Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/272789077
CITATIONS READS
3 113
6 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Article School-Based Nutrition Education Intervention Using Social Cognitive Theory for Overweight and Obese Iranian Adolescent Girls: A Cluster Randomized Controlled
Trial View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohammad Reza Sharbafchi on 25 February 2015.
1
Associate Professor, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2
Resident of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, School of Medicine And Student Re-
search Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3
Associate Professor, Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4
Clinical Psychologist, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
5
Researcher, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
.
BACKGROUND: There have been few studies to specifically examine the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
(SSRIs) for the symptoms of depression in schizophrenia. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of sertraline as a treatment for
depressive symptoms in patients with stable schizophrenia. METHODS: A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
clinical trial was designed in 2010 with an active medication (sertraline) and a matching placebo. Sertraline was administrated 50-
200 mg/daily. A total number of 60 patients were randomized into two groups in a 1:1 fashion. Calgary Depression Scale for Schi-
zophrenia (CDSS) was used as the primary measure and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale was used as the secondary
measure. The data was analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model to determine the effectiveness of sertra-
line. RSULTS: After 12 weeks, sertraline was significantly more effective than placebo in improving depressive symptoms in stable
schizophrenia (p = 0.003). The mean score of GAF did not differ significantly in the sample population as a whole (p = 0.093). The
difference between the two groups was not significant, either (p = 0.453). In addition, the rate of side effects was little but it was sig-
nificantly more in the sertraline group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested sertraline to be useful as a
treatment for depressive symptoms in patients with stable schizophrenia.
KEYWORDS: Sertraline; Schizophrenia; Post-Psychotic Depressive Disorder of Schizophrenia; Subsyndromal Depressive Symp-
toms; Negative Symptoms.
schizophrenic patients, especially during maintenance ment of depressive symptoms with this drug, we
therapy, are essential. Otherwise, the prognosis andthe aimed to compare the efficacy of sertraline with place‐
quality of life achieved through treatment will be quite bo in the treatment of depressive symptoms in schi‐
poor. zophrenic patients who are not in active phase with a
specific scale named Calgary Depression Scale for
A meta‐analysis has been performed on results of trials Schizophrenia (CDSS) which has been used seldom in
that have investigated the clinical efficacy of antide‐ previous studies [9]. CDSS was the first scale specifical‐
pressant medication (either tricyclics, SSRIs or others) ly designed and validated for the evaluation of depres‐
in the treatment of depression in schizophrenic pa‐ sive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia [24]; and
tients [9]. In this study in a subset of five trials (209 pa‐ has been shown not to overlap with negative symp‐
tients), the proportion improved in the antidepressant toms and extrapyramidal symptoms [24, 26].
group was higher than in the placebo group and there
was no evidence that antidepressant treatment induced METHODS
a deterioration of psychotic symptoms in these trials.
