Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategic aspects (corporate strategies regarding possible future extension, supply and
marketing policies)
Cost of land
Site preparations and development, requirements and costs
√ The cost of land tends to differ from one site to another in the same broad location. Sites
close to a city cost more whereas sites away from the city cost less.
4.3.2. Environment Impact Assessment (EIA)
Environmental impact assessment is part of the project planning process. Practically it is an
integral part of feasibility analysis. Environmental benefits or costs of a project are usually
externalities or side effects that affect the society wholly or partially. In a broader socio –
economic evaluation of the feasibility of a project, environmental effects on the quality of life are
considered along with other factors to determine if the overall effect of the project is positive, or
to determine what modifications may be necessary to achieve a positive evaluation.
In principle, environmental impacts should be assessed on the basis of legal regulations and
emission standards and guidelines established in the country where the project is located.
Whereas, in countries, where no or only vague regulations and standards are defined, it may be
advisable to anticipate a future serious environmental control measures, especially in the case of
long – term projects.
Generally, externalities or side effects may bound to create environmental conflicts that might
ultimately lead to compensation claims, substantial costs for purification and equipment, and
possibly to the extent of the closure of the plant.
The general objective of environmental impact assessment in project analysis is to ensure
whether the development projects are environmentally sound. This implies that the effects of the
project over its estimated life do not unacceptably degrade the environment, and that no residual
effects are anticipated that would contribute to long – term environmental deterioration. It is
well known that the immediate and long – term health and welfare of people are linked to their
natural, cultural and socio – economic environment. Because of this reason, and to promote the
objective of incorporating the ideas and aspirations of the affected population in the decision
process, right from the earliest stages and throughout the project development cycle, public
participation is desirable.
The specific objectives of environmental impact assessment are as follows:
√ To promote a comprehensive, interdisciplinary investigation of environmental consequences
of the project and its alternatives for the affected natural and cultural human habitat.
√ To develop an understanding of the scope and magnitude of incremental environmental
impacts (with and without the project) of the proposed project for each of the alternative
project designs.
√ To incorporate in the designs any existing regulatory requirements.
√ To identify measures for mitigation of adverse environmental impacts and for possible
enhancement of beneficial impacts.
√ To identify critical environmental problems requiring further investigation.
Equipment X X X X X
Vehicles X X X X X
Working Capital X X X X X
Other costs X X X X X
Total XX XX XX XX XX XX
4.7.2. Production Cost/ Operating costs
Operating costs can be divided into two:
1. Fixed costs- fixed costs will include maintenance, administration and managerial charges,
etc. which will be relatively fixed with respect to the volume of production.
2. Variable costs - Variable working capital includes items such as materials, power, labor
inputs required for manufacture which will vary directly with the volume of production.
o The total operating costs will then be the sum of the fixed and variable costs and will
increase over the operating years until full utilization of the investment asset is reached.
Table 2. Project Operating Costs Schedule
Years
No Items 1 2 3 4 5 N
Capacity Utilization Rate (%) 50% 75% 80% 85% 90% 100%
1 Raw material
2 Labor
3 Utilities
4 Repair
5 Maintenance and Repair
6 Factory Overhead
Factory Costs (1-6) (a) XX XX XX XX XX
7 Administrative costs
8 Sales costs
9 Distribution cost
Operating Costs (7-9) (b) XX XX XX XX XX
10 Depreciation (c)
11 Interest expenses (d)
Total production
Cost (a + b + c + d) (Bold) XX XX XX XX XX
3. Select an appropriate rate and a period to be considered for such evaluation to find the
present value of the future cash flows for the period by discounting by the selected rate
4. Find out the difference between the present value of cash inflows (net) and the investment
cost (present value of investments over the life of the project).This difference represents
NPV. Where:
This calculation can be represented algebraically as: CF = Cash inflows at different periods
CF t
∑ (1+r )t −C0 r = discounting rate
NPV =
C0 = cash outflow in the beginning
The decision rule here is to accept a project if the NPV is positive and reject it if it is negative. A
project that NPV approaching zero is a marginal project, the planner has to re-modify, otherwise it
will be very risk to take such projects.
If… It means… Then…
NPV>0 The investment would add value to the The project may be accepted
firm
NPV<0 The investment would subtract value from The project should be rejected
the firm
NPV=0 The investment would neither gain nor We should be indifferent in the decision whether
lose value to accept or reject the project. This project adds
for the firm no monetary value. Decision should be based on
other criteria (e.g, strategic positioning or other
factors not explicitly included in the calculation).
Table. Net Present Value
4.7.5.4. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
4.7.5.5. Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)
Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) is used for determining the attractiveness of a proposed
investment in terms of the welfare of society as a whole.
By presenting social benefits and costs in a monetary format, CBA not only facilitates choices
between alternative investment options but also gives an idea of the project worth. The
technique is principally used with regard to public sector investments.
CBA differs from financial appraisal which views an investment solely from the perspective
of individual participants, focusing on private benefits and costs and using market prices. In
contrast, CBA adopts a much broader approach, considering both monetary and non-monetary
benefits and costs, and uses prices that more accurately reflect economic, environmental and
social values.
This is a measure of efficiency and used for comparison of different projects. It is given by the
formula:
BCA = Benefits
Cost of the project
===============================//====================================