Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KUGIMIYA
AND H. STEINFINK Inorganic Chemistry
The quantitative relationships between compounds having AB204 stoichiometries and their crystal structures were investi-
gated. Diagrams relating the ratio of the radius of atom A to that of oxygen, the ratio of the radius of atom B to t h a t of
oxygen, and an artificial parameter described as a force constant between A and B atoms and derived from their electro-
negativities and the equilibrium distance between them show distinct areas for different structure types. In particular,
a plot of T J Y I , vs. the force constant provides good resolution among structures. A three-dimensional illustration in which
the axes are ratios of radii of -4 and B atoms to t h a t of oxygen and the force constant resolves the frequently occurring struc-
tures into separate volumes. A similar plot was constructed for compounds with AB4X4 stoichiometries where X is S , Se,
and Te. Although fewer known compounds are available for mapping, it was, nevertheless, possible to separate different
structures into different regions. A mathematical relationship between oxygen and cation occupancy of tetrahedral and
octahedral voids is derived which describes possible crystal structures,
unit described above for the spinel structure and the vestigation. It is quite possible, however, that the
other consists again of three B ions in octahedral voids choice of a correctly formulated difference function
and one A ion in a tetrahedral void, but the B-B dis- could yield results as good as or better than those shown
tances are first maximized and then A is placed into a here.
tetrahedral void so as to maximize the A-B distances. We have defined a tolerance factor for the spinel
The spinel cation arrangement will occur if the repul- structure as the ratio [ l l O ] / d ~ [ l O O ] . On the assump-
sion between A and B ions is greater than among the B tion that all ions are ideally spherical and rigid and that
ions, and, if the repulsion between A and B is smaller they contact each other along each direction as they
than that between the B ions, the olivine-type arrange- build up the ideal spinel structure, the length of the face
ment will occur. At the same time the repulsive forces diagonal is
among the cations must not be so large as to prevent
their contact with the oxygen ions or else the structure
becomes unstable.
The assumption is made in this development that the
ions are hard spheres although i t is recognized that the
and the lattice constant is 4(rb + ro). Thus the toler-
ance factor is
overlap of bonding electrons, bond angles, and the
polarizability influence the ion arrangement. How-
ever, the inclusion of these additional factors compli- T =
1 r,+
4 3 rb
+--------
1
Yo
+ 42 +
Yo rb
Yo
yo
cates the problem to an extent that it becomes intract-
able by the procedure adopted here. The bond and becomes unity if the ideal spinel structure is as-
stretching force constant, K , is considered to represent sumed. In order to compare the calculated lattice con-
this interplay of forces and is given by stant of the spinel structure as obtained from the ionic
radii with the experimentally measured value, Lexptlis
K = UN(Y)”~ b + taken as the average of 1/1/2[110] and [loo] and the
calculated lattice constant is
where a and b are constants, N is the bond order, re is
the equilibrium distance, and X, and Xb are the electro-
negativities of the A and B ions, r e s p e c t i ~ e l y . ~If~ ’ ~
the assumption is made that a and N are constants and No attempt was made to calculate the lattice constants
that b is small and constant so that it can be neglected, of other structures.
then K can be written as
Computations of Parameters
Tables I and I1 list the electronegativities and ionic
radii of the cations and anions used in the calculations
where re2 = (ra + + +
ro)2 (rb + +
r o ) 2 1.155(ra r o ) . of Kab,K a b / K b b , the tolerance factor, the various radius
ratios, and the products of electronegativities. The
(rb -/- T o ) , ra, rb, and ro are the radii of the A, B, and 0
ions. A further simplification can be introduced by radii shown are for octahedral coordination and were
considering re to be approximately constant and then multiplied by 0.94 to obtain the value for tetrahedral
Kab = XaXb. The ratio K a b / K b b can be considered as a coordination. If the cationic radii in the interstices did
measure of the respective repulsive forces between A-B not contact the anions, then they were adjusted as fol-
and B-B and from the known arrangements i t can be lows. (1) If the cationic radii were too small, they
postulated that the spinel structure will be preferred were assigned values of 0.414r0 and 0.225r0 for the octa-
when this ratio is small, and the olivine structure will be hedral and tetrahedral sites, respectively. (2) If the
preferred when this ratio becomes larger. I n addition tetrahedral ion was too large to fit the interstice, then
to these electrostatic interactions, the radius ratios the length of the tetrahedral oxygen edge was cal-
of the various cations and anions greatly influence the culated. If the octahedral ion radius was now too
crystallization. small, it was expanded to touch the six oxygen ions.
