Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by:
Engr. Kenny B. Cantila
Figure 1.1a Load transfer in One-way slab
One-way slabs transfer the imposed loads in one direction only. They
may be supported on two opposite sides only, in which the structural action is
essentially one-way, the loads being carried in direction perpendicular to the
supporting beams or walls.
Figure 1.1b Load transfer in Two-way slab
But rectangular slabs often have such proportions and supports (e.g.,
relatively deep, stiff monolithic concrete beams) that result in two-way
action. At any point, such slabs are curved in both directions resulting in
biaxial bending moments. It is convenient to think of such slabs as consisting
of two sets of parallel strips, in each direction and intersecting each other. So
part of the load is carried by one set and the remainder by the other.
L
w
5wL4
A B δ𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
δ 384EI
L
w 1wL4
A B δ𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
δ
192 EI
Propped Beam
L
w
1wL4
A B δ𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
δ 384 EI
A B
9
L M+ = 𝑤𝐿2
128
w
5 8 L
A B
Propped Beam 1 2
M− = 𝑤𝐿
8
L 1
M+ = 𝑤𝐿2
w 24
A B
1 1
Fixed end Beam M− = 𝑤𝐿2 M− = 𝑤𝐿2
12 12
Fig. 1.1b shows two center strips of a rectangular plate with spans la and lb.
For uniformly distributed loads of w per square foot of the slab, each strip
acts approximately like a simple beam uniformly loaded by its share of w;
i.e., wa and wb. Since they are part of the same slab, their midspan deflections
must be the same. Equating the center deflections of the short and long strips.
δa = δb
5wa la 4 5wb lb 4
=
384EI 384EI
4
wa lb
=
wb la
Therefore the larger share of the load is carried in the shorter directions, the
ratio of the two portions of the load being inversely proportional to the fourth
power of the ratio spans.
Simply supported (la) and Propped beam (lb)
δa = δb
5wa la 4 1wb lb 4
=
384EI 192 EI
4
wa 2 lb
=
wb 5 la
δa = δb
5wa la 4 1wb lb 4
=
384EI 384 EI
4
wa 1 lb
=
wb 5 la
Propped (la) and Simply supported (lb)
δa = δb
1wa la 4 5wb lb 4
=
192EI 384 EI
4
wa 5 lb
=
wb 2 la
δa = δb
1wa la 4 5wb lb 4
=
384EI 384 EI
4
wa lb
=5
wb la
Figure 1.2 Grid Model of two-way slab
wa = wb= w/2
So if only bending was present, the maximum bending moment in each slab
would be
The theory of bending of elastic plates shows that the exact maximum
bending moment in such a square slab is only 0.048wl2. However, a slab does
not behave like a beam and would not collapse if only one hypothetical
central strip reaches ultimate load. Therefore, in reality this moment can be
further reduced to 0.036wl2 due to inelastic redistribution of the load among
various strips of the slab.
