s s of ships or individual units of
the class. These include, but are not lrmited to:
il) Directed requirements related to numbers and types of

watch stations to be mannad. ,
( 2 ) Levels of administration of other support to be maintained.
( 3 ) Directed requirrments affecting qualitative assignments of

pcrsonnel.
DRfLIS AND PRACTICES: Drills and practices are composed of scheduled,
on station exercises vhich develop creu proficiency in support of
roquired mlss:an areas and cperatranal capabilitrcs.
DUTY STATUS WATCHSTANDER: Individuals who stand watches while in

a duty status and whose presence is required.
mLvTIffl: kr evolution is a w r k action or series of work actions which
require a designated portion of ship personnel to engage in a coordinated
effort to accomplish a specific functional capability. This includes
uwkload associated with the follouing:
Special Sea -tails for Piloting, hnchoring and boring.

Replenishment at Sea Details for Refuelling, üeprovisioning.
Rearming, Hi-line or light-line transfer, vertical replenishment
and cambinations of the above.
ûperational k t r i l s for Visit and Search, Boarding anâ Salvage,
&reue and Assirtance, W i n g ; Helo oprations (including launch,
recovery, in-flight Refuelling and transfer operations),
Lifeguard and Planeguard, and Unding Party.
C- 4
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

NAm VNCUSSXrXED ANEP
AVKEX C
- 21
c-5
EXCESS M I N G : hnning asrigned in excess of billets authorized
tACILTM UNfKIPiANeL ( ? X i a Facility Maintenance i r uork accoaplished

to u i n u i n cleuiliners and to prerenm the hull, superstructure urd all
.quipMnt against cormsion or deterioration. In quantitative terns, it
i 8 th. uorûload asrociat.4 w i t h routine housekeeping and periodic uork
m t í o t u âíctat.6 by deterioration of paint or otheruise presened
mrfa n o
. m1vuL T1Uf)SrWG: Poma1 Training i r composed of prriods o f inrtructions
which are scheduld, orgmired and directed in ~ t u r o . This i n c l d e r
N C actfvitior
~ a r first a i d lectures, instructional iovior and division
achool por-.
WNcTIOrUL W f N t s S a While 110 ship evolution or detail i8 characterired
ar a conâítion of manning readiness, two ruch functional requirement8 are
eonridered for ship iunpouer development k = i u r e of their influence on
tot.1 ship manning requirements for types affecteâ.. These are:
il) Fïight marterr *ir is a speciaîized,evolution of

aircraft carriers, conducted on a regular basis in support
of mission ac-plishæent and roquiring a significant portion
o f assigned personnel to be on station for prolonged periods.
(2) ñeplenishent This i r a specialized evolution applicable to

auxiliaries nerarally providing undenay replenishment services.
rUJCIXmSi The appmpriate rcsponiibili ties or ariigned duties ,

rcsponribilfties, 8issfot.s or tasks of an individual office or
G&3idt8th%.
1IvIQuI PACIDIIS E?iCIWLt1LlNGt t h e application of methods. techiquer, and
data ir- t h e rcientific âirciplines and technologier and porsonnel and
training as a multi-disciplinary dpproaeh to optbiting senWchíries
relrtionshípi in t h e planning, design and devrlopnent and test and
.rilution of weapon, aircraft urd rupport syrtass (soe also XLMW
YAcmRs RE-)
me discovmy and dirsemanition of nou knowledge

IIühWd ?ACTORS û E S E k X I î i
and irthodr to iaprovo the effectiveness of H u n a n ?actors tngineering
applicatiom in rystrar developwat. (See also "AN ? A m R s ENGXW~LRTNG)
~CeboPcT: Tho índividual assigned to a particu1.r billet or position.
8. - -
Tlrrt lova1 kintrPrrrtx under control of assigned commands
Ud n o n m ì l y eoaddrrcM bl maintainers organic to the user
c- 5
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD=NATO ANEP-21
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
E D 1-ENGL 1 9 9 1 Not for Resale
Sc 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 8 1 T T 2 S
~ ~~
ANEP - 21
ANNEX c
unit or attached there- fmai a supporting maintenance

