UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

REPORT ASSESSEMENT

Student Name : KHAIRUL HAFIDZI SIDEK

Student ID No. : 55213117243

Company Name : CHEMSAIN KONSULTANT SDN BHD

(place of INTRA)
CCP MARINE AND HEAVY ENGINEERING SDN BHD

Evaluator Name : DR. NORZAHIR SAPAWE

Evaluator ID No. : 523059

………………………………………… …………………….
University Supervisor’s Signature Date

REPORT ASSESSMENT Page 1 of 3

Effective Date: January 2020
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

GRADING *W SCORE
EVALUATION
CRITERIA
Poor Average Good
(1-2) (3) (4-5)

A) Format & No summary; No Inadequate Informative 3

Organization table of contents; summary; table summary; table of
No page of contents not in contents in logical
o Students abide by numbering; sequence; page sequence; page
the format given unsuitable sub- numbering; numbering; suitable
o Report is titles. acceptable sub- sub-titles.
effectively titles.
organized
o Title page
o Abstract
o Acknowledgement
o Table of Content
o List of Figures
o List of Tables
o References &
Appendices

(CLO5)

B) Company No main idea Main ideas are Main ideas are 2

Information presented; Ideas presented to clearly presented;
are presented in some extent; Ideas are presented
o Location of the an order that Ideas are not in an interesting
company distracts from presented in an manner; Ideas are
o Company’s clear order that adds supported by
organization chart communication; clarity; Some information and
o Nature of Ideas are not ideas are logic.
company’s supported by supported by
business/activities information and information and
o Company’s are illogical. logic.
products/ services

(CLO5)

REPORT ASSESSMENT Page 2 of 3

Effective Date: January 2020
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

C) Technical Section No main idea Main ideas are Main ideas are
presented; Ideas presented to clearly presented;
(CLO1) are presented in some extent; Ideas are presented
an order that Ideas are not in an interesting
Objective of the distracts from presented in an manner; Ideas are 1
project / training clear order that adds supported by
communication; clarity; Some information and
Schedule of the Ideas are not ideas are logic; Appropriate 1
project/training supported by supported by conclusions are
(eg. Gantt Chart) information and information and based upon evidence
are illogical; logic; presented.
Description of the Inappropriate Conclusions do 3
project/training conclusions are not follow from
presented. ideas presented.
Explanation on 3
trainee’s involvement
in the project/training

Technical 2
documentation such as
drawing, diagram,
flowchart and
programming

D) Language / writing / Errors in Sentence Generally, error free 2

convention / vocabulary. sentence structure, in regard to sentence
structure, punctuation, structure,
punctuation, capitalization, punctuation,
capitalization, spelling, and capitalization,
spelling, and standard usage spelling, and
standard usage errors are standard usage.
(CLO5) impair noticeable, but
readability. do not seriously
impair
readability.

E) Conclusion / Inappropriate Conclusions / Appropriate 3

Recommendation conclusions / recommendation conclusions /
recommendation do not follow recommendation is
is presented. from ideas based upon evidence
presented. presented.
(CLO1)

TOTAL SCORE /100

*W – Weightage

REPORT ASSESSMENT Page 3 of 3

Effective Date: January 2020