Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
C&Q guidance
2. ISPE Guide: Science and risk-Based Approach for the Delivery of Facility, System and
Equipment
Issue in mid 2011 and focused on how to deliver a project following ASTM
E2500, Quality Risk Management (QRM/ICHQ9) Based Verification (C&Q)
process.
3. ISPE Good Practice Guide: Applied Risk Management for Commissioning and
Qualification
Issued in 2011 – provide guidance on how to apply transitional approached to
incorporate QRN when moving from baseline guide to risk base approach
5
Overview
6
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1-Jan-90
31-Dec-16
Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16
1-Jan-05 31-Dec-16
©2018
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1-Jan-90
Nov 2000 31-Dec-16
ICH - Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice
Apr 90
Jan 2011 Mar 2015
Birth of ICH
FDA - Process Validation: EU - Annex 15:
General Principles and Practices Qualification and Validation
Sep 14
ICH - Q12 Lifecycle Management
Nov 05
ICH - Q9 Quality Risk Management
Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16
1-Jan-05 31-Dec-16
Jan 11
Jan 2007 Jan 2008
ISPE - Applied risk management for Today
ASTM E2500 ASTM E2537 Commissioning and Qualification
© No deviation Pte. Ltd. - 19 July 2016
9
ICH Q8 – From a CQV perspective
©2018
©2018
1
2
What is Quality by Design?
Quality is a
devotion
Accountability
Quality is a
Guidance
©2018
14
OVERVIEW OF THE LIFE CYCLE
Quality by Design
ICH Q8:
Quality by Design (QbD): A systematic approach to development that begins
with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process
understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk
management
Quality by Design
ICH Q8:
Quality by Design (QbD): A systematic approach to development that begins
with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process
understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk
management
Lean Thinking:
Poka-yoke is a Japanese term that means "mistake-proofing" or "inadvertent
error prevention".
A poka-yoke is any mechanism in a lean manufacturing process that helps
an equipment operator avoid (yokeru) mistakes (poka). Its purpose is to
eliminate product defects by preventing, correcting, or drawing attention to
human errors as they occur.
The concept was formalised, and the term adopted, by Shigeo Shingo as part of the Toyota Production
System.[3][4] It was originally described as baka-yoke, but as this means "fool-proofing" (or "idiot-
proofing") the name was changed to the milder poka-yoke.
QUALITY
18
Quality by Design not by Luck
19
ICH Q8 – From a CQV perspective
Input from
Product
development
(Science)
Scope of the
project CQV
(Engineer)
©2018
Pizza Crust
Temperature
Heat Up
Bottom Heat
Kitchen
Oven
Recipe + Cooking instruction
Brioche Raising
Temperature
Bake
Top + Bottom
Kitchen Heat
Oven Homogenous
Recipe + Cooking instruction
1. Qualification and validation is an area of GMP where there are opportunities for more
international harmonization.
2. There is a general agreement on the high-level purpose of validation
3. GMP expectation:
1. There is a systematic approach to generate evidence that a facility, system, process, equipment or activity can
consistently preform according to pre-determined requirements.
2. Those that manufacture, test, store, transport and distribute pharmaceutical products need to have q
qualification and validation program
3. The program need to be formally defined, documented, approved, implemented and preriodically reviewed.
1. Systems that are determined to have direct product impact are identified in the Validation Master Plan
(VMP) or equivalent document as requiring IQ.
2. IQ verifies that equipment as installed meets the established critical installation requirements.
3. IQ is verification of installation activities, and not the act of installation.
4. Only those critical components of equipment/systems determined to directly impact product quality
through a component-level risk or impact assessment are included in the IQ protocol. Engineering
details which do not directly impact product quality or patient safety may be documented in
Commissioning and need not be repeated in IQ.
1. OQ tests demonstrate that the system meets all product/process critical operating requirements. This
includes:
1. Control
2. Monitoring
3. Recording
4. Alarming
2. OQ should be compliance-based and only include system tests which have a potential direct impact on
product quality
3. OQ should include both equipment and automation qualification testing. intent of OQ is to operationally
qualify a unit as an integrated system.
4. OQ is not process specific, but provides documented verification that the equipment/module/system
operates within its intended design parameters and anticipated operational ranges
5. The goal during OQ testing is zero test failures and zero critical exceptions
6. Qualification is typically performed on-site under anticipated operating conditions
Lean model
V Model
No deviation Pte Ltd 2 Venture Dive #3-27 Vision Exchange Singapore 608526 +65 6592 4573 admin@nodeviation.com www.nodeviation.com ©2018
THE MANUFACTURING
NEEDS
ICH Q10 – Pharmaceutical Quality System - Objectives
©2018
3
5
FDA - Guidance for Industry Process Validation:
General Principles and Practices
Process Validation:
Stage 1 – Process Design
Stage 2 – Process Qualification (PQ) - This stage has two elements
2.a Design of the facility and qualification of the equipment and utilities
2.b Process performance qualification (PPQ)
Satge 3 – Continued Process Verification
Section 3 Page 4
QUALIFICATION STAGES FOR EQUIPMENT, FACILITIES, UTILITIES AND SYSTEMS:
Define URS / DQ / FAT / SAT / IQ / OQ / PQ
Installation qualification (IQ)
3.8. IQ should be performed on equipment, facilities, utilities, or systems.
3.9. IQ should include, but is not limited to the following:
i. Verification of the correct installation of components, instrumentation, equipment, pipe work and
services against the engineering drawings and specifications;
ii. Verification of the correct installation against pre-defined criteria;
iii. Collection and collation of supplier operating and working instructions and maintenance
requirements;
iv. Calibration of instrumentation;
v. Verification of the materials of construction.
2.3.1 The premises, the supporting utilities, the equipment and the processes have been designed in
accordance with the requirements of GMP. This normally constitutes Design Qualification or DQ.
2.3.2 The premises, supporting utilities and the equipment have been built and installed in compliance with
their design specifications. This constitutes Installation Qualification or IQ.
2.3.3 The premises, supporting utilities and the equipment operate in accordance with their design
specifications. This constitutes Operational Qualification or OQ.
2.3.4 A specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and
quality attributes. This constitutes Process Validation or PV. The term Performance Qualification or
PQ may be used also.
5.2.1 Installation Qualification is an essential step preceding the Process Validation exercise. It is normally
executed by the Engineering group.
5.3.1. The installation of equipment singularly or as a group (plant) should follow well defined plans.
5.4.1 Operational Qualification is an exercise oriented to the engineering function, generally referred to as
commissioning.
5.4.3 It is expected that during the Operational Qualification stage the manufacturer should develop
draft standard operating procedures (SOPs)
5.5.1 The conduct of an Operational Qualification should follow an authorised protocol. The critical
operating parameters for the equipment or the plant should be identified at the Operational Qualification
stage.