Health Policy and Planning Advance Access published December 26, 2016

Health Policy and Planning, 2016, 1–6

doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw156
Original Manuscript

National income inequality and ineffective

health insurance in 35 low- and middle-income
countries
Francisco N. Alvarez,1,2 Abdulrahman M. El-Sayed3
1
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 2Detroit Health Department, USA and
3
Detroit Health Department, City of Detroit, Detroit, MI, USA

Downloaded from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Newcastle on January 3, 2017

Corresponding Author: Francisco N. Alvarez, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
1830 E Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. E-mail: falvarez@jhmi.edu
Accepted on 19 October 2016

Abstract
Global health policy efforts to improve health and reduce financial burden of disease in low- and
middle-income countries (LMIC) has fuelled interest in expanding access to health insurance cover-
age to all, a movement known as Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Ineffective insurance is a meas-
ure of failure to achieve the intended outcomes of health insurance among those who nominally
have insurance. This study aimed to evaluate the relation between national-level income inequality
and the prevalence of ineffective insurance. We used Standardized World Income Inequality
Database (SWIID) Gini coefficients for 35 LMICs and World Health Survey (WHS) data about insur-
ance from 2002 to 2004 to fit multivariable regression models of the prevalence of ineffective insur-
ance on national Gini coefficients, adjusting for GDP per capita. Greater inequality predicted higher
prevalence of ineffective insurance. When stratifying by individual-level covariates, higher inequal-
ity was associated with greater ineffective insurance among sub-groups traditionally considered
more privileged: youth, men, higher education, urban residence and the wealthiest quintile.
Stratifying by World Bank country income classification, higher inequality was associated with inef-
fective insurance among upper-middle income countries but not low- or lower-middle income
countries. We hypothesize that these associations may be due to the imprint of underlying social
inequalities as countries approach decreasing marginal returns on improved health insurance by
income. Our findings suggest that beyond national income, income inequality may predict differ-
ences in the quality of insurance, with implications for efforts to achieve UHC.

Keywords: Health insurance, income inequality, ineffective insurance, LMIC, universal health coverage

Key Messages

• Greater income inequality predicted higher prevalence of ineffective health insurance when adjusting for GDP per capita.
• The association between income inequality and ineffective health insurance is stronger among sub-groups traditionally
considered more privileged: youth, men, higher education, urban residence, wealthiest quintile.
• Stratifying by country income, higher income inequality is associated with higher ineffective health insurance among
upper-middle income countries but not low- or lower-middle income countries.
• We hypothesize that these associations may be due to the imprint of underlying social inequalities as developing coun-
tries approach decreasing marginal returns on improved health insurance by income.

C The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
V
All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 1
2 Health Policy and Planning, 2016, Vol. 0, No. 0

Introduction Penn World Tables (PWT). Income inequality was assessed utilizing
Gini coefficients for the 35 countries in the WHS datasets obtained
Global health policy efforts to improve health and reduce financial
from the SWIID version 5.0 (Solt 2014). As our exposure variable,
burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has
Gini coefficients of net inequality for each country were averaged
fuelled interest in expanding access to health insurance coverage to
between 1999 and 2001, the three years before which we had out-
all, a movement for Universal Health Coverage (UHC). The World
come variable data (ineffective insurance as assessed between 2002
Health Report 2010 defines UHC as a health system where all peo-
and 2004). Averages of three years were utilized to reflect the time
ple in need of health services (promotion, prevention, treatment, re-
period of the outcome variable and minimize yearly variation.
habilitation and palliation) receive them without undue financial
National GDP data were obtained from the PWT version 8.1 to
hardship (WHO 2010). Subsequent research, including case studies
control for national wealth (Feenstra et al. 2015). The GDP per cap-
in 13 countries, has underwritten efforts to establish UHC as an out-
ita variable was generated utilizing real GDP at constant 2005 na-
come for the post-2015 development goals (Boerma et al. 2014, UN
tional prices (mil. 2005US$) divided by population (in millions) for
General Assembly 2015).
each country in each year as provided by the PWT. GDP per capita
There is substantial interest in the capacity for UHC to reflect its
was then averaged between 1999 and 2001 for the 35 countries of
goals, particularly with respect to improving health equity (Giedion
interest to match the exposure variable.
et al. 2013). For example, one study of Mexico’s new public insur-
The WHS is a cross-sectional study conducted by the World
ance program found heterogeneity in financial protection for rural
Health Organization (WHO) between 2002 and 2004 in 70 countries

