Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The first step in any beam problem is to calculate the reaction forces at the supports. To do this we must consider that the beam
is in static equilibrium. This means that we balance or resolve the forces acting on the beam.
After finding all the forces acting on the beam we can draw a free body diagram (FBD) and then balance these forces for static
equilibrium.
A pinned No 0
B roller Yes 4
C roller No 8
Stiffness Factors
To calculate the stiffness factors of each beam segment connected to each participating joint, use the following formula:
SAB EI
kAB =
LAB
SAB = the stiffness constant of the beam segment AB, which can be taken as:
The total joint stiffness is the sum of the left-hand side and right-hand side stiffness factors:
KB = kBA + kBC
Distribution Factors
The distribution factor of the sides of the joints is that side's stiffness factor divided the joint stiffness factor.
Note that for beams with continuous EI, there is no need to calculate these terms as they cancel:
kBA
DFBA =
KB
Members
The beam segments are tabulated below with the left and right hand fixity that will be used to determine end moments. Joints which
areparticipating are considered fixed as they will be locked during the analysis, otherwise joints are considered not to resist bending.
AB pinned fixed 4
BC fixed pinned 4
Segment 1
Point Load 1
Length between the end of the segment and the load b = 2 m
Load P = 50 kN
Left Hand Moment LH M = 0 kN m
Right Hand Moment RH M = 37.5 kN m
2
P × b b
RH M = × (1 − )
2
2 L
2
50 kN × 2 m 4 m
RH M = × (1 − )
2
2 16 m
RH M = 37.5 kN m
Summation
kN kN
Σ 0 kN m 37.5 kN m
Segment 2
Summation
Σ 0 kN m 0 kN m
Moment Distribution
DFL DFR
0.50 0.50
C OFL C OFR
0 0
A B B C
0 −37.5 0 0
Σ Σ Σ Σ
0 kN m −18.75 kN m 18.75 kN m 0 kN m
Segment Reactions
Variables used for this section
Distance between start of segment and start of load a
Distance between start of load and end of load b
Segment 1
Take the sum of the moments about the left support
Σ ML = +(−50 kN × 2 m) + 0 kN m + −18.75 kN m
Σ ML = −118.75 kN m
Σ MR = −(−50 kN × 2 m) + 0 kN m + −18.75 kN m
Σ MR = 81.25 kN m
Divide the sum of the moments about the right support by the length to get the reaction at left support
ΣMR
RyL = = 20.313 kN
L
Σ Fy = + − 50 kN − 20.313 kN − RyR
RyR = 29.688 kN
Segment 2
Take the sum of the moments about the left support
Σ ML = +F E MR2 + F E ML3
Σ ML = +18.75 kN m + 0 kN m
Σ ML = 18.75 kN m
Σ MR = +F E MR2 + F E ML3
Σ MR = +18.75 kN m + 0 kN m
Σ MR = 18.75 kN m
Divide the sum of the moments about the right support by the length to get the reaction at left support
ΣMR
R = = 4 6875 kN
Σ Fy = − RyL − RyR
Σ Fy = −4.6875 kN − RyR
RyR = −4.6875 kN
Joint Reactions
A B C
M 0 0 0
You should aim to 'cut' the beam between loads, supports and along distributed loads. After taking a cut you simply consider
equilibirium in the y-axis (i.e. let the sum of the forces in the y-axis equal zero and solve for the unknown shear force V).
If you follow this procedure for every cut/section then you will Find the equation of shear force for every segment of the beam
and therefore you can create the shear force diagram (SFD).
Shear for 0 ≤ x ≤ 2
V1
x
(x)
20.312 kN
x (m)
0 x 4 8
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
+20.312 − V1 (x) = 0
V1 (x) = +20.312
50 kN
V2
(x)
20.312 kN
x (m)
0 2 x 4 8
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
+20.312 − 50 − V2 (x) = 0
V2 (x) = −29.688
Shear for 4 ≤ x ≤ 8
50 kN
V3
(x)
20.312 kN 34.375 kN
(m)
0 2 4 x 8
+ ↑ ΣFy = 0
V3 (x) = +4.687
You should aim to 'cut' the beam between loads, supports and along distributed loads. After taking a cut you simply consider
equilibirium about the point of the cut (i.e. let the sum of the moment about the cut equal zero and solve for the unknown
bending moment M).
If you follow this procedure for every cut/section then you will find the equation of bending moment for every segment of the
beam and therefore you can create the bending moment diagram (BMD).
M1
(x)
x
20.312 kN
x (m)
0 x 4 8
+ ↻ ΣMx = 0
+ (20.312) (x − 0) − M1 (x) = 0
M1 (x) = +20.312x
Moment for 2 ≤ x ≤ 4
50 kN
M2
(x)
x
20.312 kN
x (m)
0 2 x 4 8
+ ↻ ΣMx = 0
50 kN
M3
(x)
x
20.312 kN 34.375 kN
x (m)
0 2 4 x 8
+ ↻ ΣMx = 0
M (x) = ∫ V (x) dx
The integration method is one of the most common and simple methods to calculate the moment. This is an alternative method
to using the method of sections/cuts as shown in the previous section of the hand calculations.
