You are on page 1of 7

2028 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 51, NO.

8, AUGUST 2003

Two Advanced Solar Antenna “SOLANT” Designs


for Satellite and Terrestrial Communications
Stefano Vaccaro, Student Member, IEEE, Juan R. Mosig, Fellow, IEEE, and Peter de Maagt, Senior Member, IEEE

Abstract—A novel hybrid technology where amorphous silicon been made possible thanks to two factors. Firstly, the introduc-
(a-Si:H) solar cells are either integrated or physically combined tion of slot antennas, the ground plane of which can be used
with printed slot antennas is presented. This basic idea is demon- as “negative” collector cathode for the solar cells. Secondly,
strated with the help of two innovative designs where the solar cells
are directly grown on a stainless steel ground-plane or glued onto
the possibility of producing solar cells with arbitrary shapes
a standard copper layer printed on a dielectric substrate. To show that don’t restrict the antenna layout. This has led to the novel
the compatibility of solar cells and antennas, the concept is used to concept of a “fully-integrated” design where the two elements
create a linearly polarized slot antenna, a circularly polarized slot are physically and functionally merged together into a single
antenna and a slot array. The concept offers advantages in terms device. This “fully-integrated” SOLANT design represents a
of surface coverage, volume, weight and electric performance when “best-of-both-worlds” solution, since a higher level of integra-
compared with a simple juxtaposition of antennas and solar cells.
tion of both RF and dc functionality is the objective. Moreover,
Index Terms—Circularly polarized array, slot antennas, the use of slots instead of patches, allows the solar cells to be
SOLANT, solar antenna, solar cells.
directly deposited on to the slot’s ground plane, resulting in an
efficient and lightweight device.
I. INTRODUCTION The concept can also have interesting spin-offs for terres-
trial applications, for example: roof tiles used for simultaneous
M OST satellite systems use separate solar cells and an-
tennas, which compete for the use of the limited surface
available. Therefore, combining both could save valuable “real
power generation and reception of satellite TV, isolated base sta-
tions for mobile telephone, alarm systems, sea buoys, container
tracking, etc.
estate” and reduce the cost design of spacecraft missions, pro-
vided that the antennas and solar cells are compatible. In partic-
ular, solar panels constitute a significant part of communication II. SOLANT SATELLITE APPLICATIONS
satellites, providing large flat surfaces on to which antennas can
be mounted or printed [1]. Printed antennas, commonly used Space-related applications of SOLANT antennas, in a first
in microwave communications, are particularly well suited for approach, can be split into two categories of missions:
this integration, especially in configurations where their radi- • Large spacecraft needed to comply with the increasing de-
ating elements (patches or apertures) can be isolated from the mand for telecommunication, multimedia and increasing
feed circuits. scientific objectives. The need to implement several com-
After the work of Tanaka et al. [2], other publications, in- plex instruments on one single spacecraft leads to an in-
cluding several by the authors of this paper, have explored the crease in the number and size of antennas and solar gen-
possibility of placing solar cells directly on the patches [3]–[6]. erators.
Other combinations like putting solar cells behind reflectarray • Constellations of numerous smaller satellites (mini, micro,
antennas have also been studied [7], [8]. In the case of patch nano-satellites) where the integration of solar cells with
antennas, the cells cannot be close to the patches’ radiating antennas can lead to considerable reduction in spacecraft
edges due to destructive interactions. As technology has been size, mass and cost.
advancing rapidly, an idea emerged to integrate the antenna and One can make a preliminary review of the missions that could
solar cell into (monolithic) building block units. These units profit from integration of antennas with solar cells, where the
may then be replicated as desired to create a structure whose emphasis would be on:
transmitting aperture is also used as the light-collection area. • Missions where there is a natural coherence between sun
The available surface where the solar cells can be placed is direction and antenna boresight. This option may be very
therefore limited. The techniques presented in this paper repre- attractive for the Future Science Program; both in terms
sent a major breakthrough in this respect. This has essentially of deep space missions to the outer planets (Mars and
beyond) and missions at the L2 Lagrangian point of the
Manuscript received November 14, 2001; revised June 4, 2002. earth-sun system. At this location, the sun, the earth, and
This work was supported by the European Space Agency under Grant
AO/1-3308/97/NL/NB.
the moon are all located behind the payload which points
S. Vaccaro and J. R. Mosig are with the Laboratory of Electromagnetics away from the Sun.
and Acoustics (LEMA), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), • Missions where there is an advantage to conform the an-
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. tenna to the spacecraft body (e.g., spinning satellites). An
P. de Maagt is with the European Space Research and Technology Centre
(ESTEC), European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands obvious example of such a mission is a one-axis stabilised
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAP.2003.815424 satellite. In this case a large cylindrical part of the satellite
0018-926X/03$17.00 © 2003 IEEE
VACCARO et al.: TWO ADVANCED SOLAR ANTENNA “SOLANT” DESIGNS 2029