Downloaded from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Newcastle on January 3, 2017

residents based upon existing access to well-staffed health facilities
representing each United Nations sub-region and comprising over
(Grogger et al. 2015). ‘Ineffective insurance’ is defined as nominal
300 000 individuals with the aim of compiling comprehensive base-
insurance coverage that does not protect beneficiaries from having
line population health information, monitoring health outcomes and
to borrow or sell personal items to pay for health services, having an
informing future health system investments. The survey was con-
untreated medical condition, or delivering a child outside a skilled
ducted at the household level and used sampling weights for national
health facility (El-Sayed et al. 2016). Using World Health Survey
representation to allow country-level inference. Household-level
data of 42 LMICs, they found a 13% prevalence of ineffective insur-
characteristics, including insurance and wealth and individual-level
ance, of which 69% had to borrow or sell personal items to pay for
characteristics, including socio-demographic information, health
healthcare. Furthermore, ineffective insurance was associated with
state descriptions, health care utilization and health system respon-
lower household wealth and residence in rural areas.
siveness, were collected. The SWIID attempts to develop a cross-
Concurrently, there has been renewed interest in income inequal-
nationally comparable database of Gini indices across time. It cur-
ity and its association with social outcomes, including economic
rently includes Gini estimates for gross and net income inequality for
growth, political stability and health and social well-being (Ortiz
171 countries from 1960 to 2009 utilizing all major sources of in-
and Cummins 2011). The relation between income inequality and
equality data including the United Nations University’s World
population health (mortality rates, life expectancy) has been well-
Income Inequality Database (UNU-WIDER WIID), the World
documented, independent of individual-level socioeconomic status
Bank’s PovcalNet, the OECD Income Distribution Database, the
or societal-level wealth (Biggs et al. 2010, De Vogli et al. 2005,
World Top Incomes Database, as well as national statistical offices
Wilkinson and Pickett 2008, Kondo et al. 2009). However, the de-
and other sources (Solt 2009). The PWT provides data on real GDP
bate about the potential causal effect of income inequality on popu-
to measure standard of living across countries (Feenstra et al. 2015).
lation health persists. First, the association may be confounded by
Utilizing prices collected by the International Comparisons Program
education, race/ethnicity, or individual income. Second, reverse
to construct purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates, the PWT
causation may occur through effects of good health that contribute
converts GDP at national prices to a common currency (U.S. dollars)
to higher socioeconomic status (e.g. increased earnings, educational
to make them comparable across countries. Data is available for 167
attainment and labour force participation) and may in turn contrib-
countries between 1950 and 2011.
ute to societal income inequality (Ellison 2002, Gravelle 1998,
The initial WHS sample includes 288 431 households in 70
Lynch et al. 2004). However, authors have argued that these alter-
countries. As our focus was LMICs, our analysis excluded those
native explanations can only explain a portion of the observed rela-
countries classified as high-income by 2003 World Bank country in-
tion and that societal-level income inequality remains causally
come classifications (n ¼ 20) (World Bank 2003). We also excluded
predictive of poor health (Babones 2008, Bezruchka et al. 2008,
countries that did not provide WHS survey weights (n ¼ 1;
Pickett and Wilkinson 2015, Zheng 2012).
Guatemala), did not collect insurance information (n ¼ 1; Latvia), or
Access to healthcare may be one causal pathway by which in-
that do not have data in the SWIID or PWT during the years of
come inequality may influence population health – and insurance is
interest (n ¼ 4; Chad, Comoros, Republic of the Congo, Myanmar).
an important predictor of health access. Therefore, we were inter-
Ineffective insurance includes, by definition, a subset of only the
ested in the relation between income inequality and the quality of in-
population that has health insurance. Therefore, we excluded coun-
surance and sought to examine the relation between national-level
tries that had a negligible prevalence of health insurance among
income inequality and ineffective health insurance in LMICs. This
those surveyed, which we define as a prevalence of health insurance
work may both shed light on the relation between income inequality
<1% among the un-weighted country WHS survey population
and population health and improve our understanding of potential
(n ¼ 9; Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Laos, Malawi, Mali,
policy challenges to achieving UHC.
Mauritania, Pakistan, Swaziland). The final sample therefore
included 35 countries of which 10 were low income, 16 lower-
middle income and 9 upper-middle income (Table 1). In addition,
Materials and Methods
Turkey was excluded for sub-analyses regarding marital and educa-
Data tional status due to missing WHS household data.
We used data from the World Health Survey (WHS), the Individual country-level data were extracted using the dataset
Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID), and the design published previously (El-Sayed et al. 2016). Briefly,
Health Policy and Planning, 2016, Vol. 0, No. 0 3