o r g a n i z a t i o n . Tàe - r a t i o n a l bovn-tisr liait 1s M
important f a c t o r a t thir l e v e l .
b. -
Second l e v e l k i n t e n a n c e -
d e r c o n t r o l of assigned
comandr and normally conducted by mupprting n i n t e n r n c e
orguriutiont ruch ar S t a t i o n Workshops, U s e h i n t e m n e e
S e c t i o n s , and ûperational Suppert n i p s . k i r r e s t r i c t i o n
on t u r n around t h , i v a i l r b i l i t y of m r e extensive r e p a i r
f a c i l i t i e s and broader range of supply support are important
factors .
e. Third level -niintenante - i a i p l w n t e d u t i l i r i n g resources
administered by Headquarters I i r i t i a e rainUnd i Q J n i r t e r . 6
Ship Repair ünits e o n t r i c t s w i t h i n d u s t r y ( W ) . ?hird
l e v e l maintenance g e n e r a l l y covers overhaul or rebuild of
' oquipnent8.
-
UIINTENA?JQ KRYPCMER REQvIw%ZS : ñbintenanca mrn,-ioutr' requirriarn'r
ar8
__ the a u a l i t & t i v e u i d q u a n t r r r t i v e awn of naval manpo+er requirements
to p e r f o A p r e v e n t i v e , c ó r r e e t i w and f a c i l i t y maintenance on the s u p
urd i t s c e m p n e n t syrt- and e q u i p n t .
19rl(E READY AND Om AWAY (mCPA)r h k e ready and p u t auiy ir preparatory

urd c l e a n up work i n c i d e n t a l t o n i n t e n a n c e a c t i o n r . Unke ready include8
drawing t h e î h i n t c n a n c r k q u i r r a w n t Card (-1, obtaining ri.cersary
í n 8 t r u c t i o n manuall, t o o l 8 and m t e r i a l s , t r a n r i t to the work a r e a , urd
any p r e p a r a t o r y mrk which aay k required, much as r a o v a l of
i n t e r f e r e n c e . P u t away i n c l u d e s n e c e s s a r y r e p l a c e m e n t of i n t e r f e r e n c e
c l e a n u p . r e t u r n of t o o l s , rnanualc r n d HRCs, and r e q u i r e d t r a n s i t s .
RWì-DAYr A u n i t of 1 o r k .qual to the productive e f f o r t of one person
warking one n o n m l , e i g h t - h o u r workday. 1
19LN-HWR: A u n i t of work equal to the produetiye e f f o r t of one person

uorking one-bour .
W-KIKFH: A u n i t of work equal to the productive e f f o r t of one perron
m r k i n g eight hours per day, f i v e drys per ueek f o r a period of one month.
WTWC: n i e n p e c i f i c í n w n t o r y of people a t an a c t i v i t y i n t e m s of
murbers, grades, and occupational group8 .
-WER DFILRHXNAfIU4 n0aa (mix The Unriper k t r m i n a t l o n W e 1 is
a cœputexired program wed I n developing preliminary manning e s t i m t e r
d u r i n g +h. t e a s í b i l i t y / ~ n c e p t u a l?hate of ship design. It c o n t r i n r
d u l o s of -puer requirement8 ùy rhipborne 8ystar1, and own shíp
nrppoa el-nts for noriu1 urd a u s t e r e m a n n i n g l r v e l r .
C-6
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

S T D NATO A N E P - 2 1
No reproduction or networking permitted without license
9 from IHS ED 1-ENGL 1Not9for9Resale
1 m
ANEP - 21
NA’K) VNCUSSItILD ANNEX C
c-7
1 )UHPOWER RUNACE-: Planning, statistical forecasting, balancing,

and approving ouipover ruxuircments: i...,the specific n w b i r and kinds
of military billets or civilain positions required by each activity
(sea or shore), to perforai its assigned 8ission and tasks, ensuring at
all,tLus that billet Uid position requirements ashore adequately p r w i d e
for operational readiness, auqmentation of the fleet, maintenance,
aá~ninistrition,training8 reahhore rotation, etc. ?lanning anâ control
of m p w e r 8 and the effective utilltation of manpower to meet such
. rquiremmnti are proper functions of .ura9.arnt (conmandl coordination.
Th. exercise of these functions includes: techniques for forecasting
iiuipowr raquirwntrr statistical analysesr applications, anâ
interpretationst measures of effective use o f ninpawer utilizationr
developwnt and maintenance mrnpou8r systems and methods of supportr
including autauated capabilityr the d e w l o p e n t and the use of
productivity measuresz development and application of staffing standards,
or occupational identification cedes, on-site manpower validation surveys,
and related iunpoinr control procedures.
KWPOVLR wGE?
E NTSYSTEM: A manpouer functiona1.ar.a system containing
data and Frogrmm, for operations, projections, stúdies, and analyses in
manpower sunagement. It will provide manpower nanlgers at all echelons
t h e means for planning. progruming, coordinrting, abhinisterinq, &nd
assessing a11 categories of m a n p e r .
M W P û ü E R REpUIümCNTSr Human resources needed to accomplish specified
workloads o f orpanitations. Specifically: The number of officer and
enlisted manpower required for each activity, which has been approved
fcr planning p u ~ s e s ,as representing:
L ( a l A stated tentative nerd for manpower by quantities and skills
(b) A Btatment of the quantity and quality of manpower (billets)
needed to pcrforsi specific capabilities in a projected
8nvironment. ror ships, aircraft squadrons and shore
activities, these requirments are displayed in manpower
docments. ror equipment, systems or individual functions
these requirancnts are stated as pertaining to the specifLC
harûwue or task inmlved.
RESOüRcLS: Hwui resources available to

