You are on page 1of 50

Lateral Earth Pressures

Retaining Structures
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Aytekin
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support
In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to
prevent lateral soil movements.

Tie rod
Anchor

Sheet pile

Cantilever Braced excavation Anchored sheet pile 2


retaining wall
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support

We have to estimate the lateral soil pressures acting on


these structures, to be able to design them.

Gravity Retaining S il nailing


Soil ili
Reinforced earth wall 3
wall
SIVA Copyright©2001

Soil Nailing

4
SIVA Copyright©2001

Sheet Pile

Sheet piles marked for driving


5
SIVA Copyright©2001

Sheet Pile

Sheet pile wall


6
SIVA Copyright©2001

Sheet Pile

During installation Sheet pile wall

7
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support

Reinforced earth walls are increasingly becoming popular.

geosynthetics

8
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support
filled with
Crib walls have been used in Queensland. soil
Good drainage & allow plant growth.
Looks good. Interlocking
stretchers
and headers

9
SIVA Copyright©2001

Earth Pressure at Rest


In a homogeneous natural soil deposit,
GL

v’
h’
X

the ratio h’/


/v’ is a constant known as coefficient
of earth pressure at rest (K0).

Importantly, at K0 state, there are no lateral strains.


10
SIVA Copyright©2001

Estimating K0

For normally consolidated clays and granular soils,


K0 = 1 – sin 
’

For overconsolidated clays,


K0,overconsolidated = K0,normally consolidated OCR0.5

From elastic analysis,



K0  Poisson s
Poisson’s
1 ratio

11
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active/Passive Earth Pressures


- in granular soils

Wall moves
away from
f soil
il

Wall moves A
towards soil
B

smooth wall

Let’s look at the soil elements A and B during the


wall movement. 12
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

v’ = z
Initially there is no lateral movement.
Initially, movement
v’ z
h’ = K0 v’ = K0 z
h’
A
As the wall moves away from the soil,
v’ remains the same; and
h’ dec
decreases
eases ttill failure
a u e occurs.
occu s.

Active state
13
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves away from the soil,


Initially (K0 state)


Failure (Active state)

v’ 
active earth
pressure
p decreasing h’
14
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

WJM Rankine
(1820-1872)

[h’]active v’ 

[ h ' ]active  K A v '


Rankine’s coefficient of
1  sin  active earth pressure
KA   tan 2 (45   / 2)
1  sin  15
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils
 Failure plane is at
45 + /2 to horizontal v’
h’
45 + /2 A

 90+

[h’]active v’ 

16
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves away from the soil,

h’ decreases till failure occurs.


occurs

h’ K0 state
v’ z
Active
h’
A state

wall movement

17
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in cohesive soils

Follow the same steps as


for granular soils. Only
difference is that c  0.

[ h ' ]active  K A v '2c K A

Everything else the same


as for granular soils.
soils
18
SIVA Copyright©2001

Example

19
SIVA Copyright©2001

20
SIVA Copyright©2001

21
SIVA Copyright©2001

22
SIVA Copyright©2001

23
SIVA Copyright©2001

What is the excavation depth


without a support

24
SIVA Copyright©2001

[ h ' ]active  K A v '2c K A

25
SIVA Copyright©2001

Solved in the classroom

26
SIVA Copyright©2001

27
SIVA Copyright©2001

28
SIVA Copyright©2001

29
SIVA Copyright©2001

30
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

Initially, soil is in K0 state.

As the wall moves towards the soil,


v’ remains the same,
same and
v’
h’ increases till failure occurs.
h’
B
Passive state

31
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves towards the soil,



Initially (K0 state)
Failure (Active state)

passive earth
pressure

v’ 

increasing h’
32
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils


v’ [h’]passive 

[ h ' ] passive  K P v '


Rankine’s coefficient of
1  sin  passive earth pressure
KP   tan 2 ( 45   / 2)
1  sin  33
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils
 Failure plane is at
45 - /2 to horizontal v’
45 - /2 h’
A

 90+

v’ [h’]passive

34
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves towards the soil,


h’ increases till failure occurs.
occurs

h’ Passive state


v’
h’
B
K0 state

wall movement

35
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in cohesive soils

Follow the same steps as


for granular soils. Only
difference is that c  0.

[ h ' ] passive  K P v '2c K P

Everything else the same


as for granular soils.
soils
36
SIVA Copyright©2001

Earth Pressure Distribution


- in granular soils
[h’]active
PA and PP are the
resultant
l active
i andd
passive thrusts on
the wall

[h’]passive H

0 5 KAH
PA=0.5 H2

h 0.5 KPh2
PP=0.5

37
KPh KAH
h’
Passive state

Active state
K0 state

Wall movement
(not to scale)
SIVA Copyright©2001

Rankine’ss Earth Pressure Theory


Rankine

[ h ' ]active  K A v '2c K A

[ h ' ] passive  K P v '2c K P

 Assumes smooth wall

 Applicable only on vertical walls

39
SIVA Copyright©2001

Retaining Walls - Applications

Road
Train

40
SIVA Copyright©2001

Retaining Walls - Applications

highway

41
SIVA Copyright©2001

Retaining Walls - Applications

High rise building


High-rise

basement wall

42
SIVA Copyright©2001

Gravity Retaining Walls

cement mortar
plain
l i concrete
t or
stone masonry
cobbles

They rely on their self weight to


support the backfill
43
SIVA Copyright©2001

Cantilever Retaining Walls

Reinforced;
smaller section
than gravity
walls
alls

They act like vertical cantilever,


fixed to the ground 44
SIVA Copyright©2001

Design of Retaining Wall


- in granular soils

2 2
Block no.

3 3
1
1

toe
toe

Wi = weight of block i
Analysey the stabilityy of this rigid g bodyy with
xi = horizontal distance of centroid of block i from toe
vertical walls (Rankine theory valid) 45
Safety against sliding along the base
PP  {{W } tan 
soil concrete friction
soil-concrete
Wi }. angle  0.5 – 0.7 
Fsliding 
PA

to be g
greater
than 1.5

2 2
PA H
3 3 PA
1
PP 1
S h PP
toe S
R
toe
y R
y

PP= 0.5 KPhh2 PA= 0.5 KAH2


Safety against overturning about toe
PP h / 3  {Wi xi }
Foverturning 
PA H/3

to be g
greater
than 2.0

2 2
PA H
3 3 PA
1
PP 1
S h PP
toe S
R
toe
y R
y
SIVA Copyright©2001

Points to Think About

How does the key help in improving the stability


against sliding?

Shouldn’t we design retaining walls to resist at-rest


(than active) earth pressures since the thrust on the
wall is greater in K0 state (K0 > KA)?

48
SIVA Copyright©2001

THE END

49
SIVA Copyright©2001

50

You might also like