Table 1 Characteristics of countries included in study sample

Country World Bank income Nominal insurance Ineffective insurance Total under-insurance Unweighted
classification prevalence prevalence prevalence (uninsured þ n*
(2003) (weighted %) (weighted %) ineffectively insured) (weighted %)

Côte d’Ivoire Low 8.88 15.47 92.49 2496

Georgia 100.00 30.81 30.81 2692
Ghana 2.40 22.75 98.15 3346
India 2.01 22.69 98.45 7340
Kenya 11.17 15.32 90.54 4067
Nepal 6.89 60.17 97.26 305
Senegal 3.38 6.85 96.85 998
Vietnam 22.25 11.18 80.24 3677
Zambia 3.20 12.46 97.20 3914
Zimbabwe 7.62 26.38 94.39 3620

Bosnia and Herzegovina Lower-Middle 89.86 5.48 15.06 1005

Brazil 100.00 12.71 12.71 450

Downloaded from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Newcastle on January 3, 2017

China (People’s Republic of) 49.95 5.71 52.90 3915
Dominican Republic 21.89 16.22 81.66 4738
Ecuador 16.90 12.13 85.16 1605
Kazakhstan 99.32 11.63 12.23 4332
Morocco 19.37 25.73 85.61 2113
Namibia 13.51 11.24 88.02 3842
Paraguay 22.54 10.83 79.90 5221
Philippines 19.24 29.25 86.39 9913
Russian Federation 98.55 9.46 10.79 4233
South Africa 17.38 15.26 85.28 1849
Sri Lanka 3.97 14.42 96.60 4751
Tunisia 84.53 25.93 37.39 4880
Turkey 97.51 13.74 15.89 8303
Ukraine 5.01 4.49 95.21 1080

Croatia Upper-Middle 98.39 5.27 6.80 956

Czech Republic 100.00 3.72 3.72 849
Estonia 96.21 6.19 9.75 924
Hungary 99.82 3.67 3.84 583
Malaysia 40.89 5.65 61.42 5873
Mauritius 6.93 5.49 93.45 3763
Mexico 43.81 12.21 61.54 38292
Slovak Republic 99.67 2.40 2.72 1613
Uruguay 92.72 5.20 12.13 2835

*Unweighted n: Number of households by country from which health insurance data was extracted from World Health Survey.

households were considered nominally insured if they answered Analysis

affirmatively regarding the insurance status of the primary
household respondent (‘Is this person covered by any kind of
health insurance plan?’). Nominally insured respondents were
considered ineffectively insured if they fulfilled any of the follow-
ing criteria: lack of treatment for a diagnosed chronic condition,
failure to deliver a child in a health facility (women only), or sale
of household assets or borrowing money from someone other
than a friend or family member in order to pay for health care in
the past year. In addition, we also collected the following covari-
ates: age in years (categorical: 13–34, 34–65, 65þ), sex, marital
status (binary: married/cohabitating versus other), education
(binary: any secondary education versus no secondary educa-
tion), urban residence (binary: urban versus rural), and country-
specific wealth quintile (Hosseinpoor et al. 2014). Within-
country relative wealth indices were created within each country
using principal components analysis of country-specific house-
hold asset questions and subsequently divided into quintiles as
described previously (Filmer and Pritchett 2001). National sur-
vey sampling weights as provided by the WHS were used to allow
for country-level inferences.
We performed logarithmic transformations on all variables to correct
for non-normal distribution of the data (not shown). First, we fit mul-
tivariable linear regression models of ineffective insurance on Gini co-
efficient, adjusting for GDP per capita, and on each constituent
component of ineffective insurance. Second, we fit further multivari-
able linear regression models of ineffective insurance by the Gini coef-
ficient stratified by each of our covariates. Third, we fit multivariable
linear regression models of ineffective insurance by the Gini coefficient
stratified by World Bank country income classifications in 2003.
The analysis utilized secondary data in the public domain and
was therefore exempt from IRB review requirements. All analyses
were conducted using Stata version 14 (StataCorp, College Station,
TX, USA).
Results
Multivariable linear regression models of ineffective insurance on
Gini coefficients adjusting for GDP per capita are shown in Table 2.
Simple regression of the prevalence of ineffective insurance on Gini
4 Health Policy and Planning, 2016, Vol. 0, No. 0

