You are on page 1of 12

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/319103065

Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in Hard Milling of SKD
61 Alloy Steel

Article  in  Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Engineers - Series C · March 2017

CITATIONS READS

0 82

2 authors:

That Huu Nguyen Q.C. Hsu


National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences
3 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION    60 PUBLICATIONS   266 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Study on Preform Design of Multi-stage Forging for Connecting Rod to Upgrade Material Retention Ratio View project

NSC 100-2221-E-151-019- View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Q.C. Hsu on 14 August 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


中國機械工程學刊第三十八卷第一期第41~51頁(民國一百零六年)
Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.38, No.1, pp 41~51 (2017)

Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal


Rate in Hard Milling of SKD 61 Alloy Steel

Huu-That Nguyen* and Quang-Cherng Hsu**

Keywords: Cutting force, Material removal rate, produced by the grinding operation is prone to
Hard milling, Multi-objective optimization thermal damage [1-3].
Nowadays, in order to enhance production
ABSTRACT and product quality in the mold and die
manufacturing industry, the finish grinding
This paper analyzes the effect of machining process is often replaced by the finish hard
parameters on cutting forces and material removal milling operation [4-6]. The hard milling is
rate (MRR) in hard milling of hardened SKD 61 cutting of the hardened materials with the
alloy steel based on integration of Taguchi hardness range from 40 HRC to 70 HRC. The
method and response surface methodology (RSM). benefits of hard milling process are improvable
A set of experiments is designed according to the fatigue life of the machined parts and minimal
Taguchi technique. The cutting force components compressive residual stresses [4, 7]. Compared to
are measured by a dynamometer, and then grinding process, the hard milling has a short
analysis of variance (ANOVA) is carried out to product cycle time, a high MRR, and a flexible
determine the influences of cutting parameters on process design. However, the disadvantages of
the given cutting force components. Quadratic hard milling are increase in cutting force and
mathematical models are developed for prediction reduction of tool life compared to machining soft
of the cutting forces during the hard milling materials [8].
process. To obtain the minimum cutting forces In hard milling, the cutting forces and MRR
and the maximum MRR, the multi-objective are two important factors affecting the machining
optimization is conducted to find out the optimal performance and the accuracy of the machined
machining conditions. In addition, the validation surface. The high cutting forces and large MRR
test is also accomplished to demonstrate the can cause machined workpiece deformation,
accuracy of optimization. The results reveal that dimension error, surface location error and
the percentage errors between the predicted and instability of machining systems [9]. Therefore,
experimental values for normal cutting force, feed modeling and optimization of cutting forces and
force, axial force and MRR are 5.46%, 7.38%, MRR are the important tasks frequently
7.87% and 1.06%, respectively. encountered in hard machining operations.
In recent years, many authors have
INTRODUCTION effectively applied the statistical analysis method
used to analyze the effect of the cutting conditions
Traditionally, the mold and die manufacturing on the cutting forces found in hard machining
process often consists of rough machining, heat processes. For instance, Ö zel et al. [10] reported
treatment, and then a grinding process. This the influences of workpiece hardness, cutting
process is both costly and time-consuming. edge geometry, cutting speed, and feed rate on
Furthermore, the quality of the machined surface resultant forces and surface roughness in the
finish hard turning of AISI H13 steel. Bartarya
Paper Received May, 2016. Revised October, 2016. Accepted and Choudhury [11] analyzed the influence of
November, 2016. Author for Correspondence:Quang-Cherng
Hsu cutting parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate
*
Ph.D. student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, and depth of cut on surface roughness and cutting
National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, forces in the hard turning operation of EN 31 steel.
Kaohsiung, Taiwan 807, ROC The experiments were designed by the full
**
Corresponding Author: Professor, Department of factorial experimental design method. By analysis
Mechanical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of variance, it was found that the depth of cut was
of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan 807, ROC; a primary factor affecting the cutting force
Email: hsuqc@kuas.edu.tw
-41-
J. CSME Vol.38, No.1(2017)

