Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted to,
Shamima Akter
Submitted by,
As an executive officer, the steps I am going to follow in order to take a proper decision in this scenario
are-
Recognize and define situation: The first step in making the right decision will be recognizing the
problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. Determine why this decision will make a difference
to my subordinates.
Identify alternatives: Once I have a clear understanding of the issue, it is time to identify the various
solutions at my disposal. It is likely that I have many different options when it comes to making my
decision, so it is important to come up with a range of options. This will help me determine which course
of action is the best way to achieve my objective .
Evaluate Alternatives: To know which alternative is best, I need to be able to weigh pros and cons of my
alternatives, then select the option that has the highest chances of success. It may be helpful to seek out
a trusted second opinion to gain a new perspective on the project issue.
Select Alternative: When it is time to make my decision, I need to be sure that I understand the risks
involved with my chosen route. I may also choose a combination of alternatives now that I fully grasp all
relevant information and potential risks.
Implement Alternative: Next, I will need to create a plan for implementation. This involves identifying
what resources are required and gaining support from employees and Organization. Getting others
onboard with my decision is a key component of executing the plan effectively, so I have to be prepared
to address any questions or concerns that may arise.
Follow up and evaluate results: An often-overlooked but important step in the decision making process
is evaluating my decision for effectiveness. Moreover, ask myself that whether it worked or what I did
well and what can be improved next time.
Answer to the question 2
The above para discusses the process of controlling here. Because it is a basic management function
which involves of establishing benchmarks or standards, comparing actual performance against them,
and taking corrective action, if required. It helps to check the errors and to take the corrective action so
that deviation from standards is minimized and stated goals of the organization are achieved in a
desired manner.
Process of Controlling:
Establishment of standards- Standards are the plans or the targets which have to be achieved in the
course of business function. They can also be called as the criterions for judging the performance.
Standards generally are classified into two-
a. Measurable or tangible - Those standards which can be measured and expressed are
called as measurable standards. They can be in form of cost, output, expenditure, time,
profit, etc. of the company for production.
b. Non-measurable or intangible- There are standards which cannot be measured
monetarily. For example- performance and deviation of workers for the production,
their attitudes towards a concern. These are called as intangible standards.
Once the deviation is identified, a manager has to think about various cause which has led to
deviation. The causes can be-
a. Erroneous planning,
b. Co-ordination loosens,
c. Implementation of plans is defective, and
d. Supervision and communication is ineffective, etc.
Taking remedial actions- Once the causes and extent of deviations are known, the manager has
to detect those errors and take remedial measures for it. There are two alternatives here-
Identify the right span of supervision: Each manager or superior may have different ability and capacity
in respect of such factors as leadership, communication, decision-making, control-
affecting management of subordinates. Further, the attitudes and personality factors of the manager
also determine the right span of supervision.
Manager/ supervisor: If the manager has a strong personality, commanding voice, controlling capacity
then span of supervision will be big.
Quality of sub-ordinates: If the sub-ordinates are skilled and experienced then span of supervision will
also be big.
Attitude of subordinates: if the subordinates are supportive to the manager then span of supervision
will be big.
Time available for supervision: If the manager can manage more time for supervision, the span of
supervision will be big.
Nature of work: if the task is very complex then span of supervision will be small.
Rate of labor turnover: if labor turnover rate is high then span of supervision will be small and vice-
versa.
Geographical dispersion: if employees are located at different floors then it will take more time to
supervise them so span of supervision will be small.
Supervisory help from non-supervisory people: if there is no help then span of supervision will be small.
Clarity of plans: if the plans are clear then span of supervision will be big.
Frequency of change: if there are so many changes then span of supervision will be small.
According to V.A. Graicunas’ theory, there are 3 types of relationship between Supervisor and
subordinates-
Case Study:
Abstract: Rohit Narang joined Apex Computers (Apex) in November after a successful stint at Zen
Computers (Zen), where he had worked as an assistant programmer. Rohit felt that Apex offered better
career prospects, as it was growing much faster than Zen, which was a relatively small company. Rohit
joined as a Senior Programmer at Apex, with a handsome pay hike. He joined Aparna Mehta's five-
member team. While she was efficient at what she did and extremely intelligent, she had neither the
time nor the inclination to groom her subordinates. Time and again, Rohit found himself thinking of
Suresh, his old boss, and of how he had been such a positive influence. Aparna, on the other hand, even
without actively doing anything, had managed to significantly lower his motivation levels.
Introduction: Rohit Narang joined Apex Computers (Apex) in November after a successful stint at Zen
Computers (Zen), where he had worked as an assistant programmer. Rohit felt that Apex offered better
career prospects, as it was growing much faster than Zen, which was a relatively small company. At Apex
he joined Aparna Mehta's five-member team. While she was efficient at what she did and extremely
intelligent, she had neither the time nor the intention to groom her subordinates. She is not a good
supervisor and never motivates her subordinates. Aparna, on the other hand, even without actively
doing anything, had managed to significantly lower his motivation levels.
Characteristics:
Skills:
Effective communication - it's more than just being able to speak and write. A leader's
communication must move people to work toward the goal the leader has chosen.
Motivation - a leader has to be able to motivate everyone to contribute. Each of us has different
"buttons". A leader knows how to push the right buttons on everyone to make them really want
to do their best to achieve the leader's goal.
Planning - the leader has a plan to achieve the goal. He/she doesn't get too bogged down in the
details, that's what managers are for, but rather uses a high level plan to keep everyone moving
together toward the goal.