Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In electromagnetics and antenna theory, antenna aperture, effective area, or receiving cross section, is a
measure of how effective an antenna is at receiving the power of electromagnetic radiation (such as radio
waves).[1] The aperture is defined as the area, oriented perpendicular to the direction of an incoming
electromagnetic wave, which would intercept the same amount of power from that wave as is produced by the
antenna receiving it. At any point , a beam of electromagnetic radiation has an irradiance or power flux
density which is the amount of power passing through a unit area of one square meter. If an antenna
delivers watts to the load connected to its output terminals (e.g. the receiver) when irradiated by a uniform
field of power density watts per square meter, the antenna's aperture in square meters is given by:[2]
So the power received by an antenna (in watts) is equal to the power density of the electromagnetic energy (in
watts per square meter), multiplied by its aperture (in square meters). The larger an antenna's aperture, the more
power it can collect from a given electromagnetic field. To actually obtain the predicted power available ,
the polarization of the incoming waves must match the polarization of the antenna, and the load (receiver) must
be impedance matched to the antenna's feedpoint impedance.
Although this concept is based on an antenna receiving an electromagnetic wave, knowing directly
supplies the (power) gain of that antenna. Due to reciprocity, an antenna's gain in receiving and transmitting
are identical. Therefore, can be used to compute the performance of a transmitting antenna also. is a
function of the direction of the electromagnetic wave relative to the orientation of the antenna, since the gain of
an antenna varies according to its radiation pattern. When no direction is specified, is understood to refer to
its maximum value, with the antenna oriented so its main lobe, the axis of maximum sensitivity, is directed
toward the source.
Contents
Aperture efficiency
Aperture and gain
Friis transmission formula
Thin element antennas
Effective length
Derivation of aperture of an isotropic antenna
References
See also
Aperture efficiency
In general, the aperture of an antenna is not directly related to its physical size.[3] However some types of
antennas, for example parabolic dishes and horn antennas, have a physical aperture (opening) which collects
the radio waves. In these aperture antennas, the effective aperture is always less than (or equal to) the area
of the antenna's physical aperture , otherwise the antenna could produce more power from its terminals
than the radio power entering its aperture, violating conservation of energy. An antenna's aperture efficiency,
is defined as the ratio of these two areas:
The aperture efficiency is a dimensionless parameter between 0 and 1.0 that measures how close the antenna
comes to using all the radio wave power entering its physical aperture. If the antenna were perfectly efficient,
all the radio power falling within its physical aperture would be converted to electrical power delivered to the
load attached to its output terminals, so these two areas would be equal and the aperture
efficiency would be 1.0. But all antennas have losses, such as power dissipated as heat in the resistance of its
elements, nonuniform illumination by its feed, and radio waves scattered by structural supports and diffraction
at the aperture edge, which reduce the power output. Aperture efficiencies of typical antennas vary from 0.35
to 0.70 but can range up to 0.90.
As shown in the section at bottom, the aperture of a lossless isotropic antenna, which by definition has unity
gain, is
So antennas with large effective apertures are high gain antennas, which have small angular beam widths. As
receiving antennas, they are most sensitive to radio waves coming from one direction, and are much less
sensitive to waves coming from other directions. As transmitting antennas, most of their power is radiated in a
narrow beam in one direction, and little in other directions. Although these terms can be used as a function of
direction, when no direction is specified, the gain and aperture are understood to refer to the antenna's axis of
maximum gain, or boresight.
Friis transmission formula
The fraction of the power delivered to a transmitting antenna that is received by a receiving antenna is
proportional to the product of the apertures of both the antennas and inversely proportional to the distance
between the antennas and wavelength. This is given by a form of the Friis transmission formula:.[1]
where:
The variables , , , and must be expressed in the same units of length, such as meters, and variables
and must be in the same units of power, such as watts.
This assumes that the monopole antenna is mounted above an infinite ground plane and that the antennas are
lossless. When resistive losses are taken into account, particularly with small antennas, the antenna gain might
be substantially less than the directivity, and the effective area is less by the same factor.[6]
Effective length
For antennas which are not defined by a physical area, such as monopoles and dipoles consisting of thin rod
conductors, the aperture bears no obvious relation to the size or area of the antenna. An alternate measure of
antenna gain that has a greater relationship to the physical structure of such antennas is effective length leff
measured in metres, which is defined for a receiving antenna as:[7]
where
The longer the effective length the more voltage and therefore the more power the antenna will receive. An
antenna's gain or Aeff increases according to the square of leff, and that this proportionality also involves the
antenna's radiation resistance. Therefore, this measure is of more theoretical than practical value and is not, by
itself, a useful figure of merit relating to an antenna's directivity.
