98. Which of the following statements is incorrect?

I. Contracts without cause or with unlawful cause produce no effect whatever and are
considered null and void.
II. Contracts without motive or with unlawful motive produce no effect whatever and are
considered null and void.
a. I only
b. Il only
c. Both I and Il
d. Neither I nor Il

99. Which of the following statements is incorrect?

a. a, The statement of a false cause in contracts shall render them void, if it should not be
proved that they were founded upon another cause which is true and lawful.
b. Although the cause is not stated in the contract, it is presumed that it exists and is lawful,
unless the debtor proves the contrary.
c. As a general rule, lesion or inadequacy of cause shall invalidate a contract.
d. The particular motives of the parties in entering into a contract are different from the cause
thereof.

100. When, three having been a meeting of minds of the parties to the contract, their true
intention is not expressed in the instrument purporting to embody the agreement, by
reason of mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct or accident, what is the remedy of one of the
parties?
a. Ask for annulment of the contract because the consent is vitiated.
b. Ask for reformation of the instrument to the end that such true intention may be
expressed. c. Ask for rescission of the contract.
d. Ask for indemnification for damages.

101. If mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct or accident has prevented a meeting of the minds of
the parties, what is the proper remedy?

a. Ask for reformation of the instrument.

b. Ask for annulment of the contract.
c. Ask for rescission of the contract.
d. Ask for indemnification for damages,

102. The following are the instances wherein reformation of the instrument is the proper
remedy, except
a. When a mutual mistake of the parties results to the failure of the instrument to disclose
their real agreement.
b. If one party was mistaken and the other acted fraudulently or inequitably in such a way that
the instrument does not show their true intention.
c. When one party was mistaken and the other knew or believed that the instrument did not
state their real agreement but concealed that fact from the former.
d. When through the ignorance, lack of skill, negligence or bad faith on the part of the person
drafting the instrument or of the clerk or typist, the instrument does not express the true
intention of the parties.
e. If two parties agree upon the mortgage or pledge of real or personal property, but the
instrument states that the property is sold absolutely or with a right of repurchase.
f. When one of the parties was induced to enter into a contract through fraud, undue
influence, mistake, intimidation or violence.

103. There shall be no reformation of instrument in the following eases, except

a. Simple donation inter vivos wherein no condition is imposed or unconditional
simple donation b. Wills whether holographic or notarial

c. When the real agreement is void

Deed of pacto de retro sale