)Rwpo*’ER the s e w t e e s which can
k appìted againrt manpower requirements.
CUNPOYTR VALIDATION: The process of establishing through on-site manpower
utilization studies, the validity of stated military and civilian nanpoucr
muír-nu.
IOIN-ILASL: A unit of work equal to the productive effort of one p.rson
rotkrni eiphts hours w r day, five days per week for a periodof one
year,;adjusted to include paid leave.
NA’P6 VNCUSSIPIED
c-7
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS E D 1-ENGL 1991Not for Resale
S ISbCLI1IiO flOb3Li83 O75 111
~
-- .
ANEP - 21 C-8
NA= UNCUSSIFIED
MEDICAL CUPPORT: m d i c a l Support comprises work a c t i o n s

necrssuy t o m e t s h i p
h e a l t h and saniTation requiremenu. Hedical Support t a s k s i n c l u b workloads
necessary f o r operation Of 8 s i c k bay, minagement of medical storeroans and s t o r e s ,
and s h i p sui;fation u i d pest c m t r o l .
mSS1Nt: Uessinp includes r t m d i n g i n the mers l i n e , & r u i n g u t e n s i l s , bein9

served, e a t i n g , etc.
S-W: me r y r t e n u t í c recording and c r i t i c a l examination of e x i s t i n g and

propesed u i y r o f doing work. 8s meas of developing and applying easier and =re
e f f e c t i v e methob and reducing cpra.
HXLfTARY DvrY YORKLUAD: I n c l u d e s command rupport rork actions 8 r r o c i a t e d vith the

p r e p a r a t i a r m d execut%on of plans required for the i n t e r n a l functioning of the
c o a u n d . mese a c t i o n s are e s s e n t i a l l y m i l i t a r y in n i t u t e and include: maintenance
o f d i r c i p l i n e i e n f o r n m e n t of general s a f e t y r e p u l 8 t i e n r ; d i v i s i o n a l and drp.r+isental
~ n a 9 m e n t ;o r g a n i z a t i e n , âemlopiiwnt and executian of t r a i n h g plans; completion of
rQLiistratiw r e q u f r e w n t s 8 r s o c i a t e d v i t h ?î4 .nâ U.
HXLITARY REQUIREHmT: An e s t a b l i s h e d need j u s t i f y i n g t h e timely a l l o c a t i o n of
resources t o achieve a c a p a b i l i t y t o r c c m p ï i s h 8pproved militaty a ò j e c t i v e s ,
rissions or tasks.
,
lUSSIa4: The mission of a s h i p is a generalized r t a t e m n t of t h e purpose f o r which a
s h i p i s desrgned o r orqanized. The mission statement serves t o broadly 8 e f i n e t h e
f u n c t i o n a l requirements f o r a new s h i p and describe t h e employaunt c a p a b i l i t i e s for
an e x i s t i n g one.
HISSION W S : A sussron area it a functional category which describes a Emjot
warfare or support C a p . b i l i t y ( C . g. Anti-submuinc Warfare). For a S p e c i f i c s h i p ,
rasigncd mission areas provide a f i r s t level breakdown of the mission statement i n t o
T r
the broad frinctional a r e a t in which a c a p a b i l i t y is expected. )Ilsrion areas may t e
u s i v e 6 as prj:.ary or rerondary caprbjlitier. A p r i r a q d a n i u z u e b i r or4= I R
uhrck. i ship m u t becapable of perf or nun^ LD support of zts a i s s i o n . A secondary
mirriosi a r e a i s one ir. which a s h i p may be a w c t e d t o perfom, b u t which i s not
e s s e n t i a l to missiai 8ccompîirhnrnt. S e c a n d q arission a r t a c a p a b i l i t y is normally
c o h c i b r n t t o a primary c a p a b i l i t y and does not require a d d i t i o n a l e q u i p m n t or
m n p w e r t o 8chieve t h e prescribed l e v e l of p . r f o r m u i n .
Ort SHIP T R A I N I N G : Oif s h i p Training is conposed of i n d i v i d u a l or t e m

