You are on page 1of 8

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com
Construction
and Building

Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555


MATERIALS
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat

Influence of activator on the strength and drying shrinkage


of alkali-activated slag mortar
a,*
Cengiz Duran Atisß , Cahit Bilim b, Özlem Çelik c, Okan Karahan a

a
Erciyes University, Civil Engineering Department, Kayseri, Turkey
b
Mustafa Kemal University, Civil Engineering Department, Hatay, Turkey
c _ _
Istanbul University, Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 1 December 2006; received in revised form 8 October 2007; accepted 17 October 2007
Available online 26 November 2007

Abstract

The development of new binders, as an alternative to traditional cement, by the alkaline activation of industrial by-products (i.e.
ground granulated slag and fly ash) is an ongoing research topic in the scientific community [Puertas F, Amat T, Jimenez AF, Vazquez
T. Mechanical and durable behaviour of alkaline cement mortars reinforced with polypropylene fibres. Cem Concr Res 2003;33(12):
2031–6]. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using and alkaline activated ground Turkish slag to produce a mortar
without Portland cement (PC).
Following the characterization of the slag, mortar specimens made with alkali-activated slag were prepared. Three different activators
were used: liquid sodium silicate (LSS), sodium hydroxide (SH) and sodium carbonate (SC) at different sodium concentrations. Com-
pressive and flexural tensile strength of alkali-activated slag mortar was measured at 7-days, 28-days and 3-months. Drying shrinkage
of the mortar was measured up to 6-months. Setting times of the alkali-activated slag paste and PC paste were also measured.
Setting times of LSS and SH activated slag pastes were found to be much slower than the setting time of PC paste. However, slag paste
activated with SC showed similar setting properties to PC paste.
LSS, SH and SC activated slag mortar developed 81, 29, and 36 MPa maximum compressive strengths, and 6.8, 3.8, and 5.3 MPa max-
imum flexural tensile strengths at 28-days. PC mortar developed 33 MPa compressive strength and 5.2 MPa flexural tensile strength. LSS
and SH activated slag mortars were found to be more brittle than SC activated slag and PC mortars.
Slag mortar made with LSS had a high drying shrinkage, up to six times that of PC mortar. Similarly, slag mortar made with SH had
a shrinkage up to three times that of PC mortar. However, SC activated slag mortar had a lower or comparable shrinkage to PC mortar.
Therefore, the use of SC as an activator for slag mortar is recommended, since it results in adequate strength, similar setting times to PC
mortar and comparable or lower shrinkage.
 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Slag; Alkali-activation; Strength; Setting time; Shrinkage

1. Introduction molten blast-furnace slag is rapidly chilled as by immersion


in water [3–5]. Fast cooling results in minimum crystallisa-
Slags are by-products of the metallurgical industry and tion and converts the molten slag into fine aggregate sized
consist mainly of lime and calcium–magnesium alumino- particles (smaller than 4 mm), composed of predominantly
silicates. The most common slags produced are from the noncrystalline material [3].
iron and steel industry, called blast-furnace slag [2], which Due to its high content of silica and alumina in an amor-
is defined as the glassy granular material formed when phous state, ground blast-furnace slag shows pozzolanic
and binding properties in an alkaline medium [3]. Blast-fur-
*
Corresponding author. nace slag has been widely utilized as an ingredient in
E-mail address: cdatis@erciyes.edu.tr (C. Duran Atisß). cement or concrete [6].

0950-0618/$ - see front matter  2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.011
C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555 549

