Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.Introduction
Organization aligns its objectives and strategy comparing its strengths with changing
environment and analyzing opportunities then performs assessment of
organizational performance needs. It identifies competencies needed (new or
improvement). Expectations are set by determining required vs desired
performances with key performance indicators.
1 My note
June 1, 2020 [PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT]
lack of attention for the process could also create gaps on executing performance
system. However, better checked features in any system keeps that system better
executed.
h. Reliability: Should include the performance measure that are consistent and
error free. Example: rating done on same employee by two supervisors should
be same.
2 My note
June 1, 2020 [PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT]
i. Validity: The measure should include what is important and within the control
of employees. Example: customers’ business get into legal action and
remaining installment payment couldn’t be fetched on time.
j. Acceptability and Fairness: This is most challenging and important. This can
be of two types. Distributive justice which includes perceptions of the
performance evaluation vs work performed and rewards received vs
evaluation received. Example: individualistic in US while collectiveness in
Korea. Procedural justice includes perceptions of the procedures used to
determine the performance as of linking the rating with rewards. System
should be well accepted from distributive and procedural perspectives. It
strengthens relationship and commitment of the employees with the
supervisors and organization.
k. Openness: A saying- good system has no secrets. Employees are evaluated
and their performance feedbacks are given on time. The appraisal meeting is
communicated in both ways, openly and honestly so that exchanged
information helps to standardize the process in clear ways.
l. Inclusiveness: The inputs are ongoing basis. The process represents the
concerns people and activates their participation to let them know how they
are evaluated. Employees voice is included while designing and implementing
the process to make them feel having ownership. This ultimately leads a
successful system, less employees resistance and obtain improved
performance overall.
m. Ethicality: The system should include ethical standards. Normally means
supervisors is not deciding according to his persona. He is suppressing his
personal self while providing evaluation parameters and doing appraisal on
the basis of sufficient information with clear understanding of respect for his
or her employees privacy.
3 My note
June 1, 2020 [PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT]
4 My note
June 1, 2020 [PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT]
DISADVANTAGE
If the system is not managed well or let’s say poorly managed it affects all the
three parties.
Employees’ may have low self-esteem due to the job dissatisfaction and
burnout. This causes damaged relationships. The system depends on the false
or misleading information if not managed well.
Managers may face the problem like high turnover, less motivated
performance and unjustified demands on manager’s resources. Managers
without required accurate information could give unfair ratings to their
employees.
For the organization, it is wastage of time and money. Organization suffers
unclear rating system, biases, risk of legal issues, mismanaged human
resource intervention and finally problem in system acceptance.
5 My note
June 1, 2020 [PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT]
4.Prerequisites of PM:
6 My note
June 1, 2020 [PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT]
7 My note