You are on page 1of 4

Our names represent who we are.

Human beings attach names that are meaningful to


people because names are supposed to designate us in
the world

However, a name is not the person itself, it is a


signifier. The self is thought to be something else than
the name.

The self is something that a person perennially


The Self from Various Philosophical molds, shapes, and develop. It is not static, it is plastic.
Perspectives
The challenge is for a person to discover him/herself
C1

Socrates and Plato

Pre-Socratic thinkers

Thales, Pythagoras,

The Inquiry of the Self Parmenides, Heraclitus,


and Empedocles were
concerned with explaining
what the world is really
made up of, why the world
is so, and what explains
the changes that they
observed around them
Socrates Plato

more concerned with the supported the idea of his master but he added that
problem of the self there are three components of the soul
he was the 1st philosopher who in his magnum opus “The Republic,” justice in human
engaged in a systematic
person can be achieved if the three parts of the soul
questioning about the self
are working harmoniously: rational soul (reason
to him, the true task of the and intellect), spirited soul (in charge of emotion),
philosopher is to know oneself; and appetitive soul (based on desires such as eating
the worst thing that can happen and rest)
to men is to live, but to die inside
when this ideal is attained, the human person’s soul
man is composed of body
(imperfect) and soul (perfect) *essence becomes just and virtuous

Augustine and
Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas

Augustine adopted some ideas from Aristotle

following the view of Plato man is composed of two parts: matter and from
and infusing the doctrine of
Christianity, he believed that
matter is common for all (eg. body), form is
man is divine in 2 parts:
imperfect yearns to be with the essence of a substance or thing (eg. soul,
the Divine and capable of character)
reaching immortality
the soul is what animates the body; it is what
body is bound to die on earth
and soul is to anticipate makes us humans
living eternally with God
Rene Descartes David Hume
Scottish philosopher, empiricist
Father of modern Philosophy (observing and experimenting), has a very
unique way of looking at man
constant search for knowledge
and continuous search for self one can know only what comes from the
senses and experiences
he claims that there is so much
that we should doubt. Since men can attain knowledge by experiencing
much of what we think and experiences may be categorized into two:
believe are not infallible impressions (these are vivid and can be
(faultless), they may turn out to felt by the senses, can be experienced) and
be false ideas (imagination)

cogito ergo sum “I think what one thinks is a unified self is simply
therefore, I am” a combination of all experiences of the
person

Immanuel Kant Gilbert Ryle


Kant recognizes the accuracy of Hume’s denied the concept of an
account (sensation and perception of internal, non physical self
impressions) but he thinks that the things
man perceive around him are not just
randomly infused but are organized for him, what truly matters is
instead (eg. time and space) the behavior that one
without the self, one cannot organize the manifests in his day to day life
different impressions that one gets in
relation to his existence self is not an entity one can
he suggests that intelligence in man locate and analyze, but simply
synthesizes all knowledge and experience the convenient name people
self is not just a personality, but a seat of use to refer to all behaviors
knowledge and acquisition for all persons that people make
Maurice Merleau-Ponty
unlike Ryle who denies the
self, Merleau-Ponty said that
the mind and body are
intertwined and cannot be
separated

he also dismissed the


Cartesian dualism (mind
and body), for him the living
body, his thoughts, emotions,
and experiences are all one

You might also like