Erdogan [3] reported that the use of granulated blast- Resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete to alkali-
furnace slag as a finely divided mineral admixture in Port- aggregate reaction and acid attack was studied by Bakha-
land Cement (PC) concrete mixes was initiated in South rev et al. [15,16]. Resistance to alkali-aggregate reaction
Africa in 1953. was lower than the resistance of PC concrete of a similar
On the other hand, the development of new binders, as grade. However, alkali-activated slag concrete showed
an alternative to traditional cement and concretes, by the superior resistance to acid attack.
alkaline activation of industrial by-products (i.e. amor- Krizan and Zivanovic [17] studied the effect of dosage
phous ground slag and fly ash) is a relatively new area and modulus of LSS on early hydration of alkali-slag
and research topic for the scientific community [1]. cements. The compressive strength of normal-cured LSS
Bakharev et al. [2] studied alkali activation of Australian activated slag cement mortars was comparable or higher
slag cements. They reported that liquid sodium silicate than PC mortars. Drying shrinkage was considerably
(LSS) provided the best activation compared to sodium higher than PC mortar. The cumulative heat of hydration
hydroxide (SH) and sodium carbonate (SC) activators in increased by increasing the modulus as well as the dosage
terms of compressive strength. LSS with a SiO2/Na2O ratio of LSS, however, it was still lower than PC.
(modulus, Ms) of 0.75 and a 4% sodium concentration was Fu-seng et al. [18] reported compressive strength and a
recommended for use in alkali-activated slag concrete. few flexural strength results at 28-days, and concluded add-
Bakharev et al. [7], studying the effect of elevated curing ing 9% sodium silicate activator and 10% PC made the dry-
temperature on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete, ing shrinkage of high-strength slag cement mortar similar
concluded that heat treatment considerably accelerates to PC cement mortar and the compressive strength higher.
strength development, but at later ages the compressive It was reported that blast-furnace slag has a variable
strength was reduced compared to concrete cured at room composition depending on the raw materials and the indus-
temperature. They also concluded that heat curing consid- trial products; therefore, each slag differs in response to
erably reduces shrinkage of alkali-activated slag concrete, activation [2,19,20]. In each case it is necessary to investi-
making it comparable to PC concrete. gate a number of activators to find the most suitable one.
Collins and Sanjayan [8,9] studied early age strength, In addition there are numerous published materials about
workability and mechanical properties of alkali-activated the compressive strength and shrinkage of mortar made with
slag concrete. They concluded that a one day compressive alkali-activated slag as the binder. However, there is insuffi-
strength comparable to PC concrete was achievable with cient data on the flexural tensile strength and particularly the
alkali-activated slag as the sole binder. influence of the activator on the flexural tensile strength of
Jimenez et al. [10], who studied the flexural and com- mortar made with alkali-activated slag. Therefore, one of
pressive mechanical strength of alkali-activated slag mor- the aims of this study was to investigate and provide more
tar, reported that the industrial manufacturing process of data on the flexural tensile strength. Another aim of this
cements based on the alkaline activation of slag started in study was to investigate a number of activators to find the
Ukraine between 1960 and 1964. They reported that LSS most suitable one for the slag used in this study.
gave the highest mechanical strengths. Another important On the other hand, the Kyoto protocol to reduce CO2
factor was the concentration of the activator, followed by emissions was signed by most countries [21]. This shows
curing temperature, and the fineness of the slag. the importance of reducing CO2 emissions.
The effect of admixtures on the properties of alkali-acti- In addition, it is also reported that energy use in the
vated slag concrete was studied by Bakharev et al. [11]. industrial sector is responsible for one third of the CO2
Concrete activated by LSS had the best mechanical proper- emissions. The cement sector holds a considerable share
ties. Air entraining agent, shrinkage reducing admixture within the energy intensive industries. The World Business
and gypsum significantly reduced shrinkage. Air entrain- Council for Sustainable Development states cement pro-
ment also improved workability and had no negative effect duction is responsible for approximately 5% of man-made
on compressive strength, thus it was recommended for use CO2 emissions [22]. In cement production, nearly half of
in alkali-activated slag concrete. the CO2 emissions result from energy use and the other half
Collins and Sanjayan [12,13] studied the cracking ten- from the decomposition of calcium carbonate during clin-
dency, microcracking and strength development of alkali- ker production [23,24].
activated slag concrete. They reported that shrinkage was The importance and role of mineral additions in reduc-
about two times greater than PC concrete. A lack of moist ing CO2 emissions was reported by Roskovic and Bjegovic
curing increased the level of micro cracking and reduced [25]. As a result of an experimental laboratory investiga-
compressive strength compared to moist curing. tion, they concluded that mineral additions as a cement
Jimenez and Puertas [14] studied the influence of activa- replacement caused reductions in CO2 emissions when
tors on the setting of alkali-activated slag cement. LSS compared to Portland cement.
developed faster setting due to the formation of an initial There is a great demand for cement and aggregates in
calcium silicate hydrate. Pastes activated with SC showed civil engineering industry, such as highway paving, dam
longer setting times due to the initial formation of a sodium and building construction. To meet the great demand on
calcium carbonate which retards the reaction process. cements and aggregates, many mountains and rivers have
550 C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555

