You are on page 1of 7

Original Article www.ejournalofdentistry.

com

EVIDENCE LEVELS OF PARAFUNCTIONAL HABITS AS PROMINENT ETIOLOGY


IN FACIAL ARTHROMYALGIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
1
S Gowri Shankar, 2M Arvind
1
Postgraduate student, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University Chennai, India.
2
Professor and Academic Head, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University Chennai, India.
Correspondence: M Arvind, MDS, Department of Oral Medicine, Professor and Academic Head, Department of Oral Medicine and
Radiology Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University Chennai, India. Email: arvindmuthukrishnan@yahoo.com
Received Apr 10, 2013; Revised May 23, 2013; Accepted Jun 28, 2013

ABSTRACT
Background:
Myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome is a painful condition arising from trigger points in a muscle that occur due
to the facial muscles going into spasm. There are numerous etiological factors responsible, and one among them is
Para functional habits.
Objective: To determine the most predominant Oral Parafunctional habit resulting in facial arthromyalgia.
Methods: Electronic search of scientific papers were carried out on EntrezPubMed and the Science direct databases
using specific keywords. PubMed search yielded 913 papers and Science direct search yielded 628; after excluding
the common search articles, 72 articles were found to be irrelevant based on the title and abstract. After going
through 61 relevant articles, 41 were excluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty one articles were
finally selected that formed the base for this review.
Conclusion: Bruxism and Gum chewing are the predominant Oral parafunctional habits in the etiology of facial
arthromyalgia/ temporomandibular disorders.
Keywords:
“Temporomandibular disorders, Myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome, Facial arthromyalgia, Chronic myofascial
pain, Bruxism, Gum chewing, Teeth clenching, Lip biting, Chewing foreign objects, Jaw play, Parafunctional habits,
Parafunctional oral habits.”

Introduction and Background: involving the masticatory system, are neither uncommon
nor are they always harmful. Its only when such activities
The term Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is exceed an individual’s physiologic tolerance the continuous
defined as a collective term embracing a number of clinical chronic micro trauma or stress leads to changes in
problems that involve the masticatory musculature, the masticatory system.
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and associated structures,
or both. Research diagnostic criteria (RDC) have grouped The term of Oral Para function was introduced
3 main conditions of TMD – (a). Myofacial pain dysfunction into dental literature in 1950 by Drum (1969) who defined it
syndrome (MPDS), (b). Disc disorders or internal as abnormal, fixed motor activities of the masticatory system
derangement, (c) Osteoarthritis. Factors predisposing to differing qualitatively and quantitatively from normal
TMDs are either psychological (anxiety, tension), dental functions of the system. According to Van der Meulen et
articulation (occlusion), Para functional habits (bruxism) al. (2006) oral Para functions may be divided into 3 scales:
and external trauma. Of the 3 common TMD disorders, a BRUX scale for bruxism activities; a BITE scale for biting
incidence and prevalence of MPDS is the maximum. MPDS activities (eg chewing gum, nails) and a SOFT scale for soft
is also referred as facial arthromyalgia, mandibular stress tissue activities (e.g. Tongue, lips). Oral Para functions may
syndrome. also be classified as non-occlusal or occlusal (involving
contact of opposing teeth) and including: biting of labial
Adverse oral habits or parafunctional habits are and buccal mucosa, involuntary tongue pushing, biting
defined as any oral non-functional activity or behavior

e-Journal of Dentistry Apr - Jun 2013 Vol 3 Issue 2 383


M Arvind et al www.ejournalofdentistry.com

pencils, pens and nails as well as chewing gums. Extensive review includes cross sectional studies, observational and
studies have suggested that oral parafunctional habits are descriptive studies, prospective and retrospective cohorts,
a major cause of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).There case control studies. There was no restriction imposed on
are limited reviews on the existing literature providing the date of the published articles and articles published in
information on parafunctional habits and its role as an English were only selected
etiological factor in facial arthromyalgia. Hence this
systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature on Inclusion criteria:
the “evidence of parafunctional habits as prominent Studies of association between parafunctional
etiology in facial arthromyalgia” habits and facial arthromyalgia. Diagnosis of
temporomandibular joint disorders were made based on the
Aim: criteria set by RDC/TMD type of classification
To analyze the existing literature on the “evidence
of parafunctional habits as prominent etiology in facial Exclusion criteria:
arthromyalgia” Etiological factors for temporomandibular joint
disorders other than parafunctional habits were excluded.
Objective:
Case reports and case series, letters, reviews, animal study
To determine the most predominant parafunctional and in-vitro studies and literature in other languages were
habit resulting in facial arthromyalgia. excluded.
Structured questions:
1. What is the prevalence frequency of parafunctional habits Figure 1: Search Flow Chart showing flow chart and
in facial arthromyalgia / temporomandibular disorders? final short listed articles
2. Does parafunctional habit have an etiological role in facial
arthromyalgia/ temporomandibular disorders?