Table 2 Survey-weighted multivariable linear regression models of ineffective health insurance and its sub-categories on national income
inequality

Simple regression Multiple regression

Gini coefficient Gini coefficient GDP per capita

Coefficient [95% CI] Coefficient [95% CI] Coefficient [95% CI]

Ineffective insurance 1.759 [0.844, 2.673] ** 1.274 [0.429, 2.119] ** 0.437 [0.696, 0.178] **
Sold/borrowed 2.573 [1.270, 3.877] *** 1.984 [0.720, 3.248] ** 0.531 [0.919, 0.143] **
Untreated chronic condition 0.901 [0.080, 1.882] 0.736 [0.310, 1.782] 0.148 [0.469, 0.173]
Non-facility delivery 3.260 [0.692, 5.828] * 1.491 [0.559, 3.540] 1.595 [2.224, 0.967] ***

*P  0.05;
**P  0.01;
***P  0.001.

Downloaded from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Newcastle on January 3, 2017

Table 3 Survey-weighted multivariable linear regression models of ineffective health insurance on national income inequality stratified by
covariates

Simple regression Multiple regression

Gini coefficient Gini coefficient GDP per capita

Coefficient [95% CI] Coefficient [95% CI] Coefficient [95% CI]

Age 13–34 years 3.196 [1.629, 4.764] *** 2.731 [1.110, 4.353] ** 0.419 [0.916, 0.078]
35–65 years 1.471 [0.561, 2.382] ** 1.011 [0.156, 1.866] * 0.415 [0.678, 0.153] **
>65 years 1.306 [1.945, 4.557] 2.245 [1.126, 5.616] 0.847 [0.187, 1.881]
Sex Female 1.122 [0.091, 2.152] * 0.555 [0.384, 1.493] 0.511 [0.799, 0.223] ***
Male 2.473 [1.005, 3.942] ** 2.239 [0.671, 3.807] ** 0.212 [0.692, 0.269]
Marital Status Unmarried 1.872 [0.988, 2.757] *** 1.495 [0.624, 2.366] *** 0.339 [0.609, 0.069] *
Married/Cohabitating 1.648 [0.670, 2.626] ** 1.109 [0.216, 2.003] * 0.484 [0.761, 0.207] ***
Education No secondary education 1.957 [0.406, 3.507] * 1.538 [0.083, 3.160] 0.375 [0.878, 0.127]
Any secondary education 1.891 [0.346, 3.436] * 1.856 [0.181, 3.530] * 0.032 [0.551, 0.488]
Residence Rural 2.391 [1.331, 3.450] *** 1.795 [0.838, 2.751] *** 0.537 [0.830, 0.244] ***
Urban 1.940 [0.463, 3.417] * 1.707 [0.129, 3.285] * 0.210 [0.694, 0.274]
Wealth Poorest 20% 0.192 [3.176, 2.791] 0.151 [3.376, 3.074] 0.037 [0.952, 1.026]
Second poorest 20% 2.137 [0.090, 4.184]* 2.519 [0.342, 4.695]* 0.344 [0.323, 1.012]
Middle 20% 2.309 [0.269, 4.349]* 2.635 [0.457, 4.814]* 0.294 [0.374, 0.962]
Second wealthiest 20% 1.892 [0.285, 3.499]* 1.354 [0.287, 2.995] 0.485 [0.988, 0.018]
Wealthiest 20% 3.428 [1.693, 5.162] *** 3.182 [1.326, 5.039]*** 0.221 [0.790, 0.348]

*P  0.05;
**P  0.01;
***P  0.001.

