Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Miguel Oliveira
Starting Questions
1/10
Research developed until now
2/10
Question 1 - How should industrial areas evolve on
the future plan of Riga?
Article: Evaluation of Recent industrial Land Use Studies: Do Theory and
History make better practice? Dempwolf (2010) - Studied several Industrial Land Uses Plan
(SFO, Chicago, Seattle etc) - Acess here
Main findings:
• Mixed use is becoming a staple in planning practice
• It´s imperative to protect prime industrial land from residential and
mixed use development. Why?
Main findings:
• Overall, the recommendations were centered on either broad policy
changes or targeted area strategies;
• Some studies recommended significant changes to industrial zoning
classifications, introducing restrictions on the use of industrial land
for non-industrial uses. These changes were designed to provide
greater protection to core industrial areas;
• Several studies also recommended rezoning certain parcels out of
industrial where it was clear that they were better suited for mixed
use;
• The alignment of infrastructure with industrial land was also a
common recommendation and this frequently shows up in targeted
area strategies.
4/10
Question 1 - How should industrial areas evolve on
the future plan of Riga?
Main Findings:
Targeted area strategies were also frequently recommended in the
studies, and the range of solutions was much greater than that of the
policy recommendations. The solutions fell into four broad categories:
5/10
Question 2 - How can we justify the importance of
maintaining/expanding industrial areas to developers who want to
change the use (to office, mixed use, residential), or the general
population who wants to use (or pass) these areas?
• What is the strategy for Riga industrial areas in the future? Can we
estabilish a long term and coherent strategy without evaluating the
current situation and it´s evolution?
• Should Riga have an industrial land use development plan?
6/10
Question 2 - How can we justify the importance of
maintaning/expanding industrial areas to developers who want
to change the use (to office, mixed use, residential), or the general
population who wants to use (or pass) these areas?
7/10
Question 3 - How other cities are dealing with the
evolution of industrial areas on their master plans?
Interview with city staff of eight cities with similiar dimension (Portland, Vancouver,
San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Minneapolis, Boston, Philadelphia.)
Five questions:
1. What are the long-term employment trends in the industrial sector?
2. What are the vacancy rates for industrial properties?
3. What pressures are owners of industrial properties facing to convert to non-
industrial uses; what are water-dependent industries in particular facing?
4. What policies have been put into place to encourage emerging industries?
5. What tools (programs, projects, regulatory mechanisms) have been
developed to retain existing industrial landowners and attract new
industrial users?
8/10
Question 3 - How other cities are dealing with the
evolution of industrial areas on their master plans?
Main Findings:
• Cities are experiencing pressures to convert industrial lands to other uses.
Most note an historical trend of a loss of industrial lands and a relatively
recent acknowledgement of their value and an attempt to reverse or at
least slow the rate of conversion;
• Speculation on land use conversion in industrial areas is putting pressure
on land prices, making it difficult for manufacturing businesses to stay in
businesses and new manufacturing businesses to locate. Sometimes
pressure is also coming from institutional uses (such as schools) ;
• Most of the cities either have some type of strategy in place for
addressing conversion and conversion pressure or are in the process of
developing a strategy. Current and planned strategies include both
regulatory and non-regulatory means;
• Most of the cities utilize special overlay or neighborhood districts with
specific regulatory approaches.
9/10
Question 3 - How other cities are dealing with the
evolution of industrial areas on their master plans?
Main Findings:
Non-regulatory or incentive based measures include a wide range of
strategies that fit into several general categories:
• a. Identification of industrial land areas where preservation efforts should
be focused;
• b. Development of tax incentives or loans for existing or new industrial
businesses;
• c. Coordination with other agencies and/or industrial councils and non-
profits to create more comprehensive strategies;
• d. Public investment in infrastructure, brownfield development, workforce
training;
• e. Development of comprehensive land use strategies aimed at retaining
industrial lands for manufacturing by allowing more flexibility in the zoning
regulations;
• f. Ongoing data gathering programs to tract trends and progress of
strategies.
10/10
Bibliography
Articles:
• Evaluation of Recent industrial Land Use Studies: Do Theory and History
make better practice? Dempwolf (2010) - Studied several Industrial Land
Uses Plan - Acess here
Websites:
• Several Industrial land studies from cities and regions throughout the United
States and Canada - Acess here