You are on page 1of 5

1

arXiv:physics/0111134v1 [physics.pop-ph] 15 Nov 2001

Photons, Clocks, Gravity and the Concept of Mass


L.B.Okuna ∗

a
ITEP, Moscow, 117218, Russia

Transparencies of the 18th Henry Primakoff lecture at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA,
April 11, 2001 and of the Special lecture given at the 7th International Workshop on Topics in Astroparticle and
Underground Physics, TAUP 2001, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy, September 9, 2001; to be published
by Elsevier Nucl. Phys. B (Proceedings supplements).
Various aspects of the concept of mass in modern physics are discussed: 1. Mass in Special Relativity, 2. Atoms
in Static Gravity, 3. Photons in Static Gravity, 4. Misleading Terminology, 5. Unsolved Problems of mass.

1. MASS IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY 11. Photon: m = 0, E = p, v = 1, no rest


frame.
1. The term mass was introduced by New-
ton in Principia, 1687: “Definition I: The 12. System of two bodies:
quantity of matter is the measure of the
same, arising from its density and bulk con- E = E1 + E2 , p = p1 + p2 ,
jointly”.
m2 = E 2 − p2 = (E1 + E2 )2 − (p1 + p2 )2 =
2. The principle of relativity was formulated = m21 + m22 + 2E1 E2 (1 − v1 v2 ) .
by Galileo in Dialogue, 1632 (Galileo’s
ship). Two photons: m22γ = 2E1 E2 (1 − cos θ).
3. His predecessor: Nicolaus Cusanus in “De 13. Mass of a system is conserved.
docta ignorata” (“On the scientific igno- Example e+ e− → 2γ at rest.
rance”), 1440. me+ e− = m2γ = 2me , though mγ = 0.
4. Velocity of light c was first measured by 14. Mass is not a measure of inertia.
O.Roemer, 1676. This measure is derived from: dp/dt = F,
p = Ev.
5. A. Michelson and E. Morley, 1887:
c is the maximal velocity of signals. c = 1. 15. Mass is not additive at v 6= 0.
m = m1 + m2 only at v1 = v2 = 0.
6. Special relativity: Interferometer of Michel-
son on the ship of Galileo. 16. Mass is not a source and receptor of gravity
at v 6= 0 (see item 20).
7. Lorentz transformations of t, r and E, p,
where r and p are 3-vectors. 17. Mass is not a measure of an amount of mat-
ter. The concept of matter is much broader
8. m2 = E 2 − p2 ; E, p – 4-vector; m – scalar. in relativity than in classical physics (exam-
9. Einstein 1905: rest energy E0 = m. ples: gas or flux of photons and/or neutri-
nos).
p
10. E = mγ , p = mγv = Ev , v = E
18. From mathematical point of view mass oc-
p cupies a higher rank position in special rel-
v = |v| , γ = 1/ 1 − v 2 , v ≤ 1 .
ativity than in non-relativistic physics: it is
∗ email: okun@heron.itep.ru a relativistic invariant.
2

19. From practical point of view the role of mass 24. Note that for electric potential the splitting
of a particle is decreasing with increase of is constant:
its energy.
E0e = m∗ + eφe .
2. ATOMS IN STATIC GRAVITY Consider an excited ion He+ in a capasitor:
20. According to General Relativity, the source ∗
∆E0e = E0e − E0e = m∗ − m .
and receptor of gravitational field is the
density of energy-momentum tensor T ik 25. The frequency ω of a photon emitted in the
which is coupled to gravitational field like process of deexcitation
density of electric current is coupled to elec-
tromagnetic field. ω = ∆E0g /h ,
For a point-like particle
where h = 2πh̄ is the Planck constant.
ik dxi dxk p
Hence atomic clocks in gravitational field
T = mδ(r) , τ = t2 − r2 .
dτ dt increase their rate with height, as predicted
For a particle at rest (v = 0) mass m is by Einstein in 1907.
the source and receptor of gravity: T 00 =
26. This was confirmed by airplane experiments
mδ(r).
in 1970s.
Thus, according to GR, there is no such no- Feynman: “atoms at the surface of the
tion as gravitational mass mg . earth are a couple of days older than at its
21. φ – gravitational potential center”.

a) the potential of sun: 27. Thought experiment: Carry clock A from


the first floor to the second. In a year carry
GM⊙ 1 rg clock B the same way. A will be ahead of
φ=− =− , φ(∞) = 0
rc2 2 r B. ∆T /T = gh/c2 . Absolute effect!
G – Newton constant, M⊙ – mass of This thought experiment is used to get rid
the sun, of disparity between a clock on an airplane
gravitational radius rg = 2GM⊙ /c2 = and that on a desk. (Think of twin paradox
3 km. in special relativity.)
b) the potential near the surface of earth
28. Pendulum clocks are not standard clocks
at height h:
similar
p to wristwatches, or atomic clocks.
gh T ∼ l/g.
φ= , φ(0) = 0 , g = 9.8 m s−2 .
c2 They are gravimeters, measuring the
22. E0g = m + mφ = m(1 + φ), E0g 6= m. strength of gravitational field.
E0g – rest energy in a static gravitational
field. It increases with increasing distance 3. PHOTONS IN STATIC GRAV-
from the source. ITY
23. For an excited level with mass m∗ 29. In 1911 Einstein predicted redshift of pho-