been exhaustingly exploited, which lead to the pollution water, respectively. Similarly, the proportions of slag mor-
and degradation of the environment [26]. tar mixture were 1:2.75:0.5 slag, sand and water,
In the light of above explanation, the use of alkali-acti- respectively.
vated slag as cementing material in the construction indus- For the LSS activator, SiO2/Na2O ratios (moduli, Ms)
try will enable us to protect the environment as well as to of 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.5 were chosen. The different ratios
use natural resources in an efficient way. It should be were obtained by adding SH to the LSS. Sodium concen-
remembered that the declared targets of the European tration in the mixture proportions were also chosen as
Community require that the environment be protected 4%, 6%, and 8% for all the activators.
and its quality be improved, and the use of natural The amount of water was adjusted to obtain a 0.5 water/
resources shall be cautious and efficient [27]. binder ratio for all mortar mixes. The amount of water in
This also justifies the importance of the research of the the activator was taken into account. A summary of the
alkali-activated slag study. experimental program is presented in Table 2.
Setting times of the alkali-activated slag and PC paste
2. Properties of materials used were measured using Vicat apparatus in compliance with
relevant standard [30].
2.1. Cement Prismatic specimens with 40 · 40 · 160 mm dimensions
were prepared from both fresh PC and slag mortar mixes
The cement used was ASTM Type I normal Portland for the strength measurements. After 24 h, the prisms
cement (42.5 MPa) with a specific gravity of 3.16 g/cm3 were demoulded and placed in a humidity cabinet at
and a Blaine specific surface area of 325 m2/kg. The chem- 65%±5 relative humidity and 23 ± 2 C temperature.
ical composition is given in Table 1. For shrinkage measurements, prismatic specimens with
25 · 25 · 285 mm dimensions were prepared and demoul-
2.2. Ground slag ded the day after. The initial length of the shrinkage spec-
imens was measured before placing them in the humidity
Ground slag was obtained from the Iskenderun Iron– cabinet.
Steel Factory in Turkey. Its chemical oxide composition The flexural tensile strength measurements, for a partic-
is given in Table 1. The specific gravity of the slag was ular mortar mix, were performed on three prismatic speci-
2.81 g/cm3 and its Blaine specific surface area was about mens using a third point loading test [31]. The compressive
425 m2/kg. It is classified as a category 80 slag according strength measurements were carried out using three broken
to ASTM C 989 [28] hydraulic activity index. pieces of the prism specimens obtained from flexure test.
Strength measurement was carried out according to rele-
2.3. Alkali-activator vant standard [31].
The flexural tensile and compressive strength of mortar
SH and SC (obtained from MERCK chemicals) and, were determined at 7-days, 28-days and 3-months. Drying
LSS (obtained from Sisecam Soda Industrials Corp., Mer- shrinkage measurements of selected alkali-activated slag
sin Soda Factory) were used as activators. LSS had a SiO2/ mortar mixes and PC mortar were carried out at 6-months.
Na2O ratio (modulus, Ms) = 2, and 38–40 Bé. Shrinkage measurement was carried out according to rele-
vant standard [32].
2.4. Sand

The sand was uncrushed, quartzitic, natural sand with


maximum size of 4 mm. The grading complied with the Table 2
requirements of ASTM C33 [29]. The absorption value of Summary of the experimental program
the sand was 1.2% and the relative density at saturated sur- Mixture name Type of activator Sodium
face dry condition was 2.67. concentration (%)
PC mortar – –
2.5. Experimental program Slag mortar Sodium hydroxide (SH) 4, 6, 8
Slag mortar Sodium carbonate (SC) 4, 6, 8
The proportions by weight of the control Portland Slag mortar Liquid sodium silicate (LSS) 4, 6, 8
cement mortar mixture were 1:2.75:0.5 cement, sand and (Ms = 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5)