Analysis of Two-way Slabs by Coefficient Method
Ma = Ca wla 2
Mb = Cb wlb 2
m=la/lb Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
0.50 0.000 0.086 0.000 0.094 0.090 0.097 0.000 0.089 0.088
0.55 0.000 0.084 0.000 0.092 0.089 0.096 0.000 0.085 0.086
0.60 0.000 0.081 0.000 0.089 0.088 0.095 0.000 0.080 0.085
0.65 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.085 0.087 0.093 0.000 0.074 0.083
0.70 0.000 0.074 0.000 0.081 0.086 0.091 0.000 0.068 0.081
0.75 0.000 0.069 0.000 0.076 0.085 0.088 0.000 0.061 0.078
0.80 0.000 0.065 0.000 0.071 0.083 0.086 0.000 0.055 0.075
0.85 0.000 0.060 0.000 0.066 0.082 0.083 0.000 0.049 0.072
0.90 0.000 0.055 0.000 0.060 0.080 0.079 0.000 0.043 0.068
0.95 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.055 0.079 0.075 0.000 0.038 0.065
1.00 0.000 0.045 0.000 0.050 0.075 0.071 0.000 0.033 0.061
Table 2: Coefficients (Cb , - ) for negative moment in slab along long direction
m=la/lb Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
0.50 0.000 0.006 0.022 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.010 0.003
0.55 0.000 0.007 0.028 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.019 0.014 0.005
0.60 0.000 0.010 0.035 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.024 0.018 0.006
0.65 0.000 0.014 0.043 0.015 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.024 0.008
0.70 0.000 0.017 0.050 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.038 0.029 0.011
0.75 0.000 0.022 0.056 0.024 0.000 0.000 0.044 0.036 0.014
0.80 0.000 0.027 0.061 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.051 0.041 0.017
0.85 0.000 0.031 0.065 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.057 0.046 0.021
0.90 0.000 0.037 0.070 0.040 0.000 0.000 0.062 0.052 0.025
0.95 0.000 0.041 0.072 0.045 0.000 0.000 0.067 0.056 0.029
1.00 0.000 0.045 0.076 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.071 0.061 0.033
Table 3: Coefficients (Ca,dl) for dead load positive moment in slab along short direction
m=la/lb Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
0.50 0.095 0.037 0.080 0.059 0.039 0.0761 0.089 0.056 0.023
0.55 0.088 0.035 0.071 0.056 0.038 0.058 0.081 0.052 0.024
0.60 0.081 0.034 0.062 0.053 0.037 0.056 0.073 0.048 0.026
0.65 0.074 0.032 0.054 0.050 0.036 0.054 0.065 0.044 0.028
0.70 0.068 0.030 0.046 0.046 0.035 0.051 0.058 0.040 0.029
0.75 0.061 0.028 0.040 0.043 0.033 0.048 0.051 0.036 0.031
0.80 0.056 0.026 0.034 0.039 0.032 0.045 0.045 0.032 0.029
0.85 0.050 0.024 0.029 0.036 0.031 0.042 0.004 0.029 0.028
0.90 0.045 0.022 0.025 0.033 0.029 0.039 0.035 0.025 0.026
0.95 0.040 0.020 0.021 0.030 0.028 0.036 0.031 0.022 0.024
1.00 0.036 0.018 0.018 0.027 0.027 0.033 0.027 0.020 0.023
Table 4: Coefficients (Cb ,dl) for dead load positive moment in slab along long direction
m=la/lb Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
0.50 0.006 0.002 0.007 0.004 0.001 0.003 0.007 0.004 0.002
0.55 0.008 0.003 0.009 0.005 0.002 0.004 0.009 0.005 0.003
0.60 0.010 0.004 0.011 0.007 0.003 0.006 0.012 0.007 0.004
0.65 0.013 0.006 0.014 0.009 0.004 0.007 0.014 0.009 0.005
0.70 0.016 0.007 0.016 0.011 0.005 0.009 0.017 0.011 0.006
0.75 0.019 0.009 0.018 0.013 0.007 0.013 0.020 0.013 0.007
