You are on page 1of 4

Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST)

ISSN: 2458-9403
Vol. 4 Issue 9, September - 2017

Design And Construction Of A Plastic


Shredding Machine
Adepo, S. O Obanoyen, N. O
Mechanical Engineering Department Mechanical Engineering Department
Rufus Giwa Polytechnic Rufus Giwa Polytechnic
Owo, Nigeria. Owo, Nigeria.

Abstract—This paper presents the design and Plastic shredder is the machine designed to
construction of a plastic shredding machine cut or reduce large materials into tiny pieces for easy
which is an integral part of plastic recycling handling. The materials that can be shredded include
process. The plastic shredding machine crushes syringe, glucose bottles, water bottles, pure water
used plastic bottles and helps in municipal waste nylon, and many other items. Shredder is an integral
management and disposal. The machine is part of any Plastic Recycling Plant.
designed using locally available raw materials Some of the common types of plastic
which make it cheap and easy to maintain and shredders are: single shaft plastic shredders, multiple
repair. The performance test analysis carried out shaft plastic shredders, high-speed-low torque plastic
defines the characteristics of the machine and shredders, low-speed-high-torque plastic shredders,
shows that at a speed of 11.5m/s the machine simple plastic shredders, and industrial plastic
functions effectively and efficiently in performing shredders.
its task producing a high finished shredding
efficiency of 97%. Design of components

SPEED OF THE BELT ON THE DRIVEN


Keywords— Recycling; plastic; shredder;
PULLEY
analysis.
Introduction To determine the speed of belt on the driven
Plastics are one of the most commonly used pulley, V
materials in the world today [10]. The huge quantities
d 2 N 2
of plastic products currently being marketed will V
ultimately find their way to the waste dump sites [2]. 60
Most plastic materials used now-a-days are non- (1)
biodegradable or it takes decades to degrade [6], this
leads to an increase in the amount of plastic wastes in
dump sites. Moreover, the presence of plastic wastes
Where d 2 = diameter of the driven pulley.
in the environment is considered to be a hazardous
affair for they are liable to catch fire easily, burn for N 2 = speed of the driven pulley
long periods of time and thus pollute the atmosphere.
They also abuse arable soil for farm work. Hence,
there is the need to promote the recycling of plastic Let N 1 = speed of the electric motor
materials. Plastic recycling is bound to realize a lot of
savings in production costs, conserve limited
resources, and alleviate environmental pollution. d 1 = diameter of the drive pulley
Machinery available to for nylon and plastic
recycling is usually of very high cost, and bulky. This, Since d1  d 2 ,
to a great extent, imposes serious restrictions to the
recycling of nylon and plastics in the developing
countries. Therefore, in order to overcome these Then N1  N 2
shortcomings, it was necessary to develop a machine
specialized in its application in order to achieve the
Using an electric motor having a power rating
set objectives of reduced cost and size optimally using
of 5 hp, with 1470 rpm, and driven pulley diameter
locally available materials.
of 0.15m.
A typical process to reclaim discarded plastic
bottles would be to first sort them based on colour and
sometimes on size, and wash them. However, i.e, d 2  0.15 and N 2  1470 rpm
washing them while in one piece is not the most
advantageous method. Therefore, to facilitate the
  0.15  1470
washing process, the bottles are shredded or crushed V
into smaller pieces. 60

www.jmest.org
JMESTN42352395 8190
Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST)
ISSN: 2458-9403
Vol. 4 Issue 9, September - 2017

 11.5m / s Therefore, Tc  0.3705  11.5  49 N


2

TENSION IN THE TIGHT SIDE OF THE DRIVE


And T1  650  49  601N
BELT

TENSION IN THE SLACK SIDE OF THE DRIVE


T1  T  Tc BELT
(2)

T a T 
Using, 2.3 log 1   
(3)
 T2 
(7)
Tc  mv 2
(4) Where   angle of contact in radians

Where T1  tension in the tight side of the belt T2  tension in the slack side of the
belt
T  Maximum tension in the tight
side of the belt   coefficient of friction between the
rubber belt and the cast iron pulley
Tc  Centrifugal tension
   rads (Since the diameters of the drive
m  Mass of belt per metre length pulley and the driven pulley are equal) and if the
coefficient of friction between the rubber belt and
v  velocity of the belt the cast iron pulley,   0.30

And a  b.t Therefore,

(5)
 601 
Where a  cross-sectional area of the belt, 2.3 log   0.30
 T2 
b  Breadth
T2  234 N
t  Thickness
POWER TRANSMITTED BY THE BELT
For a rubber belt of R10 series, width 50mm and
thickness 6.5mm.
Power transmitted by the belt is given by P,
If,   2MPa
P  T1  T2 V
a  6.5  50  325mm . 2 (8)