Table 1
Chemical composition of cement and ground slag (%)
Oxide SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO SO3 K2O Na2O LOI
Cement 19.71 5.20 3.73 62.91 2.54 2.72 0.90 0.25 0.96
Slag 36.70 14.21 0.98 32.61 10.12 0.99 0.76 0.42 NA
C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555 551

3. Results and discussion 3.2. Compressive strength

3.1. Setting times The compressive strength of alkali-activated slag and


PC mortars are presented in Table 4.
Initial and final setting times of PC and alkali-activated The compressive strength of the slag mortars increases
slag are presented in Table 3. The initial and final setting of as the sodium concentration of the activator increases. This
LSS and SH activated slag paste occur much earlier than finding is valid for each curing age. This can be explained
with PC paste. Slag paste activated with SC showed similar by the pozzolanic reaction.
setting times to PC paste. Similar findings were published The compressive strength was dependant on activator
by Jimenez and Puertas [14]. type. At 28-days, the ratio of the strength of the LSS mor-
The final setting times of alkali-activated slag paste tar to the PC mortar was 1.07–2.45, the SH mortar 0.72–
reduced with an increase in the sodium concentration of 0.88, and the SC mortar 0.75–1.08. At 3-months, the
the activator. Final setting times of LSS activated slag strength had increased a small amount and the strength
paste also reduced with increase in SiO2/Na2O ratio (Ms). ratio of the slag mortars compared to the PC mortar were
This result was also discussed elsewhere [33]. still approximately the same. The ratio increases as the con-
Since the setting times of LSS and SH activated slag centration of sodium increases. For the LSS mortar at a
paste is much shorter than the setting times of PC paste, constant sodium concentration, there is an optimum value
more research should be carried out using some setting for SiO2/Na2O ratio (Ms) at which the compressive
retarders to extend the setting times. strength becomes the highest. The optimum Ms value is
lower at higher sodium concentrations [33].
Due to the differences between curing conditions, a
proper comparison was not made with the published lit-
erature. However, the range of the compressive strength
published in the literature was provided for a comparison
Table 3 purpose. Jimenez et al. [10] obtained about 30, 40, and
Initial and final setting time of PC and alkali-activated slag paste 100 MPa compressive strength from SH, SC and LSS
Binder Activator Concentration Initial setting Final activated slag, respectively. Their samples cured at 98%
type (min) setting relative humidity with 25 C. The sand–slag ratio was
(min) 2:1, water-binder ratio was 0.51, fineness of slag was
PC – – 200 315 about 450 m2/kg. Krizan and Zivanovic [17] reported
LSS 4% Na, 26 127 compressive strength value from 50 to 65 MPa obtained
Ms = 0.75
LSS 4% Na, 15 70
from LSS activated slag mortar. Water-binder ratio was
Ms = 1.00 0.43, sand–slag ratio was 3:1, curing condition was
LSS 4% Na, 24 58 20 C with 90% relative humidity. Fineness of slag was
Ms = 1.25 428 m2/kg. The compressive strength obtained from this
LSS 4% Na, 35 54 current study seems to be higher than the values pub-
Ms = 1.50
lished by Ref. [10] and [17]. It should be noted that
LSS 6% Na, 22 77 Ref. [10] used more binder, and Ref. [17] used lower
Ms = 0.75
water-binder ratio and higher relative humidity than the
LSS 6% Na, 28 65
Ms = 1.00 present study.
LSS 6% Na, 33 55
Ms = 1.25 3.3. Flexural tensile strength
LSS 6% Na, 35 50
Ms = 1.50
The flexural tensile strength of alkali-activated slag and
Slag LSS 8% Na, 19 63 PC mortars are presented in Table 5.
Ms = 0.75 Similar findings to compressive strength were found for
LSS 8% Na, 15 60
Ms = 1.00
flexural tensile strength.
LSS 8% Na, 24 56 The flexural tensile strength of LSS alkali-activated slag
Ms = 1.25 mortar increases as the sodium concentration of the activa-
LSS 8% Na, 31 47 tor increases for a constant SiO2/Na2O ratio. This is also
Ms = 1.50 valid for the SH and SC activators. Therefore, it was con-
SH 4% Na 21 59 cluded that the more alkalis in the medium the higher the
SH 6% Na 9 34 flexural tensile strength. This finding is valid for each cur-
SH 8% Na 4 28 ing age.
SC 4% Na 190 306 For a constant sodium concentration, there is an opti-
SC 6% Na 180 294 mum value for SiO2/Na2O ratio (Ms) of LSS at which the
SC 8% Na 170 288
flexural tensile strength of alkali-activated slag mortar
552 C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555