The correlation between electronegativity differ- The conditions expressing this are : if
ences and average quantum number has successfully
grouped crystal structures in binary compounds. The
0.94ra
~~
r, + Yb + ro
2- 1.414
1.225
choice of the type of difference function, whether simply
xa - Xb or a more complicated expression, will strongly then r b = 1.154r, -t 0 . 1 5 4 r 0 and ra has the value shown
influence the resultant map when this method is applied in Table I. (3) If the octahedral ion was too large for
to compounds containing three different atoms. We the interstice, then the length of the octahedral oxygen
found that maps based on xa - Xb, or other simple dif- edge was calculated and the tetrahedral cationic radius
ference expressions, were not as effective in separating was enlarged to fit the void. The conditions expressing
crystal structures as the expression adopted in this in- this are: if
(9) W. Gordy, J . Chem. Phys., 14, 305 (1946).
(10) A. F. Wells, “Structural Inorganic Chemistry,” 3rd ed, Oxford Uni-
0.94, +
ro rb
<- ro +
versity Press, London, 1962. 1.225 1.414
i\ND H STEINFIKK
17634 K. KUGIMIYA Tnorgnnic C'hrmistry
TABLE
I11
STRUCTURES
CRYSTALDATAFOR KNOWN THE ABtX4 COMPOSITION
HAVING
,Ht*LCllf
C.f.?O(
The first three columns correspond to A, B, and X. T h e single and double asterisks and numbers in the columns immediately fol-
lowing the anions are references. T h e succeeding columns are: valence states of A and B cations; three radius ratios Y ~ / I ' ~Yb/?x,
, and
ye/rb; product of electronegativities xILxh;force constant Kat,; ratio of force constants K,b/Kbb; tolerance factor; calculated unit cell
constants; experimentally observed unit cell constant; degree of spinel inversion.
area between the spinel region and the CaFezO4 region and 2-3. One assumption of valence distribution
contains CaDy204and CaYbz04 which are monoclinic places it into an incorrect area while the other assump-
with a cation arrangement similar to CaFezO4; UCa~04 tion assigns i t to the correct structure region. Thus the
which has a tetragonal symmetry; CaIn204, SrIn204, compound MoV'AgT204lies almost on the boundary
and BaInz04 which are distorted spinels and have a between the KzAgI4 and the olivine structure areas,
structure related to that of CaFez04;BaV~04and SrV204 while M0'~"''~04 falls properly into the inverse spinel
which are defect perovskite structures; CaTizO4 which is region. Similarly Ge'1Mn'"z04 is contained in the
body-centered orthorhombic ; and CaV204 and Ca- spinel region while Ge1VMn"204 lies properly in the
Ga204which are reported to have structures depending olivine region. The compounds NiA1204 and CdGazO4
on the conditions of the formation of the crystals. The which fall into the normal spinel area are reported to be
compound GeMg204 which can have both the spinel partially inverted spinels with X = 0.38 and 0.25, re-