a s s i g n w n t ta fo-1 cours*s of i n s t r u c t i o n provided by an organization e x t e r n a l
t o t h e ship.
O P E ñ A T I N G PROFILE: m e operatin9 p r o f i l e describes the expected p a t t e r n of s h i p
employment burinp t h e Operational phase of iu l i f e cycle. The elemints of t h e
o p e r a t i n g profile u.
:
(1) Ovrrhaul c y c l e , p r c jected 8v.i iibiiities and upkeep periods.
( 7 ) Expactad 8 v a i l r b i l i t y for a p e r a d o n under normal urd emergency c o n d i t i o n s .
( 3 ) Expected aorui p t t e r n of o p e r a t i a i s .
(4) finis- r e 8 d i ~ s 8to 9 e t widemmy.
OPERATIONAL AUDIT AND XNIERVIEW: Work s t u d y techniques wed i n data c o l l e c t i o n .

#.sed o n ' a i t u a l o b s e r v a t r a s or onint8miWS. the a n a l y s t determines the
.
f t o q u n c y and m i t tio required fo prrfonn my given t a s k . I t i s essential
C-8
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 Ibb5Y9YO OOb3485 h48 I
. . c-9
i that only required workload is identified and collected and not workload
actually k i n 9 prformed but not rrquired.
QPLRATXONU W A b î L f T I t S : An operational Capability functionally describes
M action raquired to achieve a prescribed mission area capability b . g .
tng.9. s a r i n e s w i t h anti-submarine armunent) For a specific ship,
.SSign.d operational capaùilities provide a second level breakdown o f the
mission statement and indicate general Subsystan requirements and
capabilities. Multiple operational capabilities i i ~ ybe prescribed under
mission area.
OBLRATIOHAL IIANNINC: ûperrtional manning is the qualitative and quantitative

s m of aacpovar requirements to man essqntial operating stations during
a spocifiod condition of reAdineSS. F . c operational manpower requiremnt
for a condition readiness is expressed in terns of the related condition
uat ch orgrnization.
(1) An ûpcratinq Station is a specific portion vhich must be

Fanned f o r the proper or effective funcrionjnq of a system,
subsystem or equipment.
(21 A Witch Station is an operating station manned on A continuing

basis to satisfy the required operational capabilities
prescribed for the condition of readiness in effect. A watch
station requires routine relief of assigned prrsonnel.
( 3 ) A Station is A position manned to satisfy oparating station
L requirmients for A ipecific ship fuzictirrn. Assigned personnel

man 4 rtation on an as-required basis for an indefinite Berio¿
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
as dictated by the need for the functional requirement.

The àrlintation by individual billet of t h e
0 R C ; A N X Z A T I ~ U . CUNNfNC:
s i n i a m qualitative And quantitative m a n p e r required to p r f o m the unit's
assigned missions. Orpanirational Unnir.9 requirements are promulgated in
ninpouer DoCuauau.
OWN W I T SUPPORT W O W E R ~oQuIREM%T'S: ûununit support is t h e sum of

qualitative and quantitacive naval manpower requirements to perform
i&ninistrative, military, resupply, food service, hygienic and other service
tarks in support of unit personnel and equipment.
-
ani unit support also includes tht auiparer requirtments to perform siscellanaous
uork which does not fall within the cateqories of operational or maintenance
u n n í n g , but uhieh is essential to the operation of A ship or the
accamplishment of its assigned mission.
?EMmUñFZDS: Personal needs include health and comfort n e e d s , m i l ,

leisure, relaxation, uniform chanqes, etc.
I c- 9

ANEP - 21 NATO VNCUSSIT'IED
c-1 o
ANSEX C
=E!SG??.TI (PERS): ?hose i n d i v i d u a l s required i n either a m i l i t a r y or

c i v i l i a n c a p a c i t y t o accomplish t h e assigned mirsion/tasking. In the
context of manpower arnagemtr!t, per80nnel connotes i n d i v i d u a l r , whereas
mnpover connotes requirements or b i l l e t s .
PP&ENTIVE " M b O W : Preventivo maintenance i a tmrk a c c o m p l i r h d

in rerponre to acbeduleâ tequirementr. In q u a n t i t a t i v e t e m , it i r the
t o t a l rorkload a r r o c i a t e d with th* perfornianc8 o f maintenance a c t i o n 8 on
o m r a t i o n a l syrtemr, equipnent, or caaponenta that c o n t r i b u t e s t o
unrnternapted operation within designed e h a r a c t e r i s t i c r .
PRIMARY m i The main fWCti0nr a s s i g n e d to an individu81 through hi8