The use of newer antidepressants in combination with Subjects:
antipsychotics to treat the depressive symptoms of With confidence of 95 % and power of 80 % and also
schizophrenia is encouraged because of significantly estimation of clinical standard deviation of schizoph‐
more side effects in other antidepressants such as renia in both control and intervention groups which
TCAs [10, 11] and by positive results compared to placebo was 1.6 of CDSS changes range, study subjects were
in the studies of augmentation of antipsychotics. determined as 30 patients in both groups. Patients
were chosen from both admitted or outpatients, in the
Siris studies revealed that SSRIs were the most fre‐ psychiatric ward or clinic of Isfahan Noor Hospital
quently prescribed antidepressants, and the preferred respectively. All of them had a diagnosis of schizoph‐
combination was an atypical antipsychotic plus an renia. All subjects met the following inclusion criteria:
SSRI [12]. There are several published, trials examining 1) 16‐65 years aged; 2) receiving a stable dose of an
SSRIs in the treatment of depressive symptoms in pa‐ atypical antipsychotic medication; 3) to be clinically
tients with schizophrenia and have provided mixed stable; 4) diagnosed with post psychotic depressive
results. These trails include several double‐blind, pla‐ disorder of schizophrenia according to DSM‐IV‐TR
cebo‐controlled trials. In the trail with fluvoxamine [13], research criteria or clinically meaningful subsyndrom‐
the difference in mean HDRS scores between the two al depressive symptoms. Stability was defined as a
groups at the end of the study period was not signifi‐ period of at least one month when the patient main‐
cant. With fluoxetine, two of three studies demonstrat‐ tained a score of at least four or less on all positive
ed no benefit over placebo with regard to the treatment symptoms of the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale
of depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia (PANSS); This definition is based on that used by
[14, 15], but in third study, Compared with placebo, fluo‐ Schooler and colleagues [27], who used the Brief Psychia‐
xetine treatment led to a slight improvement in de‐ tric Rating Scale and patients who were stabilized on
pressive symptoms [16]. In two studies with citalopram, antipsychotic medication. The translation and back‐
no scales to assess depression were used [17, 18] but In a translation method was used to make the Persian trans‐
recent study citalopram was more effective than place‐ lation of PANSS valid. PANSS was translated by two
bo in relieving depression, negative symptoms, mental psychiatrists to Persian and then two other bilingual
functioning, and quality of life of older patient with psychiatrists translated the same text to first language.
schizophrenia [19]. In one of studies with sertraline Translated texts were evaluated by the translation team
treating patients with remitted schizophrenia and ma‐ for final decision. Subjects also met none of the follow‐
jor depression showed no benefit [20]; but in another, ing exclusion criteria: 1) any serious medical condition
Sertraline‐treated patients showed a significant im‐ that would interfere with safe study participation; 2)
provement on the anxiety/depression subscale of the any substance abuse or dependency except nicotine; 3)
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) [21]. pregnancy or nursing in women; 4) using any of psy‐
chotropic drugs except atypical antipsychotics.
Sertraline is an antidepressant drug that has proved to
be effective in the treatment of depression, with fewer Design and Procedures:
side‐effects than tricyclics [22], protecting against the The study used a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐
recurrence and relapse of depression, and carrying a controlled clinical trial design with an active medica‐
very low risk of exacerbating psychotic symptoms [23]. tion condition and a matching placebo, which was
Considering lack of studies and mixed results of treat‐ done on year 2010. The study followed the Declaration
S2 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences | March 2012 Special Issue (1) |
Omranifard, et al.: Sertraline addition for depressive symptoms in stable schizophrenia
of Helsinki on Biomedical Research Involving Human into the study. Thirty of participants randomized to the
Subjects and was approved by the Ethics Committee sertraline condition, compared to thirty of participants
from the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. All randomized to placebo. Three patients were eliminated
participants provided written informed consent. At the from placebo group; one didnʹt answer the phone,
screening visit, after providing demographic data, eli‐ oneʹs family refused to continue the treatment and one
gible subjects were randomly assigned to sertraline or because of poor compliance. And three patients were
placebo (1:1). Those assigned to sertraline started at 50 eliminated from sertraline group; one for taking a trip
mg/day and the dose was raised to 100 mg/day after and two because of drug side effects which were seda‐
four weeks, and 200 mg/day after eight weeks if partial tion and GI disturbances (Figure 1). The age range of
response was not seen. subjects was 20‐56 years with mean ± of 34.1 ± 8.5. The
demographic and clinical features of the sample are
Efficacy and Safety assessments: reported in (Table 1). There were no statistically signif‐
The subjects were assessed at the screening visit, icant imbalances on demographics or symptom severi‐
weeks eight and twelve by the CDSS and Global As‐ ty between treatment groups at baseline. The only sig‐
sessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale. In each visit sub‐ nificant difference was that subjects assigned to place‐
jects were assessed for followings: 1) urine pregnancy bo were more likely to have more prolonged illness
test for women, 2) drug side effects. The translation (P = .004) (Table 1).