obtained. Based on the regression analysis method, face milling by using regression analysis and
the second-order mathematical models were neural network methods.
developed for estimating the cutting forces. Ding Much of the above research refers to the
et al. [12] optimized the machining process cutting process parameters chosen for the hard
parameters and developed the experimental machining process according to the researchers’
equation for surface roughness and cutting forces experience without taking into consideration the
during milling of AISI H13 hardened alloy steel dynamic behaviors of the machine tools involved.
with (Ti, Al) N-TiN coated inserts. They indicated Given the nature of these approaches, it does
that the feed rate and depth of cut are two main not entirely reflect the aspects of the hard
parameters which affect cutting forces. Paiva et al. machining process.
[13] investigated the effect of cutting parameters Moreover, several of the studies conducted
on cutting time, tool life, material removal rate on the optimal manufacturing process have been
and surface roughness. Lalwani et al. [14] studied performed in order to minimize cost, to improve
the influence of cutting parameters on surface product quality, and to enhance performance
roughness and cutting forces in finish hard turning through the use of numerous diverse methods.
of MDN250 steel. Çalışkan et al. [15] Unfortunately, each methodology achieves a
investigated the effect of cutting parameters (i.e., differing levels of efficiency in the computational
cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut) and the process. No recent method has yet to provide for
coated inserts (AlTiN/TiN, TiAlSiN/TiSiN/TiAlN, the same degree of accuracy within all aspects of
and TiN/TiAlN) on surface roughness and cutting the machining process.
forces during face milling of AISI O2 cold-work In this study, an attempt has been made
tool steel. The design of experiments was to produce optimum machining parameters in the
performed based on a full factorial design by hard milling of hardened SKD 61 alloy steel with
RSM. They concluded that the feed rate and depth TiAlN coated carbide end mills based on the
of cut are found to be significantly influential integration of the Taguchi technique and RSM.
factors on cutting forces with a 95% confidence The research is carried out in the following
level. Bouacha et al. [16] researched the effect of manner. First, the cutting parameters are chosen
cutting parameters on surface roughness and based on both the tool manufac-
cutting forces in the hard turning of AISI 52100 turer's recommendations and the structural
bearing steel hardened to 64 HRC with CBN tool dynamic analysis of the machine tool. Second, a
using RSM. They noted that the depth of cut has a set of tests is designed using the Taguchi
significant influence on cutting forces as technique. Third, the effect of cutting parameters
compared to cutting speed and the feed rate on the given cutting forces is analyzed by
employed. Aouici et al. [17] investigated the hard ANOVA. Next, the quadratic models are
turning of AISI D3 cold-work steel with ceramic developed for prediction of the cutting forces
tools. The experiments were created by the use of during the hard milling process. Finally, in order
the Taguchi method. The effect of control factors to get the minimum cutting forces and the
(i.e., cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut) on maximum MRR, multi-objective optimization is
cutting forces was analyzed by ANOVA. The also performed.
quadratic models were developed by RSM. They
revealed that the depth of cut is found to be the EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
most influential factor on cutting forces. Workpiece material
In addition, many researchers have
successfully applied the new optimization In this research, the workpiece material was a
methods used to determine the optimal cutting block of SKD 61 alloy steel, which has the
conditions for machining processes. For Example, dimensions of 200 mm x 100 mm x 40 mm. The
Bouzid et al. [18] reported the multi-objective workpieces were through hardened and tempered
optimization of surface roughness and MRR to obtain the different hardness levels, namely 40,
during turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel by using 45, and 50 HRC. Their chemical compositions
Taguchi method combined with the Grey were 0.39 %C, 1.0 %Si, 0.4 %Mn, 5.15 %Cr,
relational analysis. Tsao [19] presented the 1.4 %Mo, 0.8 %V, and 0.2 %Ni.
optimization of cutting parameters for milling of
aluminium alloy by Grey- Taguchi method. Gupta Tools, machine tools
et al. [20] applied Taguchi-fuzzy techniques for
multi-objective optimization in high speed CNC The cutting tools, which used in hard milling
turning of AISI P-20 tool steel. Bajić et al. [21] tests, were M520 ultra carbide end mills of 10
studied the effects of cutting parameters on mm diameter, 35 degrees of helix angle, square
cutting force, surface roughness, and tool wear in type, 4 flutes, were made by the CMTec tool
-42-
H.T. Nguyen and Q.C. Hsu: Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in Hard Milling.

company. These tools were coated with TiAlN Identification of cutting conditions for the hard
and their cutting ability can reach to 60 HRC for milling test
the hardened tool steels. All the experiments were
performed under dry condition at a Victor V- In this study, the cutting conditions for the
Center-4 Vertical machining center, which has a hard milling test were selected based on both the
maximum spindle speed of 6,000rpm. The cutting tool manufacturer’s recommendation and
workpieces were clamped on the machine table to the structural dynamic analysis of a machine tool.
ensure rigidity during the machining process. The dynamic analysis of a machine tool was
Table 1 Experimental conditions for calculating carried out by use of CUTPRO software. The
the cutting constants CUTPRO is an advanced machining software. It
is developed at the Manufacturing Automation
Test Spindle Feed Depth Material Laboratory. It can provide a high efficiency
speed, rate, of cut hardness solution for the metal machining field. The
n (rpm) f (mm/ a H procedure of structural dynamic analysis of
tooth) (mm) (HRC) machine tool was given in Figure 1.
1 850 0.050 0.3 50 First, the measurements of the machine tool
2 850 0.075 0.3 50 dynamics were carried out by tap testing (hammer
3 850 0.100 0.3 50 test). The structural dynamics of machine tool in
4 850 0.125 0.3 50 both the X and Y directions were measured
5 850 0.150 0.3 50 through the Kistler 9722A2000 Hammer (2.13
mV/N sensitivity) and the 8778A500 M14
accelerometer (10mV/g sensitivity). The cutting
tool was clamped on the machine’s spindle head
to carry out the various measurement tasks
involved. The accelerometer was mounted on the
cutter and connect to the signal processing box.
After tap testing, the frequency response functions
(FRF) of the structure were obtained in both
directions by the use of the MALTF program in
CUTPRO software, which was installed in a PC
system.
Figure 1 Illustrations of dynamic parameter Second, the slotting milling tests were
measurement of machine tool performed to identify cutting coefficients of a
tool/ material pairing as shown in Figure 2. The
Table 2 Average cutting coefficients of SKD 61 input parameters of the cutting tests were listed in
Table 1 [22]. The cutting force components in
Kte Ktc three directions were measured with a piezo-
-66.743 -654.089
(N/mm) (N/mm2) electric, three-component dynamometer (type X-
Kre Krc Y-Z FORCE SENSOR, model 624-120-5KN) and
-89.743 -2868.340
(N/mm) (N/mm2) a System 6000’s Model 6100 scanner connected
Kae Kac to a PC employing Strain Smart force
13.832 645.043
(N/mm) (N/mm2) measurement software. In this system, a digital
filter was applied to filter out the noise signal.
This digital filter is based on the fast Fourier
transform algorithm. For each machining
condition, 1000 data points for each of the three
channels were recorded by sampling at 1000 Hz
for a period of 1 second duration. According to
the measured cutting force data, the average
cutting forces in three directions ( Fxc , Fyc , Fzc )
for each cutting condition were determined. The
average cutting force coefficients were calculated
by using the average cutting forces obtained
through the use of the CUTPRO software. The
model of average cutting force coefficients was
Figure 2 Set up test for identification of cutting given in Equation 1 [22].
constants
-43-
J. CSME Vol.38, No.1(2017)