assignment t o a p a r t i c u l a r b i l l o t .
PROWCTIVEA U ~ A N C L ?ACTOR: The p r o d u c t i v e allovanee f a c t o r i a a Z O I
allowance a p p l i e d t o baric productive uork r.quirrar.nt8 t o reflect thore
delay8 a r i r i n g fram f a t i g u e , environmental e f f e c t r , perronal needs and
unavoidable i n t e r r u p t i o n s which s e m e t o i n c r e a s e the t i m e requirtd f o r
umrk accosip1ir)rmtnt.
*
PROfiCILNCY TRAINING: Proficiency t r a i n i n g i r individual or team inStruCtiOn
ia au;gicrt of required technieal or m i l i t a m s k i l l s . The m a j o r i t y of thir
t r a i n i n g i r accmpli#hed on vatch, on the job, or during b r i l l a and practices.
PROJECìTD OPERATIONAL RIVIR3NHENT (POE): The projected o p e r a t i o n a l

7
cnrrronüacnL e s t a b l i s h e r the mort dunanding condition of operataon f o r
which the a h i p m u s t be manned.
P E W T I O N ALLOWANCE: An addition to the basic time intended to provide the
worker with the opportunity to recover from the phyriologicaî and
psychological effects of carrying out specified work under rpecifìed
conditions and t o allov attention to personal needs.
REQUIRED I V N ~ I O N A LWABILXTY I=): h \ r p e c i f i c task t o be accanplkshed

which c o n t r i b u t e s to p r r f o n n m c e o f a r e q u i r e d funtion. An RFC i s a
8 u W i v i r i o n of a funetional c a p r b i l i t y and includes paruneters.
REWIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES CROCS) I A h q u i r e d Operational C a p a b i l i t y

i 8 a 8 p r C i f i C functional requirement which murt be performed by a 8 h i p i n
mupport of i t 8 assigned mission under a p a r t i c u l a r degree o r c o n d i t i o n o f
r e a d i n e r r . The ROC Statement f o r a clasr of ship8 i s a canposit. l i s t i n g
of a l l rwquíred o m r a t i o n a l capabilities.
-
RICCfnG: Rigging is defined ar t h e 8\01 o f individual work a c t i o n s t h a t
auat be actaarp1ish.d f o r an m m l u t i o n prior t o coisaencement and g e n e r a l
manning. h r m p l e r are f l a k i n g o u t mooring l i n e s p r i o r to r e t t i n g the fp.cia1
Lea M d Anchor Detail, etc.
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NATO VNCUSSIFILD
c- 10

Ium WCiASSf?IED ANEP - 21
AmEX c
C-i i
SERvlCZ DTVLIISIOH W W C Z (SDlr S e N i c e diversions u e those actions .

required of prsonnel by regulatiOM or the nature of shipboard routrne
h i c h must be or are norsally accmplished during nonnal off-witch working
hours urd d i c h therefore deduct f r m individual capacity to do productive
-*a
Sñn " ? W E R (S)(o)t The Ship M p e r Document (-1 delineates

bv individual billets the ainiaun quantitative bnd qualitatiw personnel
m e d i essential to thr prfOrniuiC8 of bS8igned mission area8 and rmquired
operational cap&bilitias prescri&d for an active fully ready ship. me
Mnning centrind therein í r predicatod upon the rimlion, required operational
cripabilitiei, op8rating profile, configuration and workload.
SHIP'S COWPANY: The creu of a rhip, consirtin9 of the officers and

enlisted men officially ordered to duty aboard such ship. .
SKILL T I W t An area o f applied knowledge.
S A N OF -
Li A'concept of t h e #cope of supervision required to provide
effective muragement, subject to such variants as 'the number and kind of
parsonne1 reporting directly to a supemisor, t h e type of supervision
r.quir.6, the kind o f work they perform. the distance at which the wrk is
performed, and the effect this distance has on the rerction-tim required.
ffttZ;U, CúXDITfmS Or READINESS: In addition to the principal conditions

of manning readiness described above which are conmon to a l l ship#, there
u e special conditions of muining readiness which are peculiar to certain
types. By the nature of reciuirements imposed, these rpecial conditions
normally d i c t a t e a- level of n u k n g greater than any of the principal
conditions and thus serve to govern total crew t i r e .
STRïIIZ#MNr Strikeâavn is the m m of individual work action8 required to
m t w provisionr, amunition, or other items received during rn evolution.
Ordinarily, s w or a l l of the work necessary to effect strikedown will be
bc-plhhed concurrently w i t h receipt.
LMS?tCfUT!Yt 'ûfficer Bkill fields in which specialized education, training,

u4 experience are uprested as requirements seconday to their specialty
(designator).
SUPPLY ScvP?ORT: Supply Support comprises wrk actions associated with