The radio noise in the cavity is unpolarized, containing an equal mixture of polarization states. However any
antenna with a single output is polarized, and can only receive one of two orthogonal polarization states. For
example, a linearly polarized antenna cannot receive components of radio waves with electric field
perpendicular to the antenna's linear elements; similarly a right circularly polarized antenna cannot receive left
circularly polarized waves. Therefore, the antenna only receives the component of power density S in the
cavity matched to its polarization, which is half of the total power density
Suppose is the spectral radiance per hertz in the cavity; the power of black-body radiation per unit area
2
(meter ) per unit solid angle (steradian) per unit frequency (hertz) at frequency and temperature in the
cavity. If is the antenna's aperture, the amount of power in the frequency range the antenna
receives from an increment of solid angle in the direction is
To find the total power in the frequency range the antenna receives, this is integrated over all directions (a
solid angle of )
Since the antenna is isotropic, it has the same aperture in any direction. So the aperture can be
moved outside the integral. Similarly the radiance in the cavity is the same in any direction
Radio waves are low enough in frequency so the Rayleigh–Jeans formula gives a very close approximation of
the blackbody spectral radiance[11]
Therefore,
The Johnson–Nyquist noise power produced by a resistor at temperature over a frequency range is
References
1. Friis, H.T. (May 1946). "A Note on a Simple Transmission Formula". IRE Proc. 34 (5): 254–256.
doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1946.234568 (https://doi.org/10.1109%2FJRPROC.1946.234568).
S2CID 51630329 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:51630329).
2. Bakshi, K.A.; A.V.Bakshi, U.A.Bakshi (2009). Antennas And Wave Propagation (https://books.g
oogle.com/books?id=XznCTvLrX2UC&q=horn+antenna&pg=SA6-PA2). Technical
Publications. p. 1.17. ISBN 978-81-8431-278-2.
3. Narayan, C.P. (2007). Antennas And Propagation (https://books.google.com/books?id=qlpYZV
NxK1wC&q=horn+antenna&pg=PA51). Technical Publications. p. 51. ISBN 978-81-8431-176-
1.
4. Orfanidis, Sophocles J. (2010) Electromagnetic Waves and Antennas chapter 15 page 609,
retrieved 2011-04-05 from http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~orfanidi/ewa/
5. Orfanidis, Sophocles J. (2010) Electromagnetic Waves and Antennas chapter 16 page 747,
retrieved 2011-04-05 from http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~orfanidi/ewa/
6. Weeks, W.L. (1968) Antenna Engineering, McGraw Hill Book Company, chapters 8, pp. 297-
299 and 9, pp. 343-346.
7. Rudge, Alan W. (1982). The Handbook of Antenna Design, Vol. 1 (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=njTri1942n4C&q=antenna+aperture&pg=PA562). USA: IET. p. 24. ISBN 0-906048-82-
6.
8. Pawsey, J. L.; Bracewell, R. N. (1955). Radio Astronomy (https://archive.org/stream/RadioAstro
nomy_682/PawseyBracewell-RadioAstronomy#page/n35). London: Oxford University Press.
pp. 23–24.
9. Rohlfs, Kristen; Wilson, T. L. (2013). Tools of Radio Astronomy, 4th Edition (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=xvvuCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA134). Springer Science and Business Media.
pp. 134–135. ISBN 978-3662053942.
10. Condon, J. J.; Ransom, S. M. (2016). "Antenna Fundamentals" (https://www.cv.nrao.edu/cours
e/astr534/AntennaTheory.html). Essential Radio Astronomy course. US National Radio
Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) website. Retrieved 22 August 2018.
11. The Rayleigh-Jeans formula is a good approximation as long as the energy in a radio photon is
small compared with the thermal energy per degree of freedom: . This is true
throughout the radio spectrum at all ordinary temperatures.
See also
Antenna (radio)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.