4 Fyc π Fye DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS


K tc  , Kte  ,
Na Na
Taguchi technique
 4 Fxc  π Fxe (1)
K rc  , K re  ,
Na Na Taguchi technique is a powerful and effective
π Fzc 2F method which is widely used for the design of
K ac  , K ae  ze ,
Na Na experiments in engineering fields. In this research,
the Taguchi technique was applied for the design
of all the experiments in hard milling of SKD 61
Where, Ktc, Krc, Kac are cutting coefficients of steel. The input variables and its values were
the tool/workpiece material pairing in tangential, given in Table 3. With four three-level factors,
radial and axial directions [N/mm2]; Kte, Kre, Kae Taguchi’s L27 orthogonal array having 27 rows
are edge cutting coefficients of the cutting tool in and 13 columns was selected to create a set of
tangential, radial and axial directions [N/mm]; N tests in the design process. In order to avoid
is the number of teeth on the cutter; a is depth of overlap of the interactions with the main factors,
cut; F ye , Fxe , Fze are average edge cutting the columns that were chosen are 1, 3, 5, and 12
forces in three directions [N]. After calculating for [23].
average cutting force coefficients, the particular
results were revealed in Table 2. Response surface methodology
Third, once the FRF was measured and the
cutting force coefficients were also determined, The second-order model was developed
these data were exemplified in the CUTPRO based on RSM which is a statistical and
software to make the stability lobe diagram, as mathematical technique [24]. In machining
shown in Figure 3. research, the relationship between the machining
parameters and the cutting force might be
expressed by the equation as follows [25]:

lnF = A1lnV + A2lnf + A3lna + A4lnH + A5 (2)

Where, F is the cutting force; A1, A2, A3, A4


and A5 are constants; V, f, a, and H are cutting
speed (m/min), feed rate (mm/tooth), axial depth
of cut (mm) and material hardness (HRC),
respectively.
The cutting force is characterized by a
second-order polynomial for “k” input factors. It
can be noted in Equation 3.

k k k
Figure 3 Analytical stability lobe diagram for hard
milling test
y  0    i xi    ii xi2   ij xi x j  
i 1 i 1 i, j
Finally, the cutting speed and the depth of cut (3)
in a stable cutting region were selected based Where, y is the response characteristic
upon the analytical stability lobe diagram. With (output factor), xi is coded variable, βi is the
this approach, the selected cutting condition coefficient of first-order terms, βii is the
parameters for hard milling of SKD 61 alloy steel coefficients of second-order terms, and βij is the
were shown in Table 3. coefficient of interactive terms of the equation.

Table 3 Levels of input variables RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Factors Code of levels
1 2 3 During the hard milling process, the cutting
forces in three directions (i.e., the normal force Fx,
Cutting speed, V (m/min) 25 35 45
Spindle speed, n (rpm) 796 1115 1433 the feed force Fy, and the axial force Fz) were
measured by a dynamometer. In this research, we
Feed rate, f (mm/tooth) 0.01 0.02 0.03
offered an average peak force to calculate the
Depth of cut, a (mm) 0.2 0.3 0.4
values of cutting force components.
Hardness, H (HRC) 40 45 50
-44-
H.T. Nguyen and Q.C. Hsu: Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in Hard Milling.

