Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Aims
The course aims to offer an in-depth treatment of the evolution of economic thinking. The emphasis
is placed upon how the theory and methods of the past have influenced contemporary economics.
Discussions will chronicle the progress of economic ideas and philosophies from ancient to modern
times. The major tenets of various schools of western economic thought will be explored. Students
will be trained to evaluate the contributions of economic thinkers and apply the arguments from major
schools of thought to current economic issues.
Alignment of Teaching and Learning Activities, Assessment Tasks and Types of Generic Skills
Outcomes Achieved
Principal Reading:
Brue and Grant (2013), ch.1.
2
2-3 Foundations of Political Economy
a. Economic philosophies of Plato and Aristotle
b. St. Thomas Aquinas on just price
c. Mercantilism
d. Physiocrats: Francois Quesnay
Principal Reading:
Brue and Grant (2013), chs.1-3.
Ekelund and Robert (1997) chs.3-4
Supplementary Reading:
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), chs.1-2.
Principal Reading:
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), ch.3.
Brue and Grant (2013), ch.5.
6 David Ricardo
a. (Labour) Theory of value
b. Theory of rent
c. Law of distribution
Principal Reading:
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), ch.5
Supplementary Reading:
Brue and Grant (2012), ch.7.
Principal Reading:
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), chs.6 & 8.
Brue and Grant (2013), ch.8.
8 Reading week
Principal Reading:
Brue and Grant (2013), chs.6 & 8;
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), chs.4 & 6.
Principal Reading:
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), ch.11.
Brue and Grant (2013), chs.14-15.
Supplementary Reading:
Ekelund and Robert (1997) chs.3-4.
Principal Reading:
Hunt and Lautzenheiser (2011), ch.15
Brue and Grant (2013), ch.16, 21-22.
Resources
Textbooks:
Brue, Stanley and Randy Grant 2013. Evolution of Economic Thought, 8th edition, South-Western,
Cengage Learning.
Hunt, E.K. and Mark Lautzenheiser 2011. History of Economic Thought: A Critical Perspective, M.E.
Sharpe, 3rd edition.
Supplementary Reading:
Blaug, Mark 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bridel, Pascal 1987. Cambridge Monetary Thought: The Development of Saving-Investment Analysis
from Marshall to Keynes, London: Macmillan.
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. and Hebert, Robert F. 1997. A History of Economic Theory and Method, 4th
ed., McGraw Hill.
Landreth, Harry and Colander, David C. 1994. History of Economic Thought, 3rd ed., Houghton
Mufflin Company.
Pribram, Karl 1983. A History of Economic Reasoning, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
4
Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of economic analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spiegel, Henry William 1991. The Growth of Economic Thought, 3rd ed., Duke University Press.
Descriptors
Grade
Actual attendance Punctuality Participation in class
Excellent Attends all classes. Always punctual for Participates actively in classes.
A, A- classes.
Good Attends all classes. Late to class 2 to 3 times. Participates noticeably in classes.
B+, B, B-
Satisfactory Absent from class once Late to class 4 to 5 times. Participation is sporadic & passive.
C+, C, C- without any acceptable reason.
Marginal Absent from class once Late to class 6 to 7 times. Participation in classes is rare.
D+, D without any acceptable reason.
Fail Absent from class more than Late to class more than 7 No participation in classes.
E, F once without any reason. times.
AT2: Quiz
The quiz will be conducted in week 8 in the form of short essay questions. The quiz will cover the course
content from week 1 to week 8.
Grade Descriptors
Excellent Evidence of substantial understanding of the concepts covered in the course.
A, A-
Good Fairly good understanding of the concepts covered in the course.
B+, B, B-
Satisfactory Fair understanding of the concepts covered in the course.
C+, C, C-
Marginal Weak understanding of the concepts covered in the course.
D+, D
Fail Don’t understand the topics covered in the course at all.
E, F
Grade Descriptors
Excellent Highly innovative in ideas; well written and presentation of materials; well-referenced and
A, A- demonstrates the use of a wide variety of sources; excellent understanding of subject area; good
content and analytical input.
Good Able to write a comprehensive paper; logical presentation of materials; evidence of relevant
B+, B, B- reading; good understanding of subject area; evidence of analytical skills; materials organized
5
but links can be improved.
Satisfactory Some problems in analysis and presentation of materials; some evidence of reading and
C+, C, C- understanding of the subject.
Marginal Organization of materials and arguments are not satisfactory; weak understanding of key
D+, D concepts and issues; little analytical input.
Fail The paper is not written in a clear and logical way; it does not use literature to support the body
E, F of the text, and literature has not been correctly referenced; no analytical input, this is merely a
general description of other people’s research findings; poor organization; the paper is largely
incomplete; most of the materials is plagiarized.
Grade Descriptors
Excellent Present confidently and convincingly; excellent verbal and visual presentation skills;
A, A- excellent coverage of materials and contents; good time management in presentation.
Good Good verbal and visual presentation skills; good coverage of materials and contents; good
B+, B, B- organization and time management of the presentation.
Satisfactory Acceptable verbal and visual presentation skills; adequate coverage of materials and
C+, C, C- contents; adequate organization and time management of the presentation.
Marginal Barely acceptable verbal and visual presentation skills; weak coverage of materials and
D+, D contents; poor organization and time management of the presentation.
Fail Not attempted; no preparation at all
E, F
Final examination will be conducted at the end of the semester. The format of the examination is two hours
long essay questions.
Grade Descriptors
Excellent Evidence of deep understanding of the issues covered in the entire course; excellent
A, A- capabilities in assessing the contributions of major economists in history; able to integrate
relevant concepts in answering the questions; extensive elaboration of ideas and justifying
opinions with ample evidences.
Good Good understanding of the issues covered in the entire course; evidence of good capacity for
B+, B, B- analysing the issues critically and answering the questions from multiple perspectives;
evidence of good capability to integrate relevant concepts in answering the questions;
sufficient elaboration of ideas and justifying opinions with abundant evidences.
Satisfactory Fair understanding of the issues covered in the entire course; some ability to apply concepts in
C+, C, C- answering the questions; reasonable elaboration of ideas and justifying opinions with
examples.
Marginal Weak understanding of the issues covered in the entire course; weak capacity for analysing the
D+, D issues critically and answering the questions from multiple perspectives; marginal capability
to integrate relevant concepts in answering the questions; fair elaboration of ideas and
justifying opinions with few real-life examples.
Fail Poor understanding of the contents covered in the course; presentation of irrelevant materials;
E, F answers are unstructured; clear evidences of underachieved.