and back‐translation method was used to make the
Persian translation of CDSS valid. CDSS was trans‐ The difference between mean scores of CDSS at base‐
lated by two psychiatrists to Persian and then two oth‐ line and after eight and twelve weeks of intervention
er bilingual psychiatrists translated the same text to was significant in the sample as a whole (both placebo
first language. Translated texts were evaluated by the and sertraline group) (P < 0.001) (Table 2); but subjects
translation team for final decision. assigned to active medication demonstrated a signifi‐
cantly greater percentage decline compared to placebo
Statistical methods: (P = .003) (Figure 2, Table 2). Although the randomiza‐
The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical tion was generally effective, an analysis of covariance
package version 18.0. Descriptive statistics were used was conducted for duration of illness.
to determine demographic characteristics from the
sample. The difference between intervention groups The difference between mean scores of GAF at baseline
and follow‐up time (time effect) were determined us‐ and after eight and twelve weeks of intervention was
ing ANOVA repeated measure test. P‐value less than not significant in the sample as a whole (both placebo
0.05 showed a significant. and sertraline group) (P = .093) (Table 2); and there
were no significant differences between the treatment
This study was done on year 2010 and registered in groups (P = .453) (Figure 3, Table 2).
IRCT with identifier IRCT201110187839N1.
Rates of side effects were significantly different be‐
Results tween groups with no side effect in placebo group and
20.7 % in sertraline group (P < 0.001). The most com‐
A total of 101 individuals screened and 60 met all in‐ mon side effects were GI disturbances (n = 3) and seda‐
clusion and no exclusion criteria which randomized tion (n = 2).
Screened
(N = 101)
Randomized to Sertraline or
Placebo
(N = 60)
Figure 1: Study design flow chart
| March 2012 Special Issue (1) | Journal of Research in Medical Sciences S3
Omranifard, et al.: Sertraline addition for depressive symptoms in stable schizophrenia
Table 1: Demographics and clinical characteristics of subjects (n = 54)
Table 3: Frequency and Mean (SD) score of Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and Global Assess-
ment of Functioning (GAF) in weeks zero, eight and twelve
SCALE Intervention Control P-value
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
CDSS
Before intervention 12.2 (3.4) 11.2 (2.4) .216
After 8weeks 10.6 (2.7) 11.6 (2.5) .163
After 12weeks 9.2 (2.7) 11.8 (2.6) .001
GAF
Before intervention 5.6 (1.7) 6.2 (1.6) .164
After 8weeks 6 (1.5) 6.3 (1.5) .520
After 12weeks 6.1 (1.4) 6.1 (1.4) 1
| March 2012 Special Issue (1) | Journal of Research in Medical Sciences S5
Omranifard, et al.: Sertraline addition for depressive symptoms in stable schizophrenia
DISCUSSION ly effective but subjects assigned to placebo were more
likely to have more prolonged illness (P = .004), so an
Studies of depressive symptoms in schizophrenia have analysis of covariance was conducted for duration of
used a variety of measures, and non specific scales illness.
(such as Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or Beck
Depression Inventory) are the most commonly used in Also the difference between mean scores of GAF was
spite of the fact that these scales do not allow the dis‐ not significant in two arms of study but after 8 weeks
tinction of depressive from negative symptoms in schi‐ the improvement was better in sertraline group and
zophrenic patients (Micallef et al., 2006) [9]; studies on this was clinically obvious. This improvement in pa‐
fluvoxamine (Silver et al., 1992) [13], fluoxetine (Bucha‐ tients with chronic schizophrenia is a matter of concern
nan et al., 1996; Goff et al., 1995) [14, 15] and sertraline and is consistent with improvement in depressive
(Mulholland et al., 2003) [21] which used these non spe‐ symptoms. A double‐blind study with citalopram
cific scales had mixed results. We used Calgary De‐ (Kasckow et al., 2010) [28] also showed higher mental
pression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) which was the functioning and quality of life scale (QOLS) scores
first scale specifically designed and validated for the compared to the placebo group. These results suggest
evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with that improvement in depressive symptoms in patients
schizophrenia (Addington et al., 1993) [24]; this scale has with stable schizophrenia may cause improvement in
been shown not to overlap with negative symptoms their general function and quality of life which is very
and extrapyramidal symptoms (Addington et al., 1994; important in prognosis of chronic cases.