Table 4 Experimental results

V f a H Fx Fy Fz MRR
Runs
(m/min) (mm/tooth) (mm) (HRC) (N) (N) (N) (mm3/min)
1 25 0.01 0.2 40 26.59 24.47 9.53 63.69
2 25 0.01 0.3 45 54.95 36.59 11.63 95.54
3 25 0.01 0.4 50 75.43 56.73 17.3 127.39
4 25 0.02 0.2 50 64.57 55.77 15.73 127.39
5 25 0.02 0.3 40 56.40 48.03 12.93 191.08
6 25 0.02 0.4 45 71.10 51.30 16.50 254.78
7 25 0.03 0.2 45 47.37 37.53 16.44 191.08
8 25 0.03 0.3 50 98.57 87.19 17.79 286.62
9 25 0.03 0.4 40 101.03 83.37 15.50 382.17
10 35 0.01 0.2 45 29.53 23.53 9.10 89.17
11 35 0.01 0.3 50 52.20 44.80 11.50 133.76
12 35 0.01 0.4 40 71.00 52.53 14.50 178.34
13 35 0.02 0.2 40 39.73 33.50 14.47 178.34
14 35 0.02 0.3 45 49.57 43.73 15.13 267.52
15 35 0.02 0.4 50 112.9 85.90 15.70 356.69
16 35 0.03 0.2 50 60.37 44.47 18.93 267.52
17 35 0.03 0.3 40 87.00 71.63 15.53 401.27
18 35 0.03 0.4 45 96.23 74.70 16.10 535.03
19 45 0.01 0.2 50 34.60 28.80 9.67 114.65
20 45 0.01 0.3 40 28.87 29.80 9.40 171.97
21 45 0.01 0.4 45 44.63 45.63 14.13 229.30
22 45 0.02 0.2 45 44.90 39.57 13.53 229.30
23 45 0.02 0.3 50 76.77 58.43 15.53 343.95
24 45 0.02 0.4 40 71.20 51.00 13.27 458.60
25 45 0.03 0.2 40 25.80 20.90 16.47 343.95
26 45 0.03 0.3 45 72.13 59.30 17.20 515.92
27 45 0.03 0.4 50 129.77 86.63 17.70 687.90

The determination of the values of the experiments. In this research work, the analysis of
cutting force components was accomplished in direct and interactive effect of the input factors (V,
the following manner. First, ten cutting periods f, a, and H) on the cutting forces has been
were selected in a steady region, then the peak conducted through ANOVA. The regression
force was determined in each period, and finally it equation and investigated factors are called upon
was further determined that the averaged value of to be statistically significant if the estimated
all the peak forces. regression coefficient (P) value in the ANOVA
In addition, during the milling operation, the Table is less than 0.05. Besides, the percentage
MRR in mm3/min could be calculated from contribution of terms in the estimated model (%C)
Equation 4 [26]. on the total variation are also considered to
evaluate the influence degree of the controllable
a  ae  V  f  z  1000 factors on the model.
M R R (4) In this study, Minitab 16 software is used for
3.14  d
ANOVA of the response surface. The Minitab is a
statistical analysis software. It is used for
Where, V is the cutting speed (m/min), f is
analyzing the experimental data in the metal
the feed rate (mm/tooth), a is the depth of cut
cutting field. According to the experimental data
(mm), ae is the width of cut (mm), z is the flute of
in Table 4, the ANOVA is conducted and its
the cutter, and d is the diameter of the tool (mm).
results are represented in Tables 5. Study of this
table indicates that the developed models are
ANOVA for the response surface
found to be statistically significant, with 95%
confidence interval, and they are suitable for the
ANOVA is a statistical analysis which is
Taguchi experiment with the model’s P- value of
commonly applied to evaluate the data of
-45-
J. CSME Vol.38, No.1(2017)