coefficient showed a significant association (P  0.001) with a coef-
ficient of 1.759 (95% CI: 0.844–2.673). After adjusting for GDP
per capita the association remained significant (P  0.01) with a co-
efficient of 1.274 (95% CI: 0.429–2.119).
Linear regression models were also fit for each sub-category of
ineffective insurance (sold/borrowed assets or money, untreated for
chronic condition and child delivery outside health facility). In the
simple regression model national Gini coefficients were significantly
associated with selling or borrowing assets or money to pay for
healthcare expenditures (P  0.001) and delivering a child outside a
health facility (P  0.05). Upon adjusting for GDP per capita, the as-
sociation with selling or borrowing assets or money to pay for
healthcare expenditures remained significant (P  0.01) with a coef-
ficient of 1.984 (95% CI: 0.720–3.248).
Table 3 shows simple and multivariable regression models of
prevalence of income inequality on Gini coefficients stratified by
demographic covariates known to affect health and healthcare util-
ization (age, sex, marital status, education, residence, wealth quin-
tile). In a simple regression model, Gini coefficients were directly
associated with prevalence of ineffective insurance among all demo-
graphic subgroups except those >65 years old and the poorest
wealth quintile. After adjusting for GDP per capita, associations
continued to be significant among 13–34 year-olds and 35–65 year-
olds, males, those of both married and unmarried status, those with
any secondary education, both urban and rural residence, as well as
the second-poorest, middle and wealthiest quintile.
Table 4 shows simple and multivariable regression models of the
prevalence of ineffective insurance on Gini coefficients stratified by
World Bank country income classifications in 2003. Gini coeffi-
cients were significantly associated with ineffective insurance only
among upper-middle income countries (P  0.05). As expected,
GDP per capita was not significantly associated with ineffective in-
surance when stratifying by country income classification.
Discussion
This study considered the influence of income inequality on the
quality of health insurance in LMICs. We found that income
Health Policy and Planning, 2016, Vol. 0, No. 0
Table 4 Survey-weighted multivariable linear regression models of ineffective health insurance on national income inequality stratified by
World Bank country income status
Simple regression
Gini coefficient
Coefficient [95% CI]
Low income 0.770 [3.085, 4.625]
Lower-middle income 0.880 [0.427, 2.188]
Upper-middle income 1.287 [0.343, 2.231]*
*P  0.05;
**P  0.01;
***P  0.001.
inequality was directly associated with ineffective insurance after ad-
justing for national income per capita. This was particularly true
among the more privileged: younger people, men, the more highly
educated and the wealthiest quintile. Further, we found that this as-
sociation was most robust among the wealthiest LMICs.
The general results are consistent with prior studies reporting
GDP-per-capita-adjusted Gini coefficients as predictors of formal
health insurance coverage across countries (Feigl and Ding 2013).
These results are also consistent with the finding that, in the United
States, Gini index tracks inversely with life expectancy among the
highest income quartile but not among the bottom income quartile
(Chetty et al. 2016). Our findings are further supported by another
study showing that the relation between inequality by U.S. state and
poor self-rated health was stronger among advantaged sub-groups,
including a stronger relationship among whites versus blacks and
wealthier rather than poorer individuals (Subramanian and Kawachi
2006). Similarly, living in states with high income inequality was
associated with increased mortality among people with high in-
comes but not low incomes (Lochner et al. 2001).
We propose that the association between income inequality and
ineffective insurance is initially mediated by increases in health insur-
ance with increasing wealth, and therefore, health insurance quality
may be driven largely by increasing societal wealth, as represented by
GDP per capita. However, countries eventually arrive at a relative
plateau of decreasing marginal returns on health insurance quality
from increases in societal wealth. At this stage, remaining between-
country inequalities in the quality of insurance can be predicted by na-
tional income inequality and may reflect underlying social inequality.
In other words, at lower societal wealth levels, quality of insurance is
likely to track more or less directly with societal wealth. At higher so-
cietal wealth levels, where a basic set of health services can be af-
forded by a substantial portion of the population, other factors
become more important as predictors of insurance quality, such as dis-
tance to a health centre, access to transportation, and employment sta-
tus. These other factors may be more sensitive to societal-level
inequalities. Furthermore, higher income countries with more societal
inequality may exhibit policy characteristics that may predispose cer-
tain segments of the population to higher prevalence of ineffective in-