T  2  325  650N P  601  23411.5

m  b.t  density  4.22 kW


(6)
THE TWISTING MOMENT OR TORQUE ON THE
For rubber belt of density, 1140kg/m3 SHAFT

m  0.3705kg / m Twisting moment on the shaft is given, M


But v  11.5m / s

www.jmest.org
JMESTN42352395 8191
Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST)
ISSN: 2458-9403
Vol. 4 Issue 9, September - 2017

M  T1  T2 R K m  combined shock and fatigue


(9) factor for bending

d 2 0.15 K t  combined shock and fatigue


R  radius of the pulley    0.075m
2 2 factor for twisting

By substituting the appropriate values equation Let K m  1.5 and K t  2


(9),
Therefore,
M  601  234  0.075

 27.5  10 Nmm
3 Me  1.5  66.8  10   2  27.5  10 
3 2 3 2

THE BENDING MOMENT ON THE SHAFT


 114302Nmm
The maximum bending along the pulley line is got
using THE DIAMETER OF THE DRIVEN SHAFT

Mm  F  L The driven shaft diameter is given by,


(10)

Te    d 3
Where Mm  bending moment 16
(13)
F  load on the shaft
Where   allowable shear stress on the

L  perpendicular distance shaft

d  shaft diameter
and F  T1  T2 (11)
u
But  
F  601  234  835 N F .S .
(14)

Since, L  80mm Where u  ultimate shear stress on the


shaft
Therefore,
F .S.  factor of safety
Mm  835  80  66800 Nmm
The material used for the shaft is carbon steel of
 66.8 10 Nmm 3 grade 45C8, which has u  700MPa

THE EQUIVALENT TWISTING MOMENT For, F .S.  6

The equivalent twisting moment was calculated 700


using the formula below:   116.7 MPa
6

Me  K m  Mm 2  K t  M 2  116.7 N / mm2
(12)
Therefore,
Where M e  equivalent twisting moment

www.jmest.org
JMESTN42352395 8192
Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST)
ISSN: 2458-9403
Vol. 4 Issue 9, September - 2017

d 3  4988.3 [2] Craford R. J. (1987) Plastic Engineering. 2nd


Edition, Published by Peergamon Press, New
York.
d 3
4988.3
[3] Elias, H. G., (2003) An Introduction to
=17.1mm = 25mm Plastics. Vch Verlagsesellschaft Mbh.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS [4] “Encyclopaedia Britannica” (2010). Plastic.


The machine test results at various speeds using the Encyclopaedia Britannica Student and Home
same amount of input, gives the best output at a Edition. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica
speed of 11.5m/s. The efficiency of the nylon
shredding machine is obtain using, [5] Harper, C.A., E.M. Petrie, and E. Corporation,
Plastics materials and processes. 2003: Wiley
𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 Online Library.
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 = × 100%
𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
16.09𝑘𝑔 [6] Kurmi R. S. and Gupta J. K. (2005). Machine
= × 100%
16.6𝑘𝑔 Design, 14th edition, New Delhi: Eurasia
= 96.9% Publishing House (PVT.) Ltd.
With this shredding efficiency of 96.9%, the machine
which was constructed using locally available [7] Kroschwitz, J. I., (1990), Encyclopaedia of
materials had fulfilled the basic objectives required. Polymer Sience and Enineering, 2nd Edition, vol
.17, John Wiley& sons, New York.
CONCLUSIONS
A functional, easy to operate without the use of [8] Pringle, R. T., & Barker, M. (2004). Starting a
technically skilled labour due to its compact, less waste plastics recycling business. Edinburgh:
complex nature, low cost machine specifically Napier University.
designed for crushing of low-density nylon and
plastics in preparation for recycling process has been
[9] Shah, A. A., Hassan, F., Hameed, A., Ahmed,
developed. If the machine is well maintained, its
S. (2008) , Biological degradation of plastics: a
durability is guaranteed and its maintenance cost is
comprehensive review. Biotechnol. Adv. 26(3),
also lower when compared with existing imported
246-265
machinery.

References [10] Ugoamadi C. C. and Ihesiulor (2011).


[1] Brandrup, J., (Ed) 1996 Recycling and Optimization of the Development of a Plastic
recovery of plastics. 1996: Hanser Verlag Recycling Machine. Nigerian Journal of
Technology.

www.jmest.org
JMESTN42352395 8193

You might also like