Table 4
Compressive strength of alkali-activated slag and PC mortars
Binder Activator type Concentration Compressive strength (MPa)
7-Days 28-Days 3-Months
PC – – 30.6 33.1 35.0
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 0.75 31.1 35.5 37.6
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 1.00 33.4 41.2 42.0
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 1.25 35.2 42.9 47.4
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 1.50 32.5 38.6 42.0
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 0.75 62.7 71.7 74.4
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 1.00 62.0 71.3 72.5
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 1.25 50.1 56.8 58.4
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 1.50 39.9 48.4 51.2
Slag LSS 8% Na, Ms = 0.75 67.0 81.1 84.2
LSS 8% Na, Ms = 1.00 66.7 80.9 85.6
LSS 8% Na, Ms = 1.25 52.3 58.9 62.6
LSS 8% Na, Ms = 1.50 47.3 57.5 59.2
SH 4% Na 19.7 23.9 23.2
SH 6% Na 22.7 26.2 31.1
SH 8% Na 22.1 29.2 33.2
SC 4% Na 16.8 24.7 26.4
SC 6% Na 21.7 27.6 28.3
SC 8% Na 24.7 35.7 37.3

Table 5
Flexural tensile strength (MPa), flexural to compressive strength ratio at 28-days, and internal friction angle of alkali-activated slag and PC mortars at
28-days
Binder Activator type Concentration 7-Days 28-Days 3-Months Fts/Cs U
PC – – 4.7 5.2 5.5 0.16 47
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 0.75 3.0 3.2 3.1 0.09 57
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 1.00 3.2 3.5 3.6 0.08 58
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 1.25 3.9 4.6 5.1 0.11 54
LSS 4% Na, Ms = 1.50 3.5 4.4 4.2 0.11 53
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 0.75 5.9 6.1 6.2 0.09 58
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 1.00 5.4 5.6 5.9 0.08 59
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 1.25 4.9 5.1 5.5 0.09 57
LSS 6% Na, Ms = 1.50 3.4 4.3 4.6 0.09 57
Slag LSS 8% Na, Ms = 0.75 5.9 6.2 6.4 0.08 59
LSS 8% Na, Ms = 1.00 5.2 5.9 5.9 0.07 60
LSS 8% Na, Ms = 1.25 4.9 5.1 5.6 0.09 57
LSS 8% Na, Ms = 1.50 3.4 4.0 4.7 0.07 60
SH 4% Na 2.5 2.6 2.8 0.11 54
SH 6% Na 3.3 3.4 4.4 0.13 50
SH 8% Na 3.4 3.8 4.9 0.13 50
SC 4% Na 2.8 2.8 2.8 0.11 53
SC 6% Na 3.5 4.2 4.4 0.15 47
SC 8% Na 3.7 5.3 5.6 0.15 48

becomes the highest. This optimum value for Ms compared to the PC mortar were still approximately the
decreases when the sodium concentration of the activator same.
increases. LSS activated slag mortar can develop higher or compa-
The flexural tensile strength was dependant on activator rable flexural tensile strength to that of PC mortar depend-
type. At 28-days, the ratio of the flexural tensile strength of ing on sodium concentration and SiO2/Na2O ratio module.
the LSS mortar to the PC mortar was 0.62–1.19, the SH SC slag mortar developed equivalent flexural tensile
mortar 0.50–0.73, and the SC mortar 0.54–1.02. At strength to PC mortar for 8% sodium concentration. How-
3-months, the flexural tensile strength had increased a ever, SH activated mortar developed lower flexural tensile
small amount and the strength ratio of the slag mortars strength than that of PC mortar.
C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555 553