and olivine structures lies on the boundary between the spectively, and the reported inverse spinel structure for
spinel and olivine regions. Some monoclinic crystal CdInz04, which lies in the normal spinel region, is
structures which deviate from major structure types stated to be doubtful.'l The compound Fey04 which
are also observed on boundaries. lies in the normal spinel region near the boundary line
There are a few known compounds which do not fall with the inverse spinel region is known to have an in-
into the proper regions in Figure 1. Those are MoAgz- verted structure. Consequently the notable excep-
04,GeMnz04, MnV204, GeFeeO4, GeCoz04, MnFez04, tions are phenacites, MgTi,O4, BaYbzO4, and Ba-
SnCoz04,NiA1204,CdInz04,MgTiz04, CdGa204, B aCr2- Crz04. Phenacites are scattered throughout the
04,BaYbz04, and phenacites. All of these except for diagram of Figure 1, MgTiz04lies in the inverse spinel
NiAl2O4, CdInzO,, MgTi204, CdGaz04, BaInz04, and region although its structure is reported to be normal,
phenacite have two possible valence states, mainly 4-2 BaYbz04 lies in the CaFez04structure area although i t
AND H. STEINPINK
1766 K. KUGIMIYA Inorganic Chemistry
24
'
0 s p i n e l ; A unknown Q K2SOb s t r u c t u r e
0 normal s p i n e l * K2 MgP4 structure
e i n v e r s e s p i n e l ; A known 0 CaFe204 s t r u c t u r e
0 Mn O4 s t r u c t u r e BaAl 0 s t r u c t u r e
B distorted spinel structure 0 phengctte s t r u c t u r e
a olivine structure o t h e r s t r u c t u r e s a n d unknowns
Flgure 1 -Plot of K,i, VA rddlus ratlo of cations of k i i o ~ i icrystdl structures for compounds hdving the forinu~ciAB204
'TABLE I\'
ADDITIONAL COMPOUNDS
WITH THE AB& SIOICHIOMETRP~
2 3 .34 . c9 e58 1 30 I u4 ,94 uti i4 SE 2 3 .31 . E8 .54 1.33 .05 .V3
2
2
3
3
.34
.3L
.h2
a5-3
.54
.59
1-33
1.32
1u3
.b4
-91
.99 tructilre
vu C E SE
* G PQ SE
2
2
3
3
.)I .54
~ 3 1 .F4
* 58
I59
1.30
1.32 .
* 05
n5
.95
*95
2
2 3
2
3
3
.34
.3r
,34
.5T
954
*53
s
.b2
.b*
bo 1.32
1.32
1.31
.
* 04
b9
.Ul
.95
.9b
-91
nknown MG NN> SE
V G Su SE
-4ti 0'1 SE
2
2
2
3
3
3
r.i!
-31
-31
153
.SI
*49
ab0
,b%
.64
1.32
1 .32
1.31
.'15
.05
a96
.91
.98
:ructLre
nknown
2 3 I34 -51 67
I 1.35 -81 .9I UG l a SE 2 1 .31 .a7 -67 1.35 1.00
2 3 ,3* -50 .bl 1.35 .dl -99 *b U Y st L 3 .31 .e5 .D7 1.3Y 1.00
2 3 I34 * 50 ab1 1.32 -81 .99 rvli Y SE ? 3 .31 .ih .bl 1.37 1.00
2 3 * 34 * *9 -60 1.35 .MI *9L) .IG ti? SE 1 3 -31 I * 6 .68 1.3s 1.00
2 3 .34 .LU -70 1.37 .L(l 1.00 40 EU SF. 1 3 ~ 3 1 $65 a70 1.37 1.01 ublc spine:
2 3 .34 .*I .lI 1.37 .SI 1.00 Yti 1rr sc 2 3 .31 .44 .ll 1.37 I.OZ
2 3 I34 .*I a72 1.30 .u* 1.01 iublc s p i n e l ulj Y Y SE 2 3 .31 .r3 -12 1.30 1.02
2 3 .34 .4b .73 1.40 * 7R 1.01 * G LL SE 2 3 .31 .43 173 1.60 1.03
2 3 a34 .44 .77 1.48 .7Y 1.03 C 4 L A SE 2 3 .41 .5H ,a2 1.12 .99
2 3 -51 .67 -82 1.12 -70 ,91 C h CE SE 2 3 .*I .=A 111 1.LQ \.Ill
2 3 .51 .58 81 1.10 .ne
.