less than 0.05. Moreover, the model terms with a significantly effective factors on the cutting forces
P- value of less than 0.05 reveal that they have a are the depth of cut and the feed rate. This can be
significant effect on the cutting force models in explained by the fact that the increasing both
the investigated range. depth of cut and feed rate producing an increase
In addition, in statistics, R-squared (R2) is of chip load and thus a large amount of energy is
called the coefficient of determination for required to form a chip in the shear zone; so, it is
regression analysis that is used to explain the relatively difficult to remove the material in hard
goodness-of-fit of the model to the experimental milling operation [28].
data. According to ANOVA, the R2 values of the
cutting force models are 92.28%, 89.45% and Cutting force models based RSM
94.72%, respectively as shown in Tables 5. These
values are very close to 1. This indicates that the The quadratic mathematical models used in
cutting force models perfectly fit with the this research are based on the experimental data,
measured data. and they have been made by using RSM for
On the other hand, Table 5 shows that the predicting the cutting forces in the hard milling.
first-order effect of the feed rate (f), the depth of These models are evaluated through ANOVA, and
cut (a), and the material hardness (H), which all the results are given in Equations 5-7, respectively,
have a significant influence on the Fx. However, for Fx, Fy, Fz.
the depth of cut is the most influential parameter The regression model of the normal force
on the Fx, which explains a 45.42% contribution (Fx) is found in Equation 5 with R2 of 92.28%.
to model. The next influential factors are the feed
rate (25.56% contribution) and the material Fx = 828 + 0.08V – 2886f + 132a – 37.9H –
hardness (10.97% contribution). Similarly, Table 0.0398V2 – 21995f 2 – 30a2 + 0.428H2 + 29.1Vf +
5 describes that the main influential factor on the 1.38Va + 0.0299VH + 7015fa + 51.4fH – 1.79aH
feed force is the depth of cut with a 41.99% (5)
contribution to the model. The feed rate and the
material hardness are the next factors affecting the The regression model of the feed force (Fy) is
Fy. Respectively, their contributions to the model shown in Equation 6 with R2 of 89.45%.
are 26.73% and 9.59%.
Contrary to the model Fx and Fy, the resulting Fy = 536 + 2.06V + 219f + 151a – 27.1H –
ANOVA of the model Fz, which is notified in 0.0270V2 – 14366f 2 – 348a2 + 0.312H2 – 26.4Vf +
Table 5, shows that the feed rate is the most 1.21Va – 0.0078VH + 5504fa + 19.3fH + 1.34aH
influential parameter on axial force Fz, with a (6)
55.44 % contribution. The following effects on
the Fz are material hardness (H) and the depth of The regression model of the axial force (Fz)
cut (a). Its contributions are (9.17 and 7.79) %, is described in Equation 7 with R2 of 94.72%.
respectively. The cutting speed factor are not
statistically significant in this case. Fz = 9.9 – 0.079V + 434f + 17.5a – 0.40H –
In order to clarify this research work, a 0.00093V2 – 3989f 2 + 62.5a2 + 0.0043H2 +
qualitative comparison can be conducted with 5.68Vf – 0.346Va + 0.00220VH –1736fa + 6.61fH
other authors. An et al. [27] report that the cutting + 0.026aH (7)
speed is a main effective factor on the cutting
forces when hard milling of high strength steel. 140
Variables
However, Abou-El-Hossein et al. [25] indicate Measured Fx
120 Predicted Fx
that the most influential parameters among the Measured Fy
Predicted Fy
given parameters on cutting forces is feed rate 100 Measured Fz
Cutting forces (N)

followed by axial depth of cut, and radial depth of Predicted Fz

cut when end milling of AISI P20 tool steel, 80

whereas, cutting speed is an insignificant factor.


60
Ding et al. [12] show that the feed rate and depth
of cut are two main parameters which affect 40
cutting forces during milling of AISI H13
hardened alloy steel. Çalışkan et al. [15] also 20

conclude that the feed rate and depth of cut are 0


found to be significantly influential factors on 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
cutting forces with a 95% confidence level in face Experiments
milling of AISI O2 cold-work tool steel. Figure 4 Comparison between predicted and
The current study shows that the two measured values for Fx, Fy and Fz.

-46-
H.T. Nguyen and Q.C. Hsu: Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in Hard Milling.

Table 5 Analysis of variance of model for the cutting forces


Source Degree of Sum of Mean F- P- %C-
freedom squares squares variance Regression Contrib-
ratio coefficient ution
ANOVA of model for Fx, R2= 92.28%
Model 14 18107.7 1293.41 10.24 0.000 92.28
V 1 246.7 246.74 1.95 0.188 1.26
f 1 5015.6 5015.65 5015.6 0.000 25.56
a 1 8912.8 8912.83 70.57 0.000 45.42
H 1 2152.7 2152.65 17.04 0.001 10.97
ANOVA of model for Fy, R2= 89.45%
Model 14 9230.5 659.32 7.27 0.001 89.45
V 1 206.1 206.10 2.27 0.158 2.00
f 1 2758.4 2758.35 30.42 0.000 26.73
a 1 4332.8 4332.84 47.78 0.000 41.99
H 1 989.9 989.91 989.91 0.006 9.59
ANOVA of model for Fz, R2= 94.72%
Model 14 191.411 13.672 15.37 0.000 94.72
V 1 2.313 2.313 2.60 0.133 1.14
f 1 112.035 15.745 17.70 0.000 55.44
a 1 15.745 15.745 17.70 0.001 7.79
H 1 18.533 18.533 20.83 0.001 9.17