mentioned above also form a mirror for the incident solar


light in order to increase absorption and consequently, produce
more current. The actual solar cell is made of three silicon
layers: a thin high conductivity phosphor doped n-layer (about
), an intrinsic (undoped) layer with a low defect
density and a very thin highly conductive p-layer.
Most photons are absorbed in the intrinsic layer, while the
doped layers are responsible for the build-up of an electric
(a) field within the solar cell itself. The collector layer on top of
the cell must be both transparent and conductive and hence
it is made of transparent conductive oxides (TCOs)—either
indium tin oxide or zinc oxide. Since TCOs have a rather low
conductivity compared to metals, a finger pattern is deposited
on top [see Fig. 1(b)], made of a Cr adhesion layer covered
by a thicker Ag layer. Overall, the cell thickness is less than 5
but usually a 50- thick Polyimide substrate is used as a
support in standalone applications. Although this type of cell
is less efficient than GaAs solar cells which are currently used
in space applications, a-Si:H cells show a better watt/kilogram
ratio due to their light weight. Moreover, they are inexpensive
and have shown promising hardness against cosmic radiation
in initial tests [10].
(b)
IV. SLOT BASED SOLAR ANTENNAS
Fig. 1. (a) Cross-section of an amorphous Silicon solar cell, showing the
different layers (thickness not to scale). (b) Picture of a a-Si:H SOLANT As stated in the introduction, it is possible to carry the integra-
module. tion of antennas and solar cells a step further by resorting to slot
antennas instead of patches. Slot antennas provide large metallic
surface can be covered by integrated solar cells and radi- surfaces (the ground plane) on which solar cells can be laid or
ating elements. Each of them faces halftime the sun and directly grown. This yields a simple layered structure with high
the earth. The subarrays of the integrated antennas with area-coverage efficiency for the solar cells. In this case, it is pos-
solar cells should not be fed all at the same time, but an sible to nearly completely cover the ground plane with the ex-
electronic feeding network will have to allow for a con- ception of a very small area close to the radiating edges of the
tinuous rotation of the beam that opposes to the satellite slot antenna, without degradation of the RF performance.
spinning. The choice of the slot antennas could introduce some draw-
• Missions requiring very large antennas and/or solar arrays. backs that have to be considered, such as narrower bandwidth
• Missions requiring very small spacecrafts. and lower CP performance. However, these drawbacks can be
For all of the above missions there is the option to save “real overcome through efficient design. From an overall system point
estate” by combining two functions maintaining performance of view, slots remain an interesting alternative to patches, par-
equal or to increase capability (e.g., to offer communication in ticularly when the effect of solar cells on the RF performance
a nonnominal situation). SOLANT could even be a mission en- must be minimized.
abling solution. In the remainder of this section, we describe three prototypes,
which have been built and measured; a linear polarized slot an-
III. AMORPHOUS SILICON (A-SI:H) THIN FILM SOLAR CELL tenna; a circularly polarized slot antenna; a 6 1 elements cir-
TECHNOLOGY cularly polarized slot array with beam tilt.
To demonstrate the SOLANT principle, amorphous silicon
(a-Si:H) solar cells developed by IMT/University of Neuchâtel, A. Linearly Polarized Fully-Integrated SOLANT [11]
Switzerland have been selected [9]. These cells are thin, light, The antenna described in this section, has been already pre-
flexible films that can be cut to fit arbitrary patch or array shapes sented in [11]. However, for the sake of completeness and in
and, eventually, conformed to curved surfaces. Another funda- order to give the reader a complete overview of all the different
mental advantage of these solar cells is the fact that they do not variations of slot based SOLANT’s, some details given here.
involve a rigid semi-conductor wafer as substrate (germanium, This linearly polarized fully integrated unit (Fig. 2) has both
silicon, etc…). dc and RF functions intimately linked, sharing the same metallic
They can also be grown on plastic or glass as well as on metals structure. Neither the antenna nor the solar cells can function
such as stainless steel or aluminum. without this common layer.
Fig. 1(a) shows a lateral view of an amorphous silicon solar The ground plane of the antenna is a metallic plate in which
cell on a plastic film (polyimide). The polyimide substrate the slots are laser-cut. A special “dog-bone” shape of the slot has
is covered by an aluminum layer (back contact) and by a been used in order to obtain a better matching . After the
ZnO layer, which prevents aluminum diffusion. The layers cutting, the solar cells are directly deposited on the ground plane
2030 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 51, NO. 8, AUGUST 2003

(a)

Fig. 3. Photo of the circularly polarized slot SOLANT.

