MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: Voting Systems and the Condorcet Paradox

1. Three things that I significantly learned from the video clip:

Who do you decide as the victor of the Oscars? In the video it was said that an end was

utilized to figure out who won the Academy Awards. It was amusing to really discover that a

detail was used in application. The Instant Runoff Method was utilized to decide said victor for

the esteemed honor for arts the in film industry. In spite of the fact that we could state that all

these talked about casting a voting system would in every case frequently dismiss models, it was

consistently a "liked" and a "larger part vote" that truly couldn't incorporate "all" cast a ballot.

The Conundrum would consistently involve some place in the lines of really getting the votes

reasonable and square by getting individual votes and inclinations yet never the aggregate

inclinations. Maybe, in here we could incorporate consistent false notions that some way or

another bodes well however after looking into it further don't. Casting of voting systems have

been worked since a network was made. Somebody needed to lead it however we need either a

consolation that the pioneer is whom we like or the pioneer that stages something which the

larger part would pick up something from. That is the reason something "reasonable and square"

could have escape clauses. In the event that we favor the principal rank up-and-comer, what

befalls the certified however not liked?

2. Three things that are still unclear to me

It is still unclear to me how seemingly easy the field of Mathematics could

include something as confounded as a political framework and the individuals who lead

it. It is vague to me when and where do we apply the more remarkable ones instead of the

Plurality and the Majority votes. It is additionally indistinct to me why these casting a

voting system doesn’t consider the right to abstain a vote. It appears as though all votes
 ought to be equivalent to the number of inhabitants in the voters no more, no less. What

occurs if nobody wins in a voting system?

3. I used to think that

The voting system wasn't as confusing as it may seem. It possibly ends up

complex when an association discharges results that don't coordinate courses of events

and in which the checking system works slower than expected. One can't resist the urge

to feel that an extremely brief math and number would have a glitch because of

individual reasons or perhaps a superior method to state this is a result of intensity

reasons. There are at any rate 4 kinds of casting a ballot frameworks talked about in the

video yet every one of them can't include what is truly happening when we stray from the

tallying framework and truly investigate what's going on under the table to construct this

purported "inclination list".

4. Three questions that I want to ask about the video

I would like to ask the following question where I am unclear with. How do we

get this “preferred list”? Do we set up standards to arrive in the so-called ranking and

determine who has the greatest number of first ranked votes? What happens to the

qualified but not preferred? Lastly, what happens if no one wins an election?