# .I1 1.00 C A P9 SE 2 7 .bl .5* 1.11 1.01
2 3 -51 *58 .nR 1.11 .lI
c4 NO
S"
s
s
2 3 .51 .57 nq 1.11 .lI
1.00
1.01
C A NO SE
C A s u SE
2
2
3
3
.e7
.il
.53
*51
.u9
.D3
1.11
!.I1
1.02
1.03
CA
CA
CA
6')
T*
5
5
2
2
2
3
3
3
:1.51 -54
.53
.5l
e93
r9b
1.00
1.11
1.15
1.14
*7I
bP
.b9
1.02
1.03
C A G 1 SE
C A ra SE
2
2
3
3
.41
.*7
.IY
nu7
-96
l,OO
1.15
1.14
1.04
1.06
1.05 C A D V SE 2 3 I41 -16 1-31 1.1s 1.06
CA OY 5 2 3 151 .51 1.01 1.14 ,b 9 1.05 CA Y SE 2 3 .*7 146 1.01 1.15 .Ob 1.0h
CA 7 s 2 3 .51 .40 l.Ul 1.15 .bR 1.05 c4 neSE 2 3 a41 I 46 1.0; 1.1r .04 1.07
CA un s 2 3 -51 -49 1102 1.14 ab9 1.05 C 4 ER S C 2 3 .*l 145 1.05 1.15 .*4 1.07
C A ti4 S 2 3 .51 .4R 1.05 1.15 ,b8 1.06 rthorhombic c 4 T.1 SE 2 3 .41 .44 1.01 1.15 1.011
C I 19 5 2 3 .51 .&I 1.07 1.15 rbd L.01 type A C4 Y* 5E 2 3 * 41 si3 i .U* 1.10 1 .OH
CA I H 5 2 3 .51 .41 I.OM 1.10 .71 1.07 C A L l l SE 2 3 .L7 443 1.09 1.19 1.09
CL LU s 2 3 .51 .ab 1.09 1.19 b6 1.08 tructure 5" L4 BE 2 3 .57 .ER * 92 e01 1.01
CA sc s 2 3 -51 .I4 1.15 1-25 ,b3 1.09 nknown S Y CE SE 2 3 *53 .5* .Yd .U5 .n3 1.03
'14 LA 5 2 3 .Sl e h2 .92 1.07 -61 1.00 5 U PO SE 2 ? $53 -54 .99 1.0b .07 1.04
5H CF 5 2 3 .51 .5R -90 1.05 .b8 1.02 5R NO Sh 2 7 -53 .53 1.01 I .OD .03 1.06
5R PQ 5 2 3 -51 .5R .99 1.06 .67 1.02 SH S r SE 2 3 .53 1'1 1.05 1.06 .03 I-Ob
I R hrl S 2 3 .57 .51 1.01 1.06 a61 1.03 SR GO SE 2 3 .53 .49 1.09 1.10 .03 1.07
SR S U S 2 3 .57 -54 1.05 1.06 e61 1.05 i n SE 2 3 -53 947 1.13 1.OV 1.08
SI on s 2 3 -57 .53 1.09 i.10 -65 1.0b 5R uv SE 2 3 .53 .46 1.1) 1-09 1.09
S R 7R S 2 3 -57 041 1.13 1.09 .b5 1.01 TY Y SE 2 3 .53 .Lb 1.14 1.10 1.09 8rtnarhamt i c
SR OY 5 2 3 -51 .50 I.lb 1.09 b5 1.08 FU NO SE 2 3 *53 .46 I.lh 1.09 1.09 type B
SR V S 2 3 -57 ~ 5 0 1.11 1.10 .b5 1.00 5R E U SE 2 3 .53 .r5 1,IR 1.10 1.10
si? UO s 2 3 -57 .49 1.16 1-09 .b5 1.00 FR T " SE 2 3 .53 .&I 1.21 1.10 1.11
SP EU S 2 3 .57 .4R 1.18 1.10 .65 1.0'4 5 H V R SE 2 3 *53 .a3 1.22 1.05 1.11
SR
S I
TM
VH
5
5
2
2
3
3
-57
.57
.*7
.47
1.21
1.22
1.10
1.0s
.65
bO
1.10
1.10
SR LIJ SE
U A LA SL
2
2
3
3 ..s3
o*
.*3
.5B
1.24
1.10
1.13
1.05
,03
03
1.11
1.05
59
SR
LIJ
SC
5
S
2
2
3
3
e51
.
