You are on page 1of 1

HOLISM AND REDUCTIONISM

AO1:
Holism: Reductionism: Biological reductionism:
 The view that the whole is greater than the  Analyses behaviour by breaking it down into  Based on the idea that we are biological
sum of its parts component parts organisms made up of psychological
structures/processes
 Any attempt to break up the whole to  Based on the scientific principle of parsimony
understand a concept or behaviour would not (the phenomena should be explained using the  All behaviour at some level is biological and so
allow you to develop a full understanding most basic principles) can be explained through neurochemical,
neuropsychological and genetic influences
 Successful therapy is bringing all aspects of the  Most simplified and easiest level of explanation
‘whole person’. Reductionist explanations
would play a limited role
Environmental (stimulus-response) reductionism: Levels of explanations (within reductionism):
 Breaks down behaviour to simple external causes from our surrounding  Highest level – cultural and social explanations of how social groups effect
(e.g. reinforcement and stimuli) behaviour

 Researchers study observable behaviour and break complex learning up  Middle level – psychological explanations of behaviour
into stimulus response links that are measurable within the laboratory
 Lower level – biological explanations of how hormones and genes affect
 Sees behaviour on a physical level – doesn’t concern itself with mental behaviour
(cognitive) processes of the mind that occur at a psychological level. The
mind is disregarded as a ‘black box’ – in our understanding of behaviour
because it does not lie within the environment

AO2/AO3:
 Reductionism and treatments ー Holism is not scientific  Reductionism is scientific ー Reductionism oversimplifies
P A strength of the reductionist P A weakness of holistic P Reductionism also lends itself P A problem with reductionism is
approach is its application to the approaches is that they do not well to psychology’s aim to be that the breaking down of
development of treatments lend themselves to rigorous more scientific complicated concepts into
E This is because reductionism scientific testing and can become E This is because in order to draw component parts, may reduce the
requires breaking down a vague in their explanation of up reductionist explanations, it is validity of explanations
phenomenon to its simplest human behaviour more important to create E For example, explanations that
factors. Viewing complex mental E For example, humanistic operationalised variables, which operate on a gene,
illnesses such as OCD at their psychology, which takes a holistic break target behaviours down neurotransmitter or neuron level
lowest levels – in terms of approach, tends to be criticised into component parts. This makes do not include analysis of the
neurotransmitter imbalances has for its lack of empirical evidence it possible to conduct social context within which
allowed psychologists to create in support for ‘broader’ concepts experiments or record behaviour occurs
psychoactive drugs such as SSRIs, such as self-actualisation. This is a observations in a way that is valid E Thus, whilst depression has been
which can help to treat the illness problem as while psychology is and reliable strongly linked to lower levels of
E Furthermore, researchers such as trying to become scientific, non- E For example, the behaviourist serotonin, to see it as only a
Soomoro have shown that SSRIs scientific branches such as approach was able to show how neurotransmitter issue will ignore
work in around 70% of OCD humanistic psychology may be complex learning can often be factors such as major life events
patients that take it holding the field back in achieving broken down to simple stimulus- that may also contribute to its
L This further adds validity to its scientific aspirations response links which could be onset
taking a reductionist approach to E Furthermore, higher level measured empirically and L This means that reductionist
explaining behaviour as it explanations pose problems for scientifically explanations can only ever form a
illustrates that the applications researchers. If we accept that L Therefore, such practices allow part of the explanation and may
drawn from the reductionist there are many factors that for the develop of specific cause be considered incomplete in their
theories are successful contribute to a disorder such as and effect relationships and also explanation of complex human
depression, it becomes difficult to facilitate better replication, behaviour
measure them in a controlled allowing for greater reliability,
environment and come up with giving psychology greater
specific treatments to target any scientific credibility
inadequacies
L Such problems may harm the
validity of the holistic approach

NOTE: Only select the relevant AO1s (e.g. 2/3 points) and four evaluation points (AO2/AO3)

You might also like