Table 6
Drying shrinkage of selected alkali-activated slag and PC mortar (%)
Mixture-time 3-Days 7-Days 14-Days 28-Days 2-Months 3-Months 6-Months
PC 0.0309 0.0484 0.0614 0.0765 0.0933 0.1004 0.1004
4% LSS 0.75 0.1439 0.1874 0.2204 0.2449 0.28 0.2842 0.2926
4% LSS 1.00 0.1832 0.2372 0.2737 0.3018 0.3467 0.3509 0.3614
4% LSS 1.25 0.2737 0.3684 0.3993 0.4196 0.4463 0.4512 0.4625
4% LSS 1.50 0.4196 0.5418 0.5867 0.593 0.6175 0.6232 0.6372
8% LSS 0.75 0.1782 0.254 0.287 0.3151 0.3425 0.3474 0.3642
4% SH 0.0267 0.0737 0.113 0.1621 0.2035 0.2049 0.2119
8% SH 0.0989 0.1326 0.167 0.214 0.2688 0.2828 0.2968
4% SC 0.007 0.0512 0.0653 0.0744 0.0744 0.0751 0.0772
8% SC 0.0021 0.0491 0.0814 0.0954 0.0975 0.0989 0.1053

An attempt was made to evaluate the influence of the sodium concentration. For a constant SiO2/Na2O ratio, an
activator type on the brittleness of alkali-activated slag increase in sodium concentration from 4 to 8% increases
mortar. drying shrinkage from 3 to 3.6 times that of PC mortar.
It was reported that brittleness is one of the important An increase in sodium concentration also increased drying
properties of a material [34]. On the other hand, it was sta- shrinkage for SH and SC activated slag mortar. For the SH
ted that as the brittleness of a material increases the ratio of mortar the increase was from 2.1 to 3 times that of PC mor-
flexural strength to compressive strength decreases, and the tar, and for the SC mortar the change was from 0.77 to 1.0.
angle of internal friction obtained using the Mohr envelope The SC mortar had a similar or lower shrinkage than the
increases [34,35]. Angle of internal friction can be shown as PC mortar. This result was also discussed elsewhere [33].
U = 0.5*ARCTAN((CS-TS)/SQRT(CS*TS)), where CS Collins and Sanjayan [12,13] also reported that shrinkage
and TS are compressive and tensile strength. In this work, of alkali-activated slag mortar was higher than the PC
flexural tensile strength was replaced by tensile strength. mortar.
The ratio of flexural tensile strength (FTS) to compres- It should be remembered that, in flexural tensile strength
sive strength (CS), and angle of friction at 28-days are pre- section, it was concluded that, in general, LSS and SH acti-
sented in Table 5. vated slag mortar were more brittle than the PC mortar
The LSS and SH activated slag mortars are more brittle and SC activated mortar. There is direct correlation
than the PC and SC activated mortar. For example, the observed between shrinkage and brittleness of LSS and
LSS activated slag mortar with Ms = 0.75 and 4% sodium SH activated mortar. The higher the shrinkage the higher
concentration had, at 28-days, internal friction angle of the brittleness can be observed. Therefore it can be hypoth-
57. However, a similar strength grade SC activated slag esised that, the higher shrinkage may cause micro cracking
mortar with 8% sodium concentration and PC mortar in the matrix of the LSS and SH activated mortar, thus,
had the friction angles of 48 and 47, respectively. It causing to a reduction in the tensile strength properties
should be remembered that increase in friction angle indi- which means increasing brittleness.
cates increase in brittleness. Since the shrinkages of LSS and SH activated slag mor-
The LSS activated slag mortar is more brittle than the tar are higher than the shrinkage of PC mortar, more
SC activated slag mortar and PC mortar. More similar research should be carried out on shrinkage using expand-
example can be made. Therefore, when comparison was ers to reduce it to the level of PC mortar which may help to
made on similar strength grade mortar, it may be con- reduce the brittleness of LSS and SH activated slag mortar.
cluded that, in general, LSS activated slag mortar and
SH mortar behaves more brittle than that of SC activated 4. Conclusions
slag mortar and PC mortar.
The flexural tensile to compressive strength ratio and The following conclusions were made from this labora-
internal friction angle of SC activated slag mortar with tory study.
6% and 8% Na were found to be similar to that of PC mor-
tar. Therefore, the brittleness in these cases was similar to 1. Initial and final settings of LSS and SH activated slag
that of PC mortar. paste occur much earlier than that of PC paste.
2. Slag paste activated with SC showed similar setting
3.4. Drying shrinkage times to PC paste.
3. Final setting times of alkali-activated slag paste
The drying shrinkage of the alkali-activated slag mor- reduced with increase in the sodium concentration
tars is presented in Table 6. The drying shrinkage of LSS of the activator. Moreover, final setting times of
activated slag mortar increases from 3 to 6 times that of LSS activated slag paste reduced with increase in
PC mortar with the increase in SiO2/Na2O ratio at constant SiO2/Na2O ratio (from 0.75 to 1.5).
554 C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555