Collins et al., 1996) [25, 26]. Results of this twelve week,
double‐blind study suggest that sertraline is more ef‐ Also the rate of side effects was little but it was signifi‐
fective than placebo in improving depressive symp‐ cantly more in sertraline group and in two subjects
toms. Also the difference between mean scores of resulted in missing the patient. This is noteworthy,
CDSS at baseline and after eight and twelve weeks of because poor compliance is a matter of concern in pa‐
intervention was significant in both placebo and sertra‐ tients with chronic diseases like schizophrenia.
line groups but repeated measures of ANOVA re‐
vealed a significant main effect for group, time, and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
interaction of group and time which revealed that sub‐ We would like to express thanks for Behavioral
jects assigned to active medication had a significantly Sciences Research Center of Isfahan University of Med‐
greater percentage decline compared to placebo. This is ical Sciences. This study is posted on www.irct.ir with
not consistent with a double‐blind study with sertra‐ identifier IRCT201110187839N1. This paper is derived
line which also used CDSS as a rating scale (Addington from a specialty thesis in Isfahan University of Medical
et al., 2002) [20]; it could be due to lack of dose and dura‐ Sciences.
tion of treatment in that study (maximum 100 mg and
six weeks respectively) (Addington et al., 2002) [20]. We REFERENCES
used sertraline up to 200 mg and twelve weeks which
is according to references mention on raising and con‐ 1. Siris SG. Depression in schizophrenia: perspective in the era of
tinuing of SSRIs up to maximum dose and twelve “atypical” antipsychotic agents. Am J Psychiatry
2000;157:1379-89.
weeks, respectively, for treatment of depression [22]. In 2. Koreen AR, Siris SG, Chakos M, Alvir J, Mayerhoff D, Lie-
our study two arms of study didnʹt differ significantly berman J. Depression in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psy-
before twelfth week but after that, sertraline was sig‐ chiatry 1993;150:1643-8.
3. Kasckow J, Zisook S. Co-occurring depressive symptoms in the
nificantly more effective than placebo. Another recent older patients with schizophrenia. Drugs Aging 2008;25:631-47.
study which used CDSS concluded that augmentation 4. Bartels SJ, Drake RE. Depressive symptoms in schizophrenia:
with citalopram was significantly more effective than comprehensive differential diagnosis. Compr Psychiatry
1988;29:467-83.
placebo in improvement of depressive symptoms in
5. Birchwood M, Mason R, MacMillan F, Healy J. Depression,
older patients with schizophrenia (Zisook et al., 2009) demoralization and control over psychotic illness: a comparison
[19]. Results of our study with using this specific scale of depressed and non-depressed patients with a chronic psycho-
which does not overlap with negative symptoms and sis. Psychol Med 1993;23:387-95.
6. Roy A, Thompson R, Kennedy S. Depression in chronic schi-
extrapyramidal symptoms is suggestive of efficacy of zophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1983;142:465-70.
sertraline for treatment of depressive symptoms in sta‐ 7. McGlashan TH, Carpenter WT Jr. Postpsychotic depression in
ble schizophrenia. schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33: 231-9.
8. Tollefson GD, Andersen SW. Should we consider mood distur-
bance in schizophrenia as an important determinant of quality
In this study, although the randomization was general of life? J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60 Suppl 5:23-9.