Professional Documents
Culture Documents
diameter of the coax center conductor or the thickness of its outer conductor.
Transmission line loss due to metal calculation can be done in a simple three-
step process:
Note that you could easily substitute resistivity instead of conductivity into the
equation. Click here to look up resistivity of a variety of metals. Don't assume
that the inner and outer conductors are made of the same metal, often they are
not!
Step two: calculate the resistance per unit length. We recommend you use
meters for length to cut down on confusion, but you can use Potrzebies for all
we care (pronounced po-SHEB-yas). For coax that has inner conductor diameter
"d" and outer conductor inside-diameter "D", you need to integrate the sheet
resistance over the "widths" of both cylindrical surfaces:
Relax, that integration didn't take more than 8th grade math! The "width" of the
inner conductor surface is d and the outside conductor surface is D. This
solution assumes that five skin depths of metal are available on both inner and
outer conductor, and each is comprised of a single metal within those five skin
depths, which is usually the case. Here's what you get when you plug in R RFSH and
simplify:
Check it out, our equation will let you use different metals for inner and outer
conductors, we've never seen such a beautiful sight in any textbook! Or in
Agilent's ADS!
The whole ball of wax boils down into the following totally cool closed-form
equation:
Note: Roger pointed out a slight mistake in the above equation in October 2009.
Thanks! And sorry for the inconvenience to everyone else!
Now you can calculate the loss/length of any coax, using different metals for
inside and outside conductors. Sweet! You can skip the three steps we proposed,
and cut to the chase.
Note: this example examines the only metal loss, not dielectric loss tangent
loss...
Let's use RG6 coax cable (which you can buy at Home Depot for wiring up your
satellite dish etc.) as an example and see if the math works out close to
measured data. We downloaded a data sheet on this cable to use as a reference
for the calculations. You can see it here. We hope CommScope doesn't mind!
According to this supplier, the dimensions of RG6 are:
Inside conductor is 18 gauge copper-clad steel (40.4 mils on the AWG scale)
R=2.25, but in this case it is shot full of air to make it easier to bend, so we
don't know off hand what the correct R is (it must be somewhere between 1
and 2.25, right?
Let's calculate it. We know that the impedance of RG6 is 75 ohms, and it must
obey the coax equation:
Now we calculate the RF sheet resistance of the inner and outer conductors. We
did this in a spreadsheet, as a function of frequency. We looked up the
conductivities of copper and aluminum here and here. RG6 is supposed to work
up to 3 GHz, so we analyzed it up to this frequency.
Note that the inner conductor has lower sheet resistance. That's because it
benefits from the superior conductivity of copper, while the outer jacket is
aluminum. We are assuming that the copper-cladding on the steel center
conductor is at least 5 skin depths across this frequency band... that assumption
might be optimistic at MHz frequencies, but CommScope doesn't provide plating
thickness on their data sheet.
Now we calculate the resistance per unit length (ohms per meter). Here the
inner conductor has the most resistance (even though it has worse conductivity),
because its surface area is much smaller than the outer conductor.
Last, we convert to dB/length. We scaled the length units to 100 feet, because
most U.S. cable vendors quote RG6 cable loss this way:
So how did the calculation check with real life data? We calculate 5.85 dB per
100 feet at 1 GHz, the supplier says 6.15 dB. That's close enough for
government work! Part of the disparity could be that we neglected to look at the
effect of dielectric loss tangent loss. But our down-loadable coax spreadsheet will
do this for you!
A possible shortcut...
This info was provided to us by Jorge who works for a large defense contractor.
We haven't tried it yet. It relies on obsolete military specification MIL-C-17.
Instead of calculating the conductor and dielectric attenuation using the given
formulas on the coax page, you can get the results using:
Just divide the results by 1200, the number of inches in 100 ft., to get dB/inch.
K1 and K2 are available on MIL-C-17 Attenuation and Power Handling tables.
Times Microwave references this calculation on their web site, but they seem to
be the only cable supplier that uses it. We couldn't find K1 and K2 for RG6, to
compare with the loss calculation we performed.
Good luck!