8hipbeud storeleeping, food service. rhip's .tore, and disbursing functions.
P l v a s r i n g the workload n o m l l y prforaed by personnel in #e Supply
Support includes :
(1) -ration of t h e supply office including clerical functions

involved in record keeping, requisitioning and reporting.
.
NAK) 1MCIASSlPXED
c-11
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

- - ANEP - 21
m-Ex c
Haintenante of r t o r e r o o a r for repair part., q u i p a g e and

consrimable a t o t e r , inventory mnagement and irruer.
Operation of the 8hip'r atore, vending machines, laundry,
barber 8hop and o t h e r service function,.
t d sendee f u n e t i o n r including food preparation, mervice urb

r o u t i m handling rnd brerkout of proviriona.
Dirburring f u n c t i o n s anâ financial nna9ement.
-
-xi A unit of work.
TASK ANLLtrsxS: k r c r i p t i o n and q u a n t i f i c a t i o n o f individual uork ta8kS
or 9roup of related tasks. Q u a n t i f i c a t i o n should be exprerred in terms
o f the t h required to accomp1i.h a r i n g l e tark b r k unit).
TMINfNGs For the purpores o f Sm development, t r a f n i n p i s ' d e f f n e d as

a c t i v i t y of a p r a c t i c a l or i n s t r u c t i o n a l n a t u r e which c o n t r i b u t e s d i r e c t l y
t o combat r e a d i n e s s o r personnel e f f e c t i v e n e s s , b u t w h i c h # o t h e n i r e d e t r a c t s
frcm i n d i v i d u a l capacity to accomplish productive u o r k .
TRhIWINC R F Q V I m f z
a. A r e q u i r m c n t t o t r a i n personnel i n a specified q u a n t i t y t o perform

i d e n t i f i e d d u t i e s .ad t h e r e a f t e r be available for a r s i g w e n t to t h e d u t i e 8
a t a rprcifred t i m e .
b. A requirement for a t r a i n i n ; or edt*=atior.progrut which rill produce

t r a i n e d petronnc¶ fcr 4n idenzff;c¿ p u p o r c .
e. h e performance which i r r e q u i r e d of a p r r o n i n order to be e f f e c t i v e

in a given s i t u a t i o n . Thus, the jobs t o a r c h l n d l v i d u a l r are a r s i g n e d
have p e r f o m a n c e connotationr, which a r e t r a i n i n g requirement8 i n th. r e n r e
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
t h a t th. individuri18 murt be t r a i n e d to porforia a8 raquired.
d. A need, ertablirhed by the t r a i n i n g organization, for rupport of

r p . c i f ioâ nature.
üNlCfCGXNGr Unrigging i r the a m or work a c t i o n 8 that N a t be i c c o a p l i r h e d

f o l î w i n g an e w l u t î o n exclusive of r t r i k e d o n i . I t includes c l e a n up,
n r t w i n g of 9ear~andarrociated t r a b .
U?ILIîY TASXr A u t i l i t y tark i r rrork action required of an i n d i v i d u a l

or group which is neither & r o u t i n e requirement nor i d e n t i f i a b l e under any
othar uorkload category. mir i n c l u d e r workload a r r o c i a t e d w i t h the
follouing: .
. (11 Working partier (other than r o u t i n e rupply departasent f u n c t i o n s ) .

nAm VNCUSSIFXED ANEP - 21
ANHEX C
C-13
t (2) watch uid duty augmentations ie.9. fog lookouts, fire and
special watches, etc. 1 .
(3) niseellanmus work in rate not quantifiable IB A V a t & ,
maintenance, support or administrative requiranent.
=RI(*'Rie activity of 8 body or mind which can be measured againat

rtandardr in time, quantity or quality. mis includes:
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
a. Operation of .quipinnt
c. niintenuice
d . . Adninístration
e. Support
i. Utilities taiks and evolutions ,
h. SupeWiSiOn, job-related conversation, etc.
VDRII-AñZA: The functional field or physical location in which work is

aceomplisheû.
WORK CENTER: A grouping of personnel uring similar machines, processes,
methods, and operations and performing homogeneous type work, u s u a l l y
located in a centralzted area. The t e m is used to identify a relatively
aia11 activity within a broader functional segment. Personnel within a
uork centre perform work that basically contributer to t h e same end product
or result and their duties are riarilar or closely related.
WDRX m: me flar or movement of thing8 being worked on when parsing
from one operation to another. Measured by quantity, rate of movement,
and s i n i m m t h - l a g or smoothness in performance.
üOW3AAD: The M o u n t of work in terms of work units which organizations

or índaviduals perform or u e responsible for performing.
WûûX A technique -ploy& independently or in conjunction

w i t h cost AcCOuntinp for the collection o f data on man-hours and production
bu work uniu, .o thit the relationship between uork performed and m n -
)#U8 expinded can be calmlated rnb used 4 s t h e basis for manpower
planning, rcheduling, production, budget justification, performuice
evolution, and -st control.
NATO W W S I ? I E D
C-13