We start at the left side of the beam and we use the known value of the moment to calculate the constant of integration in the
first moment equation, M1 (x). If there is a Fixed Support on the left side of the beam then the moment value at x = 0 is the
value of the moment reaction. Otherwise, the value of the moment is zero at x = 0.
For all other moment equations apart from the first moment equation, the Continuity Condition is used to determine the values
of the constants of integration.
Moment for 0 ≤ x ≤ 2
For 0 ≤ x ≤ 2 :
V1 (x) = 20.312
M1 (x) = ∫ (20.312) dx
M1 (x) = 20.312x + C
At the left side of the beam (x = 0), we know the moment value is 0 because there is NOT a Fixed Support there:
M1 (0) = 0
20.312(0) + C = 0
0 +C = 0
C = 0
M1 (x) = 20.312x
V2 (x) = −29.688
M2 (x) = ∫ (−29.688) dx
M2 (x) = −29.688x + C
M1 (2) = M2 (2)
20.312(2) = −29.688(2) + C
40.624 = −59.376 + C
C = 100
Moment for 4 ≤ x ≤ 8
For 4 ≤ x ≤ 8 :
V3 (x) = 4.687
M3 (x) = ∫ (4.687) dx
M3 (x) = 4.687x + C
M2 (4) = M3 (4)
−18.752 = 18.748 + C
C = −37.5
Here the internal moment M must be expressed as a function of the x coordinates that extend across the beam. The constants
of integration are obtained from the boundary conditions at the pin, roller or fixed supports:
a) For a fixed support, the boundary condition states that the beam cannot deflect or rotate. This means that both the deflection
and slope are zero at the location of the support:
θ(x) = 0
and
υ(x) = 0
b) For a pin support or roller support, the boundary condition states that the beam cannot deflect but it is free to rotate. This
means that only the deflection is zero at the location of the support:
υ(x) = 0
2 2
d υ d υ
EI = M1 (x) → EI = 20.312x
2 2
dx dx
dυ dυ
EI = ∫ (20.312x) dx and = θ(x) is the Slope
dx dx
2
20.312x
EI θ1 (x) = + C1
2
2
EI θ1 (x) = 10.156x + C1
1
2
θ1 (x) = (10.156x + C1 )
EI
1
2
∫ θ1 (x) dx = ∫ (10.156x + C1 ) dx
EI
3
1 10.156x
υ1 (x) = ( + C1 x + C2 )
EI 3
1 3
υ1 (x) = (3.3853x + C1 x + C2 )
EI
According the type of support, we can use the next boundary conditiones for substituting these results into equations:
Pin: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Roller: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Fixed: θ = 0, υ = 0
1
3
(3.3853(0) + C1 (0) + C2 ) = 0
EI
3
3.3853(0) + C1 (0) + C2 = 0
0 + C1 (0) + C2 = 0
0C1 + C2 = 0
C2 = 0
2 2
d υ d υ
EI = M2 (x) → EI = −29.688x + 100
2 2
dx dx
dυ dυ
EI = ∫ (−29.688x + 100) dx and = θ(x) is the Slope
dx dx
2
−29.688x
EI θ2 (x) = + 100x + C3
2
2
EI θ2 (x) = −14.844x + 100x + C3
1
2
θ2 (x) = (−14.844x + 100x + C3 )
EI
1
2
∫ θ2 (x) dx = ∫ (−14.844x + 100x + C3 ) dx
EI
3 2
1 −14.844x 100x
υ2 (x) = ( + + C3 x + C4 )
EI 3 2
1
3 2
υ2 (x) = (−4.948x + 50x + C3 x + C4 )
EI
According the type of support, we can use the next boundary conditiones for substituting these results into equations:
Pin: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Roller: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Fixed: θ = 0, υ = 0
1
3 2
(−4.948(4) + 50(4) + C3 (4) + C4 ) = 0
EI
3 2
−4.948(4) + 50(4) + C3 (4) + C4 = 0
483.328 + C3 (4) + C4 = 0
4C3 + C4 = −483.328
4C3 + C4 = −483.328
2 2
d υ d υ
EI = M3 (x) → EI = 4.687x − 37.5
2 2
dx dx
dυ dυ
EI = ∫ (4.687x − 37.5) dx and = θ(x) is the Slope
dx dx
2
