Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 1 of 5
Communication is also a problem、 but he
academically behind.
doesn't have an ILP.
Colleagues (Summarize how two colleagues have addressed this issue in their classroom. Identify grade level, subject, and summary of ideas.)
My colleague, Camillia who is a kindergarten teacher said, when she
Matthew teaches English in high school and he said learning in group
groups her students, she finds that it is really helpful to group students
settings is a pedagogical focus that he has changed his mind about a lot
with different strengths together. For example, for a project that asks
in terms of how he may best implement that focus in his classroom for
students to read, write, draw, and present, she will choose one student
maximum growth.
with high reading skills, one with high writing skills, one with strong fine
He hopes to learn from my inquiry process how I determined the best
motor/creativity, and one who is comfortable speaking together in one
way to group students (e.g., heterogeneous vs. homogeneous
group. This way, students can use everyone's talents and the whole group
groupings depending on the lesson framework) and which strategies I
benefits. In addition, the students don't feel pressured to perform in an
found helpful for keeping all students in a group working cooperatively.
area where they feel less confident.
Special Emphasis: Instructional Strategy, ISTE Standards, NBPTS Core Propositions
Special Emphasis Focus How Special Emphasis will be Incorporated
Special Emphasis (Skills, Themes, ISTE Standards·Teachers, NBPTS Core Propositions (if applicable)
Results of Incorporation into Lesson Key Learnings and New Skills/Knowledge Developed by Teacher
Action Items
For curriculum design, lesson With COVID-19, all schools in Korea were closed, and the international school I was teaching was no exception. So my
planning, assessment school has been studying virtually for 8 weeks now. Virtual learning uses the Seesaw platform, and the lesson plan is
planning also suitable for virtual learning, which can be completed by second-grade students, which is short.
For classroom practice Since all the schools are closed, both me and the students are virtual learning at home.
This virtual learning provided the instructions through text, audio, and video, and if they don't understand it
For teaching English learners, correctly, they can reread it, listen to it, or watch it again, and they can use the time at their own pace, so
students with special needs,
and students with other
their participation rate increased to 100%, and their academic achievement was also much higher because
instructional challenges parents who can speak their native language could help them.
For future professional When we go back to the traditional classroom, I will try harder to grasp the students' strengths and assess them as well
development as differentiated instructions like one-on-one.
When we go back to the traditional classroom after the end of COVID-19, I will think about ways to make
For future inquiry/ILP
more use of differentiated instructions using technology to achieve the learning goals of EL students and
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 3 of 5
students who need special needs for my future ILP.
Other
Other Notes
Because of COVID-19 it was difficult to write an ILP based on a traditional lesson plan. However, I think the advantages of virtual learning were also
an opportunity to learn. However, it was difficult to show pre-assessments and post-assessments as usual.
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 4 of 5
Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program
Individualized Learning Plan (ILP)
Revised 5.1.17
Directions: Record student pre and post scores in this table. Do not use student’s actual names.
New Teacher Email Subject Area Grade Level
Sue Park parksuey@csu.fullerton.edu Multiple Subjects 2
Pre-Assessment Data Range and Average Post-Assessment Data Range and Average
Participation rate for the three focus students was increased as
Participation rate for the three focus students was below average
the general students or higher
PRE-/POST- ASSESSMENT DATA TABLE
Student Pre-Assessment Score Post-Assessment Score Comments
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
910111213141516
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 5 of 5