~
S T D - N A T O ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1771 H 61ri.54140 0 0 b 3 7 L 7 T O T E
~ ~
.. ..--
WORX SA)9rJNGr See Activity S u p l i n g .
Yom STMDMDt The n&r o f man-hours selected to rcmnplirh each uork

unit for the purpare of appraising an operation.
WRX STVW PmGnA!!i
ur8 a r k measurement
to 'assist c a m ~ n d sin obtaining optham use of iurpowr and m t e r i . 1
zm.OurHI.
a. Accounuble and tangible expression of output or performance which

c m be i d e n t i f i e d and adequately d e s c r i b d for the purpou of work
wasur.ai.nt and/or cost accounting.
b. An i t a a or group o f it- which 8emr.n to measur8 mount# of work.
WôRJWEEK: The t o t a l time expressed i n hours d i c h i s 8V4il.blO to

a c c a i p l i s h the required workload (including watches).
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

D-1
YU
iE
f8
-
ZU
m
8 I 2 la
YU
%E
ZO
.
m
8 12 la 3
t
YU
iO EI
-
20
5: 9
r
n
8
t
a
o
a
CI
8
I
3
-
ZU 3 o o
a
w g
-
Y
G
Y
t
iG
U
- br
E8 I ~~
I
P 3Y U t
m
I2 Ia
r. i9 n w o H
L
I
s a U eL a a k
O O O O O O O
e y1 * o N I
s a s
O 8 O O 8 8
D-1
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

STD-NATO ANEP-21 E D 1 - E N G L 1991 6654940 OOb3LiC10 TO5
D-2
-
Y
E
O
W
P
8
1 eg -
z
3- a
O
a
W c
U
e
O
z
8
-i
c)
3
z d
-
8 P
O
ci
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Lil
c(
Lrr
c1
z v)
v)
8 a
4
U
z
3
C
c
-a
4
W 2
2
z
8
7
ë
Ed
T T
'6
e
E
U
F E
z 8
5
o
V
m œ W
--
P
Oc, -
8
D-2

~
~~ ~
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1971 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0 0 6 3 4 9 3 7YL
d. 'Rie f o l l w i n g table c o n u i n s an a n a l y s i s of the at-rea workweeks:
Ya t ck L tinder Non-Witchst andcr
Tpral HOL-s ir-JLUArueekly i6e.c 168 .O

. o
k88 - 4 V d l . b h tir:
Sleep 56.0 56.0

Clrrsinp 14.0 14.0
?ersanal n o d s 21.0 21.0
Sunday (free t i r ) 3.0 3.0
Your8 av8ilaùle for u s i q n e â work 74.0 66.0

-. (uorlneekl
Work L l n n t s t
watch
krPiC8 DíV8r8i-8 Urd
S6.0
4.5
--
6.0
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Trahing
work 13.5 60.0
(L dioduled/lbischeâuled 1
At-Lea YorkvieL. 74.0 66.0

-~~ ~ ~ ____
STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 Y 6654940 0 0 6 3 4 9 2 B B B m,

ANEP - 21 L
ANNEX E
E-2
(il m e a c t e d .bow i r 6 &y rcheduled workveek plus Sm&y
Wrtch.8
(2) Service dáverrim urd t r r i n i n g houri for W8tchrt.nding p.rionne1

a n f 8 c t o r e d to reflect tho8e rcheduled event8 occurring while the wmbor
i r on watch general &ills0 quarters (every t h i r d day)). lours
i n d i c a t e d &va h8ve k e n r t m d u d i a d for Conditiar III. krvicm
álvisím a d training hours uill iacreu. in Conditian Il.
(3) k j o r element, o f acbeâu1.d work are ?nO and auS.
e. me foll-ing table c a i t . h r ur ui4lysir of M o inport rorlneakr:
6 Week B 8 s e Averam
I
h M l y S f 8 of Work u i d Duty Hours:
l 9 o ~ a Work
l Hours 225.00 ' 37.50
Duty Weekdays 82 .SO 13.7s
Duty Weekend - 48 .o0 - 8.00
Potu Nourr an board i n 8 Work, W4tch or