.51
.46
.*4
l.2b
1.30
1.13
1.19
a63
.b0
1.10
1.12
t r u c ture
nknown
HA CF: SL
A b PQ SE
2
2
3
3 .b4
b4
.54
.54
1.18
1.19
1rU3
I .u*
03
03
1.07
1,0n
RA
EA
EA
LA
CE
P9
5
S
5
2
2
2
3
3
3 .
.bY
bR
b8
.58
-58
h2 1.10
1.10
1.19
1.0s
1.03
1.04
a65
.bl
a66
].Ob
1-06
1.07 h3P4
I)A NO SL
Y A S r SE
H A GO SE
2
2
2
3
3
3
. .
* 84
04
ebb
a53
.51
9
.
1.21
1-26
1.30
l.Ut
1.04
l.UU
03
n3
03
1.08
1.10
1.11
0L NQ S 2 3 ,ha -57 1.21 1.04 .b6 1.07 HA T U SE 2 3 .64 .47 1.35 1.01 .n3 1,12
HA SU S 2 3 * bll 1.26 l.O+ ) r t ht oy rpheo m
B bic
8 A GO S 2 3 m b8
.54
-53 1.30 1.08
.6b
64
1.09
1.10
U A D I SE
3 1 Y LE $3,
s 06
a b4
.4b
,4b 1:: 1-01
1.08 03
103 I1.13
:!
8 1 14 S 2 3 .bH .*I 1.35 1.01 .64 1.12 BA MPI SE 2 3 h4 ~ 4 0 1-30 1.07
RA OV
R I Y
5
s
2 3
2 3
.ha
. 6 ~
.50
.90
1.31
1.31
1.07
1.00
*64
.
.b4
1.12
1.12
i(A E 9 SE
114 7 " SE
2
2
3
3 .
-64
b*
-45
.b4
1.42
1.65
1.08
1.01 103
1.14
1.15
wr P8T r
81
2 tl
S 2 3
ea
.be
60
h0 .
rn
.41
49
40 1.30
1.42
1.45
1
1-06
.01
1-08
b4
.64
b4
1.12
1.13
1.14
H A Y R SE
dA LU SE
2
2
3
3
.h4
.64
-43
.43
1.46
1-48
1.03
1.11
,r3
-03
1.15
1,1b
EA Y B S 2 3 a60 a41 1.46 1.03 -61 1.Ir
EA LU S 2 3 bR 146 1.48 1.11 e62 1.1s
S L sc s 2 3 1 bO *4+ 1.5h 1.16 .59 1.17
t r v c tu re
?known
The columns represent the ions A, B, X, valence state of A, valence of B, radius ratio
Q y8/'rx, radius ratio r,,!lrxs radius ratio Y,/YI,
electronegativity product xaxb,force constant Kat,,ratio K a b / K b ~and
, tolerance factor.
I
8 I
0.5
I
1.0
I
1.5
O-O.-> 'apb
0 s p i n e l ; h unknoxn o CaFe20q
e i:.i;erse s p i n e l e orthorhombic
0 Ag2Hg14 0 rhombohedral
@ Th p 0 s t r u c t u r e unknowri
3 4
Figure .f.-l'lot of Kciljt i s . Y ~ / ' Y I ~for chalcogenide compositions A B p & (X = Se, Se, T c ) for knonv and sornr unkno\rn structures.