The comparison of the predicted values and workpiece and the chip will be formed easily as a
the measured values is illustrated in Figure 4. It result. This phenomenon is considered to be the
shows a good correlation between experimental thermal softening of the workpiece as reported by
and predicted results, and thus the established another researcher [11, 25, 28]. Figure 5b depicts
models could be utilized to forecast the cutting the interaction influence of the depth of cut (a)
forces in the hard milling of SKD 61 steel with and material hardness (H) on the Fx. It shows that
95% confidence intervals. the Fx decreases rapidly with the decrease of both
the depth of cut and material hardness. The effect
Effect of the input variables on the cutting of feed rate and depth of cut on the Fx is also
force models illustrated in Figure 5c. This figure demonstrates
that the force Fx decreases with a decrease in both
To obviously understand the interactive the feed rate and the depth of cut as presented by
influence of input parameters on output response, Ghani et al. [28]. This is due to the decreasing
the surface graphs for the cutting force models are product of feed rate and depth of cut producing a
produced based on Equations 5-7. With four input decrease of chip load and thus only a small
control factors considered, each of the 3D plots is amount of energy is required to form a chip in the
drawn according to the change occurring in two shear zone; so, it is relatively easy to remove the
of the factors. The remaining factors of the material during hard milling.
models are seen as a constant and they are held in Similar to the normal force, the estimated
the middle level. Therefore, all the plots of the response surfaces of the feed force Fy are also
response surface are illustrated in Figures 5-7. represented in Figures 6a-c. Figure 6a represents
Figures 5a-c exhibit the relationship of the the relationship of the Fy with cutting speed and
normal force Fx with the investigating parameters. feed rate. This figure shows that the feed rate
Figure 5a indicates the influence of cutting speed remarkably influences the cutting force, whereas
(V) and feed rate (f) on the normal force Fx. It the effect of cutting speed on the cutting force is
reveals that increasing the cutting speed and found to be insignificant. From Figures 6b-c, the
decreasing the feed rate will lead to a remarkable rise in all factors (e.g., feed rate, depth of cut, and
decrease in cutting force Fx. As it can be material hardness) leads to a considerable
explained, the increase in the cutting speed causes increase in the feed force Fy.
increasing temperatures in the shear zone. Thus, Figures 7a-c depict the interactive influence
the converse increase of cutting speed and of the given parameters on the axial force Fz.
decreased feed rate will produce a softer Figure 7a shows that the axial cutting force
-47-
J. CSME Vol.38, No.1(2017)

actually lowers when the cutting speed is elevated.


This can be justified that by increasing the speed,
it increases the inclining angle of shear plane, and 80
it decreases the length of the shear plane in the
selected cutting region. Therefore, the cutting Fy 60
force is needed for the formation of the chip to be 50
40
reduced. Conversely, at lower cutting speeds, the
45 H
friction force elevates. This is one of the causes
0.2
for the increase of cutting force as stated by Bajić 0.3
0.4
40
a
et al. [21]. In addition, Figures 7b-c indicate that b)
the minimum value of axial cutting force (Fz) is
obtained when the depth of cut and feed rate
arrive minimum values.
80

60
Fy
40 0.4
80
20 0.3
60 a
Fx 0.01
0.02 0.2
40 0.03 f 0.03
c)
0.02
24
f Figure 6 The response surface plot for Fy
30 36 0.01
V 42
a)

16
100
Fz 14
80
Fx 12 0.03
60
50 10 0.02 f
40
45 24 30
H 36 0.01
0.2 42
0.3 40 V a)
a 0.4
b)

17.6
16.4
100
Fz
15.2
80
Fx 14.0 50
60
0.4 45
40 H
0.3 0.2
a 0.3 40
0.01
0.02 0.2
a b) 0.4
f 0.03
c)

Figure 5 The response surface plot for Fx


17.5

15.0
Fz
12.5
0.4
10.0
60 0.3 a
Fy 50 0.01
0.02 0.2
0.03
40 0.03 f c)
30 0.02 f
24 30 Figure 7 The response surface plot for Fz
36 42 0.01
V a)

-48-
H.T. Nguyen and Q.C. Hsu: Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in Hard Milling.

Table 6 Constrain and goal for optimization

Conditions Goal Lower Target Upper Weight


limit limit
V Is in range 25 45
f Is in range 0.01 0.03
a Is in range 0.2 0.4
H Is in range 40 50
Fx Minimum 25.80 25.80 129.77 0.1
Fy Minimum 20.90 20.90 87.19 0.1
Fz Minimum 9.10 9.10 18.93 0.1
MRR Maximum 63.69 63.69 687.90 0.1

Table 7 The results of the multi-objective optimization for response

Res- Goal Optimum conditions Predi Calcul- Error


ponse V f a H -cted ated (%)
Fx Min. 45 0.02 0.24 41.6 35.195 37.231 5.46
Fy Min. 45 0.02 0.24 41.6 32.567 35.165 7.38
Fz Min. 45 0.02 0.24 41.6 13.039 14.153 7.87
MRR Max. 45 0.02 0.24 41.6 272.27 275.19 1.06
Composite Desirability = 0.95369