4.687x
EI θ3 (x) = − 37.5x + C5
2
2
EI θ3 (x) = 2.3435x − 37.5x + C5
1
2
θ3 (x) = (2.3435x − 37.5x + C5 )
EI
1
2
∫ θ3 (x) dx = ∫ (2.3435x − 37.5x + C5 ) dx
EI
3 2
1 2.3435x −37.5x
υ3 (x) = ( + C5 x + C6 )
EI 3 2
1
3 2
υ3 (x) = (0.7812x − 18.75x + C5 x + C6 )
EI
According the type of support, we can use the next boundary conditiones for substituting these results into equations:
Pin: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Roller: θ ≠ 0, υ = 0
Fixed: θ = 0, υ = 0
1
3 2
(0.7812(4) − 18.75(4) + C5 (4) + C6 ) = 0
EI
3 2
0.7812(4) − 18.75(4) + C5 (4) + C6 = 0
−250.0053 + C5 (4) + C6 = 0
4C5 + C6 = 250.0053
4C5 + C6 = 250.0053
1
3 2
(0.7812(8) − 18.75(8) + C5 (8) + C6 ) = 0
EI
3 2
0.7812(8) − 18.75(8) + C5 (8) + C6 = 0
−800.0427 + C5 (8) + C6 = 0
8C5 + C6 = 800.0427
8C5 + C6 = 800.0427
θ1 (2) = θ2 (2)
1 1
2 2
(10.156(2) + C1 ) = (−14.844(2) + 100(2) + C3 )
EI EI
2 2
10.156(2) + C1 = −14.844(2) + 100(2) + C3
40.624 + C1 = 140.624 + C3
C1 − C3 = 100
1 3
1 3 2
(3.3853(2) + C1 (2)) = (−4.948(2) + 50(2) + C3 (2) + C4 )
EI EI
3 3 2
3.3853(2) + C1 (2) = −4.948(2) + 50(2) + C3 (2) + C4
θ2 (4) = θ3 (4)
1 2
1 2
(−14.844(4) + 100(4) + C3 ) = (2.3435(4) − 37.5(4) + C5 )
EI EI
2 2
−14.844(4) + 100(4) + C3 = 2.3435(4) − 37.5(4) + C5
162.496 + C3 = −112.504 + C5
C3 − C5 = −275
Group the relevant equations to solve the values of the remaining constants:
4C3 + C4 = −483.328
4C5 + C6 = 250.0053
8C5 + C6 = 800.0427
C1 − C3 = 100
C3 − C5 = −275
C1 = −37.4987
C2 = 0
C3 = −137.4987
C4 = 66.6667
C5 = 137.5093
C6 = −300.032
For 0 ≤ x ≤ 2 :
1 2
θ1 (x) = (10.156x − 37.4987)
EI
1 3
υ1 (x) = (3.3853x − 37.4987x)
EI
For 2 ≤ x ≤ 4 :
1
2
θ2 (x) = (−14.844x + 100x − 137.4987)
EI
1 3 2
υ2 (x) = (−4.948x + 50x − 137.4987x + 66.6667)
EI
For 4 ≤ x ≤ 8 :
1
2
θ3 (x) = (2.3435x − 37.5x + 137.5093)
EI
1
3 2
υ3 (x) = (0.7812x − 18.75x + 137.5093x − 300.032)
EI
θ(x) = 0
For 0 ≤ x ≤ 2 :
1
2
θ1 (x) = (10.156x − 37.4987)
EI
1
2
0 = (10.156x − 37.4987)
EI
2
0 = 10.156x − 37.4987
x = 1.93 is a solution to this equation, so there is a potential maximum there. Substitute it into the deflection equation:
1 3
υ1 (x) = (3.3853x − 37.4987x)
EI
1 3
υ1 (1.93) = (3.3853(1.93) − 37.4987(1.93))
EI
1
υ1 (1.93) = (−48.0351)
EI
For 2 ≤ x ≤ 4 :
1
2
θ2 (x) = (−14.844x + 100x − 137.4987)
EI
1
2
0 = (−14.844x + 100x − 137.4987)
EI
2
0 = −14.844x + 100x − 137.4987
This equation can't be solved, so there is not a maximum in this segment of the beam.
For 4 ≤ x ≤ 8 :
1
2
θ3 (x) = (2.3435x − 37.5x + 137.5093)
EI
1 2
0 = (2.3435x − 37.5x + 137.5093)
EI
2
0 = 2.3435x − 37.5x + 137.5093
x = 5.7 is a solution to this equation, so there is a potential maximum there. Substitute it into the deflection equation:
1
3 2
υ3 (x) = (0.7812x − 18.75x + 137.5093x − 300.032)
EI
1
3 2
υ3 (5.7) = (0.7812(5.7) − 18.75(5.7) + 137.5093(5.7) − 300.032)
EI
1
υ3 (5.7) = (19.2503)
EI
1
3
υ1 (x) = (3.3853x − 37.4987x)
EI
1
3
υ1 (0) = (3.3853(0) − 37.4987(0))
EI
1
υ1 (0) = (0) , so this is not a maximum and we can ignore it.
EI
1 3 2
υ3 (x) = (0.7812x − 18.75x + 137.5093x − 300.032)
EI
1 3 2
υ3 (8) = (0.7812(8) − 18.75(8) + 137.5093(8) − 300.032)
EI
1
υ3 (8) = (0) , so this is not a maximum and we can ignore it.
EI
−48.0351
∴ The absolute maximum deflection in the above equations is: at x = 1.93
EI