0.80 0.023 0.011 0.020 0.016 0.009 0.015 0.022 0.015 0.010
0.85 0.026 0.012 0.022 0.019 0.011 0.017 0.025 0.017 0.013
0.90 0.029 0.014 0.024 0.022 0.013 0.021 0.028 0.019 0.015
0.95 0.033 0.016 0.025 0.024 0.015 0.024 0.031 0.021 0.017
1.00 0.036 0.018 0.027 0.027 0.018 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.020
Table 5: Coefficients (Ca ,ll) for live load positive moment in slab along short direction
m=la/lb Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
0.50 0.095 0.066 0.088 0.077 0.067 0.078 0.092 0.076 0.067
0.55 0.088 0.062 0.080 0.072 0.063 0.073 0.085 0.070 0.063
0.60 0.081 0.058 0.071 0.067 0.059 0.068 0.077 0.065 0.059
0.65 0.074 0.053 0.064 0.062 0.055 0.064 0.070 0.059 0.054
0.70 0.068 0.049 0.057 0.057 0.051 0.060 0.063 0.054 0.050
0.75 0.061 0.045 0.051 0.052 0.047 0.055 0.056 0.049 0.046
0.80 0.056 0.041 0.045 0.048 0.044 0.051 0.051 0.044 0.042
0.85 0.050 0.037 0.040 0.043 0.041 0.046 0.045 0.040 0.039
0.90 0.045 0.034 0.035 0.039 0.037 0.042 0.040 0.035 0.036
0.95 0.040 0.030 0.031 0.035 0.034 0.038 0.036 0.031 0.032
1.00 0.036 0.027 0.027 0.032 0.032 0.035 0.032 0.028 0.030
Table 6: Coefficients (Cb,ll) for live load positive moment in slab along long direction
m=la/lb Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
0.50 0.006 0.004 0.0007 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.005 0.004
0.55 0.008 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006
0.60 0.010 0.007 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.008 0.011 0.009 0.007
0.65 0.013 0.010 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.010 0.014 0.011 0.009
0.70 0.016 0.012 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.014 0.011
0.75 0.019 0.014 0.019 0.016 0.013 0.016 0.020 0.016 0.013
0.80 0.023 0.017 0.022 0.020 0.016 0.019 0.023 0.019 0.017
0.85 0.026 0.019 0.024 0.023 0.019 0.022 0.026 0.022 0.020
0.90 0.029 0.022 0.027 0.026 0.021 0.025 0.029 0.024 0.022
0.95 0.033 0.025 0.029 0.029 0.024 0.029 0.032 0.027 0.025
1.00 0.036 0.027 0.032 0.032 0.027 0.032 0.035 0.030 0.028
Steps in Designing Two-Way Slab
3. Calculate m, which is the ratio of shorter side and longer side of the slab:
A
m=
B
D D
E E
F F
A B C
Check the validity of two-way slab
A
m=
B
6.0
m=
7.5
m = 0.80 < 1.0 (two − way slab)
2(A + B)
hmin =
180
2(6000 + 7500)
hmin =
180
𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐧 = 𝟏𝟓𝟎 𝐦𝐦
Dead weight (self-weight): WDL1 = yc hc = 24 0.15 = 3.6 kN/m2
Superimposed dead load WDL2 = 12.4 kN/m2
Total dead load 𝐖𝐃𝐋 = 16.0 kN/m2
Total live load 𝐖𝐋𝐋 = 8.0 kN/m2
Factored Load 𝐖𝐮 = 𝟏. 𝟐𝐖𝐃𝐋 + 𝟏. 𝟔𝐖𝐋𝐋 = 32.0 𝐤𝐍/𝐦𝟐
𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Ma+ = 49.08 kN ∙ m
Mb+ = 31.68 kN ∙ m
Ma+ = 42.39 kN ∙ m
Mb+ = 29.88 kN ∙ m
𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Mb+ = 23.04 kN ∙ m
Ma+ = 36. 86 kN ∙ m
𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
Mb+ = 24.12 kN ∙ m
𝐏𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝟏
A B C
D D
𝟎
+𝟒𝟗. 𝟎𝟖
𝟎 +𝟑𝟏. 𝟔𝟖 −𝟓𝟐. 𝟐𝟎
E E
−𝟖𝟏. 𝟕𝟗
F F
A B C
𝐏𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝟒
A B C
−𝟕𝟒. 𝟖𝟖
D D
+𝟑𝟔. 𝟖𝟔
−𝟒𝟖. 𝟔𝟎 +𝟐𝟒. 𝟏𝟐 −𝟒𝟖. 𝟔𝟎
E E
−𝟕𝟒. 𝟖𝟖
F F
A B C
REFERENCES
https://www.scribd.com/doc/61667964/19/EXAMPLE-DESIGN-BY-COEFFICIENT-METHOD