(b)
Fig. 2. (a) Photo of the linearly polarized slot SOLANT. (b) Diagram of an
exploded view of the antenna.

which in turn is glued onto a 0.8 mm thick epoxy substrate with


a permittivity of . The ground plane therefore also acts
as a dc collector for the solar cells. Fig. 2(a) shows a photo of
the fully integrated SOLANT basic building block and Fig. 2(b) (a)
a diagram of an exploded view.
In order to simplify the chemical deposition of the cells, it
has been decided to use a stainless steel ground plane. Copper
cannot be used as substrate for the solar cells because its atoms
diffuse into the silicon layers, which has a negative impact on
the doping of the layers. This phenomenon does not occur with
a stainless steel substrate. Another characteristic that makes the
stainless steel attractive is the fact that, if properly machined,
it presents a very smooth surface, which is crucial for correct
solar cell deposition. From the antenna point of view, this type
of ground plane has the disadvantage of lower conductivity as
compared to conventionally used copper.
In order to determine the effect of the ground plane material
on the efficiency of the antenna, a comparative measurement
of gain between an antenna based on a copper and a stainless
steel ground plane has been performed [11]. The results of the
measurements indicate that the antenna based on a stainless steel
ground plane presents a lower efficiency than the copper based (b)
one, resulting in a degradation in gain between 0.65 and 0.85 Fig. 4. (a) Solar cell module with a cross slot, (b) Dimensions of the slot and
dB. the feeding line of the circularly polarized slot SOLANT.
A complete set of measurements of this antenna is given in
[11]. tenna, the solar cells have been specially tailored to fit the slot
shape [see Figs. 3 and 4(a)].
B. Circularly Polarized Slot SOLANT The circular polarization is obtained by exciting a cross slot
An alternative design described in this section utilizes a more with a line at 45 with respect to it. By adjusting the length
complex slot shape to obtain circular polarization. For this an- of each branch of the cross it was possible to generate two
VACCARO et al.: TWO ADVANCED SOLAR ANTENNA “SOLANT” DESIGNS 2031

Fig. 5. Measured S and axial ratio of the circularly polarized slot SOLANT with and without solar cells.

Fig. 6. Measured radiation patterns of the circularly polarized slot SOLANT at 3.84 GHz. Gain with cells = 3.7 dBi. Gain without cells = 3.8 dBi.
orthogonal resonant modes at two close frequencies [12]. At back reflector has been placed at 10 mm from the feeding
some intermediate frequency, the modes are excited with equal lines. The measured characteristics of the antenna, depicted
amplitude and phase shift of 90 . This type of circularly polar- in Fig. 5, show an axial ratio (AR) under 3 dB between 3.82
ized element, as depicted in Fig. 3, has a narrow bandwidth but GHz and 3.94 GHz (3%), that corresponds to a return loss
offers the advantage of requiring a very simple feeding circuit. under (3.82–3.92 GHz). Furthermore, it is apparent
An open stub on the feeding line has been used to tune the that these parameters are not affected by the presence of the
circularly polarized element’s frequency to the best matching solar cells. The same can be said about the radiation pattern
frequency. The exact dimensions of the cross-slot and feeding and gain. In fact, the measurements depicted in Fig. 6, show
line are given in Fig. 4(b). The antenna has been built on an hardly any difference between the antenna with and without
Ultralam 2000 substrate and a the solar cells.
2032 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 51, NO. 8, AUGUST 2003

Fig. 7. SOLANT 6 2 1 slot array.

