Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Entrepreneurship
Corporate Entrepreneurship (Intrapreneurship) is a process used to develop new businesses,
products, services or processes inside of an existing organization to create value and generate
new revenue growth through entrepreneurial thought and action.
Organizations need to build a framework to support innovation and new business growth.
Corporate entrepreneurship programs should produce ideas which are disruptive in nature, rather
than smaller, incremental changes. Also, innovations tend to be led by employees, rather than
being implemented by management.
Innovation is the lifeblood of a company; without it, the company will die. But many larger
organizations struggle to innovate successfully due to their structures, bureaucracy and culture.
Implementing a corporate entrepreneurship program provides companies with a systematic way
of increasing their innovation capabilities, the benefits of which can be huge:
Employee recruitment and retention: Allowing employees to pursue their ideas and
opportunities for the business leads to higher levels of job satisfaction. A result of this is lower
levels of staff turnover. In addition, companies that are known for encouraging corporate
L4: Corporate Entrepreneurship
entrepreneurship will in turn attract other talented, entrepreneurially minded employees, creating
a positive cycle.
Most organizations find that their ability to identify and innovatively exploit opportunities
decreases as they move from the entrepreneurial to the growth phase. However, the key to
success in the highly competitive and dynamic environment that most companies presently
operate in is to retain this ability. Therefore, companies need to adopt an entrepreneurial
strategy — seeking competitive advantage through continuous innovation to effectively exploit
identified opportunities — in order to sustain and grow under such circumstances.
For such a strategy to succeed, companies should develop an enabling economic and
political ecosystem that does not impede small or large scale redeployment of resources in new
ways towards creative, entrepreneurial ends. Companies have a range of options to choose from
to achieve this objective. At the one end of this option spectrum is ‘focused entrepreneurship’
wherein specific innovation initiatives are created with the rest of the organization insulated
from them. At the other end is a managerial approach that leads to the creation of ‘organization
wide entrepreneurship.’ Entrepreneurship in such organizations is a shared value and drives
managerial behavior in conscious and subconscious ways and creates an entrepreneurial
spirit organization-wide.
Many mature organizations, unwilling to alter the status quo, tend to create focused
initiatives that are mandated to identify and exploit new opportunities. While such focused
initiatives may stimulate innovation, the very nature of their design erects barriers between the
existing organization and the innovation effort. This makes it difficult for the organizations to
access and leverage the existing capability base and to integrate new initiatives back into
operational activity.
The top managements of such companies will design an organizational context conducive to
autonomous generation of entrepreneurial initiatives, provide a sense of overall direction to
these initiatives, and ensure that promising ventures receive necessary resources as they move
through the uncertain development process wherein:
A key benefit of CE may be to push companies to employ a range of strategies often in unique
combinations. By doing so, companies build layers of advantage by combining distinctive bases
for competitive superiority.
There have been many studies to substantiate the above-mentioned claims. CE can improve a
company’s growth and profitability. The empirical evidence that CE improves performance by
increasing the company’s reactiveness and willingness to take risks through development of new
products, processes, and services.
Companies have four ways of building businesses from within their organizations. Each
approach provides certain benefits — and raises specific challenges.
L4: Corporate Entrepreneurship
A few companies such as IBM, Motorola and Cargill pursue corporate entrepreneurship by
establishing and supporting formal organizations with significant dedicated funds or active
influence over business-unit funding. As with the enabler and advocate models, an objective is to
encourage latent entrepreneurs. But the producer model also aims to protect emerging projects
from turf battles, encourage cross-unit collaboration, build potentially disruptive businesses and
create pathways for executives to pursue careers outside their business units.
L4: Corporate Entrepreneurship
Corporate entrepreneurship sets the context for innovation and growth. It provides a systems
view of the resources, processes and environment that are needed to support, motivate and
engage the organization in entrepreneurial thinking and action.
Benefits:
Organizations with strong entrepreneurial orientations statistically perform better. They achieve
higher levels of productivity, innovation, growth, employee engagement and financial returns.
Although business growth is the overall end game, corporate entrepreneurship is difficult to
achieve. It challenges traditional organizational practices. Many of the things needed to support
the core business are just the opposite of what you need to do to build a new business.
Implementation:
There is no perfect way to implement corporate entrepreneurship. There are however three
components that enable corporate entrepreneurship; people, process and place.
People – leaders that possess a core set of action oriented competencies and behaviors
Process – systems and processes that support entrepreneurial thinking and action
Place – an environment conducive to entrepreneurship, learning and growth
It is well known that internal champions can be effective in bringing new ideas to market. It is
well researched that having the right processes can help facilitate entrepreneurship.