E0g ∗
= m (1 + φ) . ton frequency in static gravitational field:
the gravitational redshift.
The splitting between levels increases with
h: 30. In 1960 Pound and Rebka discovered the

shift ∆ω/ω = gh/c2 in 57 Fe. Interpretation
∆E0g = E0g − E0g = (m∗ − m)(1 + φ) . in terms of “the weight of the photon”.
3

31. For static field and static observers the 38. Deflection of star light by sun (1911, 1915,
frequency of photon does not depend on 1919)
height. (Maxwell equations in static field). 2rg
α= ∼ 10−5
Hence the shift observed by Pound et al. R⊙
was due to the larger splitting of 57 Fe levels
at the top of the Harvard tower. Redshift 39. Gravitational lensing of galaxies.
of photons relative to clocks.
40. Delay of radar echo from a planet in upper
32. Unlike frequency, the momentum of photon conjunction (Shapiro, 1964)
decreases with height.
Schwarzshild metric in general relativity Zzp Zzp
2 1 2 rg
g ij . ∆t = dz( − 1) = dz =
c v c r
The masslessness of photon: ze ze

g ij pi pj = 0, i, j = 0, 1, 2, 3, g 00 p20 −g rr p2r = 0 rg 4rp re


=2 ln 2 ≈ 240µs
c R⊙
g 00 = 1/(1 + 2φ) , g rr = (1 + 2φ) ,
Earth: re = 150 · 106 km.
p0 ≡ E, hence, Mercury: rp = 58 · 106 km,
E E R⊙ = 0.7 · 106 km.
pr = = .
1 + 2φ 1 − rg /r 41. Deceleration of a particle approaching the
sun is a relativistic effect, characteristic not
33. Photon’s wave length λ increases with only to photons, but to any fast enough
height. In that sense photon is redshifted particle. M.I. Vysotsky (private commu-
nication) √has shown that “enough” means
2πh̄ 2πh̄
λ= = (1 + 2φ) v∞ > c/ 3, where v∞ is velocity of the
pr E particle at r = ∞.
34. Coordinate velocity is smaller near the sun: To prove this consider the expression for en-
ergy of a particle of mass m falling on the
λω sun along radius r with coordinate veloc-
v= = (1 + 2φ)
2π ity v = dr/dt (use eq. (88.9) from “Field
Theory” by L. Landau and L. Lifshitz):
35. Another derivation: Consider interval

mc2 g00
2 2
ds = g00 dt − grr dr = 0 2 E= q .
1 − ggrr
00
v 2
1 1 1
g00 = 00
= 1 + 2φ , grr = rr =
g g 1 + 2φ Note that, according to Schwarzschild,
dr p rg g00 = g1rr = 1 − rg /r and that energy does
v= = g00 /grr = 1 + 2φ = 1 − <1 not depend on r. Hence
dt r
2 −1 −3 2
36. Before general relativity (1906, 1911) Ein- 1 − v∞ = g00 − g00 v .
stein had v = 1 + φ (there was no grr at
that time). In 1915: (1 + 2φ). For rg /r ≪ 1 one gets

37. Geometrical optics. Refraction index v 2 = v∞


2 2
+ rg /r(1 − 3v∞ ) .
1 1 rg rg Thus, the particle accelerates like
n= = ≈1+ ; n−1= . √ a non-
v 1 + 2φ r r relativistic stone only if v∞ < c/ 3.
4