Technical Data
Imp. Central Weight O/D Connector
Part No. Description Dielectric Sheath
Ohms Conductor, mm Kg/Km mm Type
390006-C RG6 Type 75 1/1.00 FPE PVC 47 6.7 B1
390008-C RG8 Type 50 1/2.74 FPE PVC 207 10.2 A9
390008H-C RG8 Type 50 1/2.74 FPE LSHF 207 10.2 A9
390011AS RG11 Type 75 1/1.60 FPE PVC 84 10.2 A2
390011 RG11 A/U 75 7/0.40 PE PVC 149 10.3 A9
390011L RG11 A/U 75 7/0.40 PE LSF 149 10.3 A2
390011H RG11 A/U 75 7/0.40 PE LSHF 149 10.3 A2
390011A RG11 A/U SWA 75 7/0.40 PE LDPE 380 15.7 A2
390012 RG12 A/U 75 7/0.40 PE LDPE 380 15.7 A2
390058 RG58 C/U 50 19/0.18 PE PVC 46 5.1 A3
390058W RG58 C/U White 50 19/0.18 PE PVC 46 5.1 A3
390058H RG58 C/U 50 19/0.18 PE LSHF 46 5.1 A3
390058D RG58 C/U Duct 50 19/0.18 PE LDPE 59 6.5 A3
390059MB RG59 Mini Black 75 1/0.58 FPE PVC 16 4.0 A8
390059MW RG59 Mini White 75 1/0.58 FPE PVC 16 4.0 A8
390059MBH RG59 Mini Black 75 1/0.58 FPE LSHF 16 4.0 A8
390059MWH RG59 Mini White 75 1/0.58 FPE LSHF 16 4.0 A8
390059 RG59 B/U MIL-C-17 75 1/0.58 PE PVC 60 6.1 A1
390059-C RG59 B/U Type 75 1/0.58 PE PVC 58 6.1 A1
390059W RG59 B/U White 75 1/0.58 PE PVC 60 6.1 A1
390059L RG59 B/U 75 1/0.58 PE LSF 60 6.1 A1
390059H RG59 B/U 75 1/0.58 PE LSHF 60 6.1 A1
387FTC5903 RG59 Type IEC 60331-21 75 1/0.65 PE/Si LSHF 110 9.1 FTC
390059D RG59 B/U Duct 75 1/0.58 PE LDPE 73 7.9 A1
390059A RG59 B/U SWA 75 1/0.58 PE LDPE 195 10.3 A1
390062 RG62 A/U 93 1/0.69 PESS PVC 60 6.2 A1
390062H RG62 A/U 93 1/0.69 PESS LSHF 60 6.2 A1
390062A RG62 A/U SWA 93 1/0.69 PESS LDPE 210 10.4 A1
390108 RG108 Twin-Ax 78 2 x 7/0.32 PE PVC 48 5.9 TBA
390115 RG115 A/U 50 7/.71 PTFE GFB 240 10.6 TBA
390142 RG142 B/U 50 1/0.91 PTFE FEP 74 4.9 A6
390165 RG165 50 7/0.81 PTFE GFB 180 10.4 TBA
390174 RG174 A/U 50 7/0.16 PE PVC 16 2.6 C4
390174H RG174 A/U 50 7/0.16 PE LSHF 16 2.6 C4
390178 RG178 B/U 50 7/0.10 PTFE FEP 10 1.8 C6
390178H RG178 Type 50 1/0.30 FPE LSHF 6.9 1.9 C6
390179Y RG179 Type 75 1/0.35 PE PVC 12 2.6 A7
390179H RG179 Type 75 1/0.35 PE LSHF 12 2.6 A7
390179Y-S RG179 Type Stranded 75 7/0.10 PE PVC 12 2.6 A7
390179H-S RG179 Type Stranded 75 7/0.10 PE LSHF 12 2.6 A7
390179 RG179 B/U 75 7/0.10 PTFE FEP 15 2.5 A7
390180 RG180 95 1/0.30 PTFE TFE 29 3.7 TBA
390188 RG188 50 7/0.17 PTFE FEP 147 2.5 C4
390196 RG196 50 7/0.10 PTFE FEP 8.9 2.0 C6
390212 RG212 50 1/1.41 PE PVC 123 8.4 TBA
390213 RG213 /U 50 7/0.75 PE PVC 166 10.3 A4
390213H RG213 /U 50 7/0.75 PE LSHF 166 10.3 A4
390214 RG214 /U 50 7/0.75 PE PVC 173 10.8 A5
390214H RG214 /U 50 7/0.75 PE LSHF 173 10.8 A5
390216 RG216 75 7/0.40 PE PVC 169 10.8 TBA
390216H RG216 75 7/0.40 PE LSHF 169 10.8 TBA
390218 RG218 50 1/4.95 PE PVC 658 22.0 TBA
390223 RG223 /U 50 1/0.90 PE PVC 49 5.4 TBA
390223H RG223 /U 50 1/0.90 PE LSHF 49 5.4 TBA
390225 RG225 50 7/0.79 PTFE GFB 268 10.9 TBA
390302 RG302 75 1/0.63 PTFE FEP 47 5.3 TBA
390303 RG303 50 1/0.99 PTFE FEP 46 4.3 TBA
390304 RG304 50 1/1.49 PTFE FEP 131 7.1 TBA
390316 RG316 50 7/0.17 PTFE FEP 15 2.5 C4
390316DB RG316 2 x Braid 50 7/0.17 PTFE FEP 22 2.6 C4
390316H RG316 Type 50 7/0.17 FPE LSHF 13 2.7 C4
390316HDB RG316 Type 2 x Braid 50 7/0.17 FPE LSHF 20 3.1 C4
390393 RG393 B/U 50 7/0.79 PTFE FEP 245 10.0 TBA
390393H RG393 Type 50 7/0.81 FPE LSHF 180 10.1 TBA
390400 RG400 50 19/0.20 PTFE FEP 74 4.9 A6
390400H RG400 Type 50 19/0.20 FPE LSHF 55 5.1 A6