Review methodology:
Search strategy for identification of studies:
A systematic literature search was done to identify
articles describing parafunctional habits in facial
arthromyalgia with no time limit using the key words listed:
“Temporomandibular disorders, Temporomandibular joint
disorders, Temporomandibular joint dysfunction,
Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome,
Myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome, Mandibular stress
syndrome, Facial arthromyalgia, Chronic myofascial pain,
Bruxism, Gum chewing, Teeth clenching, Nail biting, Cheek
biting, Lip biting, Chewing foreign objects, Jaw play,
Parafunctional habits, Parafunctional oral habits.” The
search strategy was in accordance with Cochrane
guidelines. The article search included only those listed in
English literature. The search results were short listed using
preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles were
screened on the basis of title and abstract. Full text was
then procured for the relevant articles which fulfilled the
inclusion criteria.

Online resources:
EntrezPubMed
Science direct
Selection criteria:
The articles were short listed based on the
following inclusion and exclusion criteria. This systematic

384
Evidence Levels of Parafunctional Habits as Prominent Etiology in Facial Arthromyalgia: A Systematic Review www.ejournalofdentistry.com

Table 1 Depicts the Level of Evidence of Selected Studies Cheek or Lip biting, Biting foreign objects, Leaning on palm,
Nail biting, Jaw play, Chewing on one side, Mouth breathing
presented in the table.

Different studies in our systematic review suggest


that oral parafunctional habits are related to facial
arthromyalgia. Of 21 studies, 11 studies of gum chewing is
reported, 5 studies have higher prevalence percentage
compared to other parafunctional habits, the highest being
recorded by Gavish et al as 92.3%.

The most common parafunctional habit among


different studies is bruxism, the prevalence almost recorded
in all studies, but with lesser intensity compared to gum
chewing. The highest recorded as 66% by Panek et al in
2010; Bruxism was significantly higher in girls with TMJ
dysfunction. Nail biting recorded in 13 studies, of which
55.2% were recorded as highest by Widmalm et al,
1995.Studies show that this parafunctional habit is more
common among adolescent girls. Teeth clenching was
recorded in 6 studies and Fumaiki et al 2006 & Hamed
Mortazavi et al 2010 recorded teeth clenching as the most
predominant habit to be 52.4% & 64.1% Biting foreign
objects were recorded in 6 studies of which 72% recorded
by Schiffman.

The other parafunctional habits which were


minimally recorded were, recorded by Winocur et al 2001,
which showed that continuous leaning of the head on the
Results: arm was (55.1%). Gavish et al reported 40.2% of Jaw play
habit in adolescent girls. Winocur et al, 2001 showed
The included articles were investigated for chewing on one side to be 41.2 % in adolescent girls.
evidence levels of various parafunctional habits and
temporomandibular disorders. The following parafunctional S.Sari & H.Sonmez et al, 2002, showed Thumb
oral habits were found to be associated with sucking(17.07%- mixed dentition& 14.63%- permanent
temporomandibular disorders or facial arthromyalgia: dentition) was significantly higher in girls with TMJ
dysfunction than those without TMJ dysfunction
Bruxism, Clenching of teeth, Gum chewing, Cheek (P<0.05).So parafunctional habits like Bruxism, Gum
or lip biting, Biting foreign objects, Leaning on palm, Nail chewing, Nail biting are commonly involved as etiological
biting, Jaw play, Chewing on one side, Mouth breathing, factor in facial arthromyalgia, more common among
Thumb sucking. adolescent girls group.

The search methodology used in this review In addition to these common oral Para functional
revealed 913 publications of which 21 articles were included habits, other habits like chewing ice, taking games apart w/
and the remaining 760 articles were excluded from the review. teeth, opening bottles w/teeth, lying on one side, atypical
swallowing, mouth breathing have also been mentioned as
The prevalence percentages of oral parafunctional risk for development of Temporomandibular disorders.
habits used in the included studies with facial arthromyalgia
is presented. The prevalence percentages of different oral
parafunctional habits like Bruxism,Clenching,Gum chewing,

e-Journal of Dentistry Apr - Jun 2013 Vol 3 Issue 2 385


M Arvind et al www.ejournalofdentistry.com

Table 2: Depicts The Data Extracted From Various Individual Articles Based On Above Parameter

386
Evidence Levels of Parafunctional Habits as Prominent Etiology in Facial Arthromyalgia: A Systematic Review www.ejournalofdentistry.com

Discussion:

A growing number of individuals have experienced Bruxism. H.Panek et al 2010 reported that
musculoskeletal pain that affects their daily activities and subjects were seldom aware of Bruxism habit. He also
function and has a significant impact on their quality of life indicated that TMD’s were more prevalent in the presence
causing a financial burden on our healthcare system. of Bruxism than any other oral parafunction.
Muscles in general, and Myofascial pain in particular, have
received less attention as a major source of pain and In this study the prevalence of Bruxism (66%) was
dysfunction 3. significantly higher than in those with other oral Para
functions. Najlaa Alamoudi et al 2001 reported the habit of
Precipitating factors of MPDS may cause the lip and cheek biting to be 4.2% in correlation between oral
facilitated release of acetylcholine at motor end plates, parafunction and temporomandibular disorders and
sustained muscle fiber contractions, local ischemia with emotional status. A.Gavish et al, 2000 reported 48.4% of
release of vascular and neuro active substances, and biting foreign objects habit in adolescent girls. Jaw play is
muscle pain4,5. the parafunctional habit with the greatest deleterious
potential, and that chewing gum contributes to joint sound
Emodi et al in his study gives data regarding the and pain. R.Miyake et al, 2004 showed that chewing on one
prevalence of oral Para functions as 78.8% corresponding side was present in 21.8% of the population.
closely with Konenen et al and Widmalm et al who reported
that 75% of their studies children described at least one In contrast to our review, Gavish et al 2000 found
oral parafunction. no relation between the presence of bruxism and muscle
sensitivity to palpation in adolescent girls. Meulen et al,
The three most claimed reasons for gum chewing 2006 in a group of patients with TMD found no clinically
are causes pleasure, keeps the mouth busy when bored, relevant relationship between different types of oral
prevents bad mouth odor. parafunction and TMD complaints.

Schiffmann et al found that the most common Conclusion:


parafunction among female nursing student was gum
chewing (87%), biting foreign objects 72%, diurnal teeth Facial arthromyalgia or Myofacial pain
clenching (59%),nail biting(48%). dysfunction syndrome form the majority of
temporomandibular disorders. The exact etiology is unclear
Mivakke et al, in a group of 3557 university and various hypotheses have been put forth.
students found that chewing gum on one side of the mouth; Parafunctional habits are indicated as one of the most
tooth clenching increased the risk of TMD. Panek et al, in favorable predisposing factors. Various such habits exist.
his study 95%of students revealed various parafunctional Previous research and our systematic review also confirm
habits such as Chewing gum (89%), Bruxism (45%), Biting this with bruxism as the most common cause followed by
nails (41%), Biting mucosa of lip or cheek (29%). Winocur gum chewing. This would help us to initiate the appropriate
et al, among 323 females aged 15-16 yrs. Intense habit of treatment methodology to cause pain relief and cure in
chewing gum (62%) associated pain in the ear region. patients with facial arthromyalgia.

In the study reported by R. Akhter et al 2011,


showed that female subjects who reported experiencing
Bruxism had 10.56 fold higher risks of TMJ sound,
respectively, than the risk for female subjects who had not

e-Journal of Dentistry Apr - Jun 2013 Vol 3 Issue 2 387


M Arvind et al www.ejournalofdentistry.com

Table 3 Depicts the Excluded Articles and Reasons for REFERENCES :

Exclusion 1. A.EmodiPearlman, I.Eli, P.FriedmanRubi, C.Goldsmith, S.Reiter&


E.Winocur.Bruxism, oralparafunctions, anamnestic and clinical
findings of temporomandibular disorders in children. Journal of Oral
Rehabilitation 2012 39; 126-135.
2. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C,
Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990
Criteria for Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter
Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33: 160-172.

3. Worl d Health Organiz ation: T he burde n of musculoskel etal


conditions at the start of the new millennium: Report of a WHO
scientific group. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2003.

4. Association of American Medical Colleges, Report VII, Contemporary


Issues in Medicine: Musculoskeletal Medicine Education, Medical
School Objectives Project. Washington DC, 2005.
5. Borg-Stein J, Simons DG. Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 2002; 83 (3 Suppl 1):40-47.

6. R. Akhter, M. Morita, M. Esaki, K. Nakamura & T. Kanehira.


Development of temporomandibular disorder symptoms: a 3- year
cohort study of university students. Journal of Oral
Rehabilitation 2011 38; 395-403.
7. YaraDadaltiFragoso, Heloisa Helena CarvalhoAlves, Si dney
Oliveira, Alessandro Finkelsztejn. Prevalence of parafunctional
habits and temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms in patients
atte nding a tertiary headache clini c. ArqNe uropsiquiatr
2010;68(3):377-380.