Multi-objective optimization of the cutting 7, reveal that the obtained force components (Fx,
parameters using desirability functioning Fy and Fz) and MRR under the optimized
machining conditions are (37.231; 35.165; and
To enhance productivity, minimize cost and 14.153) N and 275.195 mm3/min, respectively.
improve overall surface quality, the multi- The percentage errors between predicted and
objective optimization method should be applied measured results for cutting force components (Fx,
to find the optimal cutting conditions for the Fy and Fz) and MRR are 5.46%, 7.38%, 7.87%
machining process. In this study, the multi- and 1.06%, respectively. It can be concluded that
objective optimization method is carried out these values are small. Thus, the RSM method
based on a desirability function. The input can be applied to predict the cutting forces and
parameters, the goals, the limits and the weight MRR during the hard milling process of SKD 61
are completely listed in Table 6. The results of steel.
optimization for the cutting forces and MRR are
summarized in Table 7. CONCLUSIONS
Table 7 shows that the optimum cutting
conditions are the cutting speed (45 m/min), the This paper has presented the study of the
feed rate (0.02 mm/tooth), the depth of cut (0.24 cutting forces and MRR in hard milling of SKD
mm), and the material hardness (41.6 HRC). 61 steel with hardness of (40~50) HRC by means
According to these optimal conditions, of a combination of Taguchi technique and the
respectively, the minimum cutting forces (Fx, Fy, RSM. It could be concluded as follows:
and Fz) are (35.195; 32.567; and 13.039) N and • The feed rate, depth of cut, and material
the maximum MRR is 272.27 mm3/min. Moreover, hardness have a significant effect on the cutting
the composite desirability value is 0.95369 as forces at the reliability level 95%. The most
reported in Table 7 and it is very close to 1. influential factor on cutting forces is the depth of
Therefore, this multi-objective optimization of the cut followed by feed rate, and material hardness
cutting forces and the MRR is completely and, finally, by cutting speed.
acceptable. • The results of the models are in reasonably
Once the optimal machining parameters are good agreement with the observation of the
determined, the validation test must be conducted experiments. Thus, the established models can be
to demonstrate the accuracy of the multi-objective utilized to estimate the cutting forces in the hard
optimization. The valid results, as shown in Table milling of SKD 61 steel with 95% confidence
-49-
J. CSME Vol.38, No.1(2017)

interval within the range of machining conditions measures in hard-milling process," Expert
investigated. Systems with Applications, Vol. 32, pp.
• The optimized cutting parameters for the 1020-1027(2007).
simultaneous combination of the minimum [8] Denkena, B., Köhler, J., and Bergmann, B.,
cutting force components (Fx, Fy and Fz) and "Development of cutting edge geometries
maximum MRR are V (cutting speed 45 m/min), f for hard milling operations," CIRP Journal
(feed rate 0.02 mm/tooth), a (depth of cut 0.24 of Manufacturing Science and Technology,
mm), and H (material hardness 41.6 HRC). The Vol. 8, pp. 43-52(2015).
desirability value of optimization is 0.95369. This [9] Wang, S., Geng, L., Zhang, Y., Liu, K., and
value is very close to 1. Thus, the desirability Ng, T., "Cutting force prediction for five-
function approach is more appropriate for the axis ball-end milling considering cutter
multi-objective optimization in machining process. vibrations and run-out," International
• The percentage errors between predicted Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 96, pp.
and experimental values for normal cutting force, 206-215(2015).
feed force, axial force and MRR are 5.46%, 7.38%, [10] Ö zel, T., Hsu, T. K., and Zeren, E., "Effects
7.87% and 1.06%, respectively. Thus, the of cutting edge geometry, workpiece
integration of the Taguchi technique and RSM is hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on
seen to be a suitable approach for investigation of surface roughness and forces in finish
cutting forces and MRR in hard milling of turning of hardened AISI H13 steel," The
hardened SKD 61 alloy. International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3-4,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS pp. 262-269(2005).
[11] Bartarya, G. and Choudhury, S. K.,
The authors thank the Mold and Die "Influence of machining parameters on
Department of the National Kaohsiung University forces and surface roughness during finish
of Applied Sciences for help of the dynamometer hard turning of EN 31 steel," Proceedings of
to measure the cutting forces. the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,
Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture,
REFERENCES Vol. 228, No. 9, pp. 1068-1080(2014).
[12] Ding, T., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., and Zhu, X.,
[1] De Lacalle, L. N. L., and Lamikiz, "Empirical models and optimal cutting
A.,"Sculptured surface machining," in parameters for cutting forces and surface
Machining, Springer, pp. 225-248(2008). roughness in hard milling of AISI H13
[2] Lamikiz, A., De Lacalle, L. L., Sanchez, J., steel," The International Journal of
and Salgado, M., "Cutting force estimation Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.
in sculptured surface milling," International 51, No. 1-4, pp. 45-55(2010).
Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, [13] Paiva, A. P., Ferreira, J. R., and Balestrassi,
Vol. 44, No. 14, pp. 1511-1526(2004). P. P., "A multivariate hybrid approach
[3] Zhang, S., and Guo, Y., "Taguchi method applied to AISI 52100 hardened steel
based process space for optimal surface turning optimization," Journal of Materials
topography by finish hard milling," Journal Processing Technology, Vol. 189, No. 1, pp.
of manufacturing science and engineering, 26-35(2007).
Vol. 131, No. 5, pp. 051003(2009). [14] Lalwani, D., Mehta, N., and Jain, P.,
[4] Davim, J. P., "Machining of hard materials" "Experimental investigations of cutting
Springer Science & Business Media, (2011). parameters influence on cutting forces and
[5] Cappellini, C., Attanasio, A., Rotella, G., surface roughness in finish hard turning of
and Umbrello, D., "Formation of white and MDN250 steel," Journal of materials
dark layers in hard cutting: influence of tool processing technology, Vol. 206, No. 1, pp.
wear," International Journal of Material 167-179(2008).
Forming, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 455-458(2010). [15] Çalışkan, H., Kurbanoğlu, C., Panjan, P.,
[6] Tamizharasan, T., Selvaraj, T., and Haq, A. and Kramar, D., "Investigation of the
N., "Analysis of tool wear and surface finish performance of carbide cutting tools with
in hard turning," The International Journal hard coatings in hard milling based on the
of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. response surface methodology," The
28, No. 7-8, pp. 671-679(2006). International Journal of Advanced
[7] Iqbal, A., He, N., Li, L., and Dar, N. U., "A Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 66, No. 5-8,
fuzzy expert system for optimizing pp. 883-893(2013).
parameters and predicting performance [16] Bouacha, K., Yallese, M. A., Mabrouki, T.,

