You are on page 1of 10

Case study

The first step


Comparative study
• Site
• Design on the basis of site context
• Organization of spaces
• Visual effects
• Comparison with standards
• Comments
Site
Dayananda sagar school of
architecture R.V. college of architecture
• Sloped site- situated on a • Sloped site- site inclined in
hillock two directions
• Site cut and filled to a • Designed with context to
leveled surface the site’s slope
Design on the basis of site context
Dayananda sagar school of
architecture R.V. college of architecture
• No separate block for architecture • A dedicated block for architecture in a campus of
• Housed in a floor of a block meant to serve an engineering college
an engineering department • To screen activities of school from engineering-
blank walls
• Building here hasn’t been designed with • Slope incorporated in design
context to the site which is actually a sloped • Built to human scale
site
Organization of spaces
Dayananda sagar school of
architecture R.V. college of architecture
• Learning spaces branch out from • Studio spaces separated from
the corridor lecture rooms to promote physical
• Learning spaces activity
o Studio cum lecture halls, 5 nos., • Learning spaces
meant for 40 students o 9 studios with a capacity of 40
students
o 1 seminar hall that doubles as a o 6 lecture halls with A/V facilities
crit room
o 1 seminar hall with 120 seating
o A 40 unit computer lab capacity
• Interactive spaces o 60 unit computer lab
o Nothing specific- the built • Interactive spaces
environment does not promote o Landscaped courtyards
interaction o 200 seater- Open air theatre
• Two faculty rooms – equipped • Faculty rooms – individual and
with PCs common rooms
Lighting & ventilation
Dayananda sagar school of
architecture R.V. college of architecture
• Doubly loaded corridor dimly • doubly loaded corridor-well lit and
ventilated
lit and poorly ventilated by • Studios- well lit and ventilated by
natural means inducing the natural means - vertical windows at
necessity for artificial lighting two levels, studio ht-15’
• Well lit studios/classrooms of • Classrooms- artificial lighting
required on gloomy days, room
height 12’ with strip windows ht-11’
Comparison with standards
Standards R.V. college of architecture
• Studios- space required/ A0 drawing • Fixed tables A0 size
table-3.5sq.m • Area of studio- 155 sq.m approx.-3.8sq.
• Adjustable drawing table preferred m per head-more than sufficient
• Classrooms- 1.2 sq.m per head • Spacing between tables-edge to edge 4’
• Classrooms-1.56 sq.m per head
Design concept
• Located in an engineering campus-
privacy desired-Blank outer walls
• Friendly and welcoming to
students-
o human scale
o Several small courtyards
instead of a single large one
• Main corridor-spine of the college
• Site inclined in two directions-
levels of site used in design
• Classrooms and studios spaced
out to increase student’s physical
activity and relax their minds
• Built form encourages interaction
between students
Corridors
• Main hub of the college
• Serves as an interaction
space
• Display and notification
space
• Branches out the learning
spaces
• Runs at three different
levels across the entire
school
• Height of the corridor
ranges from 10’-15’ since
it varies from place to
place due to levels in the
site - 6’ wide
• Well lit and ventilated by
courtyards
Dayananda Sagar
School of
Architecture
• Location: Kumarasamy layout,
south Bangalore
• Area: 28 acres(DSI)
• School of architecture: housed in
a floor of a building meant to
cater to the needs of engineering
• A linear corridor with learning
spaces and faculty rooms on
either sides

You might also like