C. SOLANT 6 1 Beam Tilted Slot Array

The next step was to demonstrate that beam tilt can be ob-
tained with SOLANT antennas and that this is unaffected by
the solar cells. For the sake of simplicity, the previously de-
scribed circularly polarized slot cross design was used as array
element and a 6 1 linear array has been built to obtain a 15
beam tilt. The phases for each element were imposed by prop-
erly adjusting the length of the feeding network (phase shifts).
The spacing between the elements is 0.81 (64 mm) which
was given by the module size. To improve the gain, a back re-
flector was placed at 10 mm behind the antenna. Furthermore,
an MMIC amplifier has been integrated on the back of the an-
tenna, which is powered by solar cells that produce 0.821 Watt (a)
with 122 mA at 7 V.
As was explained in Section III, depending on the metal being
used, the solar cells can either be directly grown as a thin film
or glued directly onto the ground plane. For efficiency reasons
copper was selected as ground plane and the cells glued on to
it. The solar cells module, depicted in Fig. 4(a), consists of four
solar cells connected in series with a cross cut in the middle to
allow the RF radiation. Six solar cell modules have been used,
one per radiating element.
Fig. 8(a) and (b) present, respectively, the radiation patterns
in the XZ (six element direction) and YZ (one element direction)
planes for the antenna with and without solar cells at the fre-
quency of 3.8 GHz. As expected, the XZ pattern presents the (b)
principal lobe tilted at 15 while a secondary lobe appears at
2
Fig. 8. Measured radiation patterns at 3.80 GHz for the 6 1 slot array. (a)
60 . It can be seen that the presence of the solar cells does not
= =
XZ plane, (b) YZ plane. Gain without cells 11.00 dBi. Gain with cells 11.6
affect the radiating characteristics in this plane. dBi.
Due to the fact that in comparative measurements the an-
tennas need to be assembled and disassembled several times, it with and without solar cells are attributed to these imperfec-
is difficult to guarantee absolute repeatability between the radi- tions. Moreover, it is also important to point out the fact that
ation pattern measurements with and without solar cells. How- the patterns with and without solar cells are normalized to their
ever, the antenna replacement on the positioning system led to respective maximum value and not to the same reference. For
only minor changes in the radiation pattern measurements. this reason it is not possible to compare directly the levels for
The radiation pattern measurement in the YZ plane is most the two situations. Nevertheless, a comparison of the efficiency
sensitive to the antenna orientation, and consequently the slight between the antenna with and without solar cells can be made
differences that can be observed in Table I between the antenna with the gain values reported in Table I.
VACCARO et al.: TWO ADVANCED SOLAR ANTENNA “SOLANT” DESIGNS 2033

TABLE I
GAIN VALUES OF THE 6 2 1 ARRAY WITH AND WITHOUT SOLAR CELLS AT DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES

Fig. 9. Return loss of the 6 2 1 slot array with and without solar cells.
The values of the maximum gain in the direction of the beam ously comply with all of the standard RF requirements (gain,
range between 9.7 and 11.6 dBi, depending on frequency. The polarization, radiation pattern) as well as the standard dc
anomalous result at 3.91 GHz is most likely due to measure- requirements (power, voltage, current) in many situations.
ment instability. Overall, a check over the useful frequency band The results obtained in this paper, utilizing standard technolo-
shows that the variation of the antenna gain due to the solar cells gies, show that it should be possible to realize large arrays of
is less than 1 dB, which is within the accuracy of the measure- SOLANT antennas with circularly polarized operation, beam
ment setup. tilt capability and sizeable dc power production.
Finally, Fig. 9 represents the return loss for the antenna with
and without solar cells. The antenna presents return losses lower ACKNOWLEDGMENT
than between 3.7 and 3.9 GHz, with the minimum at
3.84 GHz. It should be noted once more that the array was built The authors particularly wish to thank Dr. P. Torres,
with the basic element as described in Section IV-B. As such, Dr. M. Götz, J. Kündig, and Prof. A. Shah of IMT, Uni-
the array performance is not optimum. However, the mechanism versity of Neuchâtel, Switzerland, Prof. A. Skrivervik and
of beam tilt is demonstrated and the effect and the effect of the Mr. J.-F. Zürcher of LEMA-EPFL, Switzerland. Finally, the
solar cells on radiation performance is shown to be minimal. authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Swiss Space
Office at Bern, Switzerland.

V. CONCLUSION REFERENCES
A novel concept of integration between antennas and solar [1] B. Pattan, Satellite-Based Cellular Communications. New York: Mc-
cells has been presented and demonstrated. Thanks to the use of Graw-Hill, 1997.
[2] M. Tanaka, Y. Suzuki, K. Araki, and R. Suzuki, “Microstrip antennas
the versatile amorphous silicon solar cells, it has been possible with solar cells for microsatellites,” Electron. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 263–266,
to develop slot antenna solutions that make more efficient use of 1996.
the space available for solar cells. The amorphous silicon solar [3] S. Vaccaro, P. Torres, J. R. Mosig, A. Shah, J.-F. Zürcher, A. K.
Skrivervik, F. Gardiol, P. de Maagt, and L. Gerlach, “Integrated solar
cells can be adapted to each antenna shape, either by cutting panel antennas,” Electron. Lett., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 390–391, Mar. 2000.
them or by directly growing them on the antenna surface. [4] S. Vaccaro, P. Torres, J. R. Mosig, A. Shah, A. K. Skrivervik, J.-F.
The presented designs represent different levels of integra- Zürcher, P. de Maagt, and L. Gerlach. Integration of antennas and solar
cells for satellite communications. presented at Proc. Millenium Conf.
tion, potentially useful in diverse space-related and terrestrial Antennas and Propagation, Symp.. [CD-ROM] Session 4A7, paper No
applications. The fully-integrated slot design can simultane- 0954
2034 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 51, NO. 8, AUGUST 2003

