Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethical
Explanations
Considerations
Questions and Themes from literature
Why has sexual violence been dealt with separately
from other types of war violence? Should it be?
Why/Why not?
How are peacetime gender relations reflected in
wartime sexual violence
What explanations for are given in the literature for
the prevalence of sexual violence across different
conflict settings?
What are the ethical considerations and material
obstacles in researching conflict related sexual
violence?
What is Conflict Related Sexual Violence?
Vulnerable to
Injury and
Trauma victim-
infection
blaming
Risk of poverty
Societal
HIV and further
Trauma
insecurity
Social Stigma
‘When some of us escaped from the rebels and went back
to find our families, we got disappointed. They called us
names. They said we were defiled and they didn’t want us
anymore. So what could we do? We had to live so we
went to Freetown and sold ourselves just to survive’
(Young woman abducted by RUF in Sierra Leone quoted in
DeLargy, 2013: 67)
‘No, my wife was absolutely not raped while she was being
held. If she had been raped, then I would not be able to let
her come home and take care of the children and be my
wife’
(Kosovar man speaking about his wife held by Serbian
militia, DeLargy, 2013, 68))
Prosecution of Conflict Related Sexual
Violence
Imperative to end culture of impunity
But
Requires
• Proper laws criminalizing sexual violence
• A functioning security and judicial system
• Financial resources
• Social barriers to reporting
Bosnia-Herzegovina and Rwanda
• Rape in the Bosnian Conflict (1992-1995)
• Between 20,000 to 60,000 women were raped.
• Rape camps.
• Gang Rapes
• Male Rapes.
• Serb notions of military masculinity intersecting with notions of
nationalism and ethnic superiority
• Rwanda 1994
• Between 100,000 and 250,000 women raped during three
months of genocide
Cases
• Sierra Leone (1991-2002)
• 60,000 women were raped
• Liberia (1989-2003)
• 40,000 women were raped
• Syria
• Widespread conflict related violence throughout conflict
International Tribunals
• International Criminal Tribunal for the former
Yugoslavia 1993
• 2001 first international court to find an accused person guilt of
rape as a crime against humanity
• Expanded definition of slavery to include sexual slavery
• International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 1994
• 1998 first international court to find an accused person guilty
of rape as a crime of genocide
• Court found Jean-Paul Akayesu guilty as rape and sexual
assault were committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or
in part, the Tutsi ethnic group
• See ‘Sexual Violence and the Triumph of Justice’, UN ICTY
https://youtu.be/HZ4EM6iiq0k
Explanations in the Literature
• A weapon of war:
• Impregnate ‘the other’ collective (woman as symbol of
collective)
• Humiliate ‘the other’ men
• Dishonour ‘the other’ collective by dishonouring their women
• The result of a breakdown in social constraints;
• The consequence of a ‘root cause’ of masculinity;
• The expression of frustration-aggression and male trauma
• Proof strength of own emasculated society/group
Rape as a ‘weapon’ of war
• Enloe (2000: 111) – Uses of rape during war
1. Recreational Rape
i. Resulting from soldiers’ inadequate access to ‘militarized
prostitution’
2. National Security Rape
i. The use of rape by government forces against women and
men associated with insurgency movements or who
transgress gender norms
3. Systematic Rape
i. Rape as an instrument of open warfare
ii. Systematic rape is ‘administered’ rape
Strategic ‘value’ of rape as weapon
of war
• Cheap
• Hard to prosecute
• Effective means of terrorising civilian population to
• Clear populations from specific areas
• Destroys ethnicity (Forced pregnancies of Muslim women in
Bosnia-Hergegovina)
• Galvanises group cohesion within militaries?
• Reward for troops
• Rooted in essentialist and deterministic understanding of
male sexual desire
Biologically driven sexual aggression
Claim:
Natural sexual aggressiveness of men coupled with
breakdown of social constraints of peacetime =
wartime rape
However
• Does not explain the organised, purposive
employment of rape as a weapon of war
• Does not explain variation of sexual violence and
rape across time
• Does not explain why rape would be targeted at
one group over another
Hegemonic Masculinity as root cause
• Rape of women communicative act among men
• Disrupts ethno-national constructions of women as bearers of
the nation and men as protectors
• Sexual violence against men an act of ‘feminisation’ thus an
act of humiliation and demoralising defeat
• Militarism as a root cause of sexual violence
• Training denigrates the ‘other’ and the feminine
• Hyper-masculinity of ‘aggression and uncontrolled virility
Jabhat al-Nusra –
• Forced Marriages
• Punishment for homosexuality
• Capital punishment for extra-marital affairs
• Regulation of dress and freedom of movement
• Torture
Report to Human Rights Council
Armed Groups – Non-state
Islamic State
• Women placed under control of male relatives and
prevented from working
• Capital punishment for extra-marital affairs
• Capital punishment for homosexuality
• Corporeal punishment for infringement of social rules
• Forced marriage of girls to IS fighters
• Yazidi women and girls enslaved
Further Reading
• Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape, New York, Ballantine Books.
• DeLargy, P. (2013) 'Sexual Violence and Women's Health in War', in Cohn, C. (ed.) Women and Wars:
Contested Histories, Uncertain Futures. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 54-79.
• Enloe, C. (2000) Manoeuvres: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives, London, University of
California Press.
• Enloe, C. (2004) The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire, Berkley, California;
London, University of California Press.
• Erisksson Baaz, M. & Stern, M. (2018) 'Curious erasures: the sexual in wartime sexual violence', International
Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(3), pp. 295-314
• Eriksson Baaz, M. & Stern, M. (2016) 'Researching Wartime Rape in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A
Methodology of Unease', in Wibben, A. T. R. (ed.) Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics.
Oxen: Routledge, pp. 117-140.
• Eriksson Baaz, M. E. & Stern, M. (2009) 'Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the
Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC)', International Studies Quarterly, 53(2), pp. 495-518.
• Harrington, C. (2010) Politicisation of Sexual Violent: From Abolition to Peacekeeping, Surrey, Ashgate.
• Ní Aoláin, F., Cahn, N. R., Haynes, D. F. & Valji, N. (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Gender and
Conflict, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Pankhurst, D. (2015) 'Sexual Violence in War', in Shepherd, L. J. (ed.) Gender Matters in Global Politics: A
Feminist Introduction to International Relations. 2nd edition. ed. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 159-
170.
• Scarry, E. (1985) The Body in Pain : The Making and Unmaking of the World, New York ; Oxford, Oxford
University Press.
• Wood, E. J. (2018) 'Rape as a Practice of War: Toward a Typology of Political Violence', Politics & Society,
46(4), pp. 513-537.
• Wood, E. J. (2009) 'Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare?', Politics & Society,
37(1), pp. 131-161.
• Wood, E. J. (2006) 'Variation in Sexual Violence during War', Politics & Society, 34(3), pp. 307-342.