surance. For example, higher income countries more dependent on
private health insurance systems may have segments of their popula-
tion exposed to higher deductibles or co-insurance or pre-existing con-
dition exclusions leading to relatively increased prevalence of
ineffective insurance than would be expected for their level of societal
wealth. Hence, societies with greater income inequality may be those
where the inter-individual influences of the social determinants of
health, including quality of health insurance, are most distinct.
5
Multiple regression
Gini coefficient GDP per capita
Coefficient [95% CI] Coefficient [95% CI]
0.740 [3.500, 4.980] 0.090 [1.209, 1.388]
0.899 [0.489, 2.286] 0.067 [0.966, 0.831]
1.715 [0.338, 3.092]* 0.912 [1.177, 3.001]
This is supported by our finding that upon stratifying the associ-
Downloaded from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Newcastle on January 3, 2017
ation between income inequality and health insurance by individual-
level markers of socioeconomic well-being, the influence of income
inequality was more substantial among privileged groups: younger
people, men, the more educated and the wealthiest. Among higher-
income societies, where the effects of income inequality on ineffect-
ive insurance is more pronounced, standardized state benefits are af-
forded primarily to the poor. This could leave the relatively more
privileged more exposed to the negative influences of income in-
equality. Alternatively, those more poised to reap benefits from a
more egalitarian distribution of wealth may be currently disadvan-
taged members of historically privileged groups, thus allowing them
to more acutely respond to changes in income inequality.
Research on causal mechanisms of the effect of income inequal-
ity on health has focused on a hypothesized pathway of socioeco-
nomic status differentiation mediated by effects of relative
deprivation and upward social comparisons as well as erosion of so-
cial cohesion (Deaton 2003, Kondo et al. 2009, Pickett and
Wilkinson 2015). Furthermore, the causal link from income inequal-
ity to health has often been contested among health economists,
who allow only an effect mediated by the purchase of health care
(Deaton 2003). This study provides evidence of another policy-
mediated link between income inequality and health. Inferior health
insurance may lead to poorer health outcomes (via decreased access
to care, lapses in financial protection, etc.). The quality of health in-
surance may have structural social underpinnings independent of
the ability of individuals to purchase health insurance. This effect
may be one of multiple possible causal pathways by which socioeco-
nomic status differentiation in unequal societies affects health.
This study had numerous limitations largely resulting from the
source data and exigencies of study design. Since income inequality,
and therefore Gini coefficient, is a societal-level variable, the ana-
lysis must be done on a societal—not household—level, and the
power from having 288 431 households in the WHS was lost. The
WHS survey included 70 countries, and after excluding the 20
upper-income countries we were left with only 35 countries eligible
for this study, partially due to the low insurance prevalence in nine
of the LMIC countries included in the WHS. This is, however, a
common limitation of ecological studies investigating cross national
income inequality, with the number of countries included ranging
between 21 and 24 in numerous studies (De Vogli et al. 2005,
Wilkinson and Pickett 2007, Biggs et al. 2010). The limited number
of countries is often compensated for by longitudinal analyses, but
the lack of time series data from the WHS prohibited us from analy-
sing trends in ineffective insurance and income inequality over time.
The type of data collected in the WHS also limited our case
6 Health Policy and Planning, 2016, Vol. 0, No. 0
definition and, therefore, assessment of ineffective insurance. Thus,
estimates of ineffective insurance were intended to reflect conserva-
tive estimates by limiting our definition to the existence of three po-
tential issues (having an untreated chronic condition, selling assets
or borrowing money to pay for healthcare expenditures, and deliver-
ing a child outside of a health facility).
We found that income inequality was directly associated with inef-
fective insurance, especially among groups that are traditionally more
privileged and among wealthier LMICs. We hypothesize that this as-
sociation may be due to the imprint of underlying social inequities as
a population approach decreasing marginal returns of societal wealth
on improved health insurance. Despite the growth in health insurance
coverage from UHC expansion and increasing wealth of LMICs, there
can still be inequities in access and financial protection that are reflect-
ive of underlying social inequities. As UHC is further expanded under
the Sustainable Development Goals, our work emphasizes the need
for investment in health systems strengthening to monitor and ameli-
orate the development of such inequities.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their feedback.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from Columbia University College of