Vol. 7, No. 5 , September 1968 O F AI32X4 STOICHIOMETRIES
CRYSTALLIZATION 1769
Tetrahedral
I11 FOR THE CASEn = 2
FOR SOLUTON
Oxygen 1-----
Octahedral
-------Oxygen
Tetrahedral
2----
Octahedral
-
void belong to each oxygen, and on the average one- elements elements elements elements
A B A B A B A B
fourth of A and one-half of B in compounds with the
0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3
formula AB204 are attached to an oxygen ion. The 0 1 3 -0
following equations can be derived 0 2 3 1
0 3 3 0
1 0 0
i 3
1 1 .0. -3
1 2 2 1
Thus 1 3 -
9 0
2 0 1 3
2 1 1 2
2 2 1 1
-0 3 1 o
3 0 0 3
where all N's and n's are positive integers. 3 1 0 2
The degree of inversion X of a spinel is related to 3 -3 0 1
no^ by 3 3 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 1 3 3
N~A 0 1 3 2
x=
+
N ~ A no^ 0
0
2
3
3
3
1
0
and usually No* 5 no^. Since for the inverse spinels 1 0 2 3
1 1 2 2
1 2 2 la
1 3 2 0
a This row represents arrangement for inverse spinel.
X can be also expressed as
TABLE VI
= )*(1 THECATION ARRANGEMENTSAROUND A N ANION FOR THE CASE
2 n n = 4 CORRESPONDING
TO THE DISTRIBUTION IN MgGanSOc
No. of anions in unit cell
For thecasen = 1 with same cation nearest No. of Mg ions in No. of Ga ions in
NtA = 1 no^ = 0 and two A atoms and one B atom are associated in the
(1) octahedral voids. The other solutions are
NtB = 2 no^ = 0
The iigzHgI4 structure has this type of cation arrange- N ~=
A 0 no^ = 3
(IV)
ment. NtB = 0 no^ = 6
A 1 No* = 0
N ~=
(11)
NtB = 0 NoB = 3
The spinel structure and the olivine structure are ex-
amples of this type of cation arrangement.
For thecasen = 2
3Nta +2No~ 6 =
Generally the number of solutions for the case n = m
is given by
3NtB + 2 N o B 12 =
(Im/21 + + 1)
Six solutions exist among which two solutions give the
where [m/2] is m / 2 if m is even and [m/2]is (m - 1)/2
same cation distribution as (I) and (11) above, while a
if m is odd, and all solutions for n = m are contained in
third solution
the solutions for n = I , if and only if m is a divisor of 1.
There are several possible combinations of ion dis-
tributions around the two oxygens for each solution.
I n Table V the possible combinations for the third
describes the inverse spinel structure. One oxygen is solution are shown. Mathematically all configurations
associated with one B atom in the tetrahedral void, are consistent with respect to charge distributions and
A N D LIPPAKU
1770 BENNETT,COTTON,LEGZUINS, inorgimic Chemistry
stoichiometry, but a modifying principle can be intro- will be given by the expression I[lcm(4,n)/4], where 1
duced which will make some distributions more likely is an integer and the numerator is the least common
than others by assuming that the oxygen ions will pre- multiplier of 4 and n.
fer identical or nearly identical cation environments. It is quite possible that the local energy around oxy-
The ion distribution around oxygens characterized by gen due to the ionic charges becomes higher as n in-
0112 and 0121 is that of an inverse spinel. The cation creases. If n is small, e . g . , 1, then each oxygen ion has
arrangement of MgGazS418is an example of the case the same cation environment. For n = 2 the cation
n = 4, which is a partially inverted structure of solu- environment becomes different for the inverted spinel
tion V,and the cation arrangement is listed in Table VI. structure and these differences among oxygen ions
The number of integral formula weights per unit cell would become more pronounced as n increases. The
fact that spinel, olivine, and AgzHgI3 structures occur
(18) C . Romers, B. A. Blaisse, and D. J. W. Ijdo, Acta Cryst., 23, 634
so frequently indicates that structures in which the
(1967). local surroundings of anions differ greatly are unstable.