4. MISLEADING TERMINOLOGY 53. What makes the critical energy density of


vacuum εc ≃ 10−47 GeV4 so small com-
42. If, instead of p = Ev/c2 , the non- pared with η 4 , the density of vacuum ex-
relativistic formula p = mv is kept, then pectation value (VEV) of the Higgs field:
m = E/c2 . This “relativistic mass”, often η = (246 GeV)?
denoted as mr , is another notation for en-
54. If the recent data on the universe expansion
ergy.
are correct, how to explain the pattern of
43. When applied to photon “mγ = Eγ /c2 ”. cosmological energy densities of baryons of
Poincare, Lorentz, Born, Pauli, partly Ein- dark matter, and of vacuum:
stein. ΩB ≡ εB /εc ≃ 0.03, ΩDM ≡ εDM /εc ≃ 0.3 ,
44. Einstein coined the expression “energy - ΩΛ ≡ εΛ /εc ≃ 0.7 ?
mass equivalence”, which sometimes he
used in the sense “whenever there is energy, 55. Compared with the above enigmas, the
there is mass”. (Recall massless photon.) problem of neutrino masses and mixings
may seem to be not so lofty. But it could re-
45. A redundant term “rest mass” m0 is abun- veal important clues to the concept of mass.
dantly used.
56. A serious twist to the concept of mass was
46. Gravitational redshift is interpreted as “loss given by quarks and gluons. The basic def-
of photon’s energy as it climbs out of grav- inition m2 = E 2 − p2 is not applicable to
itational potential”. them, as they never exist as free particles
with definite value of momentum. This col-
47. From the point of view of relativity no mr , ored particles are confined within colorless
m0 , mg , mi , ml , mt . Only m! hadrons.
57. That reminds us that when speaking about
5. UNSOLVED PROBLEMS OF m mass of a particle we have to specify the
distance (momentum tranfer q) at which it
48. Is the Higgs mechanism correct? is measured. Masses as well as charges are
If yes, we have to discover higgses and to running functions of q 2 . It is not enough
study the pattern of their couplings. to write down the fundamental Lagrangian.
One has to indicate the scale to which its
49. Can the hierarchy problem (mP l ≃ 1019 couplings and masses refer.
GeV vs mZ ≃ 100 GeV) be solved by
SUSY? 58. At short distances the masses of light u-
If yes, we have to discover numerous su- quarks and d-quarks, the building blocks
perparticles and to ascertain the pattern of of nucleons, are smaller than 10 MeV,
their masses and couplings. while masses of nucleons are hundred times
larger. These short-distance quarks are
50. SUSY, if confirmed, would lead us into the called “current quarks”.
quantum dimensions of space and time, into
superspace. 59. The same quarks with their “gluon coats”
are called “constituent quarks”, their
51. Supergravity might lead to superunification masses being about 300 MeV. There should
of all forces. exist “constituent gluons”. Hadrons with-
out “valent” quarks are called “glueballs”,
52. The scale and mechanism of SUSY breaking hadrons containing both “valent” quarks
is of paramount importance. and gluons are referred to as “hybrids”.
5

60. The quark-antiquark and gluonic vacuum Origin of Mass”, v.29, Ed. A.Zichichi (Plenum
condensates: < q q̄ >, < GG >, etc. play an Press, N.Y., 1992) pp.1-24.
important role. The masses of hadrons ap- 5. Note on the meaning and terminology of Spe-
pear due to “burning out” of these (negative cial Relativity. Eur. J. Phys. 15 (1998) 403-
energy density) vacuum condensates inside 406.
hadrons by the intense color fields of the va- 6. Comment on the physical meaning of ’c’ in
lent constituents. Though this picture has relativistic equations (with B. Webber). Eur.
not been rigorously proved, it seems evident J. Phys. 20 (1999) L47.
that the origin of mass is in vacuum. 7. Gravitation, Photons, Clocks (with K. Seliv-
anov, V.Telegdi). UFN 169 (1999) 1141-1147;
61. The existing terminology is obsolete and Phys. Uspekhi 42 (1999) 1045-1051.
non-adequate. Fermions (quarks and lep- 8. On the interpretation of the redshift in a
tons) are usually referred to as “matter”, static gravitational field (with K. Selivanov,
though neutrinos kinematically behave like V. Telegdi). Am. J. Phys. 68 (2000) 115-119.
photons. Even very heavy bosons are of- 9. Photons and static gravity. Mod. Phys.
ten referred to as “radiation”. Actually Lett. A15 (2000) 1941-1947; preprint hep-
all fields and their quantum excitations (in- ph/0010120.
cluding photons) are matter. 10. A thought experiment with clocks in static
Massive vacuum; is it also matter? gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A15 (2000) 2007-
2009; preprint hep-ph/0010256.
62. The literature on the subjects discussed in 11. Reply to the letter “What is mass?” by
this lecture is very vast and controversial. R.I.Khrapko. UFN 170 (2000) 1366-1371;
The interested reader might look for further Phys. Uspekhi 43 (2000) 1270-1275.
references in article [1–12] 12. Relation between energy and mass in Bohr’s
essay on his debate with Einstein. Yad. Fiz.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 64 (2001) 590-593; Phys. Atomic Nuclei 64
(2001) 536-539.
I am grateful to Paul Langacker, Alfred Mann
and their colleagues at the Physics Department of
University of Pennsylvania and also to Alessandro
Bettini and Venya Berezinsky at LNGS for the
kind invitation to give this lecture and for their
warm hospitality. The work was partially sup-
ported by A. von Humbold Award and by RFBR
grant No. 00-15-96562.

REFERENCES
1. On the photon mass (with I.Yu.Kobzarev).
UFN 95 (1968) 131-137;
Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 11 (1968) 338-344.
2. The concept of mass. Physics Today, June
1989, pp. 31-36
3. Putting to rest mass misconseptions. Physics
Today, May 1990, pp.13,15,115-117.
4. The Problem of Mass: From Galilei to Higgs.
Opening lecture at the 29th Intern. School of
Subnuclear Physics, in ”Physics at the High-
est Energy and Luminosity to Understand the

You might also like