8. H. Panek, P. Nawrot, M. Mazan, B. Bielicka, M. Sumislawska& R.


Pomianowski. Coincidence and awareness of oral parafunctions in
college students. Community dental health (2012) 29, 74-77

9. Rafael PovedaRoda, Jose V. Bagan, Jose Maria Diaz Fernandez, Sergio


Hernandez Bazan, Yolanda Jimenez Soriano. Revie w of
temporomandibular joi nt pathology. Part I: Cl assification,
epidemiology and risk factors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;
12:E292-8

10. Ephraim Winocur, DMD, D an Littnerusb zaq;2?, DMD, Iris


Adamsusb zaq;3?usb zoutf;AQ: 2,3?, DMD &AnatGavish, DMD,
Tel Aviv, Israel. Oral habits and their association with signs and
symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adolescents: a gender
comparison. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod
2006;102:482-7

11. P.M. Castelo, M. B. D. Gaviao, L. J. Pereira & L. R. Bonjardim.


Relationship between oral parafunctional/nutritive sucking habits
and temporomandibular joint dysfunction in primary dentition.
International journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2005; 15: 29-36

12. R. Miyake, R. Ohkubo, J. Takehara& M. Morita. Oral parafunctions


and association with symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in
Japanese university students. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2004 31;
518-523
13. N.M.A. Farsi. Symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders
and oral parafunctions among Saudi children. Journal of oral
rehabilitation 2003 30; 1200-1208

14. Anna Pergamalian, DDS, MS, Thomas E. Rudy, PhD, Hussein S. Zaki,
DDS, MS, and Carol M. Greco, PhD. The association between wear
facets, bruxism, and severity of facial pain in patients with
temporomandibular disorders. Journal of prosthetic dentistry
2003:90:194-200.

15. Robert Celic, DDS, MS Vjekosl avJeroli mov, DDS, PhD


JosipPanduric, DDS, PhD. A study of the influence of occlusal factors
and parafunctional habits on the prevalence of signs and symptoms of
TMD. Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2002: 15; 43-48
16. S. Sari & H. Sonmez. Investigation of the relationship between oral
parafunction and temporomandibular joint dysfunction in Turkish
children with mixed and permanent dentition. Journal of oral
rehabilitation 2002 29; 108-112

388
Evidence Levels of Parafunctional Habits as Prominent Etiology in Facial Arthromyalgia: A Systematic Review www.ejournalofdentistry.com

17. NajlaaAlamoudi, Corre lation between oral parafunction and


temporomandibular disorders and emotional status among Saudi
children. Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry (26)1: 71-80, 2001.

18. E. Winocur, A. Gavish, T. Finkelshtein, M. Halachmi& E. Gazit. Oral


habits among adolescent girls and their association with symptoms
of temporomandibular disorders. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2001
28; 624-629.
19. Kazuhiro Yamada, DDS, PhD, KoojiHanada, DDS, Phd, Tadao Fukui,
DDS, PhD, YuusukeSatou, DDS, Kanako Ochi, DDS, PhD, Takafumi
Hayashi, DDS, PhD, &Jusuke Ito, MD, PhD, Niigata, Japan. Condylar
bony change and self- reported parafunctional habits in prospective
orthognathic surgery patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiolEndod 2001;92:265-71

20. A. Gavish, M. Halachmi, E. Winocur& E. Gazit. Oral habits and their


association with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders
in adolescent girls. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2000 27; 22-32

21. S.E. Widmalm, R.L. Christiansen, S.M. Gunn & L.M. Hawley.
Prevalence of signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders and
orofacialparafunction in 4-6 year- old African and Caucasian children.
Journal of oral rehabilitation 1995 22; 87-93
22. Tsolka, J.D. Walter, R.F. Wilson & H.W. Preiskel. Occlusal variables,
bruxism andtemporomandibular disorde rs: a clinical and
kinesiographic assessment. Journal of oral rehabilitation 1995 22;
849-856

23. E.L. Schiffman, J.R. Fricton and D. Haley. The relationship of occlusion,
parafunctional habits and recent life events to mandibular dysfunction
in a non-patient population. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 1992,
volume 19, pages 201-223

24. Anders Wanman and GoranAgerberg. Mandibular dysfunction in


adolescents. ActaOdontolscand 1986;44:47-54. Oslo. ISSN 001-
6357.

25. Huang GJ, LeResche L, Critchlow CW, Martin MD, Drangsholt MT.
Risk factors for diagnostic subgroups of painful temporomandibular
disorders (TMD). J Dent Res 2002; 81:284-8

Source of Support : Nil, Conflict of Interest : Nil

e-Journal of Dentistry Apr - Jun 2013 Vol 3 Issue 2 389

You might also like