4. LSS was the best; SC was the second; and SH was the [8] Collins F, Sanjayan JG. Early age strength and workability of slag
third in terms of compressive and flexural tensile pastes activated by NaOH and Na2CO3. Cem Concr Res
1998;28(5):655–64.
strength of mortar studied. [9] Collins FG, Sanjayan JG. Workability and mechanical properties
5. Increasing the sodium concentration of the activators of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Res 1999;29(3):
results in an increase of compressive and flexural ten- 455–8.
sile strength of mortar. [10] Jimenez AF, Palomo JG, Puertas F. Alkali-activated slag mor-
6. There is an optimum SiO2/Na2O ratio for LSS to tars mechanical strength behaviour. Cem Concr Res 1999;29(8):
1313–21.
obtain the highest compressive and flexural tensile [11] Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng YB. Effect of admixtures on
strength. properties of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Res
7. At 28-days, the ratio of the compressive strength of 2000;30(9):1367–74.
the LSS mortar to the PC mortar was 1.07–2.45, [12] Collins F, Sanjayan JG. Cracking tendency of alkali-activated slag
the SH mortar 0.72–0.88, and the SC mortar 0.75– concrete subjected to restrained shrinkage. Cem Concr Res
2000;30(5):791–8.
1.08. Similarly, the ratio of the flexural tensile [13] Collins F, Sanjayan JG. Microcracking and strength development of
strength of the LSS mortar to the PC mortar was alkali-activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Compos 2001;23(4–5):
0.62–1.19, the SH mortar 0.50–0.73, and the SC mor- 345–52.
tar 0.54–1.02. Slag mortar activated with LSS results [14] Jimenez AF, Puertas F. Setting of alkali-activated slag cements
with comparable or higher compressive and flexural influence of activator nature. Adv Cem Res 2001;13(3):115–21.
[15] Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng YB. Resistance of alkali-activated
tensile strength than that of PC mortar, depending slag concrete to alkali-aggregate reaction. Cem Concr Res
on SiO2/Na2O ratio module and sodium concentra- 2001;31(2):331–4.
tion. Slag mortar activated with SH developed com- [16] Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng YB. Resistance of alkali-acti-
parable compressive and lower flexural tensile vated slag concrete to acidic attack. Cem Concr Res 2003;33(10):
strength than that of to PC mortar strength. Depend- 1607–11.
[17] Krizan D, Zivanovic B. Effect of dosage and modulus of water glass
ing on sodium concentration, slag mortar activated on early hydration of alkali-slag cements. Cem Concr Res
with SC developed equivalent or comparable com- 2002;32(8):1181–8.
pressive and flexural tensile strength to PC mortar. [18] Fu-seng W, Rui-lian S, Ying-jing C. Study on modification of the
8. Mortar made with alkali-activated slag was more high-strength slag cement material. Cem Concr Res
brittle than PC mortar. Mortar with the SC activator 2005;35(7):1344–8.
[19] Wang SD, Scrinever KL, Pratt PL. Factors affecting the strength of
came closest to the PC mortar. alkali-activated slag. Cem Concr Res 1994;24(6):1033–43.
9. The shrinkage of LSS and SH activated slag mortar [20] Wang SD. Alkaline activation of slag, PhD thesis, University of
was 3 and 6 times more than that of PC mortar, London, UK; 1995.
respectively. The shrinkage of SC activated slag mor- [21] Juneja D, Sivasundaram V, http://www.hvfacprojectindia.com/re-
tar was lower or similar to PC mortar. sources/Publications/ Han dbook3forweb .pdf.
[22] The World Business Council for Sustainable Development,