Physicians and Surgeons to F.N.A.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
References
Babones SJ. 2008. Income inequality and population health: Correlation and
causality. Social Science & Medicine 66: 1614–26.
Bezruchka S, Namekata T, Sistrom MG. 2008. Improving economic equity
and health: The case of postwar Japan. American Journal of Public Health
98: 589–94.
Biggs B, King L, Sanjay B, Stuckler D. 2010. Is wealthier always healthier? The
impact of national income level, inequality, and poverty on public health in
Latin America. Social Science & Medicine 71: 266–73.
Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D et al. 2014. Monitoring progress towards univer-
sal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Medicine 11: e1001731.,
Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S et al. 2016. The association between income
and life expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. JAMA doi:10.1001/
jama.2016.4226.
De Vogli R, Mistry R, Gnesotto R, Cornia GA. 2005. Has the relation between in-
equality and life expectancy disappeared? Evidence from Italy and top industri-
alised countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59: 158–62.
Deaton A. 2003. Health, inequality, and economic development. Journal of
Economic Literature 41: 113–58.
El-Sayed AM, Vail D, Kruk ME. 2016. Ineffective insurance in 42 lower- and
middle-income countries. Manuscript in review.
Ellison GTH. 2002. Letting the Gini out of the bottle?: Challenges facing the
relative income hypothesis. Social Science & Medicine 54: 561–76.
Feenstra RC, Inklaar R, Timmer MP. 2015. The next generation of the Penn
World Table. American Economic Review 105: 3150–82.
Feigl AB, Ding EL. 2013. Evidenced Formal Coverage Index and universal
healthcare enactment: A prospective longitudinal study of economic, social,
and political predictors of 194 countries. Health Policy 113: 50–60.
Filmer D, Pritchett LH. 2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure
data – or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India.
Demography 38: 115–31.
Giedion U, Alfonso DA, Dıaz Y. 2013. The Impact of Universal Coverage
Schemes in the Developing World: A Review of the Existing Evidence.
Washington DC: The World Bank.
Gravelle H. 1998. How much of the relation between population mortality
and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact?. BMJ 316:
382–5.
Grogger J, Arnold T, Le on AS, Ome A. 2015. Heterogeneity in the effect of
public health insurance on catastrophic out-of-pocket health expenditures:
the case of Mexico. Health Policy and Planning 30: 593–9.
Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Koller T et al. 2014. Equity-oriented monitoring
Downloaded from http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Newcastle on January 3, 2017
in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Medicine 11: e1001727.
Kondo N, Sembajwe G, Kawachi I et al. 2009. Income inequality,
mortality, and self-rated health: meta-analysis of multilevel studies. BMJ
339: b4471.,
Lochner K, Pamuk E, Makuc D, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I. 2001. State-level in-
come inequality and individual mortality risk: a prospective, multilevel
study. American Journal of Public Health 91: 385–91.
Lynch J, Smith GD, Harper SAM, Hillemeier M. 2004. Is income inequality a
determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. Milbank
Quarterly 82: 5–99.
Ortiz I, Cummins M. 2011. Global Inequality: Beyond the Bottom Billion – A
Rapid Review of Income Distribution in 141 Countries. New York: United
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG. 2015. Income inequality and health: A causal re-
view. Social Science & Medicine 128: 316–26.
Solt F. 2009. Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social
Science Quarterly 90: 231–42.
Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. 2006. Whose health is affected by income in-
equality? A multilevel interaction analysis of contemporaneous and lagged
effects of state income inequality on individual self-rated health in the
United States. Health & Place 12: 141–56.
UN General Assembly, 2015. Draft outcome document of the United Nations
summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda. Draft reso-
lution submitted by the President of the General Assembly. A/69/L.85.
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol¼A/69/L.85&Lang¼E,
accessed 31 December 2015.
Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. 2007. The problems of relative deprivation: why
some societies do better than others. Social Science & Medicine 65:
1965–78.
Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. 2008. Income inequality and socioeconomic gradi-
ents in mortality. American Journal of Public Health 98: 699–704.
World Bank. World Development Indicators 2003 – Country Income
Classification. Washington DC: World Bank, 2003.
World Health Organization. 2010. The World Health Report – Health
Systems Financing: the Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health
Organization.
Zheng H. 2012. Do people die from income inequality of a decade ago?. Social
Science & Medicine 75: 36–45.