Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesis Entitled
Helwan University
“Flow Control in Industrial Injection Applications by
Changing the Exit Splitter Positions Inside a Fluidic
Oscillator”
By
Ahmed Mohamed Abdulnaim Mohamed
Mechanical Power Engineering Department
Under Supervision of
Continuous
Combustion LASER Applications and
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
• Flow control strategies aim to manipulate the flow field to achieve a desired
change to improve efficiency or performance of the fluid flow systems.
• These strategies can be branched into two main categories:
Passive Control and Active Control.
1 2 3 1 2
Feedback Flow
Separation Bubble
Feedback Flow
Separation Bubble
Feedback Flow
Feedback Flow
Separation Bubble
• A fluidic oscillator can produce two jet types depending on the exit
configuration, pulsating or sweeping jet.
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
Dh
• Internal and external flow fields are demonstrated and visualized through
velocity contours and streamlines.
• Since the emanating jet has an oscillatory movement, a complete cycle was
determined by the completion of one cycle inside the oscillation chamber,
and it was divided into 360 degrees (6 phase angles, one per 60o) to
demonstrate the different phase angles (θ) of the oscillator.
• The contours and streamlines are graphed only for half the oscillation cycle
(θ = 0o, 60o, 120o, and 180o) because the phenomenon is inversely repeating.
• The next equation was used to calculate the phase angles (θ):
u (m/s)
T t (s)
360 θ (o)
o
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
Streamwise velocity fluctuation at the exit limbs for the three different grids:
2.5 2.5 2.5
Lower Lower Lower
1 1 1
0 0 0
Upper Limb
Inlet
Lower Limb
The baseline model FX100 was simulated with an inlet flow rate of 87 l/min
resulting in an oscillation frequency of 16.11 Hz.
Velocity magnitude contours at different phase angles and Re = 6337 for the
baseline model FX100
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 120
o
o o
Ɵ = 60 Ɵ = 180
V/UB [-]
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 120o
o o
Ɵ = 60 Ɵ = 180
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 120o
o o
Ɵ = 60 Ɵ = 180
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 120o
o o
Ɵ = 60 Ɵ = 180
2
FX100
1 u (IU)
u (IL)
0 u (C)
u (OU)
-1 u (OL)
-2
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees]
1
FX100, A (IL)
FX100, A (C)
0.8
Amplitude, A [m/s]
FX100, A (OL)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Frequency, f [Hz]
M.Sc. Thesis Ahmed Abdulnaim
Results and Discussion
The Effect of Exit Configuration
Helwan University
Radial velocity (v/UB) contour plots at different phase angles and Re = 6337
for configurations FX100, FX0 and FX0'
o o o
Ɵ=0 Ɵ = 60 Ɵ = 120 Ɵ = 180o
FX100
FX0
FX0'
FX100, A (IL)
1 FX0, A (IL)
Amplitude, A [m/s]
2 FX0', A (IL)
FX100 0.8
1 u (IU)
u (IL) 0.6
0 u (C)
0.4
u (OU)
-1 u (OL) 0.2
-2 0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees] Frequency, f [Hz]
3
Streamwise Velocity, u [m/s]
FX100, A (C)
0.3 FX0, A (C)
Amplitude, A [m/s]
2 FX0', A (C)
FX0
1 u (IU) 0.2
u (IL)
0 u (C)
u (OU) 0.1
-1 u (OL)
-2 0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees] Frequency, f [Hz]
3 0.8
Streamwise Velocity, u [m/s]
FX100, A (OL)
FX0, A (OL)
Amplitude, A [m/s]
-2 0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees] Frequency, f [Hz]
Velocity magnitude (V/UB) contour plots at different phase angles and Re = 6337 for
configurations FX100, FX75, FX50 and FX25
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 60o Ɵ = 120o Ɵ = 180
o
FX100
FX75
FX50
FX25
Streamwise velocity (u/UB) contour plots at different phase angles and Re = 6337 for
configurations FX100, FX75, FX50 and FX25
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 60o Ɵ = 120o Ɵ = 180
o
FX100
FX75
FX50
FX25
Radial velocity (v/UB) contour plots at different phase angles and Re = 6337 for
configurations FX100, FX75, FX50 and FX25
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 60o Ɵ = 120o Ɵ = 180
o
FX100
FX75
FX50
FX25
Streamlines colored by velocity magnitude (V/UB) contours at different phase angles and
Re = 6337 for configurations FX100, FX75, FX50 and FX25
Ɵ = 0o Ɵ = 60o Ɵ = 120o Ɵ = 180
o
FX100
FX75
FX50
FX25
Comparison between the streamwise velocities and the frequency spectrums for
configurations (FX100, FX75, FX50 and FX25) at deferent monitoring points
3
Streamwise Velocity, u [m/s]
1 FX100, A (IL)
2 FX75, A (IL)
Amplitude, A [m/s]
FX100
1 u (IU) 0.8 FX50, A (IL)
u (IL) FX25, A (IL)
0 u (C) 0.6
u (OU)
-1 u (OL)
0.4
-2
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 0.2
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees]
3
Streamwise Velocity, u [m/s]
0
2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
FX75 Frequency, f [Hz]
1 u (IU) 0.4
u (IL) FX100, A (C)
0 u (C)
FX75, A (C)
Amplitude, A [m/s]
u (OU)
-1 u (OL) 0.3 FX50, A (C)
FX25, A (C)
-2
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
0.2
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees]
3
Streamwise Velocity, u [m/s]
2 0.1
FX50
1 u (IU)
u (IL) 0
0 u (C) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
u (OU) Frequency, f [Hz]
-1 u (OL)
0.8
-2
FX100, A (OL)
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 FX75, A (OL)
Amplitude, A [m/s]
FX25, A (OL)
2
FX25 0.4
1 u (IU)
u (IL)
0 u (C) 0.2
u (OU)
-1 u (OL)
0
-2
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Phase Angle, Theta [degrees] Frequency, f [Hz]
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
7) The emanating jets are deflecting due to shorting the splitter, which
shorting the exit limbs' paths.
8) The dominant frequency of the emanating jet is not affected by the
splitter length, while its amplitude changes in an irregular manner.
Motivations
Overview
Study Approach
Conclusions
Recommendations
cross-flows
swirling-flows
Continuous
Combustion LASER Applications and