10. The use of SC as an alkaline activator for the slag www.wbcsd.org.
used in this study was recommended since the slag [23] Anand S, Vrat P, Dahiya RP. Application of a system
mortar activated with SC has comparable setting dynamics approach for assessment and mitigation of CO2
times, strength, and shrinkage properties to PC emissions from the cement industry. J Environ Manage
mortars. 2006;79(4):383–98.
[24] Hendriks CA, Worrell E, Price L, Mertin N, Ozawa Media L.
Greenhouse gases from cement production, IEA Greenhouse Gas
R&D Programme, Report # PH 3/7. Ecofys, Utrecht, The Nether-
References lands; 1999.
[25] Roskovic R, Bjegovic D. Role of mineral additions in reducing CO2
emissions. Cem Concr Res 2005;35(5):974–8.
[1] Puertas F, Amat T, Jimenez AF, Vazquez T. Mechanical and durable
[26] Wu S, Xue Y, Ye Q, Chen Y. Utilization of steel slag as aggregates
behaviour of alkaline cement mortars reinforced with polypropylene
for stone mastic asphalt (SMA) mixtures. Build Environ
fibres. Cem Concr Res 2003;33(12):2031–6.
2007;42(7):2580–5.
[2] Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng Y. Alkali activation of Australian
[27] Motz H, Geiseler J. Products of steel slags an opportunity to save
slag cements. Cem Concr Res 1999;29(1):113–20.
natural resources. Waste Manage 2001;21(3):285–93.
[3] Erdogan TY. Concrete. Ankara: Metu Press; 2003 [in Turkish].
[28] ASTM C-989. Standard specification for ground granulated blast-
[4] ASTM C-125. Standard terminology relating to concrete and
furnace slag for use in concrete and mortars. Annual book of ASTM
concrete aggregates, Annual book of ASTM Standards. 1994.
Standards; 1994.
[5] ACI Committee 116, 1 16R-90, Cement and Concrete Terminology,
[29] ASTM C33. Standard specification for concrete aggregates.
ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, 1994.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, USA;
[6] Sakai K, Watanabe H, Suzuki M, Hamazaki K. Properties of
2005.
granulated blast-furnace slag cement concrete. Proceedings of 4th
[30] ASTM C191. Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic
International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural
cement by vicat needle. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West
Pozzolans in Concrete, Istanbul, Turkey. AC!-SP: American Concrete
Conshohocken, USA; 2005.
Institute Publication; 1992. pp. 1367–1383.
[31] TS EN 1015-11. Mortar testing method, Part 11. Measurement of
[7] Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng YB. Effect of elevated temperature
compressive and flexural tensile strength of mortar, TSE, Ankara;
curing on properties of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Res
2000.
1999;29(10):1619–25.
C. Duran Atisß et al. / Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 548–555 555

[32] ASTM C596. Standard test method for drying shrinkage of mortar [34] Kahraman S, Altindag R. A brittleness index to estimate fracture
containing hydraulic cement. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, toughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004;41:343–8.
West Conshohocken, USA; 2005. [35] Gunsallus KL, Kulhawy FH. A comparative evaluation of rock
[33] Atis CD, Bilim C, Celik O, Karahan O. Properties of alkali-activated strength measures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr
slag mortars. In: TCMA 3rd international symposium, sustainability 1984;21(5):233–48.
in cement and concrete, Istanbul, Turkey, May 2007. p. 201–11.

You might also like