Duty L t 8 t W 3ss. so 59.25
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Watchrturder Non-Watchrtander
v
59.25 55.25
9.33 9.33
2.33 2.33
1.7s 1.72
0.84 4.84
r0t.l B o w Available f o r Workweeks IS. O0 41.00

watchrtuikr ñon-Watchstuibrr
9.33 u
& M a Wwrrionr u i b Training 6.20 6. SO I

Work 29.47 34. SO
hport üorkueek 45.00 4 1 .O0
IPA'LD üNCXASSIFItD
E-2

--
ANEP 21
NAIY)
E-3
UNCLASSIFIED
-
"EX E
(1) k f l e c t e d above ir a 5-day rchcduled workweek plum weekend

war&..
(2) QI. day i n i i x duty rot.tion w i t h a duty weekend i n c l u b d .
i. In the 6.velopawnt of the Sm, the standard uorkueekm are to be

u t i l i z e d am a conrtraint. mey form the u u l y t í c a l bare for worklord
caaiputatiau. The n8ture o f Navy work, Watch and duty requirement8 makas
it impasribla môer a l l circuartmnm te fix work períodr an a daily or
w e k l y b u h . Avaraging technique8 have, therefore, been eip1oy.d in
d e t e m h i n g the el-ntr w h i c h COapriSe the r u i o u workweeks. k a
r e s u l t , they ara not necermarily an exprerrion of the auiaiuia weekly hourr
--`,,,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
wñlcb might actually k expnded by ur average weekly hourr that w i l l

be upended on a m n t h l y or annul barir. At-mea, the u o r k i m k a m m ~ m
w a r t i m e environrrnt uith the mit rterming i n Condition XII (Yartir
C r u i r h g kaâinerr) on a thme Section watch b88ir. Inport, the uorkwek
m m ~ the m mit to be in Condition V (Inport Peacetime ù e i â i n e r r ) w i t h a
riniiiip of mir duty mection8.


ANEP-21 (Procedure For Ship Manning)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANEP-21 (Procedure For Ship Manning)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STD-NATO ANEP-2L ED L-ENGL L99L = 6654940 0063392 9T7

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

PROCEDURE FOR SHIP MANNING

T h i s ANEP i s p a r t of t h e ANEP S e r i e s on Ergonomics (Human F a c t o r s ) i n S h i p

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

NORTH ATLATN IC TREATY ORGANIZATION

MILITARY AGENCY FOR STANDARDIZATION (MAS)

NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION

1. ANEP-21 "Procedure for Ship Manning for NATO Surface Ships" is a

2. ANEP-21 is effective on receipt.

3. It is permissible to distribute copies of this publication t o

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

S T D - N A T O A N E P - 2 1 E D 1 - E N G L 19?1 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 00633’35 606

II CHAPTER II RESERVATION BY NATIONS

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

RECORD OF NATIONAL RESERVATIONS (CONT.)

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Change Date Effective By Whom

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

1. The p u r p o s e of t h i s document i s to d e f i n e a uniform methodology

2. This Allied Naval E n g i n e e r i n g P u b l i c a t i o n , ANEP-21, has been

3. Each n a t i o n i s encouraged t o use t h i s ANEP i n i t s own design i n

4. T h i s ANEP i s p a r t of t h e ANEP Series On Ergonomics (Human F a c t o r s )

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL L99L 6 6 5 4 9 4 0 0063399 2 5 1

CHAPTER PAGE NO.

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

1 INTRODUCTION 4 PAGE NO.

3 THE SHIP MANN ING DOCUM EN" (SMDL

4 THE DEVELOPMENT OP WORKLOAD ELEMENTS

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

5. Utility Task and Evolution Manning 4-17

5 ALLOWANCES AND CONSTRAINTS

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

STD-NATO ANEP-21 ED 1-ENGL 1991 66.54940 0 0 6 3 4 0 2 h7b lcl

7 PROCEDURES FOR DOCUMENT DEVELOP m

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

(a) A stated tentative need for manpower by

(b) A statement of the quantity and quality of

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

1.3.2 The following elements comprise the workload for the

(a) Operational workload

(3) Utility task and evolution workload

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

1.6 LIST OF ANNEXES

ANNEX B Ship Manning Requirements Analysis Chart (In Port)

ANNEX C Gl08sary o f Terms

ANNEX D National Rank Equivalences for Naval Personnel

ANNEX E Typical U.S. Navy Standard Workweek

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

2.1 The ShiD Mannina Document

Management and control:

Discussion is directed to the establishment of man-

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Pig. 1 Symbolic representation of the four categories

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

2.2.1 Operational Manninq

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

2.2.4 Utilitv Task & Evolution Manning

2.3 &&gWANCES AND CONSTRAINTS

Copyright North Atlantic Treaty Organization

2.4 DETERMINATION OF MANPOWER STRUCTURE