[5] , “Combination of antennas and solar cells for satellite communi- Juan R. Mosig (S’76–M’87–SM’94–F’99) was born in Cadiz, Spain. He
cations,” MOTL, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 11–16, Apr. 2001. received the electrical engineer degree from the Universidad Politecnica
[6] J. Huang, “Mars rover antenna for solar array integration, JPL TMO de Madrid, Spain, in 1973 and the Ph.D. degree from the Laboratory of
progress report 42-136,”, JPL report is publicly available, 1999. Electromagnetics and Acoustics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
[7] , “Capabilities of printed reflectarray antennas,” in Proc. IEEE (EPFL), Switzerland, in 1976.
Phased Array Systems and Technology Symp., Boston, MA, Oct. 1996, In 1976, he joined the Laboratory of Electromagnetics and Acoustics, Ecole
pp. 131–134. Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland. Since 1991, he has
[8] M. Zawadzki and J. Huang, “Integrated RF antenna and solar array for been a Professor at EPFL and, since 2000, the Head of the Laboratory of Elec-
spacecraft application,” in Proc. IEEE Phased Array Systems and Tech- tromagnetics and Acoustics. In 1984, he was a Visiting Research Associate at
nology Conf., Dana Point, CA, May 2000, pp. 239–242. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY. He has also held scientific
[9] P. Pernet, M. Goetz, X. Niquille, D. Fischer, and A. Shah, “Front contact appointments at universities of Rennes (France), Nice (France), Technical Uni-
and series connection problems of a-SI:H solar cells on polymer film versity of Denmark and University of Colorado at Boulder. He is the author of
substrates,” in Proc. 2nd World Conf. Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, four chapters in books on microstrip antennas and circuits. He is Coorganizer
vol. I, Vienna, Switzerland, July 1998, pp. 976–979. and Lecturer of yearly short intensive courses in numerical electromagnetics
[10] J. Kuendig, M. Goetz, J. Meier, P. Torres, L. Feitknecht, P. Pernet, X. (Europe and USA). His research interests include electromagnetic theory, nu-
Niquille, A. Shah, L. Gerlach, and E. Fernandez, “Effect of proton irra- merical methods and microstrip antennas.
diation on the characteristics of different types of thin-film silicon solar Dr. Mosig is a Member of the Swiss Federal Commission for Space Appli-
cells,” presented at the Proc. 16th EU Photovoltaic Solar Energy Con- cations and is responsible for several research projects for the European Space
ference, Glasgow, U.K., May 2000. Agency.
[11] S. Vaccaro, P. Torres, J. R. Mosig, A. Shah, J.-F. Zürcher, A. K.
Skrivervik, P. de Maagt, and L. Gerlach, “Stainless steel slot antenna
with integrated solar cells,” Electron. Lett., vol. 36, no. 25, pp.
2059–2060, Dec. 2000.
[12] T. Vlasits, E. Korolkiewicz, A. Sambell, and B. Robinson, “Performance
of a cross-aperture coupled single feed circularly polarized patch an-
tenna,” Electron. Lett., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 612–613, Mar. 1996. Peter de Maagt (S’88–M’88–SM’02) was born in Pauluspolder, The Nether-
lands, in 1964. He received the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees from Eindhoven Uni-
versity of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, in 1988 and 1992, respec-
tively, both in electrical engineering.
Currently, he is with the European Space Research and Technology Centre
Stefano Vaccaro (S’00) was born in Locarno, Switzerland. He received the (ESTEC), European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. His research
M.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de interests are in the area of millimeter and submillimeter-wave reflector and
Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland, in 1998, where he is working toward the Ph.D. planar integrated antennas, quasioptics, photonic bandgap antennas, and mil-
in the Laboratory of Electromagnetics and Acoustics. limeter- and submillimeter-wave components.
After a short industrial experience, he joined the Laboratory of Electromag- Dr. de Maagt was a corecipient of the H. A. Wheeler Award of the IEEE
netics and Acoustics at EPFL in 1999. His current research interests are in the Antennas and Propagation Society for the Best Applications Paper of 2001 and
development of microstrip antennas and in their integration with solar cells. a recipient of a 2002 ESA Award for Innovation.

You might also like