-50-
H.T. Nguyen and Q.C. Hsu: Study on Cutting Forces and Material Removal Rate in Hard Milling.

and Rigal, J. F., "Statistical analysis of Hamdi, M., and Benyounis, K., "Prediction
surface roughness and cutting forces using of cutting force in end-milling operation of
response surface methodology in hard modified AISI P20 tool steel," Journal of
turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 182,
CBN tool," International Journal of No. 1, pp. 241-247(2007).
Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, Vol. [26] Nee, A. Y. C., "Handbook of Manufacturing
28, No. 3, pp. 349-361(2010). Engineering and Technology," Springer
[17] Aouici, H., Bouchelaghem, H., Yallese, M., Publishing Company, (2014).
Elbah, M., and Fnides, B., "Machinability [27] An, Q., Wang, C., Xu, J., P. Liu, and Chen,
investigation in hard turning of AISI D3 M., "Experimental investigation on hard
cold work steel with ceramic tool using milling of high strength steel using PVD-
response surface methodology," The AlTiN coated cemented carbide tool,"
International Journal of Advanced International Journal of Refractory Metals
Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 73, No. 9- and Hard Materials, Vol. 43, pp. 94-
12, pp. 1775-1788(2014). 101(2014).
[18] Bouzid, L., Boutabba, S., Yallese, M. A., [28] Ghani, J., Choudhury, I., and Hassan, H.,
Belhadi, S., and Girardin, F., "Simultaneous "Application of Taguchi method in the
optimization of surface roughness and optimization of end milling parameters,"
material removal rate for turning of Journal of Materials Processing Technology,
X20Cr13 stainless steel," The International Vol. 145, No. 1, pp. 84-92, (2004).
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology, Vol. 74, No. 5-8, pp. 879-
891(2014).
[19] Tsao, C., "Grey–Taguchi method to optimize SKD 61合金鋼硬銑削力
the milling parameters of aluminum alloy,"
The International Journal of Advanced 和材料移除率之研究
Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 40, No. 1-2,
pp. 41-48(2009).
[20] Gupta, A., Singh, H., and Aggarwal, A., 阮友真 許光城
"Taguchi-fuzzy multi output optimization
國立高雄應用科技大學 機械工程系
(MOO) in high speed CNC turning of AISI
P-20 tool steel," Expert Systems with
Applications, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 6822- 摘要
6828(2011).
[21] Bajić, D., Celent, L., and Jozić, S., 本文整合應用田口品質工程方法和反應曲
"Modeling of the influence of cutting
parameters on the surface roughness, tool 面法,分析預硬化 SKD61 合金鋼硬銑削加工
wear and the cutting force in face milling in
參數對切削力和材料移除率的影響。首先根據
off-line process control," Strojniški vestnik-
Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 58, 田口方法設計與進行一組實驗,藉由動力計測
No. 11, pp. 673-682(2012).
[22] Taylan, F., Ç olak, O., and Kayacan, M. C., 得切削負載,依變異分析法,了解銑削加工參
"Investigation of TiN coated CBN and CBN 數對切削力的影響,並以二次函數模型歸納其
cutting tool performance in hard milling
application," Strojniški vestnik-Journal of 關聯性,可作為後續切削負載預測用。本文並
Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 57, No. 5, pp. 以多目標優化,來獲得最小切削力和最大材料
417-424(2011).
[23] Ross, P. J., "Taguchi techniques for quality 移除率,以找出最佳的加工條件。在驗證測試
engineering," Mcgraw-hil International
結果中,呈現此優化的準確性,對於正向切削
editions, (1996).
[24] Montgomery, D. C., and Myers, R. H., 力、進給力、軸向力和材料移除率之預測值與
"Response surface methodology: process
and product optimization using designed 實驗值之間的百分比誤差分別為 5.46%、7.38
experiments," Raymond H. Meyers and %、7.87%和 1.06%。
Douglas C. Montgomery. A Wiley-
Interscience Publications, (1995).
[25] Abou-El-Hossein, K., Kadirgama, K.,

-51-

View publication stats

You might also like